Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
some dude larping as Sonic gives a rose-tinted view about how great the Obama Administration was because you didn’t have to worry about le drumpfler.
View attachment 7811025
They’ve also been slowly realizing that they’re on blocklists and are now starting to complain about said blocklists.
View attachment 7811042
They don't have enough le-evil-trumplers to block anymore so they have to resort to block each other instead.

Stop measure engagement in number of posts or likes and start measure engagement in number of blocks and Bluesky will suddenly shoot up to be the top social media when it comes to engagement.

Serious suggestion. This is how they can differentiate themselves from other social media.
Instead of showing how many followers you have, have it show how many people you have blocked directly or indirectly.
The more people you block, the more pure you are and thus the more trustworthy you are. It kind of makes your posts more special and exclusive.
 
Screenshot 2025-08-21 150540.webp


Something something orange man bad something something he is some sort of lovecraftian villain.
 
View attachment 7811421

Something something orange man bad something something he is some sort of lovecraftian villain.
For some reason libtards don't want to talk to me. They get really, really upset when I dismantle their arguments. Then I get banned or blocked. Welp I guess I'll keep voting for whoever makes the libtards mad.

I don't think voting will fix anything but seeing them miserable gives me a shred of joy in this bleak world.
 
For some reason libtards don't want to talk to me. They get really, really upset when I dismantle their arguments. Then I get banned or blocked. Welp I guess I'll keep voting for whoever makes the libtards mad.

I don't think voting will fix anything but seeing them miserable gives me a shred of joy in this bleak world.

90% of the time when I try and engage with some stupid post a shitlib makes on twitter I almost immediately get blocked as they throw a last fuck you in my direction while running away. And I don't even troll them or insult them most of the time.
 
Do people actually use bluesky outside of when theres drama because twitter has done something really retarded?
 
View attachment 7815078

Actually its the total opposite, any tiktok tard who finds out any old music they'll just look for an excuse to cancel them, happened to metalica with stranger things it could even happen to janet jackson since she does and rightfully so defends her brother to this day.
Regardless of whether this is true or not, tiktok is not the sole place this phenomenon occurs. In fact, if tiktok was banned, all the people who were there would have been doing this on another website. Nothing would change, as there's nothing special about tiktok that makes this happen.
 
some dude larping as Sonic gives a rose-tinted view about how great the Obama Administration was because you didn’t have to worry about le drumpfler.
View attachment 7811025
This is just the prog version of "literally everything in the entire world was better when I was 12". I've noticed a staggeringly high number of people earnestly think this way. Usually their justification boils down to "I didn't worry back then, therefore there was nothing to worry about". This retard is doing that, but somehow tying it back to orange man.
 
This is just the prog version of "literally everything in the entire world was better when I was 12".
I bet the retard who runs this account was too young to remember the Great Recession and all the other political controversies of the Obama admin. I bet your ass there will be people who view the Trump years the same way. I bet you a lot of Zillennials (1996-2000 zoomers) that view Bush Jr's second term in the same blissful way.
 
I bet the retard who runs this account was too young to remember the Great Recession and all the other political controversies of the Obama admin.
1000051911.webp

If we're charitable and assume he's 33, which is the oldest I'd ever call "early thirties", that means he was born in late 91/early 92 and was thus 16 or 17 when the market crashed. So he'd remember it, but wouldn't have been personally affected much if at all.

Shocker.
 
IMG_0320.webp

Bluesky Goes Dark in Mississippi Over Age Verification Law​

Bluesky has chosen to block access in the state rather than risk potential fines of up to $10,000 per violation.

PEOPLE IN MISSISSIPPI can no longer use the social media platform Bluesky. The company announced Friday that it will be blocking all IP addresses within Mississippi for the foreseeable future in response to a recent US Supreme Courtdecision that allows the state to enforce strict age verification for social media platforms.
According to Bluesky, Mississippi’s approach to verification “would fundamentally change” how users access the site. “We think this law creates challenges that go beyond its child safety goals, and creates significant barriers that limit free speech and disproportionately harm smaller platforms and emerging technologies,” the Bluesky team said in its statement.


Bluesky did not respond to a request for comment.
The company says that compliance with Mississippi’s law—which would require identifying and tracking all users under 18, in addition to asking every user for sensitive personal information to verify their age—is not possible with the team’s current resources and infrastructure. By not complying with the law, Bluesky could face fines of up to $10,000 per violation. It is the first major social media platform to take such drastic steps in response to the law.

Age verification laws, which on the surface are intended to protect children from harmful content online, have already begun to broadly impact internet use in places around the world where they've been enacted. In the UK, users trying to access everything from pornography to social platforms must now submit to ID scans, credit card checks, age-estimation scans, and more to verify they’re over the age of 18. The state of Texas has a similar law the US Supreme Court upheld in June, despite concerns from critics over the erosion of free speech and access to information on the open internet.
Whether these laws are effective at protecting children is unclear; the use of virtual private networks (VPNs) in the UK spiked just after its age verification law went into effect as users deployed the tech to spoof their location. On platforms like Discord, people discovered they could use video game characters to trick face scans. Furthermore, critics say that age verification laws intended to reduce harm to children can sometimes have the opposite effect by putting kids in greater danger of identity theft and privacy violations.
WIRED has reached out to the sponsors of the original bill, Mississippi state representatives Jill Ford, Fabian Nelson, and Larry Byrd, and will update this story if they comment.
“We believe effective child safety policies should be carefully tailored to address real harms, without creating huge obstacles for smaller providers and resulting in negative consequences for free expression,” Bluesky wrote.

[L] [A]
 
Back
Top Bottom