Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I think we still underestimate the damage Musk did to the left by buying twitter.

they are now in tiny, barely working and money burning echo chambers and lost soooo much influence.
Musk being involved alot in space and AI only hurts them more because those are the fields of the future and they dont use them because they hate musk so much and are all starving furry artists and self proclaimed experts in something they dont understand.
I think that there is the "audience" on the internet that are a complete financial blackhole that devalued tumblr, then twitter, and now blusky.
 
Morrissey, the boomer singer? What have they got against him? Also funny to me that the guy seems to have gone out of his way to make a threat that would be legally prosecutable by including specific details like the time, location, and weapon he will use. 100% on purpose as some kind of false flag / attempted martyrdom.
1758504464969.webp

"A few days ago, legendary singer and former frontman of The Smiths, Morrissey, canceled a series of concerts due to a credible death threat. After further investigation, I can confirm the individual responsible is Noah Castellano, a 26-year-old Ottawa resident and self-identified far-left activist. His motivations appear to be politically driven.
My research uncovered Castellano’s old Facebook profile, where his only non-music-related interests included the “Rochester Queer Arts Festival” and the “Cleveland Democratic Socialists of America.”
I spoke with a former coworker from Odd Burger, a restaurant where Castellano previously worked, described him as “an awkward, left-leaning individual.”
In recent years, Morrissey has emerged as an unexpected political figure, known for his nationalistic views and outspoken criticism of cancel culture and political correctness. These stances have alienated some of his fanbase while solidifying support among others.
Castellano has been charged in connection with the threat and was recently released on $5,000 bail. He has been ordered to reside with his father in Washington, D.C., pending further legal proceedings."

The person in question from facebook:
1758504532020.webp
 
Oh boy, I was waiting for this to hit the Bluesky thread!
[...]
1758505327019.webp

"I'm so sick of my life being too disgusting to post about online"
This single self-reporting line really just sums up so much, so much about these type of people. It's perfect. It's poetry. I can add nothing to this to make it more impactful.
 
Does Musk even tolerate +18 content? I am not a twigger, my guess a lot of them will start shilling shit on 4chan or even look for 8chan that is even more accepting of godless degenerates.
Musk has stated that he despises the amount of porn on Twitter/X but has not done anything to remove it because any ban would result in the thing that would kill the site. Leading to a"don't ask don't tell" truce on the issue
 
Imagine being so coddled that you feel comfortable going mask off enough to say “removing child rape porn hurts our community, let’s all publicly discuss how we all agree on this point”
 
"I'm so sick of my life being too disgusting to post about online"
This single self-reporting line really just sums up so much, so much about these type of people. It's perfect. It's poetry. I can add nothing to this to make it more impactful.
And by disgusting, she's probably still pissed off that the high school science teacher she has a crush on in 9th grade groomed and knocked up and paid for the subsequent abortion the head cheerleader Stacy Hoe-Maker and not her.
 
Actually they won't do that because they're terminally retarded. You see that would actually solve their problem and give them full control over the moderation. So naturally they'll do the opposite.
Sadly this is true, they’re so fucking dumb that they couldn’t manage something like fedi, even if 1/3 of the people there I’ve encountered are gooners who’d welcome them with open arms.
 
Bluesky users, especially "elders" and the most egregious examples of the people-of-gender community, have this idea that they built the platform by themselves, so they are exempt from any rule and can be as gross, violent, and rude as they feel like, while dirty normies should be punished by the full extent of the TOS for the slightest of perceived transgressions. This is the third time or so Bluesky has tried to clean up its image and faced similar backlash (for example, during the big Twitter 𝕏odus, there was a lot of noise made when they tried to put a stop to the rampant CSAM content the pseudo-normies were being subjected to, and it only got worse when Trans users were banned for it).
Those users see porn as a way to mark their territory and to flaunt their domination over the owners of the platform. The grosser it is, the better: nothing says "we rule this space" better than posting things that would get you into big trouble anywhere else. If you can get away with that, you can get away with anything.
For those who haven't been around Bluesky since its earliest days, this is a completely accurate account of the situation. Bluesky users weaponize hyper-antagonistic left-wing extremism and relentless inundation of pornography as a form of essentially controlling who stays and who leaves; there are many ordinary people who are criticized for rejecting Bluesky's "red light district" vibes because they are allegedly "suppressing queer voices" by not wanting to see furries eating each other until they're the size of horse trailers.

Further, you can see in users like Ana Valens and Gretchen Felker-Martin (both of whom are rape-fetishizing degenerate trannies with their own independent threads over in the Stinkditch) that they absolutely despise any attempts at leveling the playing field. Jesse Singal is one of the most widely blocked users on the platform and they consider his mere presence to be asinine and a sign that Bluesky aligns itself with Nazi principles, while crying out that their explicitly detailed revenge fantasies towards political enemies should be protected under the policies as a form of free speech. Logic would dictate that the ability to speak openly about dismembering JKR should therefore be as protected as saying you want trannies sent to a desered island with only smallpox blankets to clothe themselves in, but these are not people who believe in equality - these are people who are furious when authoritarianism doesn't wear their team's colors.

It is legitimately the closest I've seen to a madhouse since the wild west of 4chan, but at least 4chan never once pretended it had an air of dignity or decency. That's the worst part of it all, I think - that these chronically masturbating monkeys wish to be taken seriously among doctors, lawyers, politicians and other societally influential people.

And to answer a question that always rears its head, but never seems to get an answer...
In particular, the porn art community thrives on being part of any sort of digital space where there are non-artists - i.e., consumers - among themselves. This is because many artists have the goal of finding delusional paypigs to pave their lifestyles so they don't have to traumatize themselves with jobs that involve scary things like "talking on the phone" or "filling out forms" or "having someone else manage your time and responsibilities"; other artists are less likely to be customers, because if you wanted to see a kobold living in the foreskin of an orc as the orc urinates everywhere, then you could just draw it yourself. (This is also why they are so threatened by AI, because AI is happy to make as many free attempts to depict such a nauseating concept as you'd like.)

They want to be where the people are. This is also why e-whores show up left, right and center to every new platform (thus propagating the misconception that "queer furries and sex workers built this platform!") because they want to turn every website into a dirty, dingy alley the second it goes live in an attempt to claim it as their haunt. The only way for sites to protect themselves is to state outright that they don't welcome nastiness like that from the outset, but these users are also essentially acting as honey to attract flies, which is why websites keep falling into cycles of "start up site" > "let the whores and perverts populate to make it look like a popular new place to go" > "get big enough to attract normies" > "cut off the gangrenous limb once its use has been served." It's so cyclical one can predict it more accurately than one can predict the rain.

It goes completely and totally against the interests of these freaks, geeks and weirdos to have their own little hidey-holes because they need to have "more eyes" on their works, because they are capitalists at heart that seek where the market exists so they can always have a paying customer. I also saw someone compare it or liken it to early porn introduction/EPI which I agree is definitely an element to their behavior; many of them take actual pride in being able to 'convert' people to new fetishes, so it's closer to the truth than any of them would ever admit to (because that gets a bit too close to admitting all of their fantasies about nonconsensually involving people in sexually malignant behavior are indicative of a very serious flaw in personality that can result in legal repercussions at its worst).

Anyway, total tranny and gooner death. Wait, why did I say "gooner" twice?
 
And the kicker? People are talking about explicitly not tagging NSFW content, especially rape porn, as a form of rebellion against staff. They genuinely believe it is their human right to draw animals, kids and dead people being raped as a form of sexual expression. Total lunacy
I think the worst part about all of this is they have to make it about therapy. If you paid me 20000 bucks to moral fag on these people’s behalf I’d be posting every single case of revenge porn, child abuse, and rape posted on conventional pornography sites and hammer home the fact that no matter how bad my clients weird shit is, at least it’s not someone’s daughter being plausibly abused on camera for some sleazy pimp or drug dealer.

But no it’s never “ethical consumption of pornography” is it. No it has to be some “healing process” or other nonsense and the fucking sickening implication that because they (allegedly) had something bad happen to them now they are into it for the rest of their life and they HAVE to draw porn of it.

that’s just a shitty porn trope they are larping. 100%. I’m calling it. There is not a single genuine woman who chooses to spend dozens of hours reminiscing about the time she was raped and if she does she definitely isn’t better off for it.

Even fags like Milo who carried water for the guy who molested him eventually came around. If fucking Milo can come to his senses, nobody has any excuse.
 
This is like the fifth time I've seen genuinely deplorable content getting banned off of a platform, and gay people saying how it's targeting them.
I'm sensing a pattern here guys.
 
I'm sure the tranny rape enthusiasts will love Twitter now, post-Charlie Kirk, especially with takes like this:
1758467363712.webp
>"Charlie Kirk's neck consented to doing that!"

Why is it that everyone on the Internet is always in the biggest rush to be the most tasteless faggot imaginable?
Here's a smattering of other screenshots, for posterity. There's no cherry-picking here; it's literally comment after comment, each one like this.
1758467803366.webp
>"material rape victims use to process their trauma"

That is such a crock of shit. Rape victims don't do that, they never do that, because if there's one thing a victim doesn't like it's being reminded of their trauma.

Don't try to moralize this shit with bullshit excuses, just say you're a sick fuck who think's rape is hot because you're an amoral faggot who gets off on pain and suffering.

But no, that would be too truthful now wouldn't it?
 
Last edited:
Aw man now where would i have access to my constant stream of Sonic guro rape anally vored by futa Amy rose and forced cumflation? this is literally 1984.
 
Don't forget a mixture of "it's muh sexual trauma" so they can claim its a coping mechanism.
A huge percentage of rapists/ sexual abusers were themselves sexually abused. Victims turned perpetrators are not off the hook.

Anyway, Attn: Bluesky Artists: you faggots should quit making porn entirely. It's a depraved and gross way to live. Do literally anything else with your life.
 
Back
Top Bottom