Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I've gotten to the point where I hear some kid or young(ish) person on the Internet saying they have a lot of trauma, I roll my eyes. It could be anything from I-witnessed-my-dad-commit-suicide or I-was-raped to my-parents-told-me-I-had-to-come-straight-home-after-school-because-they're-toxic-like-that.
a lot of them lie too. Not bluesky per se but the boyfriend of the dude who killed Charlie Kirk, was on the internet talking about his religious parents kicking him out when he was underage because he was gay when in reality they were paying his rent as a 23 year old tranny living with his boyfriend. His mom sent him money all the time. Having trauma is seen as a badge of honor so when they don't have any, they make it up.
 
Last edited:
Anytime I see a youtube channel mention that they have a bluesky I sort of recoil. It seems like an absolute waste of a platform and the idea that normal people would visit the website is laughable to me.
 
From that article:
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-54-10-300.webp
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-54-39-189.webp
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-54-57-280.webp
Anyway, even though it's now been about a week since the warning fire sounded into the big sky of blue, people have not moved on and are still shitting themselves about it.
In one of your screenshots someone mentioned a folder - I believe it's this one.

Many NSFW artists who rely on BlueSky for income are very upset:
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-50-11-621.webp
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-50-39-102.webp
Why would you want prostitutes talking to your kids? It's not a performance - many do it because they have no choice.
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-51-11-506.webp
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-51-20-526.webp
Screenshot_2025-09-28-02-51-34-389.webp
Their politics truly do start and end with porn.
 
From that article:
View attachment 7971346
View attachment 7971347
View attachment 7971348

In one of your screenshots someone mentioned a folder - I believe it's this one.

Many NSFW artists who rely on BlueSky for income are very upset:
View attachment 7971341
View attachment 7971342
Why would you want prostitutes talking to your kids? It's not a performance - many do it because they have no choice.
View attachment 7971343
View attachment 7971344
View attachment 7971345
Their politics truly do start and end with porn.

Cant these degenerates just jerk off and leave the rest of us alone? That would be nice.
 
Cant these degenerates just jerk off and leave the rest of us alone? That would be nice.
They see their work as an extension of free expression, but it is the only free expression they accept. There's little quality control on BlueSky and it is intolerable even to other progressives on Twitter.
 
From that article:
View attachment 7971346
View attachment 7971347
View attachment 7971348

In one of your screenshots someone mentioned a folder - I believe it's this one.

Many NSFW artists who rely on BlueSky for income are very upset:
View attachment 7971341
View attachment 7971342
Why would you want prostitutes talking to your kids? It's not a performance - many do it because they have no choice.
View attachment 7971343
View attachment 7971344
View attachment 7971345
Their politics truly do start and end with porn.
wait, are they banning all porn or just rape porn, why are thet acting as if they are banning all of it?
 
wait, are they banning all porn or just rape porn, why are thet acting as if they are banning all of it?
Rape porn. Same as Patreon or Gumroad. That's why you see in so many NSFW art little hearts near the couples - it's to show everything is consensual.

They're angry they can't draw rape, that's it. It doesn't ban rough sex or BDSM; all you literally have to do is draw heart eyes and it's fine.

IIRC even Pixiv clawed back the rape porn due to pressure from payment processors but the other boorus will have it.
 
From that article:
This is really an attempt to normalize rape itself imo. It's a true fact that rape is one of the most common fetishes, but it's rape FANTASY, which is nothing like actual rape. Look at any Harlequin Romance cover, it's always this bodice-ripping shit with consent being questionable at best, and that's utter normie shit.

This doesn't mean they want to be ACTUALLY raped. They just like the idea of a man (preferably a cross between a burly he-man and Fabio) being so driven out of his mind by desire for her that he can't control himself. But it's almost always someone they would actually willingly have sex with.
 
if rape porn is the only thing stopping you from actually molesting someone then i think you genuinely need help
That’s the same defense most lolicons use.
This is really an attempt to normalize rape itself imo. It's a true fact that rape is one of the most common fetishes, but it's rape FANTASY, which is nothing like actual rape. Look at any Harlequin Romance cover, it's always this bodice-ripping shit with consent being questionable at best, and that's utter normie shit.

This doesn't mean they want to be ACTUALLY raped. They just like the idea of a man (preferably a cross between a burly he-man and Fabio) being so driven out of his mind by desire for her that he can't control himself. But it's almost always someone they would actually willingly have sex with.
Most people who have rape fantasies are women. They complain about rape culture or toxic masculinity in the US whilst also simping for peoples and cultures that view woman less as people and more living flashlights.
 
Most people who have rape fantasies are women. They complain about rape culture or toxic masculinity in the US whilst also simping for peoples and cultures that view woman less as people and more living flashlights.
That's a different issue, though. There's a serious sociocultural issue of brainless whores who are literally more attracted to invasive migrants and want to bear their rape babies.

That is an ENTIRELY different issue.
 
Choosing not to host non-consensual sexual depictions on one's platform is unprofessional???

:lunacy:
He's mad about that, but he's also arguing they're bumbling around with how they are communicating/implementing, including a statement somewhere that the TOS change is not meant to affect most of the content or something: https://bsky.app/profile/acvalens.net/post/3lzw4rvb5d22s
If Bluesky wasn’t going to clamp down on noncon artwork, it would just publish a direct clarification. We wouldn’t see all this contrasting information, confusing wording, and these bizarre one-on-one calls to assuage various posters. What’s going on right now is suspicious. It’s not transparent

Oh, I missed something important:
https://bsky.app/profile/acvalens.net/post/3lzw2lglq322i (archive)
https://clearsky.app/lizthegrey.com/history (archive) (mega) - Wow, caught it just in time, it's the last one Archive.today can load.
liz-surprised.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom