Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Oh my gosh. She's not even pretty, not even in a chubby way, she's a fucking Blob woman, like Bob himself. He defended her? Just because she was a woman and a critic? Practically the ENTIRE internet, left and right, was against Cuties, sans the most woke of twitter tards. Bob, you played yourself.
View attachment 5110930
This is why I harp on the Cuties issue. It is flabbergasting that he ate so much shit, took such a credibility hit, and will forever have a scarlet letter branded on his chest because he defended some dumb bitch, whose patreon has a whole hefty 28 patrons
1683124036650.png
from people he didn't like all in the hopes of a crumb of pussy. I firmly believe it's that because there's a tweet where Bob thanks some rando for supporting Monica and shows how good of ally Bob himself is by quote tweeting himself saying that he supports Monica in the same reply.
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304444081003794432
https://archive.vn/kDnRk
1683124386949.png
Neither Matt nor Monica liked this or the original tweet. Monica, a woman who's interactions with him on twitter were before this (I guess I was wrong about how much they knew of each other. She tweets to him all the way back in 2012 which is bonkers), they stop on July 14 of 2020, and she never interacts with him again. These are the last two times she's publicly talked to him and I feel their pretty indicative of their relationship.
1683125041420.png
1683125073456.png
This doesn't feel like a Naomi Wu situation where she's just using Bob as a whale. Nor does this feel like a hotdog girl situation where she's doing her best to keep Bob at arm's length out of fear. This feels like there was something, I don't know what, there. If nothing else there's actual longevity and familiarity there.

I have been proven wrong. I had thought for years that Bob just found some rando, like he always does, and decided to latch on to her. But no! He knew this chick for almost a decade and it sounds like they may have actually met IRL. For me this has completely changed the Cuties story of being a hilarious tale of one man's uber simping to a tragedy of one man knowingly doing the wrong thing to defend someone he believed to be his friend (since 2012, two years before gamer gate blew up) only to be abandoned by that person. You may disagree with that assessment and that's fine. For me this is the stuff that really humanizes Bob and makes him more than a bitter avatar on twitter and makes him interesting.

If sounds like the theme and tone of my post changes through out it's because I was making this discovery live.
 
Ladies and Guntlemen, Bobologists of all ages, I have a question for you:

Null, in his infinite beneficence, has created an Internet Tough Guys subforum, and is currently looking for nominees. Should Moviebob have his thread moved there?
I would say no. While Bob does occasionally, I don't think its the best categorization for him.

If we look at someone like Fatrick, he's always doing this gay as fuck macho posturing about how he'll feed haters their teeth, posing with guns, and making weird assertions, like how a couple St Patrick's day's ago, he said he was going to dress in orange and beat Catholics.

That's the type of faggotry that I think is required to be a Internet Tough Guy. For Bob, its more just a undeserved snobbery and being patently insane with most of his takes. Not saying he never goes ITG, just not enough where I think its the best label.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Flexo and Koby_Fish
have been proven wrong. I had thought for years that Bob just found some rando, like he always does, and decided to latch on to her. But no! He knew this chick for almost a decade and it sounds like they may have actually met IRL. For me this has completely changed the Cuties story of being a hilarious tale of one man's uber simping to a tragedy of one man knowingly doing the wrong thing to defend someone he believed to be his friend (since 2012, two years before gamer gate blew up) only to be abandoned by that person. You may disagree with that assessment and that's fine. For me this is the stuff that really humanizes Bob and makes him more than a bitter avatar on twitter and makes him interesting.

If sounds like the theme and tone of my post changes through out it's because I was making this discovery live.
Thing is it would explain why he quadrupled down over a "literally who". He's already bitter about the state of his life, losing a friend would suck, especially if that most likely lead to Lindsay Ellis thashing him as hard as she did. Probably why he never brings it up anymore
 
joke.jpg


Kotaku cockroaches show their journalistic integrity; gets pikachu-face when Nintendo blacklisted them.
kot.jpg

As for being "Internet Tough Guy", this is not really the first thing in your mind when you think of Bobby, although he does check out all three characteristics listed by Null:
  • They're not afraid of attention on the Internet. In fact, they welcome it! Despite having busy, successful careers, they have plenty of time to put down losers on Twitter.
  • Every L is a W. Actually, they never lose. They're too tough to lose. You thought something was humiliating to them? Wrong again, stalker.
  • Mess with the lolbull, get the lolhorns. These tough guys are going to get people put in cyberjail. Talking online? That's a felony, child. Enjoy prison! (N.B. Bobby doesn't put you in cyberjail; he unleashes his cronies to mass-report you, which is not very tough.)
I feel Null's criteria are too general, so on this matter I vote NO. I would nominate Rhys McKinnon if not for the fact that he fits better in Rat King / Stinkditch.
 
Last edited:
Ladies and Guntlemen, Bobologists of all ages, I have a question for you:

Null, in his infinite beneficence, has created an Internet Tough Guys subforum, and is currently looking for nominees. Should Moviebob have his thread moved there?
My vote is yes. Bob has numerous times threatened people with things like "well if I hit you you're not getting back up" and tried to intimidate people with things like his totally real 310 bench press and grand pappy's pop gun. Anytime that he's been confronted by people he runs away. When someone makes fun of him he will block them and then demand his followers flag that person down. When someone confronts him with that he blocks and runs. He will dish out whatever criticism he can and is incapable of taking any himself.

Is Bob the best Internet tough guy? No, but I do think it is a better descriptor for him than just a simple lolcow one.
Kotaku cockroaches shows their journalistic integrity, and gets pikachu-face when Nintendo blacklisted them.
kot.jpg
"simping for The Company is just never a good look"
Holy shit.
:story:
EDIT:
dat sweet sweet archive
 
Last edited:
"I enjoyed The Naked Gun despite knowing that O.J. Simpson murdered his wife," Bobby seems to have made an excuse for himself in case people lambast him for shilling MCU films that star that nigger being sued for beating up a prostitute
Why can't people enjoy Harry Potter despite knowing that JK Rowling doesn't worship trannies?
 
View attachment 5110441

Kotaku cockroaches show their journalistic integrity; gets pikachu-face when Nintendo blacklisted them.
View attachment 5110456

As for being "Internet Tough Guy", this is not really the first thing in your mind when you think of Bobby, although he does check out all three characteristics listed by Null:
  • They're not afraid of attention on the Internet. In fact, they welcome it! Despite having busy, successful careers, they have plenty of time to put down losers on Twitter.
  • Every L is a W. Actually, they never lose. They're too tough to lose. You thought something was humiliating to them? Wrong again, stalker.
  • Mess with the lolbull, get the lolhorns. These tough guys are going to get people put in cyberjail. Talking online? That's a felony, child. Enjoy prison! (N.B. Bobby doesn't put you in cyberjail; he unleashes his cronies to mass-report you, which is not very tough.)
I feel Null's criteria are too general, so on this matter I vote NO. I would vote for Rhys McKinnon if not for the fact that he fits better in Rat King / Stinkditch.
Gee when you leak company secrets, the company doesn't want to associate with you. Imagine my shock. You get what you deserve Kotaku.

As for the vote, I still say yes. Just because he's a bit weaker doesn't change the fact he refuses to back down (see cuties) and he's still a neckbeard in mommas basement wanting to replace all blue collar workers with robots.
 
Because they're retarded.

Its basically a purity spiral. I can't like it because then I''m tangentially supporting a TERF. And Terfs are bad, which means I'm bad.
Oh I know, I was just pointing out the hypocrisy. Not that Robert or any other alphabet alingned cultist actually cares about that or a universal set of rules apart from "I'm good and you're not."
 
Kotaku cockroaches show their journalistic integrity; gets pikachu-face when Nintendo blacklisted them.
kot.jpg
I hate Nintendo, but I hate Kotaku more, so keep seething, journofags.

It's not like this is unprecedented behavior, either. You'd think that they'd have learned their lesson from another Gawker rag, when Gizmodo got banned from Apple events for four years for leaking the iPhone 4 (tl;dr: an Apple employee lost a prototype, Gizmodo bought it from the guy who found it for $5000, did a full teardown and article before returning it, the editor got raided by the cops, then Apple banned them). As it turns out, companies generally don't like when you leak unreleased products, and while Kotaku themselves aren't responsible for this leak, they also don't like when you report on something major like this.

Absolute irony that Bob, Nintendo simp numero uno, claims that it's a bad look to be on Ninty's side.
Ladies and Guntlemen, Bobologists of all ages, I have a question for you:

Null, in his infinite beneficence, has created an Internet Tough Guys subforum, and is currently looking for nominees. Should Moviebob have his thread moved there?
I'm leaning towards yes. It's a bit of a better descriptor for him than general lolcow, especially as his behavior has gotten more belligerent over the years. I don't think anyone but an Internet Tough Guy would constantly go around yelling at people that they aren't human. He's not always getting into fights with anyone who disagrees (easier to just jab the block button), but he does have that constant sense of smug superiority about him. He talks big, but that's about the extent of it, never really going beyond a pathetic zinger.

Tough call.
 
Ladies and Guntlemen, Bobologists of all ages, I have a question for you:

Null, in his infinite beneficence, has created an Internet Tough Guys subforum, and is currently looking for nominees. Should Moviebob have his thread moved there?
I'm voting no, not because Bob isn't an obnoxious internet warrior of much renown, but because I'm old and retarded and lose my cows when they move the pastures.

I'd forgotten all about John Flynt for close to a year until he stuck his beak into someone else's shitpile.

"simping for The Company is just never a good look"
Holy shit.
:story:
Even aside from Bob being king of all corporate brown nosers, it's a dispute/vendetta between two corporate entities. Cucktaco isn't some part time bloggers doing it out of love.
 
And I love Bob acting like he gives a shit about the staffers that Crowder showed his dick to.

He probably thinks they deserved to literally be raped by him for working for him at all.

--

Bob has a knack for making his own esoteric thought terminating cliches. "You're not a person!" "Thinkers and believers!" "Superior Future!" All shit he pig hollers at people as a way to not actually have to think about what they say.

I've said before that his repeating of those words is like autistic stimming.
 
I want to replace Bob with automation. And I'm not joking!

Bob is always droning on and on about how its the natural progress of things for the working class to be wiped out, and he's superior to them because he picked a "more advanced" job. But with the advancement of Chat AI, we've seen how vulnerable all creative mediums are to being replaced by AI automation. I think it would be beautiful iron if Bob became a case study for this.

My concept: ROBOTHINKER REVIEWS! A fully automated AI content creator.

It isn't difficult, and can be done with material just about everybody already has access to. It would work like this:

1) A chatbot writes the scripts for movie reviews, along with random essays and maybe even some sketches. Accuracy and even quality don't matter much, since the standard we're trying to match is Bob.
2) An AI voice to read the scripts.
3) B-roll footage of whatever he's reviewing.
4) A user avatar with some canned poses/animations to cut back and forth between it and B-roll.

The goal is to create a totally automated channel while putting miminal human effort into the content, and making something that can easily be compared to MovieBob's content in terms of quality. It isn't hard, and just about anybody on this forum can do it a few hours, or even less time. The end result would be a perfect replication of Bob's style of content, in a fraction of the time and effort. In a week the channel could have ten new videos before Bob's even into the second paragraph on his newest script.
 
I want to replace Bob with automation. And I'm not joking!

Bob is always droning on and on about how its the natural progress of things for the working class to be wiped out, and he's superior to them because he picked a "more advanced" job. But with the advancement of Chat AI, we've seen how vulnerable all creative mediums are to being replaced by AI automation. I think it would be beautiful iron if Bob became a case study for this.

My concept: ROBOTHINKER REVIEWS! A fully automated AI content creator.

It isn't difficult, and can be done with material just about everybody already has access to. It would work like this:

1) A chatbot writes the scripts for movie reviews, along with random essays and maybe even some sketches. Accuracy and even quality don't matter much, since the standard we're trying to match is Bob.
2) An AI voice to read the scripts.
3) B-roll footage of whatever he's reviewing.
4) A user avatar with some canned poses/animations to cut back and forth between it and B-roll.

The goal is to create a totally automated channel while putting miminal human effort into the content, and making something that can easily be compared to MovieBob's content in terms of quality. It isn't hard, and just about anybody on this forum can do it a few hours, or even less time. The end result would be a perfect replication of Bob's style of content, in a fraction of the time and effort. In a week the channel could have ten new videos before Bob's even into the second paragraph on his newest script.
And even if the AI youtuber still wanted half the population dead, it would probably express its genocidal lust with proper punctuation.
 
But he does it as a 42 yo man. From his mom's basement. Advocating genocide when he won't even go out for a walk. That's a internet tough guy
No. That's just someone talking shit at a general group of people.
If that were the criteria than everyone who had a meltdown over Trump 7 years ago would deserve to be called Internet Tough Guy.
 
Are we really debating whether Bob is an Internet Tough Guy? Maybe there's not enough of this stuff out there for him to qualify, but when it does show up it's always hilarious:

toughguybob.jpg
 
Back