Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The reason Moviebob hates debates? Here's my guess: Whenever Bob's been engaged in debates on any subject--film, politics, etc.--Bob's win percentage is zero.
I think Moviebob is taking the Andrew Dobson line on "debates", you know, the one where the one side is "Genocide" and the other side is "Civil Rights" but if they debate they meet in the middle under the banner of "Murder".
1683139153856.png

Besides the fact that Bob is in fact too smooth-brained to defend his own arguments (whether technically "debate" or not). Which is why he resorts to shit like ad hominem fallacies all the damn time, like the lazy crayon-eating blue curtain analyst he is. For he is the Kwisatz Tarderach.

Ladies and Guntlemen, Bobologists of all ages, I have a question for you:

Null, in his infinite beneficence, has created an Internet Tough Guys subforum, and is currently looking for nominees. Should Moviebob have his thread moved there?
absofuckingloutely. Bob is peak Internet Tough Guy when he's had a few, especially when someone "attacks" his extended family. You'd think he'd gone all The Godfather if someone dares use his disabled niece in a hypothetical (but failed) attempt to force Bob to actually THINK about the political positions he's advocating for.
This doesn't feel like a Naomi Wu situation where she's just using Bob as a whale. Nor does this feel like a hotdog girl situation where she's doing her best to keep Bob at arm's length out of fear. This feels like there was something, I don't know what, there. If nothing else there's actual longevity and familiarity there.

I have been proven wrong. I had thought for years that Bob just found some rando, like he always does, and decided to latch on to her. But no! He knew this chick for almost a decade and it sounds like they may have actually met IRL. For me this has completely changed the Cuties story of being a hilarious tale of one man's uber simping to a tragedy of one man knowingly doing the wrong thing to defend someone he believed to be his friend (since 2012, two years before gamer gate blew up) only to be abandoned by that person. You may disagree with that assessment and that's fine. For me this is the stuff that really humanizes Bob and makes him more than a bitter avatar on twitter and makes him interesting.

If sounds like the theme and tone of my post changes through out it's because I was making this discovery live.
OK so apparently this land whale met Bob at a Boston sci fi marathon. Sounds like she always goes. No wonder Bob thinks she's a "dear friend", just like he thought Lindsay Ellis was not only his friend but also about to touch his peepee. He's probably been trying to get this Monica lady to touch his peepee for the last fucking decade.

I wonder how many times this bitch soft-blocked Bob, herself. The Lindsay Ellis debacle would only reveal what a psycho Bob actually is and probably cause her to distance herself from him. Lord only knows if she holds the same anti-MAGAnaiseghoulen exterminationalist views as Bob (probably not).
Gee when you leak company secrets, the company doesn't want to associate with you. Imagine my shock. You get what you deserve Kotaku.
If Bob did what Kotaku did, he'd never be allowed into a critics-only movie screening ever again.
"A.I. Bros."

Why do soyleftists have to nickname every group that they don't like as some kind of bros? Does it come from their hatred of men?
to them, all "toxic masculinity" is represented by the type of men that say shit like "Dude! Bro!" (hence the term dude-bro). The type of men that the soy left thinks are bullies, arrogant, condescending, sexist, hyper-masculine, cowardly, etc. (the supreme irony being that the stereotypical hippie-adjacent California "surfer dude" is most likely to say shit like "Dude! Bro!").

Bob himself is a "dude-bro" of sorts, because he's an arrogant, condescending bully, and a bigger coward than Shaggy and Scooby Doo put together.
 
Are we really debating whether Bob is an Internet Tough Guy? Maybe there's not enough of this stuff out there for him to qualify, but when it does show up it's always hilarious:

View attachment 5111626
Null apparently disagreed with there not being enough tough guy content. Welcome to your new subforum, Robert!
 
Are we really debating whether Bob is an Internet Tough Guy? Maybe there's not enough of this stuff out there for him to qualify, but when it does show up it's always hilarious:

View attachment 5111626
I mean if Mr. Eugenics here isn't the face of Internet Tough Guys then I really don't know who or what is.
 
The irony is, everything you said describes the left to a tee.
I know, right? And it also particularly ironically describes Film Robert to a tee as well. For he is the Last of his Line, Lard of Lynn, Masshole Mussolini, Pol Potbelly, the Kwisatz Tarderach - the crayon-eating, blue curtain analyzing exceptional individual.
 
View attachment 5112491
As you can see from this image, Internet Tough Guy Bob has some sort of dagger hanging from the wall of his swanky basement apartment. Terrifying.

Gaze upon him in all his glory!

That's a Sting replica from the Lord of the Rings films. Classy with a capital K.

I'd fret over the possibility of him finally doing that LOTR retrospective he's occasionally threatened, but I think he's gotten too lazy to ever actually do it.
 
View attachment 5112491
As you can see from this image, Internet Tough Guy Bob has some sort of dagger hanging from the wall of his swanky basement apartment. Terrifying.

Gaze upon him in all his glory!
Had, my fellow Bobologist, he had that hanging. He no longer lives there and con no longer collect beer cans in the window well either.
 
I have a theory as to why so many male feminists are such creeps- it's not just the "moral shield", it's that female feminists wanted men to join their movement to make it bigger once female attendance started declining. Problem is, the basic question of "what's in it for men" goes unanswered. As a man, there are plenty of reasons not to become a feminist. For starters, I'll be paid less (or women will be paid more, the important thing to them is equal pay), I'll have less disposable income on top of that (since I'm expected to support women who hate me and prioritize them above myself, equal pay is not enough you see), my free time/entertainment will be less fun and sacrificed in favor of people who hate me for absolutely no benefit, to the point where it may even hurt businesses of decent women just because they're something I like, I will generally have fewer rights and mobility as the rights of women increase at my expense, there's just no point.

As a good, productive man with regular employment, good looks, fun to be around, and even a liking for community service such as picking up trash in public (WHICH BENEFITS WOMEN BTW), and a propensity to support excellent businesses run by women as it is (such as a massage spa near my house, no it's not a brothel it's just a massage spa) and even having been asked out by women before, the benefits of joining feminism would be less than nothing for me.

The only bargaining power they have, besides the vague sensation that you're on the "right side of history", is pussy. Thus, lots of bottom-of-the-barrel men imagine they're the only man in a movement full of unattractive, but easy women and they'll be the hero and have their pick out of plenty. It rarely works out this way as these men damage the movement more than anything and the women are understandably creeped out by them no matter how much money and yass kweening they receive.
 
I want to replace Bob with automation. And I'm not joking!

Bob is always droning on and on about how its the natural progress of things for the working class to be wiped out, and he's superior to them because he picked a "more advanced" job. But with the advancement of Chat AI, we've seen how vulnerable all creative mediums are to being replaced by AI automation. I think it would be beautiful iron if Bob became a case study for this.

My concept: ROBOTHINKER REVIEWS! A fully automated AI content creator.

It isn't difficult, and can be done with material just about everybody already has access to. It would work like this:

1) A chatbot writes the scripts for movie reviews, along with random essays and maybe even some sketches. Accuracy and even quality don't matter much, since the standard we're trying to match is Bob.
2) An AI voice to read the scripts.
3) B-roll footage of whatever he's reviewing.
4) A user avatar with some canned poses/animations to cut back and forth between it and B-roll.

The goal is to create a totally automated channel while putting miminal human effort into the content, and making something that can easily be compared to MovieBob's content in terms of quality. It isn't hard, and just about anybody on this forum can do it a few hours, or even less time. The end result would be a perfect replication of Bob's style of content, in a fraction of the time and effort. In a week the channel could have ten new videos before Bob's even into the second paragraph on his newest script.
Earlier in the thread I had chatgpt write some Bob reviews. They weren't bad. But I had trouble getting a program to make the actual videos. Nothing seemed to work right.

But at the rate things are going, you just know anyone will be able to make Bob's videos better than he ever could. I'd give it a year or so. Not like it'll be hard.

Also, congrats to Bob for being knighted an official Internet Tough Guy. Which all know really means pussy.
 
Shouldn't I as the OP writer have a "thread tools" button? I feel like adding "Anger is how you win" as the subtitle.
anger.png


fashion.png
This guy needs to watch Bobby's videos. Any one will do, so why not start with the newest?

gunn1.png



Hideo Kojima (ha ha he paid for Twitter!!!!) approves.
kojima.png
Isn't Kojima problematic for reasons on top of having a blue tick?

And Bobby managed to find his Gardians 1 review among a rubble of beer cans. You know it already, but Bobby favors characters shooting breeze regardless of the situation they are in.
G1.jpg



Disney did injustice to Gunn! How dare the family-oriented company fired someone who made pedo jokes!
gunn.jpg

gunn5.png

gunn2.jpg

Superman has a sex change.
supersex.jpg
This is what WGA gave us, lady and gentlemen!

jimlee.png

old.jpg
Nice codpieces.

Mola Ram, Kali-ma is in Star Wars!
kali.png


The trailer for Dune Part 2 is out. I'm sure this will lead to some kind of rant about "Film Twitter", and what pieces of shit they are for being more excited for this than the latest Disney thing.
dune.jpg

dance.jpg
I can definitely see the scene rewiring the brains of many fat basement dwellers (not Bobby's; he is already convinced he is the favorite beard of lesbians the world over.)

uk.jpg
Ukraine is part of Russia; indeed Ukraine is the heart of Russia, the origin of the national Rus ethos. This is why Zelensky's betrayal is unacceptable -- but how can you expect the American woke, who betray their own nation, to respect anything like national ethos?

double.png

SF6.jpg


WGA
AI1.jpg

wga1.jpg
You don't speak for "all of us"; you don't speak for me.

obsolete.jpg
Call people who don't eat up your crap "racist Christian pedophiles" as you like: people who still watch TV and movies are ditching Hollywood in favor of foreign fare. Your side is NOT winning.

These crybabies are so entitled that they even imagine nurses, teachers -- and truckers -- giving a fuck about them.
nuts.png
Where were the WGA writers during the trucker convoys? The more I read about them the more I agree with @Ralph Barnhardt : let this pile of shit crash and burn.

For the first time ever, people discover there are Black people in Nairobi.
nairobi.png

I suppose the following is about some white man fatally chokeheld a Black lunatic.
choke.png

pool.jpg

drag.png

Jezebel.
jeze.png

sex.jpg

man.png
Everyone would take one look at those John Cena jaws and rightly recognize you as a man.

crab.png

coffee.jpg
 
Last edited:
I do like how they had to pick the one guy who had produced something you might have actually heard of for that soundbite. Now, I do see Mr Strong's point, it is hard to negotiate when you don't know the numbers your previous product has pulled in. Now, I will assume that if it did really well, the network would brag about it, they would talk about how popular their show is, and how everyone should watch it, because everyone is watching it. You know, typical advertising stuff.

However, I don't think anyone is clamoring for Mr Strong's creation of an 8-hour dramatization about oxycontin, which is what Dopesick is. Now it won a ton of awards, however awards don't exactly translate to views, and it probably didn't do as well as the creator thinks. Getting money out of streaming, is not the gold mine a lot of these people think it's going to be. I guarantee you, no one really wants those numbers to come out. It would be massively embarrassing for all levels of the entertainment industry. No one wants it revealed that Netflix paid 20 million for a 10 episode show, that got less than 50k viewers per episode.

Now this isn't entirely the writers or the streaming services fault. We are spoiled for choice in the tv we watch. There has never been more selection available, never has there been more content put out. However, none of it is good. The biggest shows on streaming are Friends, and The Office. Think about that, sitcoms from the 90's and 2000's, that I personally never thought were that good are still the kings of tv.

It also doesn't help that so much content is just a preachy morality play, written by trustfund twenty somethings about current thing. No one liked when it was preachy christian morality plays, and no one likes it when it's the same shit, but gay. All you do is have half the audience roll their eyes and dip out, and the audience it's made for, all 12 of them dip out because it's bad. I don't know why this is such a hard concept for people to grasp.

As for Blobbo, you can tell he was seething mad when he typed that. He immediately jumped down that dude's throat, made claims, didn't bother to back them up. In the span of a few tweets, Blobby went from lamenting about the hiding of metrics, so people don't know the numbers, to screaming about metrics proving some rando wrong. We all know Blobbo doesn't have some secret insider numbers to see who likes and doesn't like certain shows. Because no one in the industry talks to Blobby. The only people who talk to him are losers like Arkle.
 
Back