- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
I'm not trying to start anything but I would legitimately like to know how is it good? As you correctly pointed out I have not seen the show. I've only seen what's on twitter and what I've seen is awful. Am I only seeing the show through the lens of idiots like Bob? There was that Ryan Reynolds movie, Free Guy, that I hated even though I never saw because I only saw it from clapping consoomers despite Bobologists like @Flexo saying that it was pretty decent. I am fully open to the fact that I am nostalgia poisoned, because I am.Blobby's a fucking moron but X-Men '97 is pretty fucking good
Nobody knew what to do with Scott. The original trilogy were Wolverine vehicles more than they were X-Men movies until they reset the timeline...followed by them resetting the reset and making Wolverine the main character again. It's like they're too scared to make a by the books, trust worthy, male leader, like they thought "kids won't like an authority figure so let's dumb him up". Or maybe it was just easier to use the edgy bad boy who could smoke and cuss like all the cool kids do.as a Cyclops fan who suffered through the Fox Movies this was kind of nice seeing him portrayed as competent.
Added in the correction.that wasn't Deathstrike it was Morph.
EDIT:
>Make non-penetrative pornoI looked these three up on Youtube. I didn't see any commentary for Cecil B. DeMille's The Crusades, but I think the full movie is on there. Happily Ever After, aka Snow White 2 did have a review, which said it is a bad knockoff of a Disney film (the review was 8 years old). I didn't find a review for Ginger, I did find a pornographic trailer on Youtube (warning: pornographic trailer is actually pornographic) for it though. I'm surprised Youtube allowed it up. I can't wait to have MovieBob tell me all about a porno movie from the 70s, that'll be great. I read it was shot in New Jersey though, so I'm sure that means it was an important movie.
View attachment 5839656
36% audience score.
>Make lead a female private eye/undercover agent/killer/something
>Name her Ginger
>Don't hire redhead actress
I just watched the trailer and I have no idea what in the hell Bob would even talk about with it. I couldn't tell from the poster Bob put in his video so I thought she was an actual ginger but she's just some blonde woman. That's the only thing notable about this movie. Everything else is just grindhouse trash. Is he really gonna spend 20 minutes going "Wow guys! Can you believe that this movie is basically a porno that was shown in theaters? Folks, she threatened to garrote a man's dick off! If that's not female empowerment, I don't know what is."
...He's gonna try to talk about how this movie is actually empowering for women, isn't he?
I even looked through his comment section to try to ascertain what was so amazing about Ginger, like if someone was too excited to not spoilt the surprise, but all I found was people doubting putting all three out at the same time was a good thing, asking why he's doing this when he has multiple other series that already does what this series looks like it's trying to do, and one guy who is familiar with one of Bob's linguistic tics.

It is such a nothing movie that neither Vinegar Syndrome nor it's old timey porno sister site, MÉLUSINE, has it.
Some people have taken noticeShame he already used the word "gem" for his now-defunct "G.E.Ms" series, because now he can't use "Hidden Gems" as a title. Not like it's a fantastic option itself, but it's certainly better than "This Movie Exists." Good luck to anyone who bothers suffering through a triple dose of Bob; just remember to download and watch locally, he wouldn't want the support of vile kiwis after all!

Last edited: