Tacgnol
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Always was.
The Man Who Sold the Moon was written 70 years ago and DD Harriman looks an awful lot like a certain African American.
Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.
- Thread starter Positron
- Start date
The Man Who Sold the Moon was written 70 years ago and DD Harriman looks an awful lot like a certain African American.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
Bob should be LIVID at NASA and Obama for cancelling the whole Space Shuttle program. Sure, the fleet was aging, but space shuttles are of the SOOPEERYAH FYOOTCHAH, FRIENDO! And it's not like you couldn't, you know, improve the design and BUILD MORE.
Arthur Morgan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
I've always found it funny that Bob is so pro-space travel, yet so anti-republican when they're the ones pushing for space travel. But he genuinely believes if the right got voted out of office completely, Democrats would give extra funding to NASA and he'd be on his space ship within the next decade, possibly even sooner.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
Bob's got such cognitive dissonance that he wholly believes the entire Right is "anti-science" and this includes everything regarding Space ("lol Flat Earthers, amirite, Friendo?") so he can't contemplate a scenario where Republicans are pro-space travel (without it devolving into rationalizing that the ONLY reason for it is "LOL Reagan's Star Wars").
Bob would have a crisis of Soopeeryah Fyootchah
if he ever saw the placards held by PeeOhCees who were demanding that NASA be defunded to instead give the money as gibs me dat for the colored poors, IN THE 1960s. But then of course Bob's go-to cope when a Person of a Color goes against the holy Soopeeryah Fyootchah is to dismiss them as Believers and Oreos and honorary Not-A-Persons.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
As a space exploration nerd and sci-fi buff, it's been obvious for decades that private industry is how we'll move beyond the Earth and begin to have a permanent human presence in space. Only tards like Bob think otherwise.
I will never knock the accomplishments of NASA over its history, they've done some truly impressive stuff. Hell, the fact that we went from putting a guy in space to dropping them on the moon in less than a decade will never cease to amaze me. But the fact is that any agency or program beholden to government is also subject to the whims of a new administration that may not see the point in continuing, whether it's due to not agreeing with its goals, not getting its significance, or simply not having been part of it from the beginning. The Space Race was deemed vitally important at the time, but after the moon landings, it was clear that the Soviets were never going to catch up, and thus funding got slashed. We've had this tug-of-war with NASA ever since, where one administration (generally Republican) will angle for increased funding and a return to space, then the next (generally Democrat) will cut funding and send them back to square one.
But private industry, on the other hand, can more easily see the value of spaceflight because it's easily translated to dollars and cents. Resources abound beyond Earth, mostly metals, but also (in light of the recent news of that successful fusion reaction experiment) hydrogen and helium. Not only could those resources be sent down the gravity well to be used here, they could also be used in space to construct new ships and stations that don't need to be lifted back up. There could be all manner of products developed in low- or zero-G environments that could revolutionize industries. Not to mention, there's the potential for big bucks to be made on space tourism, from space stations to lunar or Martian colonies.
And this is something that's been explored in sci-fi for ages now. Very few works portray spaceflight as exclusive to government agencies, and those that do are usually contemporary or near-future tales. Most show commercial interests as being the primary driver for continued exploration and development of the Solar System and beyond. Scientific interests are still addressed, but the buildout is primarily through industry.
To an extent, I get the romanticized view of NASA that brainlets like Bobby have. To them, Science™ is serious business that needs to be done by smart scientists in lab coats, and it needs to remain pure of the influence of capitalism and industry. Because spaceflight has been the domain of government agencies like NASA for so long, they view space as pure and untainted, and they vehemently resist any attempts to "exploit" it. They want the entire rest of the universe to remain exactly the same aside from the occasional scientific mission every two or three years (or more), and if we ever colonize another planet, it will have to be a tiny base of scientists doing pure science for science's sake.
It's incredibly naive, failing to understand how science works, how science and industry constantly overlap, and how inefficient government can be. I loathe Black Science Man with a passion, but he's 100% right that Elon's one of the few forward thinkers that understands the importance of space to humanity's future that's putting his money to that end. The technological developments that come from this new space race will drive costs down and make it easier than ever to get into space, benefiting everyone. Just because he's ruined your little hugbox doesn't make those accomplishments null and void, Blobbo.
I will never knock the accomplishments of NASA over its history, they've done some truly impressive stuff. Hell, the fact that we went from putting a guy in space to dropping them on the moon in less than a decade will never cease to amaze me. But the fact is that any agency or program beholden to government is also subject to the whims of a new administration that may not see the point in continuing, whether it's due to not agreeing with its goals, not getting its significance, or simply not having been part of it from the beginning. The Space Race was deemed vitally important at the time, but after the moon landings, it was clear that the Soviets were never going to catch up, and thus funding got slashed. We've had this tug-of-war with NASA ever since, where one administration (generally Republican) will angle for increased funding and a return to space, then the next (generally Democrat) will cut funding and send them back to square one.
But private industry, on the other hand, can more easily see the value of spaceflight because it's easily translated to dollars and cents. Resources abound beyond Earth, mostly metals, but also (in light of the recent news of that successful fusion reaction experiment) hydrogen and helium. Not only could those resources be sent down the gravity well to be used here, they could also be used in space to construct new ships and stations that don't need to be lifted back up. There could be all manner of products developed in low- or zero-G environments that could revolutionize industries. Not to mention, there's the potential for big bucks to be made on space tourism, from space stations to lunar or Martian colonies.
And this is something that's been explored in sci-fi for ages now. Very few works portray spaceflight as exclusive to government agencies, and those that do are usually contemporary or near-future tales. Most show commercial interests as being the primary driver for continued exploration and development of the Solar System and beyond. Scientific interests are still addressed, but the buildout is primarily through industry.
To an extent, I get the romanticized view of NASA that brainlets like Bobby have. To them, Science™ is serious business that needs to be done by smart scientists in lab coats, and it needs to remain pure of the influence of capitalism and industry. Because spaceflight has been the domain of government agencies like NASA for so long, they view space as pure and untainted, and they vehemently resist any attempts to "exploit" it. They want the entire rest of the universe to remain exactly the same aside from the occasional scientific mission every two or three years (or more), and if we ever colonize another planet, it will have to be a tiny base of scientists doing pure science for science's sake.
It's incredibly naive, failing to understand how science works, how science and industry constantly overlap, and how inefficient government can be. I loathe Black Science Man with a passion, but he's 100% right that Elon's one of the few forward thinkers that understands the importance of space to humanity's future that's putting his money to that end. The technological developments that come from this new space race will drive costs down and make it easier than ever to get into space, benefiting everyone. Just because he's ruined your little hugbox doesn't make those accomplishments null and void, Blobbo.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2018
All I can remember about the first movie is that that tree had to burn.
OutInTheRain
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
A lot of people don't understand the culture difference between public and private sector. Most of the issues with public sector come from endless red tape, and there is a culture that is resistant to change. The orgs are big, bloated and very slow moving, and most of the leadership is incentivized to prioritize secondary government objectives than the org's main purpose. Like making sure everyone has their equality training done, or various community events that distract from work. Private sector doesn't have that. Especially smaller, more nimble companies. There is less day to day slow walking of every little thing.
Like if they found an asteroid that had ALL the materials to make batteries for electric cars. NASA would maybe draft a proposal to convene a working group to study the feasibility of convening another working group to plan a mission to capture this asteroid into Earth's orbit. The timeline for the project would be 30 years. A crazed billionaire would have something launched inside of 6 months.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
They actually haven't tbh; most of their 'innovations' are just older NASA and Aerospace projects under a new brand, touted in the same way Disney desperately bleats and honks about how their 18th gay character is the first. Musk's well known for doing that, ranging from "reinventing" Goddard's vacuum train, to effectively just reinventing the Grumman Pegasus, which is what his reusable rockets basically are.
The reusables also aren't necessarily reusable given that SpaceX seems to have a pretty high rate of rocket explosions compared to NASA, and even then reusables are much more expensive given you have to refit them and fix them after every recovery. It's kind of why space shuttles suck.
Not disagreeing that their presences makes space travel more likely, since competitions in general drive technology.
Also Brainless Bob is still retarded for rejecting an option for space travel just because the garbage website he's addicted to tells him that Diamond Man bad.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
What's the point of lunar tourism if you cannot indulge in a fairly small amount of gruel?
I remember young but grownass men self-congratulate as "kidults" back in the mid-90. I suspect it came with the IT boom when irresponsible men somehow earned themselves huge amount of money, buying their way into adult privilege without coming to terms with adult responsibilities.
JayHarrison
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
(Moviebob: "Hallowed be Obama's name.")
But that would require Moviebob to end its blind loyalty to the Democratic Party... which is something Bob will likely never do.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Elon Musk likes Nazis.
He also hates humanity.
Bobby knows the rules of journalism, especially the precise distinction between "rule" and "custom".
The GOP cares about the health of your balls. This alone will be enough reason to vote for them.
I daresay Bobby's been having lots of intimate convo with sex workers.
To answer Greenwald's question: that's because the Dems are in bed with Big Pharma.
Some prostitute needs money again; Candice Owen sympathizes.
Greenwald rightly points out that the $100B Biden poured into the pocket of some jewish comedian does not improve the lives of average American one bit, except to those who own the stocks of weapon manufacturers. Bobby begrudges Greenwald's lack of sympathy.
It is Zelensky's responsibility, not that of American taxpayers, to keep the people in his Russian province alive.
Bobby is profoundly serious, and can read the mind of Xi Jin-Ping just surely as the mind of Lindsay Ellis.
Of course this is fake (why would China need more babies?) but I have no idea why Bobby Believes that the GOP is behind this.
GENOCIDE!!!
Texas cops call out tranny on his lies. Genocide!!!
Automobile happened, moron.
By this point MCU should be synonymous with SNL.
Below-average Avengers.
Sun Spiders are these things:
Bobby feels especially angry because he Believes anyone wearing a rainbow dress must be trans. The following, for example, must be a transwoman:
James Gunn is not as popular as Bobby Believes.
Watch the video here. I'm not summarizing it.
Musk...eteers.
Something called Night Court.
I agree that "surprise transwoman" should be a dead trope; trannies are so garishly trans that even a slime mold can sense and avoid them. And nice to see a staunch ally like Bobby spells "transwoman" as one word.
About some ugly webtoon. Reading the thread might make sense of it.
He also hates humanity.
Bobby knows the rules of journalism, especially the precise distinction between "rule" and "custom".
The GOP cares about the health of your balls. This alone will be enough reason to vote for them.
I daresay Bobby's been having lots of intimate convo with sex workers.
To answer Greenwald's question: that's because the Dems are in bed with Big Pharma.
Some prostitute needs money again; Candice Owen sympathizes.
Greenwald rightly points out that the $100B Biden poured into the pocket of some jewish comedian does not improve the lives of average American one bit, except to those who own the stocks of weapon manufacturers. Bobby begrudges Greenwald's lack of sympathy.
It is Zelensky's responsibility, not that of American taxpayers, to keep the people in his Russian province alive.
Bobby is profoundly serious, and can read the mind of Xi Jin-Ping just surely as the mind of Lindsay Ellis.
Of course this is fake (why would China need more babies?) but I have no idea why Bobby Believes that the GOP is behind this.
GENOCIDE!!!
Texas cops call out tranny on his lies. Genocide!!!
Automobile happened, moron.
By this point MCU should be synonymous with SNL.
Below-average Avengers.
Sun Spiders are these things:
Bobby feels especially angry because he Believes anyone wearing a rainbow dress must be trans. The following, for example, must be a transwoman:
James Gunn is not as popular as Bobby Believes.
Watch the video here. I'm not summarizing it.
Musk...eteers.
Something called Night Court.
I agree that "surprise transwoman" should be a dead trope; trannies are so garishly trans that even a slime mold can sense and avoid them. And nice to see a staunch ally like Bobby spells "transwoman" as one word.
About some ugly webtoon. Reading the thread might make sense of it.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2019
If Russia's the one losing the war, why is Zelensky constantly begging for more money, guns, rockets and etc, while his country was and still is considered the poorest country in Europe? Or the fact they're using AA's from the old Soviet Era while the drones sent by the US are being sold off to Iran? Also, lol "Well Poland and Estonia might happen next!" because Russia really gives a shit for those.
Stopping WW3 huh? Ya sure it's not that they're making shit worse with that cokehead Zelenski saying retarded shit? Oh! Oh! How about when that fucker asked for Nukes?
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2015
Of course, the reason there will be a McDonalds on the moon someday is exactly for people like Bob who soy out about taking a trip to space but who will still want to eat the same slop they always do.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
So, Bob knows Ladies of the Night? IRL or online? I bet even they think Bob is fat and will not have sex with him, not for all the money in the world. Hardly anybody talks about sperm, although sperm counts are a real concern and a few people do talk about that. Most people just go straight to "It's r/childfree's fault!" or something. Bob's in the wrong social/pseudosocial circles; nobody he knows gives a fuck about birth rates going into the toilet. After all, he and his buddies worship a man that pretty much coined the phrase "PUNISHED with a BABY".
If Bob doesn't realize that Xi Jinping is a liar, because communists lie because that is what they do, then Bob is stupider than the Believers.
I decided to figure out what exactly Joe Fettucini is all about since Bob apparently either decided to mute or block him.
No pronouns in the bio, used to work for Indiewire, calls himself a "former" film critic (since he's not doing it officially as an employee for someone else I guess). Very interesting tweets:
Indiewire apparently falsely reported several death notices, including the alleged passing of Michael Caine, which was promptly baleeted, because Michael Caine is still alive.
He's got a weird feud going on with some guy called Seoul Patch:
Seoul man give the guy a break; he just joined twitter THIS MONTH.
Nothing indicates that this guy is a "believer" though.
Last edited:
OutInTheRain
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
Xi Jinping is dressing up China hitting a period of economic recession, possibly for a very long period of time. The environment is just putting a positive spin on it. Blobbo would realize this, TPTB care about the environment...until they don't.Bobby is profoundly serious, and can read the mind of Xi Jin-Ping just surely as the mind of Lindsay Ellis.
They did it in the comics so they could do it in the films. It was also stupid there as well. It even looked fucking stupid, and apparently all the artists hating drawing it.
Bobby projecting once again, he needs a better insult. That aside, this panel looks fucking stupid. It's a spider lesbian who's legs don't work. No one wants to see the amazing adventures of floppy legs and her struggles with stairs. But I guess struggling with stairs is something Bobby can relate to, of course his problem is he gets winded, has to stop half way to catch his breath.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
the whole wheelchair spider person thing makes no sense whatsoever. It's not just her legs, it's EVERYTHING, including HER ARMS. Sun Spider's web shooters coming out of a crutch stick looks like a mechanical thing like Peter Parker's web shooters, but HOW is she holding on to them, let alone supporting her weight, while UP IN THE AIR SWINGING FROM BUILDING TO BUILDING? Spider strength or no, if a joint FAILS, no amount of strength in the world will overcome that, OR the MASSIVE amount of pain that doing what a spiderman does would cause. Joints can pop out and be dislocated, and of all the disability-causing syndromes, Ehlers-Danlos is probably one of the worst ones to utilize for a character that does the things a spiderman does.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
It would be more practical to have two tentacles and marionette web shooters that anchor you to the area instead of doing what Marvel is doing.
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2013
The funny thing is it's technically not even a Marvel character. Sun Spider's a fan character that got acknowledged because after Into the Spider-Verse came out, Marvel started encouraging fans to make their own "Spider-sonas" inspired by Miles Morales in that movie and she happened to be one of them they picked to get a short story. Why? I have no clue, it's really silly.
JayHarrison
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
If true that Elon Musk likes Nazis, then Elon Musk must absolutely love Moviebob.
Elon hasn't lost yet, Bob.
I hope I'm not the only one here with this mindset, but I honestly don't give a flying fuck about Donald Trump's tax returns... mainly because they aren't a Constitutional requirement to run for America's highest office.
Except... Greenwald is correct. I seem to recall many lamestream media outlets wanting anything and everything that could be used to incriminating Trump published and out in the open. I also seem to recall the same lamestream outlets refusing to publish stories that would incriminate Democrats (see Twitter and Facebook silencing the New York Post's
stories regarding Hunter Biden's laptop.
The only sex worker I ever see willing to hang out with Moviebob is one Madame Rosie Palms.
A-yup.
For being a Thinker™, Moviebob should know that.
Since when has Moviebob ever cared about the less fortunate? (Correct answer: Never.)
Had you not voted for Fuckwit in Chief Biden, there's a good chance that we wouldn't be on the brink of WW3, you braindead bitch!
Wow. I find it difficult to believe that Xi Jinping may actually have less credibilty in this post than Moviebob.
You'd think Eugenicsbob would approve of an artificial womb laboratory.
Notice how Moviebob doesn't volunteer to patch these metropolitan roads up.
Funn with Venn diagrams!
Red circle: Thinkers.
Blue circle: Moviebob.
Outcome: One perfect red circle and one perfect blue circle without zero overlap.
Not gona lie: A Mendel Palace/Quinty remake would be nice...
Last edited: