Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

guys, I got my hands on Bobs script for DS9:

Sisko: Odo, stop. You can not fill your empty void with religion. It’s a dead form of myth to control those with lesser minds.

Quark: What he said. That’s for idiots. I believe in cash money.

Sisko: that is… at least something.

Odo: I just feel that -

SUDDENLY BOBULUOS WALKS INTO SCENE. BOBULUOS CAM BENCH PRESS 370 AND IS THE FEDERATIONS TOP PHILOSPHER AND ART CRITIC. HE IS A A HANDSOME KLINGON WARRIOR

Bobulous: Odo, there is believers… and then there are thinkers. Which are you?

Odo: Wow, you are right! I’m going to give up on this scam and going to make a book about superhero’s defeating theocracy. Unlike Worf who believes in his insanely pathetic warriors and gods.

Dax: Oh, Bobulous. He’s right. Now I hate Worf. Can I have sex with you?

Bobulous: Perhaps.
 
I think I get what he's saying. The problem is while his argument might be (barely) comprehensible, it's almost impossible to apply to Star Trek. Sure, the American Cold War identity informed the depiction of the Federation, particularly in TOS, but the conflict itself is barely background material. Such a metaphor would require a low intensity, unresolvable military dispute behind the scenes, occasionally flaring into overt warfare, but this doesn't describe anything in TNG or TOS. Who would the antagonist be? I suppose the Klingons in TOS (certainly the last TOS film adopted the Klingons as an obvious USSR stand-in with no reservations), but in both series there's no consistent adversary. The dangers of the unknown are much greater.

Amusingly, Bob's analysis might apply to DS9, what with the Dominion War, but that's a much more overt conflict than the Cold War ever was, with a slow erosion of willpower and strength over the course of years rather than a final apocalyptic event looming on the horizon. His actual analysis of DS9 strongly suggests he's never seen it. I haven't seen Voyager, so I can't comment on what he says about it.

Honestly, if not for Bob's TNG boner I'd wonder if he ever saw any Trek outside the films. His analysis is complete nonsense.

The worst part is you just know he was smirking to himself as he drooled this out, chortling over how brilliant he is.
Voyager's premise is pretty simple, "Lost in Space but with a Federation Starship." The Voyager gets flung to a far corner of space, very far away from the Federation. As such, the only familiar enemy species I can remember it running into is the Borg (which was active in this part of space). Other than that it was mostly new alien species, and it often had a monster of the week format similar to TOS. The Voyager is doing it's best to get back to Federation space, while not violating the Prime Directive, and making do with less resources than Federation personnel are normally used to.

Here's an RLM video that completely misrepresents to content of the show... or does it?

Bob's demented and retarded word vomit? Doesn't really represent the show at all (or Deep Space Nine either really, which ended up being a big hot war with a lot of death and destruction).
 
I think I get what he's saying. The problem is while his argument might be (barely) comprehensible, it's almost impossible to apply to Star Trek. Sure, the American Cold War identity informed the depiction of the Federation, particularly in TOS, but the conflict itself is barely background material. Such a metaphor would require a low intensity, unresolvable military dispute behind the scenes, occasionally flaring into overt warfare, but this doesn't describe anything in TNG or TOS. Who would the antagonist be? I suppose the Klingons in TOS (certainly the last TOS film adopted the Klingons as an obvious USSR stand-in with no reservations), but in both series there's no consistent adversary. The dangers of the unknown are much greater.
the nearest thing would be Federation-Romulan relations in both series, but that's not so much a cold war as an uneasy truce
and neither of the Romulan episodes in TOS were based on the cold war; the first was based on a WW2 submarine movie, the second on the Pueblo incident in the Vietnam war

Star Trek peaked at DS9 for sure, it all started slowly going to shit after that
 
Yeah, they'd be bad, but I do wish Bob had, at some point, had the opportunity to actually make some of his ideas a reality just so we could see how awful they would be. Like, if he actually got that movie finished, if he'd managed to write a full novel, and if he and Dobson had gotten together to make a comic that was basically the Nintendo fan fic described here.

What insanity lies in that rotten brain we haven't gotten to experience? It makes me wish we could see it.
Game overthinker sketches....
 
A lot of these other ethnic groups aren't considered Chinese by the way, they are just citizens of China.
Depends on whom you ask and when you ask. In the wake of the Cultural Revolution, i.e. the 1980s, much propaganda was about how China consists of 56 ethnicities. This was especially notable because back then there was no tourism to China, so the propaganda was strictly domestic. Today, China is greedy for the tourist buck, but we don't see her blowing that trumpet.

block.png
You stalk Peter Coffin's account from behind a block, creep.

This fucking creep dug out a seven-year-old tweet by Bethany Mandel, because he doesn't like her definition of "woke". Un-fucking-believable.
beth.jpg

simp.png
I dunno; The Simpsons has always strikes me as center-right.


Vice is still high on Ivermectin.
iver.png
I hope Vice were at least 10% as concerned about parents subjecting their autistic children to puberty blockers, even as the kids complain of terrible symptoms. And I dread that when a professional wrestling legend speaks against religion, Christianity is done for.

m1.png
Musk might or might not be qualified to talk about Medicine, but he is infinitely more qualified to talk about parenthood than you do Bobby, even though one of his sons trooned out -- especially since one of his sons trooned out, since he knows first hand how failure looks like.

detrans.png

Doubtless very-qualified people weight in on the covid lab-leak theory.
leak.png

The Hague want to arrest Putin. Even Bobby sees how dumb they are.
hague.png

car.png
Maybe someone who can't get a Ford F-150 might buy it?


Someone worries that Disney will betray Superior Future in The Malodorians.
mal.png

Willow, Bobby's favorite lesbun fap last year, was canceled.
will.png

sw.png

Tom Cruise singles out The Flash for praise, among dozens of identical capeshit. Bobby feels sour.
miller.png
"Has Miller been a Scientologist?" Dude reputedly tried to start his own sex cult!

Starlet Jenna Ortega was blasted for "unprofessional", "entitled" and "toxic" behavior on set. She changed the script without consultation with the writers, claiming the script "made no sense" and that she had to "put her foot down". (Archive of NYP article)
cunt.png
She had read the fucking script before accepting the job dammit. But then, Believe Women. Poor things, Hollywood women are so abused.


Picard.
picard.png

Star Trek fans deplores how escapist media isn't escapist enough.
trek.jpg
Musk must start charging Twitter users for hyphens.

Bobby has another brilliant plot.
trek2.png

Harley Quinn in Scooby-Doo.
doo.png

Angel is a film critic and an expert in propaganda. A propaganda is something that dumb proles don't recognize as propaganda. Bobby gives him the same praise, "you are wrong still you are smart wrong," again. He is also the first person Bobby met in years that he disagree with and yet not a Nazi. (Will you fuck me?)
angel.png
If you read a MovieBob tweet and conclude he is a despotic eugenic creep, he is not a despotic eugenic creep.

who.png
Who are these people and why should anyone care?

food.png
 
View attachment 4800324
OMG I can't even with these braindead scrubs. Sino- means CHINESE, NOT Japanese, you exceptional Camel Scrambler.
I would not be surprised to discover Moviebob is Sinophillic to the point where the re-animated corpse of Mao would say, "Whoa, Bob, srow down! Even I not that diaboricor."



block.png
You stalk Peter Coffin's account from behind a block, creep.
You have to remember, Moviebob loves harassing others but acts like a spineless pussy when called out (justifiably) by others.



This fucking creep dug out a seven-year-old tweet by Bethany Mandel, because he doesn't like her definition of "woke". Un-fucking-believable.
beth.jpg
So, if Moviebob's OK with razzing Mandel over this Roomba tweet from 2016, then Moviebob should have no problems receiving justifable criticism for the infamous eugenics tweet from 2012--a credo that Moviebob observably still stnads by.



simp.png
I dunno; The Simpsons has always strikes me as center-right.
Was that pre-Trump or post-Trump? Outside of short clips and the Universal Hollywood Simpsons Ride, I've not watching anything Simpsons related in nearly 16 years.



Vice is still high on Ivermectin.
iver.png
I hope Vice were at least 10% as concerned about parents subjecting their autistic children to puberty blockers, even as the kids complain of terrible symptoms.
Remember: Moviebob was an ardent anti-vaxxer until Fuckwit in Chief Biden was inaugurated. Since then, Moviebob is not only a staunch pro-vaxxer, Bob is now a "vaxx up or you don't wualify as human" Democrat toady.

And I dread that when a professional wrestling legend speaks against religion, Christianity is done for.
Eh. As someone who enjoyed watching "pro" wrestling during the Hulk Hogan heyday, I can tell you that I don't care what these overpaid performers care about.



I'd rather throw my entire bank balance into a roaring fireplace, thankyouverymuch.



Doubtless very-qualified people weight [sic] in on the covid lab-leak theory.
leak.png
Like how Moviebob genuflects before the Democrat Diocese at every opportunity.



car.png
Maybe someone who can't get a Ford F-150 might buy it?
Why would Moviebob care about a Tesla truck?



Starlet Jenna Ortega was blasted for "unprofessional", "entitled" and "toxic" behavior on set. She changed the script without consultation with the writers, claiming the script "made no sense" and that she had to "put her foot down". (Archive of NYP article)
cunt.png
She had read the fucking script before accepting the job dammit. But then, Believe Women. Poor things, Hollywood women are so abused.
Believe me: Moviebob's written stuff so openly racist, so openly sexist, so openly Nazi-level fascistic, Bob's career should have been hurt damaged destroyed annihilated self-vaporized hundreds of times already. (I've seen well-known TV personalities get fired from their shows for far less hateful than the rempant -isms that Moviebob's gotten away with.)



So... McDonald's? Obviously, the great Thinker™ known as Moviebob misread the question.

(And, for those curious to my response of which of these chains I would miss the least: Taco Bell, surprisingly. I find Chick-Fil-Eh mediocre, but I don't see much reason to visit TB anymore when rival California chain Del Taco has, IMO, better prices for similar menu items.)



BONUS!
Stupidest possible use of the stupidest possible technology used by Earth's stupidest film critic for many stupid reasons--mainly spewing hate, racism, sexism, harassment, hypocrisy, disinformation, misinformation, genocide advocacy, the promotion of bioterrorism, etc.
Screen Shot 2023-03-17 at 22.58.43.png




DOUBLE BONUS!
Ben Shapiro suggests that elitists demand rebuilding systems around their personal quirks.
Screen Shot 2023-03-18 A.png


Shapiro's accurate comments seems to have hit a nerve with Moviebob:
Screen Shot 2023-03-18 at 00.12.05.png

Let's be honest here: Shapiro's got Moviebob by the short hairs. Moviebob is E-X-actly the kind of Elitist (and Technocrat dandy) who's been demanding society adjust to Bob's own megalomaniacal personality for several years. (Additionally, if mankind were led by intellectual "exceptions" like Moviebob, Earth's collective IQ could easily be counted on a single finger, assuming it's even that high.)
 
Last edited:
Who the fuck EVER stalked Bob?* When? How many times? Why would they do so? Was it a MAGAnaiseghoulen? Pressing X to doubt here.

Also, Bob has no idea what a "good parent" looks like. Certainly not Ma and Pa Chipman, never mind Lesser Brother and his wife.
Why would Moviebob care about a Tesla truck?
Because Elmo is Evil, therefore Futuristic Truck Bad.

1679125744926.png
I noticed that too and it bugs the shit out of me because holy fuck, you know if he was actually paying attention he'd say "The one I CAN'T go to on Sunday and gives my money to Christian Fascism".

But it's only "Christian Fascism" insofar as they USED to (not anymore) donate to some group that allegedly was conversion-therapying the bundles of sticks.

* besides John Speznaz
 
simp.png
I dunno; The Simpsons has always strikes me as center-right.
Maybe he always been doing this but I noticed lately this strange pivot Bob and his like are doing with trying to tie the anit-woke crowd with the moral busybodies of the past. Usually you see the anit-woke crowd comparing SJW types to the overly religious moral busybodies of the 80's and 90's getting outrage at offensive cartoons and violent video games and such. Bob and his like is doing this "no actually you are the out of touch people who are offended by everything" to the people who are on the other side of him. It is an odd strategy that I don't think is going to work in the long run. The anti-woke side can be a tad annoying at times but it seems most of the critic of woke content is less off a moral perspective and more of wanting a higher quality standard. They don't like woke content because it comes at expense of a quality story. While the woke crowd seems to want things added and removed in media based on what they think will lead the audience to more progressive thought. Overall, this pivot I find most interesting but kind of baffling.
 
DOUBLE BONUS!
Ben Shapiro suggests that elitists demand rebuilding systems around their personal quirks.
Screen Shot 2023-03-18 A.png


Shapiro's accurate comments seems to have hit a nerve with Moviebob:
Screen Shot 2023-03-18 at 00.12.05.png

Let's be honest here: Shapiro's got Moviebob by the short hairs. Moviebob is E-X-actly the kind of Elitist (and Technocrat dandy) who's been demanding society adjust to Bob's own megalomaniacal personality for several years. (Additionally, if mankind were led by intellectual "exceptions" like Moviebob, Earth's collective IQ could easily be counted on a single finger, assuming it's even that high.)
It's been well documented that Bob is a fucking retard (5000+ pages and counting), but sometimes he says something that really takes the cake. And this is one of those times.

He's made this point multiple times in the past, and I believe I commented on it before. What he fails to include in his declaration that the "weirdos" run society is that there are a lot of weirdos that have no business being anywhere near the levers of power. By any objective definition, Chris-Chan is exceptionally weird, but given his ideas of how the world should be run, he'd have society crashing to a screeching halt in days.

Being weird is not automatically good, and being normal is not automatically bad. It's the mass of normalcy that gives society stability to allow it to keep functioning. Some weirdness is important to shake things up and keep things from sliding into stagnancy, but when you try to let the weirdos run everything...well, you get Portland, or San Francisco, or...hell, pretty much all of California at this point. It's a recipe for disaster.

And it goes without saying, but Bob is one of the bad weirdos. Again, see the last 5000 pages for all the proof you need of this.
 
Normal gets things done; weird gets things destroyed. And if you ever gets things done, you'd better hope your boss doesn't weird out of your payment.

I wonder whether this "normal = mediocre" mindset is the side-effect of the "special snowflake" education that Boomers subjected their kids to.
 
Honestly, if not for Bob's TNG boner I'd wonder if he ever saw any Trek outside the films. His analysis is complete nonsense.
The funny thing is he doesn't like TNG and hates people who think it's better than the original series, insisting that was the better one. Though it becomes pretty obvious he's never watched the show and is just going by what he's heard from other nerds.
Game overthinker sketches....
Yeah, but imagine those on an actual budget and feature length.
Who the fuck EVER stalked Bob?
In his own twisted mind? Trump, Elon, the Jan 6 people, his bullies from high school, Lindsay Ellis, the people at Escapist who fired him, Total Biscuit, the evil cabal of Republicans doing their best to prevent the superior future, and any directors he doesn't like. Oh, and us.

Bob likely doesn't know the meaning of stalk because I'm pretty sure he tried it in the past to try and woo a girl.
 
Okay Blobby's Trek takes make my brain hurt. When I was a kid, I use to think smart people liked Star Trek God the internet has shown me how fucking wrong I was.

In TOS the Klingons were the Soviet insert with the full out tensions happening in the sixties but once you got to TNG Klingons became Space Vikings.

The relationship with the Romulans in TNG were closer to 80's and 90's Cold War tensions, but the Romulans only appeared in 21 episodes of 178.

& both series were episodic meaning there was no continuing storylines so usually after the episode ended the Romulans and Klingons weren't thought of again until they showed up again. Well outside of the occasional reference to the Neutral Zone.

As for the Navy aspect Gene patterned TOS after the Navy because it was the only point of reference, he really had but once you got to The Motion Picture and definitely TNG he patterned Starfleet more after an Armed NASA vs the actual Navy. Seeing Starfleet's primary mission as exploration not defense.
 
simp.png
I dunno; The Simpsons has always strikes me as center-right.
Yes, the Simpsons was pretty center right back then. A few politicians went after it because they were being out of touch boomers. They were even more offended by Beavis and Butthead though.
Maybe he always been doing this but I noticed lately this strange pivot Bob and his like are doing with trying to tie the anit-woke crowd with the moral busybodies of the past. Usually you see the anit-woke crowd comparing SJW types to the overly religious moral busybodies of the 80's and 90's getting outrage at offensive cartoons and violent video games and such. Bob and his like is doing this "no actually you are the out of touch people who are offended by everything" to the people who are on the other side of him. It is an odd strategy that I don't think is going to work in the long run. The anti-woke side can be a tad annoying at times but it seems most of the critic of woke content is less off a moral perspective and more of wanting a higher quality standard. They don't like woke content because it comes at expense of a quality story. While the woke crowd seems to want things added and removed in media based on what they think will lead the audience to more progressive thought. Overall, this pivot I find most interesting but kind of baffling.
They are probably laying groundwork (not Bob, Bob is too stupid to realize it and is just being a good follower) for when the Republicans take power again. I mean, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Bob's favorite person, tried to legislate censorship of videogames. Tipper Gore was doing the same for music. The moral busybodies tended to be the same out of touch boomers noted above rather than belonging to a particular political party. Certainly, the Evangelical preachers and organizations attacked the same pop culture stuff as the politicians did, and often in a more hysterical and cringy way, but I remember what actually happened too. It wasn't just the Evangelicals, they were just the easiest to mock.
 
Maybe he always been doing this but I noticed lately this strange pivot Bob and his like are doing with trying to tie the anit-woke crowd with the moral busybodies of the past. Usually you see the anit-woke crowd comparing SJW types to the overly religious moral busybodies of the 80's and 90's getting outrage at offensive cartoons and violent video games and such. Bob and his like is doing this "no actually you are the out of touch people who are offended by everything" to the people who are on the other side of him. It is an odd strategy that I don't think is going to work in the long run. The anti-woke side can be a tad annoying at times but it seems most of the critic of woke content is less off a moral perspective and more of wanting a higher quality standard. They don't like woke content because it comes at expense of a quality story. While the woke crowd seems to want things added and removed in media based on what they think will lead the audience to more progressive thought. Overall, this pivot I find most interesting but kind of baffling.
This is going to be a hot take. I think the "Christian moral panics" of the 90s were overblown. This idea that fundamentalist Christians ran America and destroyed everything in their wake seems like an anachronism. From what I see most of these supposed moral panics don't seem like they were ever that wide spared or accomplished anything. Whenever people bring them up I just ask but what did that do though ? For example "the Christians went after Pokemon," but what did that do though ? It still went on to be a multi billion dollar franchise and was so at the time. "The Christians went after Marilyn Manson," but what did that do though he was a multi platinum selling artist. I just think this whole idea is an attempt on the part of people like Movibebob to manufacture consent for their psychotic warlike ambitions.

They are probably laying groundwork (not Bob, Bob is too stupid to realize it and is just being a good follower) for when the Republicans take power again. I mean, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Bob's favorite person, tried to legislate censorship of videogames. Tipper Gore was doing the same for music. The moral busybodies tended to be the same out of touch boomers noted above rather than belonging to a particular political party. Certainly, the Evangelical preachers and organizations attacked the same pop culture stuff as the politicians did, and often in a more hysterical and cringy way, but I remember what actually happened too. It wasn't just the Evangelicals, they were just the easiest to mock.
True, the censorship campaigns of the 90s were less partisan then people think. A lot of the moral panics in general were. For example a lot of 20th century feminist were very against gay rights because they thought it was sexist men who wanted to get away from women.

Bob to me is the posterchild of the "Blueanon" phenomenon. Blueanon is a fascinating thing and is almost a red pill. Blueanon is a pun of Qanon and the color blue which is the color of the DNC in the political party in America bob supports. In short the Blueanon phenomenon highlights that if you think about it objectively a lot of the Democratic partisans and neo liberals blatantly are conspiracy theorist. The reason they are not called out as such is because they (or more accurately the people they support) are in power so they get to decide what is true and what isn't. Bob has so many conspiratorial beliefs. Bob for example thinks first person shooters were an attempt by the US military to turn kids violent so they could go fight in wars overseas. If you think about it this is basically what Jack Thompson believed. He thinks Gamergate was a right wing conspiracy to take over gaming. He thinks anyone concerned that Hillary Clinton's aggressive rhetoric towards Russia could start a war is being paid by Russia. He thinks Halo 4 was released on election day in an attempt to stop Obama from winning the election. He similarly He thinks that Gamergate was an attempt to stop Hillary Clinton from being elected.
 
Last edited:
Who the fuck EVER stalked Bob?* When? How many times? Why would they do so? Was it a MAGAnaiseghoulen? Pressing X to doubt here.

Also, Bob has no idea what a "good parent" looks like. Certainly not Ma and Pa Chipman, never mind Lesser Brother and his wife.

Because Elmo is Evil, therefore Futuristic Truck Bad.

View attachment 4809400
I noticed that too and it bugs the shit out of me because holy fuck, you know if he was actually paying attention he'd say "The one I CAN'T go to on Sunday and gives my money to Christian Fascism".

But it's only "Christian Fascism" insofar as they USED to (not anymore) donate to some group that allegedly was conversion-therapying the bundles of sticks.

* besides John Speznaz
Funny how MovieBlob goes on about Chick-Fil-A's past of being against marriage between a bundle of sticks, but is dead silent about Subway having Jared Fogle, a pedophile and groomer, be their spokesperson, as well as their mascot.

Hmmm... Then again, MovieBlob white knighted Cuties and it's creator, so make what you may of all this.
 
Back