Can we also point out Blobby has no idea what Lore means.
He called it "Fixed in Place, Obsessed, and Canonical"
That's pretty much the opposite of Lore.
Lore is knowledge and traditions passed down by generations usually orally. Hence most Lore are a form of "Telephone or Chinese Whispers" Lores are the same as Myths and Legends while Data is Fixed in Place and Canonical because Data is actual factual information on subject.
Also, Star Trek recently merged Data and Lore into one being so I guess Lore isn't all bad Bobert.
as much as I hate to credit anyone making Kurtzman-trek, the scene where Data "gave" Lore all his precious memories of things like his Sherlock Holmes Pipe, his poker chips, and his cat Spot, which ironically would give Lore Data himself, was kinda clever. It tricked Lore into keeping parts of Data instead of deleting it all, and then Lore then unwittingly took into himself pieces of Data that fixed his own broken nature.
But you have to remember, Bob is the Foremost Expert in the Science

of Blue Curtain Analysis. This is why he reads the curtains in Star Trek The Next Generation and imparts bullshit reasoning to them, like this ridiculous attempt to use abstract concepts that had diddly squat to do with either the characters or the episodes, to determine why "Data" was the "good" one and Lore was the "bad" one, outside the writers' arbitrary choice.

Oh for pete's sake, Bob.
Black Jesus wasn't worshipped for being a "real" world leader. He was given the shrine in a damn restaurant in motherfucking COMMUNIST VIETNAM because, duh, the person who owned and ran it was a Commie Black Jesus worshipper. A restauranteur who probably knows jack and shit about how to run a country or how to properly foreign policy. All they care about is MUH BLEK PREZIDENT WITH THE (D) BY HIS NAME! Because he's also a damn commie.
Ironically? Bob would call shit like this "cult-like behavior" if they did it for Drumpf. Because it
IS cult-like behavior. Bob, if a damn COMMUNIST loves your (ex) President, your president is doing something
wrong. And he's being loved for all the WRONG reasons.
Holy shit, tie-dyed rainbow bagels? They probably taste like shit.
The Bible depicts all this because human nature is sinful. You are supposed to learn this all these are bad.
I am getting pretty fucking sick and tired of those
Atheism 101 idiots like Bob who don't understand context. Just because a thing is DEPICTED IN the Bible,
doesn't mean it's being condoned in the Bible. Like, there's a verse that predicts (NOT commands - there's a difference) that people will eat their children. That was because there was going to be a seige. Hell, starving people eating their children during wartime came up a lot in the O.T. Complaining about recorded events in a book is like complaining about the News.
It does NOT affirm rape. The passage most people use to claim that, is Deutoronomy 22:28-29. There is a problem with this, because the word translated as "rape" into English, is NOT the actual Hebrew word for rape. This is evidenced by the fact that in another verse the hebrew word for rape IS used - immediately above, in Deutoronomy 22:25.
Incest is a special case because in the early days of the world, the DNA of humans hadn't been so scrambled and mutated, that "incest" wasn't a problem. It only became a problem during the Exodus. I guess God had determined that enough genetic damage had occurred that it could no longer be allowed.
God really didn't like infanticide; this was one of the things the Canaanites did when worshipping Molech/Chemosh (similar if not identical gods). One of the commands is "Do not let your son or daughter pass through the fire."
Herod killing all the baby boys in the Bethlehem area was certainly not celebrated or condoned by the Bible in any way. It just showed how crazy paranoid Herod was.
Also, violent misogyny? Really? Compared to the surrounding nations, Ancient Israel was downright progressive! Men and women were to be punished equally for crimes. Showing instances of someone being a misogynistic prick (like that entire town of assholes that abused that one Levite's concubine right to death) isn't a statement of approval, geez.

It's true that Star Trek has always been Progressive. If Gene had gotten his alleged way with Troi (a few men
did wear skirt uniforms early seasons), NOBODY WOULD GIVE A SHIT.
You know why, Bob?
BECAUSE THEY KNEW HOW TO WRITE. At least until Kurtzman-trek.
Star Trek up to and including Enterprise was Progressive. STD and everything thereafter is "woke". And when I say "woke" I mean "the writing fucking stinks and there's too many people crying inappropriately at the wrong times and talking about FEELINGS in hallways at the worst possible moment and the writers should be fired and the old TNG/DS9/VOY writers hired back in."
Bob knows that Drew Carey is a Believer and hardcore libertarian right?
Obviously not. He would have unpersoned him by now.
I wonder if Bob thinks all women are secretly lesbians because no woman has ever, or will ever be sexually attracted to him or love him (well, with the exception of his blood relatives, in what we can call the Tragedy of Ma Chipman). Bob, you have to understand you are very ugly, and even if someone were to try to get past your looks they'd find your other traits are equally as vile.
Bob being a narcissistic Autist, projects when he calls others ugly or "Barney Rubble in a dress" and shit like that. Only people who truly know they're ugly inside and out will make fun of other people's looks like that when they're just in a glass house throwing stones, and they haven't even gotten out of the house yet.
Bob has yet to find a woman that hates Drumpf and loves BlackJesus Obama as much as he does, but IIRC, Joy Behar is already taken.