Given Bobby's family was able to afford a game console in the 80s, his life cannot be too shitty.
Notice how among Bob's excuses is "I got Religious Indoctrination Drilled Into Me at School" as if that was a
bad thing (it obviously didn't take, regardless). I admire Kendolyn's persistence but at this point they're just casting their pearls before PiggyBob swine. Bob can't get it. Bob can't EVER get it. He's too goddamn stupid. He's also too brainwashed by the precursors of the Woke Mind Virus. The whole comment about how "Humanity is not the Lament Configuration, we're just Psychotic Apes" is like DUDE, speak for yourself.
Bob may be a Psychotic Ape - hell, his behavior all along points in this direction - but the whole Lament Configuration (
Hellraiser reference; a puzzle box that releases demonic Cenobites) comparison is ridiculous. Humanity is not a puzzle box requiring sacrifices to open.
Imma press X to doubt that his FAMILY got harassed by anything BOB shared online. If Chippa got harassed, it was something Chippa put online. Hell, it's more likely that people found shit out to harass any Chipman from Chippa rather than Bob.
Also I find Bob's definition of "harassed" suspect. Considering he's calling the conversation with Kendolyn "targeted harassment" (and so are some of his braindead senpais). Bob's just mad because he can't think and Kendolyn's trying their hardest to GET him to think.
I read all the kendolyn/bob exchange and felt sorry for the guy/girl/troon. You just know time and again that he wants to call Bob a slur but is trying his damnest not to as to not get unpersoned by the community.
With Bob, you just can't have a good faith argument because he's either too dumb to understand the point or so entrenched in the ideological side that he won't admit any other position. I re-read it twice and kendolyn's argument is kind of solid: no one is immune to propaganda, Bob, stop being judge jury and executioner of half the population of the united states. His mistake is showing Bob evidence of his doublethink because Bob, as it has been said many times here, does not have any real ideology. It's either party soundbites, the approved dogma or whatever can make Bob look good.
That's how you square the circle. "Bob, you were a randyan libertarian and then became a staunch liberal/democrat. Why do you think you deserve any sympathy but no one else does?"
Etc, you get the point. Bob is fat and no one will have sex with him.
I remember fondly when he was preaching about BLM during the summer of Floyd until some black guy jumped into his timeline and was like, "Shut up cracka, you owe us reparashions!". Bob folded like the bitch he is.
Yeah I feel bad for Kendolyn as well; the person definitely means well but Bob can't even see it - anyone who QuestionS Bob has Ulterior Right Wing CHUD motives, after all! [/sarcasm]. This is bob's Narcissistic Autism at play. Narcissists HATE to be contradicted or asked uncomfortable questions about why they think/feel/believe what they do. His autistic portion prevents him from understanding in whole or in part the entire point of what the guy was saying. Hell, Bob was even treating that one bootlicker who tagged in
badly for no good reason.
Bob's exceptional argument was "
Even when I was Randian I wasn't a BIGOT, Friendo!", which doesn't track because libertarians get thrown in the "bigot" pot too.
Bob, there's a difference between someone voting for a controverial presidential canditate and a serial killer murdering innocent people for the fun of it.
Bob thinks by voting for Controversial Presidential Candidate, you're voting FOR a serial killer to murder innocent people. In those non-existent concentration camps for Troons and bundles of sticks,
gang members illegal immigrants, etc.
I've made this point a few times, but it's worth reiterating as the thread ages and newcomers arrive every now and then.
Personally, the Rosetta Stone for Bob's intellectual dishonesty, the moment I realized how utterly bereft of critical analysis he is and how willing he is to twist himself into a pretzel making a shitheaded point, was that video where he addresses a question a lot of people asked him when he was stanning for Anita Sarkeesian: what, exactly, is the difference between Anita and Jack Thompson, whom Bob rightly loathed, when the end result of either of them getting their way would be the mass censorship of video games?
Bob's answer was essentially Anita had good motives and Thompson didn't. That's bad enough, and revealing of the kind of thinking that fails to recognize submitting one's work to a sensitivity reader is in the same ballpark as submitting one's work to a member of the clergy, but Bob -- as he does so often -- took it a step further into the land of lunacy. He didn't just handwave both activists' desire for censorship as one being good and the other being bad; he did this obnoxious pantomime of slowly cocking his head to the side as he glowered into the camera, acting as though even to ask the question was the stupidest thing he ever heard.
This kind of thing is why I've come to roll my eyes whenever the idea is raised of Bob debating someone. It's not just that he would balk at participating in a format he can't edit to his advantage -- he totally lacks the skills and perception necessary to engage in such a thing. He's a gross hypocrite from the crown of his misshapen head to the soles of his diabetically endangered feet.
Bob's cognitive dissonance is amazing to behold. Bob can't debate, let alone with any honesty, intellectual or otherwise. He moves goalposts
constantly, as his Senpais on the Far Left do. He thinks the world can Minecraft its way into the Holy Soopeeryah Fyootchah.
It's been a long while since we had an update on what Bob is like in person, but what info we did have suggested he was more rude and aggressive than the cringing coward his internet tough guy act would suggest. Personally, I'd bet that it depends on how sauced he is at any given moment.
Bob is 100% half-buzzed at the least rn.
