Disaster Boeing "Overwrote" Camera Footage Of Work On MAX Jet Door That Blew Out, Can Not Identify Employee Who Worked On It - First whistleblower getting suicided with two shots in the back of the head now this

Just when you thought it couldn't get any more bizarre or surreal, the Boeing story did just that.

As previously reported, the aerospace giant has been under regulatory scrutiny following a string of safety-related incidents since the beginning of the year (really, since 2019 when two of its 737 MAXes fell out of the sky like overpriced deadly paperweight, but let's just skip to the latest snafu), starting with a door blowing off a flight and continuing with multiple other incidents, including a cracked cockpit window, bolts missing on a wing, various wheels falling off during takeoff in at least two incidents and several engine fires/failures.

And as the pressure ratchets up on Boeing, it's becoming increasingly obvious that management is running the same type of interference it did during the infamous MCAS scandal and ensuing cover-up attempt which cost former CEO Muilenburg his job. Sure enough, on Wednesday we learned that Boeing - in a pure coincidence that Jeffrey Epstein would approve of - "overwrote", i.e. deleted, security camera footage showing work being done on a door that blew out on the Alaska Airlines MAX jet in January

It's not just the footage however: NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said it is unclear "who performed the work to open, reinstall, and close the door plug on the accident aircraft," as Boeing is "unable to find the records documenting this work." In Homendy's letter, she writes that despite requests to Boeing and interviews at the Renton, Washington factory where the panel was removed, the identity of the crew member that worked on the panel remains unknown and has would be unable to "provide a statement or interview to NTSB due to medical issues."

It gets crazier: in her letter, NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy said she directly appealed to Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun for information on who worked on the faulty door plug, expressing frustration over Boeing's claim of missing records and security footage. Even then, Boeing merely stonewalled and said it was "unable to provide that information and maintained that Boeing has no records of the work being performed."

Finally, the epic culmination - at least so far - of the shitstorm that has engulfed Boeing, we noted yesterday that a key whistleblower, a former quality control manager at the company who raised concerns about the firm's production standards, was found dead from an apparent suicide.

John Barnett, a former veteran Boeing employee of 32 years, passed away from a self-inflicted wound on March 9, the BBC reported on Monday evening. Barnett was involved in a whistleblower lawsuit against Boeing, alleging serious safety concerns at the North Charleston plant, where he managed quality for the 787 Dreamliner production. Boeing was in Charleston for legal interviews related to the lawsuit when he was found dead.

He claimed the push for speed compromised safety, with sub-standard parts being used and a significant failure rate in emergency oxygen systems. Despite raising these issues, he felt his concerns were disregarded, leading to legal action against Boeing, alleging career damage due to his whistleblowing

Meanwhile, what would a catastrophe in a company near and dear to the government - and of course, the deep state - be without questionable trading surrounding the incident in Congress? In filings reported on Wednesday, it was revealed that Congressman William R. Keating sold somewhere between $1,001 and $15,000 worth of Boeing shares on February 28

He's the latest Congress critter to have "excellent timing" when it comes to stock trades: while it isn't Fed Governor Raphael Bostic selling massive S&P futures lots ahead of Fed minutes dropping, the sale took place the day before it was announced that the DOJ was investigating Boeing. Recall, on February 29, Bloomberg wrote that the DOJ was "looking into" the Boeing door plug blowout that took place earlier that month. Since his sale, Boeing's stock value has tumbled by about 11%.

In any case, between Barnett who "suicided" himself, and now the video footage which also also apparently was "accidentally" snuffed out, we wonder just who is next on the Epstein escalator of "not suiciding themselves" at Boeing

He's the latest Congress critter to have "excellent timing" when it comes to stock trades: while it isn't Fed Governor Raphael Bostic selling massive S&P futures lots ahead of Fed minutes dropping, the sale took place the day before it was announced that the DOJ was investigating Boeing. Recall, on February 29, Bloomberg wrote that the DOJ was "looking into" the Boeing door plug blowout that took place earlier that month. Since his sale, Boeing's stock value has tumbled by about 11%.

In any case, between Barnett who "suicided" himself, and now the video footage which also also apparently was "accidentally" snuffed out, we wonder just who is next on the Epstein escalator of "not suiciding themselves" at Boeing


 
Serious question guys are you planning to go on an airplane trip the next year or you cancel everything and go on car trips only?
I think there are some trip planners you can use that don't involve planes. I'll be looking into that.

Next commercial flight Im going on better be an Airbus or Embraer. Im not flying Boeing. Idk what is going on but its not good.
If it's Boeing, we're not going.
 
Friendly reminder that the underhanded tactics of Boeing forced Bombardier to sell their commercial aviation division to Airbus which is why their next gen CSeries planes are now known as the Airbus 220. Boeing has been an evil company for years.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Serious question guys are you planning to go on an airplane trip the next year or you cancel everything and go on car trips only?
I've been flying multiple times a year for most of my life.

Not stopping

The fact that there is obviously some Serious Shit going down in Boeing's internal workings, yet the planes are not grounded, makes me feel that the US indeed is a shell country masking the fact that it's 3 corporations in a trenchcoat. Theres been hella corruption in govt for years but I felt like there was at least some part of government that wasnt bought out yet. Maybe not anymore. This whole thing is incredibly disturbing.
Jesus Christ calm down.

The door issue was traced to a retarded subcontractor. The issue is easily fixable after an inspection.

The MAX issues were training and software related, note that a MAX didn't go down in the West.... Just in shitty 3rd world airlines

The FAA has been like this for years. Same in the EU vis a via Airbus
 
Friendly reminder that the underhanded tactics of Boeing forced Bombardier to sell their commercial aviation division to Airbus which is why their next gen CSeries planes are now known as the Airbus 220. Boeing has been an evil company for years.
Fuck the Canuks and fuck their trumped up little corporate jet maker that has to cry to Ottawa when they got BTFO by Learjet, Cessna, Embraer, Dassault, and others.
 
The door issue was traced to a retarded subcontractor. The issue is easily fixable after an inspection.
Subcontractors have become 'retarded' because Boeing has been shitting on them for years by demanding lower prices and helping them less with R&D.
The MAX issues were training and software related, note that a MAX didn't go down in the West.... Just in shitty 3rd world airlines
1. The training issues were caused because Boeing intentionally hid MCAS in order to avoid training previous 737 pilots thus making the MAX less attractive to airlines.

2. The fundamental issue was Boeing's refusal to produce a new airframe and instead jam larger engines to create the 737 MAX altering its flight characteristics.

3. The reason why the two 737 MAX accidents caused such a bad impression was because they were shown to be caused by MCAS. Had they been the consequence of shit pilots or shit maintenance, nobody would have batted an eye.
The FAA has been like this for years. Same in the EU vis a via Airbus
What would the Airbus analogue be of the 737 MAX?
 
Companies involved with air travel attempting to hide evidence isn't new. South African airlines decades ago smuggled weapons on-board commercial jets and after it caused a fire they hid the evidence of that as well.
 
makes me feel that the US indeed is a shell country masking the fact that it's 3 corporations in a trenchcoat.
the person the admin put in charge of transportation is a homo and the FAA admin under him is a jew and swap creature.

I would say incompetency and it will take a death for grounding to happen
 
This was absolutely caused by a diversity hire.
I don't believe for a second they don't know exactly who installed the door. They absolutely know, or did know.

One has to wonder what is so bad that Boeing decided "losing" footage, logs, and thus facing the ire of the FTC/NTSB was the best option they had.

I have the option to fly on Airbuses and other non-Boeing planes which given recent revelations seems like the correct choice.
Better to lose evidence than prove to the world how deadly DIE can be.
 
lol!
boeing records.png
 
One has to wonder what is so bad that Boeing decided "losing" footage, logs, and thus facing the ire of the FTC/NTSB was the best option they had.
Sounds like they just don't want the employee, any employee, to go before the investigation and spill the beans on what is going on on the factory floor at boeing.
This is not to protect the worker, it is to stop the worker from going in there and say "the whistleblower was right all along, but it is even worse. Let me tell you what shit regularly happens ..."
 
Subcontractors have become 'retarded' because Boeing has been shitting on them for years by demanding lower prices and helping them less with R&D.

1. The training issues were caused because Boeing intentionally hid MCAS in order to avoid training previous 737 pilots thus making the MAX less attractive to airlines.

2. The fundamental issue was Boeing's refusal to produce a new airframe and instead jam larger engines to create the 737 MAX altering its flight characteristics.

3. The reason why the two 737 MAX accidents caused such a bad impression was because they were shown to be caused by MCAS. Had they been the consequence of shit pilots or shit maintenance, nobody would have batted an eye.

What would the Airbus analogue be of the 737 MAX?
Airbus A330

"Only" killed ~230 people so I guess it's a ok
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: N Space
Serious question guys are you planning to go on an airplane trip the next year or you cancel everything and go on car trips only?
I’m spending months in Korea later this year, and when I bought my tickets, you bess believe I filtered out any/all Boeing options, as well as United and Alaska airlines. I’m not fucking with any of that shit
 
Sure enough, on Wednesday we learned that Boeing - in a pure coincidence that Jeffrey Epstein would approve of - "overwrote", i.e. deleted, security camera footage showing work being done on a door that blew out on the Alaska Airlines MAX jet in January
Man, for once a corporation looks out for one of their own? Color me genuinely shocked. Must have been the CEO showing the floor men a thing or two.
The fact that there is obviously some Serious Shit going down in Boeing's internal workings, yet the planes are not grounded, makes me feel that the US indeed is a shell country masking the fact that it's 3 corporations in a trenchcoat. Theres been hella corruption in govt for years but I felt like there was at least some part of government that wasnt bought out yet. Maybe not anymore. This whole thing is incredibly disturbing.
I've been under the assumption that the entire government works for corporate interests since United Fruit Corporation and friends managed to get the USMC to topple several South American governments (over the course of 40 years) for bananas.
1710516484308.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: ATI Escapee
I've been under the assumption that the entire government works for corporate interests since United Fruit Corporation and friends managed to get the USMC to topple several South American governments (over the course of 40 years) for bananas.
View attachment 5817976

If there's any tangible difference between now and then it would've been the entire Western Hemisphere (minus the European colonies) was under the purview of the United States via the Monroe Doctrine. So the U.S. govt, military and corporations injunction with aforementioned could largely do whatever the fuck it wanted to any Central and South American country it wanted as long it advances United States interests. However if any American individual and corporation decided to go off the reservation to start shit without the approval of U.S. govt, they will have been cut loose and let the local populations deal with with them however they deem fit.
 
Back