Boeing Troubles - One of the world's largest aerospace manufacturers keeps having problems with their planes.

The 737 should have been replaced after the NG variant but retarded GREEN airline initiatives and Boeing shortsightedness stopped that.

Not to defend Boeing, but it should be noted that they sold an option to have multiple sensors in the standard setup for MCAS; the planes that went down did NOT have that option.

Also to note is that even though the jet did not require retraining you were still supposed to learn the failure modes of MCAS and how to resolve it. But they should have made it niggerproof, because any system that is not niggerproof will eventually fail catastrophically.
You bring up a good point about airline initiatives and airlines being lazy about wanting to retrain crew to a new airframe. I think airlines are just as much to blame for Boeing's greenlighting the 737 max program. Southwest and Ryanair who fly exclusively 737 probably had major influence to make Boeing build the max so that they wouldn't have to spend time and money to retrain their existing flight crew. I'm sure American also had decent sway since they also have a big 737 fleet, but are now more diversified thanks to the US Airways merger.

Back in the days during the golden age of aviation, Panam worked with Boeing to make amazing developments like the 747 and a modern ATC system that we still use today. Gone is that kind of innovation and forward thinking in companies. Instead forward thinking now is meeting diversity quotas.
 
@Breadbassket After Jeffrey Epstein "killed himself", a considerable amount of normies I knew completely believed the narrative and would even get visibly annoyed when anyone suggested otherwise. But with the Boeing whistleblower story, no one is buying the suicide angle – not even Redditards.

1709316526119252.jpg
 
You bring up a good point about airline initiatives and airlines being lazy about wanting to retrain crew to a new airframe. I think airlines are just as much to blame for Boeing's greenlighting the 737 max program. Southwest and Ryanair who fly exclusively 737 probably had major influence to make Boeing build the max so that they wouldn't have to spend time and money to retrain their existing flight crew. I'm sure American also had decent sway since they also have a big 737 fleet, but are now more diversified thanks to the US Airways merger.

Back in the days during the golden age of aviation, Panam worked with Boeing to make amazing developments like the 747 and a modern ATC system that we still use today. Gone is that kind of innovation and forward thinking in companies. Instead forward thinking now is meeting diversity quotas.
Boing was pitching a 737 replacement about a decade ago. Then airbus started offering a tweaked a320 with nearly the same fuel burn and got a ton of orders. Boeing management shit itself and forced a crash program to improve the 737 enough to match the neo while halting the replacement program.
 
You now realize that DSP will survive Boeing.
Much like with DSP, the US Government will step in to save the day. The question is who they decide to crucify. Will they actually do the needful and string the C suite up by their ankles? Or will the hammer fall on mid level supervisors and factory foremen? We all know what needs to be done. But we also know what will be done anyway. The idea that the US Government would hold any member of its ruling class accountable for anything is laughable.
 
Panel falls off a Boeing 737
I showed this article to a friend who works in aircraft maintenance. According to him, this is not uncommon and panels come off and sometimes have to be taped down.
IMO, it's worrisome, but not nearly as bad as a door blowing off. The aircraft skin doesn't hold pressure, the fuselage does. The whole door incident has got everyone razor focused on planes right now, so even a minor mishap will be on headlines.
 
You bring up a good point about airline initiatives and airlines being lazy about wanting to retrain crew to a new airframe. I think airlines are just as much to blame for Boeing's greenlighting the 737 max program. Southwest and Ryanair who fly exclusively 737 probably had major influence to make Boeing build the max so that they wouldn't have to spend time and money to retrain their existing flight crew. I'm sure American also had decent sway since they also have a big 737 fleet, but are now more diversified thanks to the US Airways merger.

Back in the days during the golden age of aviation, Panam worked with Boeing to make amazing developments like the 747 and a modern ATC system that we still use today. Gone is that kind of innovation and forward thinking in companies. Instead forward thinking now is meeting diversity quotas.
DEI quotas and the Almighty SHAREHOLDER VALUE metrics

God forbid the stock price grows at 1% instead of the estimated 1.3%
 
Boing was pitching a 737 replacement about a decade ago. Then airbus started offering a tweaked a320 with nearly the same fuel burn and got a ton of orders. Boeing management shit itself and forced a crash program to improve the 737 enough to match the neo while halting the replacement program.
Their biggest mistakes was installing MCAS with known-to-fail AOA and not allowing training since that meant giving money back.
 
I really hate making that argument, even though its correct. Its always 'wow I cant believe you are blaming them for your problems how could it be their fault they are a minority' and its the worst feeling ever to hear that. The dumb a-holes stabbing you in the back on this are far worse than the niggers themselves.

Niggers are by far the most lazy and incompetent niggers at my place of work by far and for the most part they get paid more than me. This is literally all civil rights act equity crap. If you think entrusting them with any important task wont have consequences just because there are non niggers still on the team, you deserve to have your planes fall apart and your missiles fail to launch.
 
Basically. The MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System) system relies on two Angle-of-Attack sensors
It relied on one. Two was an optional upgrade.
MCAS was installed in the 737 MAX lineup after Boeing moved the engines forward to change the aerodynamics of the plane for better fuel efficiency
No. Boeing installed different engines which were more fuel efficient, and they were so much larger than the previous engines for that airframe that they had to move them upwards, to not scrape along the floor. Unfortunately, there's a wing in the way of moving engines upwards, so they had to also be moved forwards.

As you said, this changed the aerodynamics of the plane.
they should have made it niggerproof
That's just challenging the universe to make a bigger nigger.
 
Unfortunately, there's a wing in the way of moving engines upwards, so they had to also be moved forwards.
The faggots at boing missed the chance of having a wing with engines on top for mad style points
That's just challenging the universe to make a bigger nigger.
The key is it takes time, if your thing has been on the market for 10 years before it fucks up, everyone will blame the niggers. If it's been on the market ten days, they'll blame you.
 
The faggots at boing missed the chance of having a wing with engines on top for mad style points
No they didn't.
1710925640395.png
The key is it takes time, if your thing has been on the market for 10 years before it fucks up, everyone will blame the niggers. If it's been on the market ten days, they'll blame you.
Oh definitely, I just wanted to say something very funny to lighten up my plane autism post.
 
Back