Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

[The Telomerase Truth]

I'm not sure which is sadder and stupider; whether you legitimately have no clue what a loanword is, or you do know what a loanword is and you're willing to make yourself look like a complete moron to avoid having to admit it.

The latter is sadder.

This is perhaps more factual information than you have ever been exposed to at once, so I'll stop here to not fry what remains of your brain even further.

We might have to call @LocalFireDept , just in case there's a fire.

Also, stop giving the mods so much work and learn to put your incoherent ramblings in one post.

This. I really wish he would stop this as well. Even if Brad's posts weren't dumb, people still wouldn't want to listen to his rambling due to his disorganization.

P.S. @Brad Watson_Miami , stop changing the colors in your post already. It's time to fucking stop, Brad.

Updated version of Seth Lloyd's work.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.4455.pdf
No mention of "bit bangs" or white holes anywhere in it.

Was there ever any real doubt you wouldn't find it? This is Brad we're talking about. We all know he's a batshit insane liar.

 

[LoverofPi]

The latter is sadder.

We might have to call @LocalFireDept , just in case there's a fire.

This. I really wish he would stop this as well. Even if Brad's posts weren't dumb, people still wouldn't want to listen to his rambling due to his disorganization.

P.S. @Brad Watson_Miami , stop changing the colors in your post already. It's time to fucking stop, Brad.
Was there ever any real doubt you wouldn't find it? This is Brad we're talking about. We all know he's a batshit insane liar.

You might even say he's a compulsive/ pathological one.

 

[LocalFireDept]

"Sextillion"? Is that a porn industry term? I AM unfamiliar with it.

For someone so obsessed with numbers you are incredibly ignorant to them. Sextillion would be represented as 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^21. The etemology of sextillion comes from the Latin root sext- and sex meaning six. Sextillion was originally six millions, or six times six trailing zeroes: 10^36.

Ignorance is not an excuse.

 

[Adolf Von Merkel]

"Sextillion"? Is that a porn industry term? I AM unfamiliar with it.

For someone so obsessed with numbers you are incredibly ignorant to them. Sextillion would be represented as 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^21. The etemology of sextillion comes from the Latin root sext- and sex meaning six. Sextillion was originally six millions, or six times six trailing zeroes: 10^36.
Ignorance is not an excuse.

I'm starting to suspect that you aren't the reincarnation of Einstein , @Brad Watson_Miami .
He would have known about sextillion.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Updated version of Seth Lloyd's work.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.4455.pdf
No mention of "bit bangs" or white holes anywhere in it.

Ya, I've read that paper. You do such a poor job of paying attention, which is why you get almost everything wrong. I bet you heard that from your teachers alot, huh?

I didn't refer to Seth Lloyd's 2013 paper, I clearly referred to his 2006 book Programming the Universe which I acquired while in Houston (attending a Lunar and Planetary Institute conference) when it first came out. I've read it a couple of times (it gets technical). If you haven't read it, then just admit it. You're constantly trying to portray yourself as a know-it-all and when you don't, you 'attack the messenger' (very devilish). In this book, he refers to the "bit bang" more than once.

I never said that Seth Lloyd referred to white holes - he didn't. His specialty is quantum computers, not cosmology/ astrophysics.

You never cleared up the question of whether you were married to any of the 4 different mothers of your 4 children? You maniacally dismiss Planet Nestor being created with the mathematical* model of FOD=6_4, yet haven't commented on the synchronism of your oldest child being 6 & you having 4 children. That's a BIG 'coincidence', huh?


*Synchronism: 15:36 "Teaching mathematics to mankind." - Ancient Aliens, The Satan Conspiracy (S6/Ep5, 2013) on History Channel

 

[[V A P O R W A V E]]

I didn't refer to Seth Lloyd's 2013 paper, I clearly referred to his 2006 book Programming the Universe which I acquired while in Houston (attending a Lunar and Planetary Institute conference) when it first came out. I've read it a couple of times (it gets technical).

"It gets technical" in Brad's schizophrenic mind mean "I didnt understand anything."

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@Adolf Von Merkel,

Maybe I've heard of sextillion - I was trying to make a joke. I don't use the number 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^21 much, but the next time I do, I will remember SEXTILLION!

@[W A P O R V A V E],

I AM betting you haven't read Programming the Universe, but thought you'd attack me for reading it. What an asshole.

What was the last book you read? (Comic books don't count.)

 

[The Telomerase Truth]

You never cleared up the question of whether you were married to any of the 4 different mothers of your 4 children? You maniacally dismiss Planet Nestor being created with the mathematical* model of FOD=6_4, yet haven't commented on the synchronism of your oldest child being 6 & having 4 children. That's a BIG 'coincidence', huh?

Yes, it is a coincidence, you lunatic. You know, they say that doing something over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.

Tell me, Brad, why are you here? No one here believes you. You've been trying to explain your autistic beliefs for years and it hasn't worked. Yet, you keep wasting your life by coming back here and expecting someone here to believe you. But no one ever does believe you.

Are you not the definition of an insane person, Brad?

@Adolf Von Merkel,

Maybe I've heard of sextillion - I was trying to make a joke.

No, you haven't. You're far too illiterate. Even if you have heard of it before, it was probably before you became the sad, mentally ill man you are today. Your brain has degenerated a lot since then.

@[W A P O R V A V E],
What was the last book you read? (Comic books don't count.)

It's not about what you read, it's how you apply what you read to your life and what you learn from what you read, Brad.

You don't really learn much, Brad. Learning requires remembering something and you're always forgetting things that happen. You're not in a very good position to judge anyone else's literacy, Brad.

 

[Adolf Von Merkel]

@Adolf Von Merkel,

Maybe I've heard of sextillion - I was trying to make a joke. I don't use the number 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^21 much, but the next time I do, I will remember SEXTILLION!

Einstein would never joke about that.

 

[The Telomerase Truth]

Einstein would never joke about that.

That is one of the many reasons he's not the reincarnation of Einstein.

The main one being that he's fucking dumb.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

@The Telomerase Truth I believe the only reason why Richard is here is because no one replies to him on the forums he goes on to elsewhere anymore and his girlfriend wont introduce him to any of her friends. He's a lonely old man suffering from mental illness...And I doubt anything is on television for him to watch since that's how he spends his life.

I can confirm that Richard doesn't understand what was in that book since it talks about bits, as in the smallest amount of information as in in computers since the book talks about how the universe is a quantum computer, it's in a similar idea as people who think the universe is just a simulation. In other words few people believe it.


Also Richard, prove me wrong. I've spent months proving that I understand physics, mathematics, biology, and literature. You have spent years proving that your IQ is the same as your shoe size.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

Seth Lloyd at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.4455.pdf

9 Conclusions
This article reviewed the history of computation with the goal of answering the question, ‘Is the universe a computer?’ The inability of classical digital computers to reproduce quantum effects efficiently makes it implausible that the universe is a classical digital system such as a cellular automaton. However, all observed phenomena are consistent with the model in which the universe is a quantum computer, e.g., a quantum cellular automaton. The quantum computational model of the universe explains previously unexplained features, most importantly, the co-existence in the universe of randomness and order, and of simplicity and complexity.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

As pointed out in 2016 by voiceguy, Richard here has confirmatory bias when it comes to pretty much every thing. voiceguy pointed out the Ken Warton papers, such as this one https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7081 and Richard here fails to understand or even know about the multitude of research that has been done on the subject of "is the universe a computer?", such as this one https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/physicists-find-we-re-not-living-in-a-computer-simulation where they found out that you would need more memory than there are atoms in the universe.
Older articles, nice explanation you can listen to near the end.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/digital-reality-check-you-are-not-computer-simulation/

The whole "are we living in a computer" thing is more of a philosophy debate, not a scientific debate. (The whole idea after all started with Nick Bostrom, a philosopher)

Another fun read if anyone is interested
https://www.fastcompany.com/40537955/we-are-not-living-in-a-simulation-probably it gives two sides of the debate, leaning towards that no, the universe is not a computer.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

NEWS ALERT!​

I don't know what the number 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^20 is called! I could google it.

 

[The Telomerase Truth]

@The Telomerase Truth I believe the only reason why Richard is here is because no one replies to him on the forums he goes on to elsewhere anymore and his girlfriend wont introduce him to any of her friends. He's a lonely old man suffering from mental illness...And I doubt anything is on television for him to watch since that's how he spends his life.

I can confirm that Richard doesn't understand what was in that book since it talks about bits, as in the smallest amount of information as in in computers since the book talks about how the universe is a quantum computer, it's in a similar idea as people who think the universe is just a simulation. In other words few people believe it.


Also Richard, prove me wrong. I've spent months proving that I understand physics, mathematics, biology, and literature. You have spent years proving that your IQ is the same as your shoe size.

You're probably right, unless Brad is mentally ill enough to think he's accomplishing something here. As someone who is absolutely nothing like Brad, I have trouble imagining sharing my beliefs on a forum where almost everyone makes fun of me/gets angry at me and never believes what I say regardless my situation.

Then again, I am a sane person, so...

As pointed out in 2016 by voiceguy, Richard here has confirmatory bias when it comes to pretty much every thing. voiceguy pointed out the Ken Warton papers, such as this one https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7081 and Richard here fails to understand or even know about the multitude of research that has been done on the subject of "is the universe a computer?", such as this one https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/physicists-find-we-re-not-living-in-a-computer-simulation where they found out that you would need more memory than there are atoms in the universe.
Older articles, nice explanation you can listen to near the end.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/digital-reality-check-you-are-not-computer-simulation/

The whole "are we living in a computer" thing is more of a philosophy debate, not a scientific debate. (The whole idea after all started with Nick Bostrom, a philosopher)

Another fun read if anyone is interested
https://www.fastcompany.com/40537955/we-are-not-living-in-a-simulation-probably it gives two sides of the debate, leaning towards that no, the universe is not a computer.

Thank you for this post. It was very educational.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

NEWS ALERT!​

I don't know what the number 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^20 is called! I could google it.

Generally, you don't do well googling things. It's because you don't seem to be able to separate good data from bad, which is necessary if you're going to be online.

You really would benefit from a return to formal education. I realize you didn't do so well the last time around, but assistance programs have come a long way since then.

 

[Brad Watson_Miami]

@Anonymus Fluffer,

You're an atheist, antichrist, an awful Buddhist, and you've been caught lying several times here. You believe in randomness and coincidence. Your confirmation bias is not going to recognize that the Universe is an omniscient quantum computer - that sounds way too much like GOD. Find me a quantum computer scientist who says that the Universe does not behave as a quantum computer - google that.

As a Buddhist, you should believe in reincarnation - do you?

And your repeated non-answers mean that you weren't married to any of the 4 different mothers of your 4 illegitimate children.

 

[ChurchOfGodBear]

@Anonymus Fluffer,

You're an atheist, antichrist, an awful Buddhist, and you've been caught lying several times here. You believe in randomness and coincidence. Your confirmation bias is not going to recognize that the Universe is an omniscient quantum computer - that sounds way too much like GOD. Find me a quantum computer scientist who says that the Universe does not behave as a quantum computer - google that.

As a Buddhist, you should believe in reincarnation - do you?

And your repeated non-answers mean that you weren't married to any of the 4 different mothers of your 4 illegitimate children.

You have no proof that he's an atheist. In fact, several of the facts you reference prove he is not.

This is why pasting the same gibberish over and over makes you look stupid.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Richard, you've been with the same woman for 12 years and you never bothered to marry her so what's your issue with marriage? Is it because your father couldn't stick with one woman once he was married? I don't know if you know this but that's not my fault, that's your daddies issue.

Also, in my country we got rid of the whole "illegitimate children" thing. According to the law they are my children so you can kindly fuck off with that bull shit Richard. Also here common law is very similar to marriage so one need not marry and waste more money hence why it's called common law marriage. I know you have no damn clue about this but not every country follows American laws, only the United States does. You have issues with marriage, maybe you should ask your girlfriend to marry you, you're in your twilight years so you don't have much time left.

I guess proving you wrong again today upset you, maybe go and watch some more television or get a subscription to Netflix and suck it up. You're not an intelligent man. Hell you're not even a man, you a child who throws a tantrum online when he's told he's wrong and a fool.

Your best attempt to try and hurt me is by attacking my children. You claim to be Jesus but you're no better than Herod.

You have no proof that he's an atheist. In fact, several of the facts you reference prove he is not.

This is why pasting the same gibberish over and over makes you look stupid.

I think he's upset because I can easily dismantle everything he says and the fact I have a family. He could change such things but he chooses not to.

I should point out that Siddhārtha Gautama is seen as an Avatar of Vishnu by some. (the Ninth Avatar to be precise). However that is Hinduists that believe this, not Buddhists.

 

[Adolf Von Merkel]

NEWS ALERT!​

I don't know what the number 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 or 10^20 is called! I could google it.

Why didn't you google it, then.