Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
@The Telomerase Truth I'd have to agree with the marriage thing. 12 years with someone and not being married to them is pretty sad, but he is a man who thinks taking care of your kids is a sin.
I'd say they're taking it as slow as possible, but that would imply their relationship was actually going somewhere.
All his name calling is terrible. Like his changes to my name all reveal his pee and poop fixation, or they're about me liking cute things, like pigs.



I too, await another year of our puddle being a low intelligence senior citizen jealous of everyone around him, impotent to do anything about it. Sexually impotent as well.
And now they reveal his Teletubbies fixation.

What a great thread this is.
 
Your premise is wrong.
My premise is sound. Time is a measured interval, years can be subdivided into months, which can be subdivided into weeks, further subdivided into days, and subdivided yet again to hours, minutes, and seconds. So those all start measuring at 0, like every other interval. Your premise is the one that is flawed.

That's quite false. You're trying to turn the #4 into #3 and every number = -1 of its value which is the stupidest argument I've yet encountered here! You're also implying that FOD=6_4 is a measurement of time - it's not.
That is a logical leap, Bran Whatsit_Yammy, that you have made because I've pointing out a glaring error in your deeply flawed theory. Intervals begin counting at 0. Of course, it is reasonable to argue that letters surely cannot be intervals; however, any numerological significance of letters should begin at 0, not 1, because 0 is the least number. Excluding a numeral from the theory is a sign that it is flawed. The theory is instead 6_3=FOC to account for your egregious off-by-one error.
 
My premise is sound. Time is a measured interval, years can be subdivided into months, which can be subdivided into weeks, further subdivided into days, and subdivided yet again to hours, minutes, and seconds. So those all start measuring at 0, like every other interval. Your premise is the one that is flawed.


That is a logical leap, Bran Whatsit_Yammy, that you have made because I've pointing out a glaring error in your deeply flawed theory. Intervals begin counting at 0. Of course, it is reasonable to argue that letters surely cannot be intervals; however, any numerological significance of letters should begin at 0, not 1, because 0 is the least number. Excluding a numeral from the theory is a sign that it is flawed. The theory is instead 6_3=FOC to account for your egregious off-by-one error.

In a related thought, O shouldn't be 0 because it comes in the middle of the alphabet, and 0 is the starting point. Another simple failure of Brad's 6_3= F_C theory.

Though seeing it put like that, it reminds me Brad likes to yell "FUC you" at people. I think we've found our connection. The true theory is that 6213=FUC.

There are no coincidences, huh Brad?
 
In a related thought, O shouldn't be 0 because it comes in the middle of the alphabet, and 0 is the starting point. Another simple failure of Brad's 6_3= F_C theory.

Though seeing it put like that, it reminds me Brad likes to yell "FUC you" at people. I think we've found our connection. The true theory is that 6213=FUC.

There are no coincidences, huh Brad?
B1 R17 A0 D3=21 what could it mean?
 
There are 774,746 words in the King James Version of the Bible (google that).
And? Are you saying the King James Version of the Bible is the version that God approves of or something else retarded?

Also, you're wrong about how many words there are, as proven by @Anonymus Fluhre . Even if he wasn't right, you're still actively picking out whatever satisfies your number fetish. There are plenty of versions of the Bible that don't have 74 or 7 and 4.

The New American Standard Bible, for example, has 782,815 words.

https://wordcounter.io/blog/how-many-words-are-in-the-bible/

There's nothing fucking special about the King James Version of the Bible.
 
Actually it has 783,137 words.
https://wordcounter.net/blog/2015/12/08/10975_how-many-words-bible.html
or 788,280 words https://www.billkochman.com/Articles-Non-BBB/Bible-Breakdown.html
or more (read the consideration part)

If I wasn't busy I could just throw the Bible into Word and do a word count that way too.

And? Are you saying the King James Version of the Bible is the version that God approves of or something else exceptional?

Also, you're wrong about how many words there are, as proven by @Anonymus Fluhre . Even if he wasn't right, you're still actively picking out whatever satisfies your number fetish. There are plenty of versions of the Bible that don't have 74 or 7 and 4.

The New American Standard Bible, for example, has 782,815 words.

https://wordcounter.io/blog/how-many-words-are-in-the-bible/

There's nothing fucking special about the King James Version of the Bible.

I'm consistently getting upwards of 820000 when using word to count the KJV. The source for the 774746 number appears to be over a hundred years old and simply repeated by others.
 
In a related thought, O shouldn't be 0 because it comes in the middle of the alphabet, and 0 is the starting point. Another simple failure of Brad's 6_3= F_C theory.
Oh that? He came up with that subrule a long time ago, back when he was just a shade more functional (my guess is he went out more). He basically put it there as solution whenever his number game doesn't gabble out the results he wants. Same thing with his collection of one-time ciphers (he's used at least two) he disposes of like napkins. He also loves changing words and claiming his intentional misspellings are right too; as well as changing names and/or details to continue to delude himself that his number counting addiction allows him to use God as a big gun essentially and smite people post-mortem.

This is comparable to the old epicycle system used to try and rationalize geocentric theory, just used by a man with room temperature IQ. It's added on babble to keep something with no legs to stand on going.
 
I just posted the following on https://www.space.com/41272-mars-liquid-water-below-ice-cap.html?utm_source=notification

The ancients recognized the 'Sacred 7 Luminaires' - what we now call the '7 Classical Planets' or '7 Naked-Eye Planets': Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. 4 of these can't be easily seen during daytime/4 don't cast shadows on Earth (Venus can). Mars returns to the same point in relationship to the background stars, Sun, and Earth every 47 years.

These are just two examples of GOD=7_4 Theory - google that.
 
I just posted the following on https://www.space.com/41272-mars-liquid-water-below-ice-cap.html?utm_source=notification

The ancients recognized the 'Sacred 7 Luminaires' - what we now call the '7 Classical Planets' or '7 Naked-Eye Planets': Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. 4 of these can't be easily seen during daytime/4 don't cast shadows on Earth (Venus can). Mars returns to the same point in relationship to the background stars, Sun, and Earth every 47 years.

These are just two examples of GOD=7_4 Theory - google that.
We don't need to google that. You've been sperging about your 'theory' on this forum for years now. We're aware of your batshit insane and autistic 'theory' by now.

Everyone but you in this thread is sane. Your insane ramblings isn't convincing anyone here, Brad (well, excepting for convincing them you're autistic and insane. It's done a good job of that).
 
I just posted the following on https://www.space.com/41272-mars-liquid-water-below-ice-cap.html?utm_source=notification

The ancients recognized the 'Sacred 7 Luminaires' - what we now call the '7 Classical Planets' or '7 Naked-Eye Planets': Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. 4 of these can't be easily seen during daytime/4 don't cast shadows on Earth (Venus can). Mars returns to the same point in relationship to the background stars, Sun, and Earth every 47 years.

These are just two examples of GOD=7_4 Theory - google that.
Motherfucker still be going on about people that think the sun and moon are planets.
 
I'm consistently getting upwards of 820000 when using word to count the KJV. The source for the 774746 number appears to be over a hundred years old and simply repeated by others.
They're using what's called the Authorized version of it on those sites I believe which is the unedited 1611 version of it. Version I have I believe is around 790k.

I just posted the following on https://www.space.com/41272-mars-liquid-water-below-ice-cap.html?utm_source=notification

The ancients recognized the 'Sacred 7 Luminaires' - what we now call the '7 Classical Planets' or '7 Naked-Eye Planets': Moon, Mercury, Venus, Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. 4 of these can't be easily seen during daytime/4 don't cast shadows on Earth (Venus can). Mars returns to the same point in relationship to the background stars, Sun, and Earth every 47 years.

These are just two examples of GOD=7_4 Theory - google that.
Why do we have to Google anything you write when you just post your shit here thinking we want to read it?
 
So, Brad, it's officially your birthday. Are you planning on doing anything special or are you just going to sperg out here as usual?
Motherfucker still be going on about people that think the sun and moon are planets.
I'm pretty that's what he was talking about right after I started posting.
Motherfuck is still talking about it weeks later.
They're using what's called the Authorized version of it on those sites I believe which is the unedited 1611 version of it. Version I have I believe is around 790k.


Why do we have to Google anything you write when you just post your shit here thinking we want to read it?
Who knows? It's not like he doesn't share all his delusional beliefs with us almost every day. He'll spam them whether we want him to or not.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: BlueArmedDevil
Motherfucker still be going on about people that think the sun and moon are planets.
Dick's memory is shit, to the point that it's criminally easy to get him to repeat horseshit that he spewed out years ago on here, and then forget that he did so he does it again just as he did the last time.

So if you want, you can watch him be dishonest and cripplingly autistic about how the Spanish language works (despite not speaking a lick of it) by just mentioning that ball in it is bola or pelota, not bol... which is Spanish for bowl. I almost guarantee he'd try arguing this point because he's mentally a child with ODD and he'll dig his heels in and scream the whole way. That's just one example.

Jog his noggin about any of his dumb claims, and he'll dumpsterpost stuff from from the beginning of the thread on here, pretending he edited it by saying he "tweaked" it.
 
There's a supermassive black hole at the center of most galaxies and the SBH Big Bangs-Bit Bangs - supermassive white holes - into new universes.
Supermassive White Hole.jpg

http://BigBangBitBang.blogspot.com
 
Last edited:
Back