No, it doesn't. And like I've pointed out to you before, cosmologists predict this Universe to exist for ~20 billion more years. Hawking's theory first developed in '74 states that a blackhole will emit radiation for 10^52 years. How do cosmologists explain that?
Not necessarily.
Wrong, what's the opposite of radiation?
I AM specifically dealing with supermassive black holes (SBH) spawning supermassive white holes (SWH).
I never said it was. PAY ATTENTION. The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe.
That's called a duality: there's an obvious connect74ion between74 a supermassive black hole and the BIG Bang-Bit Bang/white hole.
Fluffbol, if you can take a break from your job of destroying things and fathering a 5th bastard to tweak Wikipedia, then PLEASE do. Otherwise, SHUT UP!
The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe. This duality combines relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this & all universes within The Conglomerate: multiverse w/out random bubble universes & parallel worlds. Our U exists inside that SBH & shares the same boundary/event horizon. That SBH-SWH phase transition was an umbilical Einstein-Rosen wormhole w/ energy transformed & info transferred. Our U is 1 in ~2 trillion offspring - each w/ similar physical constants - of its parent universe. This ‘simple’ cause-&-effect cycle explains both infinite space & eternity. Reproduction (making a copy) is an essential characteristic & the simplest plan of continued existence for everything from cells, to animals, to humans, to universes.