Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 168 13.6%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 64.9%

  • Total voters
    1,235
Brad, I have to admire the sheer depths of your deluded arrogance here.

In fact, fun story for you.

When Da Vinci was doing the painting for a monastery, a prior there was bugging him to speed up the pace while he was struggling for a good way to paint Judas Iscariot. The prior eventually shut up when Da Vinci told him to piss off or he'd make the prior the model for Judas.

If this were modern day, Da Vinci would have no better model for Judas than a craven thief who turns on what Jesus stands for. not for what they are, but for what they wanted them to be not turning out like they want their idea of Jesus to be.
I would have to agree, both did a crime for only a few dollars too.
Brad, here's an explanation of the Butterfly Effect that even you can understand. It's in cartoon form too, so you don't have to read anything!
Also, serious question: why do you call the Big Bang "the Bit Bang?"
He likes to pretend that he knows something about quantum computers (he doesn't)
 
Brad, here's an explanation of the Butterfly Effect that even you can understand. It's in cartoon form too, so you don't have to read anything!
Also, serious question: why do you call the Big Bang "the Bit Bang?"
That's from an unrevised version of some dude's book he chose to cling to for little to no reason. If I had to guess? It's because the idea that we're a matrix of some sort sounds cool to him because of that one movie with Keanu Reeves.

Basically, I just take Dick's status of couch potato and go utter casual with picks to get an idea. Usually works pretty well too.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Anonymus Fluhre
serious question: why do you call the Big Bang "the Bit Bang?"
The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe...

See http://BigBangBitBang.blogspot.com .

Black hole - White hole.jpg
 
Too bad with hawking radiation being a thing it makes it harder for a white hole to exist. You see, hawking radiation is very similar to what we would expect from a white hole. Also, it would need it's own form of Hawking Radiation that would allow matter inside. After all, a white Hole is the opposite of a black Hole.

Also, the Big Bang wasn't a supermassive black hole. Why? It didn't collapse back in on itself. The only similarities between a black hole and the Big Bang is that they both have singularities at their core.

Not that Richard would know that because even after being told this he still thinks Wikipedia is right.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Adamska
I just posted this in https://www.facebook.com/groups/116...if_id=1548302776964532&notif_t=group_activity ...

One of the ways you recognize the returned Christ is that he correctly identifies Ronald(6 letters) Wilson(6) Reagan(6) was the prophesied "666 1st Beast"/Antichrist. George Walker Bush (Jr.) is the prophesied "2nd Beast"/Antichrist. Pope Benedict XVI is the "false prophet". United(6) States(6) Dollar(6) is the "666 mark of the Beast". The "destruction of (literal) Babylon" was the Iraq War. "Mystery Babylon" is the United States. "Armageddon" is in Syria. Donald Trump = "six hundred sixty-six (666)"; he's the current Antichrist whose actions are the opposite of the Christ, e.g. he's extremely greedy and helps the rich get richer while hurting the poor.

Anyone claiming to be the returned Christ must fulfill the prophecy of Revelation 5:1 by producing the "book/scroll sealed with 7 seals"; see http://7seals.blogspot.com . I've unveiled secrets hidden since the foundation of this world. Anyone who claims to be the reincarnated Jesus son of Joseph must fulfill his critical mission of "Judging everyone according to their actions"; see my Judgments on http://7seals.yuku.com . Christ II must produce the "resurrection of the dead"; see Seal #7: Reincarnation Theory and its examples of reincarnated souls. In my eternal soul's last incarnation, I was Albert Einstein. The returned Messiah literally "taking his bride" has been fulfilled.

I just realized something. Brad claims GOD=GOOD, but if GOD=704, wouldn't GOOD=7004?
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD=G-D which is how observant Jews write GOD.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You really need to stop spamming sites Richard, it's one reason why you get banned from so many pages.

Also, sitting on your lazy ass doesn't do anything to prevent a World War nor are you any form of God.
Untitled.png
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Adamska
So, it's no longer enough to be Jesustein with silly powers, he now has to pretend that he somehow keeps our planet spinning. That's a new level of egomania even for Brad.

Stanislas Petrov prevented WWIII. The only thing Brad prevents is a medical intervention into his miserable insanity.
 
Too bad with Hawking radiation being a thing, it makes it harder for a white hole to exist.
No, it doesn't. And like I've pointed out to you before, cosmologists predict this Universe to exist for ~20 billion more years. Hawking's theory first developed in '74 states that a blackhole will emit radiation for 10^52 years. How do cosmologists explain that?
You see, Hawking radiation is very similar to what we would expect from a white hole.
Not necessarily.
Also, it would need its own form of Hawking radiation that would allow matter inside.
Wrong, what's the opposite of radiation?
After all, a white hole is the opposite of a black hole.
I AM specifically dealing with supermassive black holes (SBH) spawning supermassive white holes (SWH).
Also, the Big Bang wasn't a supermassive black hole.
I never said it was. PAY ATTENTION. The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe.
The only similarities between a black hole and the Big Bang is that they both have singularities at their core.
That's called a duality: there's an obvious connect74ion between74 a supermassive black hole and the BIG Bang-Bit Bang/white hole.
Not that Richard II would know that because even after being told this, he still thinks Wikipedia is right.
Fluffbol, if you can take a break from your job of destroying things and fathering a 5th bastard to tweak Wikipedia, then PLEASE do. Otherwise, SHUT UP!

The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe. This duality combines relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this & all universes within The Conglomerate: multiverse w/out random bubble universes & parallel worlds. Our U exists inside that SBH & shares the same boundary/event horizon. That SBH-SWH phase transition was an umbilical Einstein-Rosen wormhole w/ energy transformed & info transferred. Our U is 1 in ~2 trillion offspring - each w/ similar physical constants - of its parent universe. This ‘simple’ cause-&-effect cycle explains both infinite space & eternity. Reproduction (making a copy) is an essential characteristic & the simplest plan of continued existence for everything from cells, to animals, to humans, to universes.
 
Fluffbol, if you can take a break from your job of destroying things and fathering a 5th bastard to tweak Wikipedia, then PLEASE do. Otherwise, SHUT UP!

Brad, to quote Warren Harding:

"It doesn't work like that here. No one is obligated to "shut up"."

Further, I'm sorry you will never pass your mentally damaged genes on to another, but your anger over leaving nothing but a legacy of insanity, crime, and mediocrity in this world is no reason to insult a man's children.

Also, nice try:

The following users were removed from Brad's ignore list:
@Mr. X, @RomanesEuntDomus, @LoverofPi
 
I hate to break it to Richard here but Steve Hsu has a similar hypothesis to my own
https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.2934
This isn't the first such paper either to discuss why a white hole wont exist in our universe.

So there's one physicist and one future physicist saying that you're wrong.

You also need to stop a-logging children.

Oh and by the way, cosmology isn't astrophysics.

Brad, to quote Warren Harding:

"It doesn't work like that here. No one is obligated to "shut up"."

Further, I'm sorry you will never pass your mentally damaged genes on to another, but your anger over leaving nothing but a legacy of insanity, crime, and mediocrity in this world is no reason to insult a man's children.

Also, nice try:
Richard is just an angry twat because it's so easy to ruin his little fanfiction of his with actual science, something he never took in school, just like he never took mathematics.
 
Last edited:
No, it doesn't. And like I've pointed out to you before, cosmologists predict this Universe to exist for ~20 billion more years. Hawking's theory first developed in '74 states that a blackhole will emit radiation for 10^52 years. How do cosmologists explain that?

Not necessarily.

Wrong, what's the opposite of radiation?

I AM specifically dealing with supermassive black holes (SBH) spawning supermassive white holes (SWH).

I never said it was. PAY ATTENTION. The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe.

That's called a duality: there's an obvious connect74ion between74 a supermassive black hole and the BIG Bang-Bit Bang/white hole.

Fluffbol, if you can take a break from your job of destroying things and fathering a 5th bastard to tweak Wikipedia, then PLEASE do. Otherwise, SHUT UP!

The BIG Bang-Bit Bang: a supermassive white hole expansion of energy74 & information 13.8 billion years ago that was spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our parent universe. This duality combines relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this & all universes within The Conglomerate: multiverse w/out random bubble universes & parallel worlds. Our U exists inside that SBH & shares the same boundary/event horizon. That SBH-SWH phase transition was an umbilical Einstein-Rosen wormhole w/ energy transformed & info transferred. Our U is 1 in ~2 trillion offspring - each w/ similar physical constants - of its parent universe. This ‘simple’ cause-&-effect cycle explains both infinite space & eternity. Reproduction (making a copy) is an essential characteristic & the simplest plan of continued existence for everything from cells, to animals, to humans, to universes.
Sorry, all I am getting is that Fluhre really manages to get under your skin by being far more knowledgable about science than you and you need to reassert your imaginary role as some sort of great thinker by going full grammar nazi like a school kid.
Also, it's blatantly obvious that you are still mad that Wikipedia told you to fuck off and took away your rights to write your drivel on their webspace. Did you curse the administrators of Wikipedia? Has it done any good?

You're almost 60 years old and you behave like a tantruming 6 year old, grow the fuck up.
 
Sorry, all I am getting is that Fluhre really manages to get under your skin by being far more knowledgable about science than you and you need to reassert your imaginary role as some sort of great thinker by going full grammar nazi like a school kid.
Also, it's blatantly obvious that you are still mad that Wikipedia told you to fuck off and took away your rights to write your drivel on their webspace. Did you curse the administrators of Wikipedia? Has it done any good?

You're almost 60 years old and you behave like a tantruming 6 year old, grow the fuck up.
It's all this little man can do, throw tantrums and fling curses like it means anything. He acts worse than any of my children have ever had and when you're worse than a child it's time to re-evaluate your life, at least what few years he has left.

By the way should I mention that the 10^52-10^67 (some say 69) number for a black hole to disappear is only for a black hole that has the same mass as our sun. Smallest black holes we've found are between 2-4 times the mass of our sun, but most point out that they're probably closer to 6-10 times the mass. Anything smaller after all is a neutron star. Richard really needs to learn to comprehend what he reads. Don't just skip parts of something because it disagrees with you.

Many of Richards posts on that Facebook page have been removed but at least I capped this.
 

Attachments

  • Richard 0001.png
    Richard 0001.png
    537.4 KB · Views: 121
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Winner
Reactions: The Un-Clit
I just sent the following to https://www.investopedia.com/corp/contactus.aspx ...

I've attached the prophesied "7 Seals" of Revelation 5:1 revealed as 'Beyond Einstein Theories'. I recommend selling all stock and precious metals, and investing in Govt bonds and the Euro. Sell the United(6 letters) States(6) Dollar(6).
 
It's all this little man can do
I AM 6'4" tall. How tall are you?
the 10^52-10^67 (some say 69) number for a black hole to disappear is only for a black hole that has the same mass as our sun. Smallest black holes we've found are between 2-4 times the mass of our sun, but most point out that they're probably closer to 6-10 times the mass. Anything smaller after all is a neutron star.
Source/link for that and no crummy Wikipedia articles? And what about supermassive black holes?

Fluffie really needs to learn to comprehend what he reads. Don't just skip parts of something because it disagrees with you.

Accuse the other side .jpg


--------------------------------​

7 continents of the world
The widely recognized all the 7 continents are listed by size below, from biggest to smallest.

  • Asia includes 50 countries, and it is the most populated continent, the 60% of the total population of the Earth live here.
  • Africa comprises 54 countries. It is the hottest continent and home of the world's largest desert, the Sahara, occupying the 25% of the total area of Africa.
  • North America includes 23 countries led by the USA as the largest economy in the world.
  • South America comprises 12 countries. Here is located the largest forest, the Amazon rainforest, which covers 30% of the South America total area.
  • Antarctica is the coldest continent in the world, completely covered with ice. There are no permanent inhabitants, except of scientists maintaining research stations in Antarctica.
  • Europe comprises 51 countries. It is the most developed economically continent with the European Union as the biggest economic and political union in the world.
  • Australia/Oceania includes 14 countries. It is the least populated continent after Antarctica, only 0.3% of the total Earth population live here.
 
Last edited:
I AM 6'4" tall. How tall are you?

Source/link for that and no crummy Wikipedia articles? And what about supermassive black holes?

Fluffie really needs to learn to comprehend what he reads. Don't just skip parts of something because it disagrees with you.


Brad, it doesn't matter how physically tall you are, you're a petty asshole who insults children all because their father made you look (for factual reasons) stupid.

As a result, that makes you not just a little man, you're barely an inch high and getting smaller by the day.

@Brad Watson_Miami

The following users were removed from Brad's ignore list:
@GethN7, @Anonymus Fluhre

You can stop trying to ignore us, we can always undo it and there is absolutely nothing you can change about that.
 
You really need to learn the meaning of words Richard.

Funny only you can use a Wikipedia page, that's fine.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/starts...ck-holes-singularity-evaporates/#769d163b7c8c Ethan is an astrophysicist.
https://owlcation.com/stem/How-Do-Black-Holes-Evaporate (states that it's 10^71)
http://burro.astr.cwru.edu/Academics/Astr221/LifeCycle/blackholes.html (states 10^66)
It was back in 1973 that Steven found that out by the way.
https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/377674main_Black_Hole_Math.pdf

Oh, and for the maximum size of a supermassive black hole (5e10 solar masses) it would take it 2.62146e99 years for it to evaporate.
 
Last edited:
Many of Richards posts on that Facebook page have been removed but at least I capped this.
Tina Luther is under the impression that Brad thinks he's citing the bible, if she knew that he is refering to this strange voice in his head that he thinks is "god", that also tells him to steal photos or commit other crimes, she'd be scared - as any sane person should be.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GethN7
Back