BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

[Lobster Cult High Priest]

Who you guys think are the worse type of breadtube grifters? The former right winger turned communist like xanderthal, the one who try playing both sides like hunter, the ones trooning like suris and philosophy troon or a open grifter like vaush.

Probably Vaush cause he advocates for far left revolution and then back corporate neo liberals and falls 100% in line

 

[Luna Mothews]

Who you guys think are the worse type of breadtube grifters? The former right winger turned communist like xanderthal, the one who try playing both sides like hunter, the ones trooning like suris and philosophy troon or a open grifter like vaush.

I would say the first, not even as far as content creators but as far as people. It’s a sad fact that in our society a person can genuinely believe they’re having some deep political awakening just because they started watching “bad” YouTube videos and ended up watching “good” YouTube videos. It’s a toxic narrative that just keeps people trapped on the internet.

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

For a change from shitting on breadtubers for once, I'd like to recommend one today. Endernax has 2k subs, he has real world political experience(helped on the Yang campaign) and he's honestly a very bright guy. He's a "Christian Democrat", aka economically left and socially right. He knows foreign policy well, has great domestic policy, has really good takes on China and he's more honest than just about any breadtuber I've seen.

Not to mention, the guy actually has a sense of humor and isn't afraid to be a bit edgy.

His channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDjoyoORa35CcmFyKx8CANg

 

[America's Hat]

For a change from shitting on breadtubers for once, I'd like to recommend one today. Endernax has 2k subs, he has real world political experience(helped on the Yang campaign) and he's honestly a very bright guy. He's a "Christian Democrat", aka economically left and socially right. He knows foreign policy well, has great domestic policy, has really good takes on China and he's more honest than just about any breadtuber I've seen.

Not to mention, the guy actually has a sense of humor and isn't afraid to be a bit edgy.

Wouldn't a socially right, economically left alight more with Christian Fascism or Christian Authoritarian? I don't see how someone advocating against left win politics in the social sense be seen as a breadtuber, as even National Socialist were at least somewhat socialist to their national bloodline.

The real issue for Right-Wing and Left-Wing individuals is they have too choose between Pro-Family policies at the cost of supporting monopolies and big businesses or Pro-Labor a the cost of supporting Anti-Family policies. I think this is why Christians will still support the Right-wing monopolies as at least there it will allow them to build some kind of a family.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Wouldn't a socially right, economically left alight more with Christian Fascism or Christian Authoritarian? I don't see how someone advocating against left win politics in the social sense be seen as a breadtuber, as even National Socialist were at least somewhat socialist to their national bloodline.

The real issue for Right-Wing and Left-Wing individuals is they have too choose between Pro-Family policies at the cost of supporting monopolies and big businesses or Pro-Labor a the cost of supporting Anti-Family policies. I think this is why Christians will still support the Right-wing monopolies as at least there it will allow them to build some kind of a family.

This is the essence of what the right-wing refers to as the "Kosher Sandwich." Both sides differ only in ways that the elites don't care about. Leftists advocate for the anti-family stuff the elite loves, and Rightists advocate for the anti-labor stuff the elite loves. They can pretend to compromise on minor issues while promoting those agendas to their fullest extent without angering their base too much because they seem to be getting morale victories.

 

[NormieCasual]

The real issue for Right-Wing and Left-Wing individuals is they have too choose between Pro-Family policies at the cost of supporting monopolies and big businesses or Pro-Labor a the cost of supporting Anti-Family policies. I think this is why Christians will still support the Right-wing monopolies as at least there it will allow them to build some kind of a family.

I think it's because the left hates religion. Ever since Marx has leftist railed against religion as a tool of the bourgeoisie and something that needs to be destroyed to create a classless society.

You see it even now and you see so many religious institutes in Europe just following the demand of leftist that never goes to church. The Swedish church is completely cucked, basically all the priests are women, they make plays were Jesus is played as a woman, so many are doing the whole God is non-binary, and the Swedish church is part of the pride parade. (What annoys me is that they aren't even following the bible and Christian faith and that they think they can decide what part of Gods word to follow. It's a weak faith for weak people.)

 

[Neko GF]

The Kavernacle's out there, answering the truly important questions!

Original:

Archive (720p):

 

[scathefire]

You see it even now and you see so many religious institutes in Europe just following the demand of leftist that never goes to church. The Swedish church is completely cucked, basically all the priests are women, they make plays were Jesus is played as a woman, so many are doing the whole God is non-binary, and the Swedish church is part of the pride parade. (What annoys me is that they aren't even following the bible and Christian faith and that they think they can decide what part of Gods word to follow. It's a weak faith for weak people.)

At that point why even bother with Christianity? This is exactly what I was saying earlier about progressive denominations, just abandon Christianity if you don't like its basic values and principles. Sweden kind of blows my mind in this sense, in most other countries with wokeshit the woke people either outright reject religion or follow some kind of New Age faith. I don't get it.

 

[Mr Metron666]

The Kavernacle's out there, answering the truly important questions!

Original:

Archive (720p):
View attachment 2007436

Didn’t he already do this?

 

[Ethan Ralphs Micro Penis]

At that point why even bother with Christianity? This is exactly what I was saying earlier about progressive denominations, just abandon Christianity if you don't like its basic values and principles. Sweden kind of blows my mind in this sense, in most other countries with wokeshit the woke people either outright reject religion or follow some kind of New Age faith. I don't get it.

Instead of trying to aggressively remove the "Church", which will undoubtedly make the Woke movement lose a lot of its immediate traction and risk it permanently being taboo to all religious people, the best thing to do is subversion. If enough people who follow Woke ideology get to leadership positions in the faith, they can "retcon" its beliefs. Those blind enough to follow whatever the Church says will fall into line. Those who question will be cast out and their treatment used as a boogeyman.

 

[America's Hat]

At that point why even bother with Christianity? This is exactly what I was saying earlier about progressive denominations, just abandon Christianity if you don't like its basic values and principles. Sweden kind of blows my mind in this sense, in most other countries with wokeshit the woke people either outright reject religion or follow some kind of New Age faith. I don't get it.

Well for one, don't follow protestant organizations (all non Catholic/Orthodox groups), where the "elders" say what is and isn't the law. The Anglican church voted on Gay marriage, as if God's word and justice is something that changes democratically. The reason people are leftwing "Christians" followers is it allows them to come to the natural mysticism in life while not having to change, so they get their cake and eat it too.

 

[Retrodogkiller]

Well for one, don't follow protestant organizations (all non Catholic/Orthodox groups), where the "elders" say what is and isn't the law. The Anglican church voted on Gay marriage, as if God's word and justice is something that changes democratically. The reason people are leftwing "Christians" followers is it allows them to come to the natural mysticism in life while not having to change, so they get their cake and eat it too.

Even Catholicism is infected if the current pope is to go by. I know the bishop's hastily provided a supposed clarification but it's not looking good. While God's laws do not change, the churches, all of them, are run by greedy men who seek gain and will permit faggotry if it fills the coffers. I hope I'm wrong but I could see the Church allowing fags to get married in another 10-20 years.

 

[America's Hat]

Even Catholicism is infected if the current pope is to go by. I know the bishop's hastily provided a supposed clarification but it's not looking good. While God's laws do not change, the churches, all of them, are run by greedy men who seek gain and will permit faggotry if it fills the coffers. I hope I'm wrong but I could see the Church allowing fags to get married in another 10-20 years.

What do you mean, "The bishops hastily provided a supposed clarification?"
The vast "quotes" this Pope says are from second tier accounts, never a direct statement, The two direct statements he gave recently:
"If the state is going to give you a gay marriage license, call it a civil union, as gay marriage is an affront to God."
"All priest will NOT bless gay marriages, as God cannot bless sin."

And his statements against transgenderism:

"Let's think of the nuclear arms, of the possibility to annihilate in a few instants a very high number of human beings," he continues. "Let's think also of genetic manipulation, of the manipulation of life, or of the gender theory, that does not recognize the order of creation."
"With this attitude, man commits a new sin, that against God the Creator," the pope says. "The true custody of creation does not have anything to do with the ideologies that consider man like an accident, like a problem to eliminate."
"God has placed man and woman and the summit of creation and has entrusted them with the earth," Francis says. "The design of the Creator is written in nature."

The Catholic Church has not and will not support gay marriages. We support all sinners and want them to live a fruitful and faithful life, so we won't be gay beating if that's what you're looking for (not saying you specifically, just some "Christians" out there believe violence is to only solution). The Catholic Ruling on gay marriage cannot be overturned ever, as we have both scriptures and councils banning it.

In fact, there is a potential modern Schism of progressive bishops talking about leaving the church due to his statement against blessing marriages from two days ago.

 

[Flamenco]

What do you mean, "The bishops hastily provided a supposed clarification?"
The vast "quotes" this Pope says are from second tier accounts, never a direct statement, The two direct statements he gave recently:
"If the state is going to give you a gay marriage license, call it a civil union, as gay marriage is an affront to God."
"All priest will NOT bless gay marriages, as God cannot bless sin."

And his statements against transgenderism:


The Catholic Church has not and will not support gay marriages. We support all sinners and want them to live a fruitful and faithful life, so we won't be gay beating if that's what you're looking for (not saying you specifically, just some "Christians" out there believe violence is to only solution). The Catholic Ruling on gay marriage cannot be overturned ever, as we have both scriptures and councils banning it.

In fact, there is a potential modern Schism of progressive bishops talking about leaving the church due to his statement against blessing marriages from two days ago.

Essentially the mindset of "hate the sin, not the sinner". The main mindset of Christianity is that all human beings aside from Christ (and Mary to Catholics) are all flawed and seeped in sin and unworthy of salvation, only Christ's gift will allow us to be redeemed.

 

[America's Hat]

"hate the sin, not the sinner".

Exactly, the recent document from the Vatican, which I'll attach states the following:

At the same time, the Church recalls that God Himself never ceases to bless each of His pilgrim children in this world, because for Him “we are more important to God than all of the sins that we can commit”. But he does not and cannot bless sin: he blesses sinful man, so that he may recognize that he is part of his plan of love and allow himself to be changed by him. He in fact “takes us as we are, but never leaves us as we are”.

Pope Francis has never gone against the Church teaching in regards to LGBT, he is a very loving man, but compared to what he's changed versus John Paul II, its night and day. JPII kissed a Quran, which was revolutionary, amongst other "crazy" deeds.

 

[Josterman]

"Borders bad"- Leon Thomas

Original:

Archive (Potato Quality):
View attachment 2005037

Got his tweets

 

[NationalBolshevik]

Essentially the mindset of "hate the sin, not the sinner". The main mindset of Christianity is that all human beings aside from Christ (and Mary to Catholics) are all flawed and seeped in sin and unworthy of salvation, only Christ's gift will allow us to be redeemed.

Christ isn't flawed?

The one who called Peter Satan?

The one who doubts in the garden?

Flips over tables in a temple in a fit of rage?

Randomly spites one fig tree for not having figs out of season?

The entire point of christ is that he's a flawed human but also devine. If you're going to do your cod theology at least get the central tenet of the New Testament correct you goddamned idiot.

 

[Lapis Lazuli]

What a fucking retard
View attachment 1974279
https://twitter.com/HunterAA6 (https://archive.md/RLOUy)

Wait, is Hunter going full lefty now? No more "own da libs" content? Not that it was great to begin with, but when he starts to call his lost subscriber base "Nazis", you just know he went off the deep end.

I have a feeling that his girlfriend might've lent a hand in this inspiring change.

View attachment 1974297
Whoops, did our enby pal just accidentally refer to himself as a man? Really makes you think...

At that point, why keep the enby title? He's male-presenting, doesn't make an attempt at looking androgynous, and he looks like your typical soyboy. Might as well unironically call yourself "cishet".

Which, speaking of, is a little funny that he refers to himself as a beta male, though. Is he self aware?

View attachment 1976958

Looks like he isn't up to date with what just happened today, concerning the video Drag Queen Story Time.

 

[Retrodogkiller]

Christ isn't flawed?

The one who called Peter Satan?

The one who doubts in the garden?

Flips over tables in a temple in a fit of rage?

Randomly spites one fig tree for not having figs out of season?

The entire point of christ is that he's a flawed human but also devine. If you're going to do your cod theology at least get the central tenet of the New Testament correct you goddamned idiot.

You're a retard if you don't understand those situations.

 

[America's Hat]

Christ isn't flawed?

First of all, claiming God is flawed is literal heresy.

The one who called Peter Satan?

From Mathew 16:21-23
21 From that time on Jesus began to explain to his disciples that he must go to Jerusalem and suffer many things at the hands of the elders, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life. 22 Peter took him aside and began to rebuke him. “Never, Lord!” he said. “This shall never happen to you!” 23 Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.”

Here Jesus is rebuking Peter for saying that his death must not happen, where as Jesus death is a requirement for his resurrection, leading to salvation for all. He speaks that Peter's concern are human based and not foreseeing of their divine nature (valuing human life against the divine life is the work of the devil.

The one who doubts in the garden?

The one who doubts in the garden?
It's called the agony in the garden, not the doubt. Jesus knew his Father will be done.
From Mathew 26:39:
Going a little farther, He fell facedown and prayed, “My Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from Me. Yet not as I will, but as You will.”

He wants another alternative then dying for all of mankind, as he is fully man (and fully divine), and the man part would not like to suffer. But he understands his Fathers will.

Flips over tables in a temple in a fit of rage?

From Mathew 21:12-13:
12 Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. 13 “It is written,” he said to them, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’”
Jesus' house was full of moneylender, people full of sin and greed. He removed them from his house, not out of rage but of justifiable anger. (The peaceful, never hurt a fly Jesus never heard of Matthew 18:6). Jesus is the ruler of the house and does not want people lying on his behalf, while harming good people.

Randomly spites one fig tree for not having figs out of season?

The fig tree is a parable to the Jews not accepting Christ as king. From "An Introduction to the Gospels" :
Mark uses the cursing of the barren fig tree to bracket and comment on his story of the Jewish temple: Jesus and his disciples are on their way to Jerusalem when Jesus curses a fig tree because it bears no fruit; in Jerusalem he drives the money-changers from the temple; and the next morning the disciples find that the fig tree has withered and died, with the implied message that the temple is cursed and will wither because, like the fig tree, it failed to produce the fruit of righteousness.

The entire point of christ is that he's a flawed human but also devine. If you're going to do your cod theology at least get the central tenet of the New Testament correct you goddamned idiot.

"If you're going to do your cod theology at least get the central tenet of the New Testament correct you goddamned idiot."

If you're going to claim statements about the New Testament, at least read it once and google search these basic points. This isn't anything controversial and has been understood for centuries.