Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

I'm on the fence about whether this actually happened. On the one hand, Wu has no friends and would not have been at a college party. On the other, it's Wu. Maybe she hit the Smirnoff Ice too hard while dancing with her dog to Madonna at 3 am.
I like how the point the other person was making flew right over Wu's head.

John, most people accept that everyone did stupid stuff in college or when they were younger. However, not everyone is running for office. People want to remain blissfully ignorant of whether or not their elected official got black out drunk in college. They sure don't want to see them stealth-bragging about it or talking about in a way to make them seem cool. Especially from someone who has admitted to having a history of substance abuse because it makes your "recovery" look disingenuous. Look at how much shit people gave George W. Bush for his college party hound days.
 
Injecting saline after getting drop dead drunk continually might help to go a ways in explaining away the failure that is John on every single front though . . .

Do we have a volunteer to mansplain the difference between electrolytes by IV and saline that comes from your tear ducts that the body expels as a waste product to Flu yet?
 
Let's see: the party that controls the Presidency and the House, or the party that attracts pathetic cockless scam artists?

hiring.jpg
 
Nothing John says is ever true. Ever. It's amazing when anything he says is even partially true, but it is not at all uncommon for every single word in a sentence John says to be a separate lie, or even for him somehow to pack more lies into a sentence than there are words. I'm almost impressed by his Olympic Gold Medal level mendacity.

She's like Stephen Glass, only worse. Take Glass, subtract the ability to be gainfully employed, and a dash of "internet celebrity for all of the wrong reasons" and you have Wu.

I have to believe that one day all of these lies will unravel. They're so obvious and so easy to prove false. It will just take one mainstream journalist to do his or her actual job and ask real questions/do real vetting.

Someone like that has to exist out there, right? Right?

Edit: I know this has been discussed, but I'm casting my ballot for "Wu secretly wants to lose the election." This is why she's not bothering to campaign in the district. She's having fun, riding high on cosplaying a "woman in politics" but she does not want to win because winning would mean having to actually hold a job and try at it or look like a complete idiot.

Winning means being accountable. And Wu? Wu carries an epi pen for when she might accidentally be exposed to accountability.
 
Last edited:
She's like Stephen Glass, only worse. Take Glass, subtract the ability to be gainfully employed, and a dash of "internet celebrity for all of the wrong reasons" and you have Wu.

I have to believe that one day all of these lies will unravel. They're so obvious and so easy to prove false. It will just take one mainstream journalist to do his or her actual job and ask real questions/do real vetting.

Someone like that has to exist out there, right? Right?

Nobody will do it because Wu is a total nonentity. People who enjoy watching some spastic sperg out are the only people who care. Wu only matters to us, because we enjoy watching something so pitiably hopeless yet idiotic flail around wildly, attempting to navigate through life as a true and honest woman.

Wu does not get invited to real conferences.

Wu is not a """woman""" in tech anymore, if one can consider shitting out an iOS game to be "in the industry".

Gamergate is at most a footnote in mainstream news following a couple weeks of sporadic coverage and a law and order svu episode. Any other mention of GG is practically limited to publications that believe it's still going on and that they are heroically fighting against it.

Wu is a crackpot candidate, and barring a funny news blurb when they make a ridiculous attack ad or get arrested for something stupid, those guys do not deserve or receive coverage.

Nobody will report on Wu because it would be like CNN doing an expose on your neighbor lying about the size of the fish he caught last week at the lake. Wu is just another autism-addled, mental illness ridden, virtue signaling, asspat begging, exceptional individual. Nothing he says has any bearing on anything, it has no weight. If the last year has shown us anything, whiny bitch babies on Twitter amount to nothing in the real world.

Wu had his 15 minutes of dubious fame in the dim glow of gamergate. The rapidly dwindling patreonbux show how his recognition has faded. He is a walking, tweeting sideshow, a man-gorilla, and nothing else. Nobody will take him to task in the media because you don't give somebody like that the time of day. Wu's name might be on a couple of rolodexes for when some scumsucking ex-gawker "journalist" needs a one sentence sound byte from somebody they can tenuously connect to feminism or gamergate for a backpack article nobody will read, and that is about it.

Nothing Wu does is of consequence. None of his words, his actions, how tweets, his speeches, his anything, matters at all. Even in the (few and far between) crowds that will allow him as an audience, nobody gives any thought to his words or talks. Wu is the safest sort of cow because he isn't a ticking timebomb like the schizos or horrorcows. He's just a mess.

No, the chief domestic product, and purpose of Wu, is (aside from the copious quantities of dumb bullshit spewed on Twitter with amazing frequency) mild amusement that somebody so stupid can exist, and a feeling of contentment among those few who bother to keep aware of his antics that they can never sink that low in life, no matter what.

Wu's lies aren't something that can or would "unravel" because anybody that would be inclined to do so would either abandon an investigation immediately upon seeing what he is, or make an account here to join the peanut gallery and laugh.
 
She's like Stephen Glass, only worse. Take Glass, subtract the ability to be gainfully employed, and a dash of "internet celebrity for all of the wrong reasons" and you have Wu.

I have to believe that one day all of these lies will unravel. They're so obvious and so easy to prove false. It will just take one mainstream journalist to do his or her actual job and ask real questions/do real vetting.

Someone like that has to exist out there, right? Right?

It'll never happen. Remember that Glass was only caught because he wrote an article about an industry that was not heavily politicized at the time (tech). He had been writing bullshit stories for years and there was proof they were bullshit but since they typically targeted Republicans or the establishment, they ignored them.

As long as Wu sticks to the progressive talking points, she can lie all she wants and no mainstream reporter will touch it. Even if all those lies are easily verifiable.

And remember that the editor of the New Republic who fiercely defended Glass even when it was patently obvious his stories were bullshit didn't get laughed out of the industry. He was given a job running The Atlantic. Heck, Rolling Stone even hired Glass a few years later.
 
I sure as shit want to know which job drops everything in a workday to go play the newest FPS. Sounds like a sweet deal.

I wouldn't be surprised if Wu just watched The Office on Netflix and thinks that this is what "normal, employable people" do every day:
office_cod2.jpg
 
Wait -- it turns out that this TECCA thing is not only a virtual school but also a charter school. If you search Twitter for "Spacekatgal Charter Schools," you'll see multiple instances of her shitting all over them in her usual unknowledgeable, unresearched way.

Just another day in Wu-Ville where brazen hypocrisy doesn't matter because she's blocked every account that might have called her out on yet another example.

Keeping track of all of the bullshit is getting to be exhausting.

What a shitty robot in a cheap human suit.

Talking about the above sent me into the rabbit hole. I was looking to see if Brianna ever said in a still-existing Tweet that she graduated from college. Instead, I found that Crash Wu graduated puppy training school in 2009! Yet just like with everything else, Brianna lies and says he was four when he died.

I realize this is a totally :autism: thing to comment on but I'm just sitting here laughing because she REALLY DOES LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING, no matter how inconsequential.
It could theoretically have been a different dog whom she also called "Crash".

What always gets me is how Brianna names her pets. Crash. What sort of name is that? Aren't her new dogs called Splat, Kablam and Rocket? I know she's trying to be lol-so-nerdy by naming them like soundwords from oldschool comics, but calling a pet "Splat" seems like such a bad omen concerning his safety in traffic.
 
It could theoretically have been a different dog whom she also called "Crash".

What always gets me is how Brianna names her pets. Crash. What sort of name is that? Aren't her new dogs called Splat, Kablam and Rocket? I know she's trying to be lol-so-nerdy by naming them like soundwords from oldschool comics, but calling a pet "Splat" seems like such a bad omen concerning his safety in traffic.

I think it's full name was "Crash Override" which is a reference to that 90s movie "Hackers".

Totally fitting for woman in tech and l33t h4x0r Brianna Wu.
 
I think it's full name was "Crash Override" which is a reference to that 90s movie "Hackers".
I haven't seen it, but wasn't this movie made without any knowledge of actual hacker culture and just regurgitated popular conceptions about them (kewl kids who break into super-sikrit corporate/government computers)? If so, it should be very fitting for Brianna.
 
I haven't seen it, but wasn't this movie made without any knowledge of actual hacker culture and just regurgitated popular conceptions about them (kewl kids who break into super-sikrit corporate/government computers)? If so, it should be very fitting for Brianna.
No, it's the movie made with advice from a real hacker who wanted to see how much bullshit he could get into the movie. Old school troll.
 
"As someone who lived in a state next to Georgia" really nigga

GA.jpg


EDIT: No mention of course that the winner, Karen Handel, is the first Republican woman to be elected to Congress from Georgia. Not that I personally give a shit nor should anyone, but funny how that's only important if you're the right kind of woman - like John W. Flynt, obviously.
 
Last edited:
"As someone who lived in a state next to Georgia" really nigga

View attachment 236874

Haha remember when Ossoff was going to win every Democratic voter in the district as well as 15% or more of the Republicans? I do. It was last week.

At least John knows how to move goalposts like a pro spin doctor. I mean, it's just regurgitating whatever he reads ("reads") on HuffPo or Reddit or wherever he gets his news, but at least he can stick to the party line.
 
Haha remember when Ossoff was going to win every Democratic voter in the district as well as 15% or more of the Republicans? I do. It was last week.

At least John knows how to move goalposts like a pro spin doctor. I mean, it's just regurgitating whatever he reads ("reads") on HuffPo or Reddit or wherever he gets his news, but at least he can stick to the party line.
It's easy for Wu to stick to the party line when nobody really knows what that line is except that it's probably batshit insane at this point.
 
I haven't seen it, but wasn't this movie made without any knowledge of actual hacker culture and just regurgitated popular conceptions about them (kewl kids who break into super-sikrit corporate/government computers)? If so, it should be very fitting for Brianna.

Sneakers is the (much) better hacker movie, it's actually entertaining, but it's full of old dudes(problematic) plus naming your dog Mother doesn't sound like a cool reference meant to validate your identity and Cosmo or Whistler actually sounds like reasonable dog names.
 
It's easy for Wu to stick to the party line when nobody really knows what that line is except that it's probably batshit insane at this point.
Do the Democrats even have an agenda right now? Other than dragging Hillary onstage every few weeks to blame someone else for losing

Someone should ask wuwu
 
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets
"As someone who lived in a state next to Georgia" really nigga

View attachment 236874

EDIT: No mention of course that the winner, Karen Handel, is the first Republican woman to be elected to Congress from Georgia. Not that I personally give a shit nor should anyone, but funny how that's only important if you're the right kind of woman - like John W. Flynt, obviously.

If the right Twitter accounts see this, "next door to Georgia" could be the next Moon Rocks. It's an utterly stupid thing to fixate on, but this is the kind of thing that actually gets under Wu's skin. Let's hope they see it!

There's a lot about the republicans that worries me, but at least they know how to organize and maintain power. The democrats keep building echo chambers for themselves so they're surprised when the obvious happens. For example Trump, Ossoff.

Well, except Wu. She rewrites history every five seconds so that she was always the wise sage who predicted things would go to shit for her party... never mind that she's often too lazing to bother deleting the contradictory Tweets.

She despised Hillary ten years ago. Then she loved her, pretended to have always loved her, and thought she could do no wrong. Then, when Hillary lost, Wu trotted out other people's analyses and presented them as her own (her usual MO), pretending that she always saw flaws in Hillary.

That's Wu for you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Back