Crime Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to killing 4 University of Idaho students in deal to avoid execution - Trial was only 5 weeks away

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to killing 4 University of Idaho students in deal to avoid execution
Oregon Public Braodcasting
By REBECCA BOONE (Associated Press)
June 30, 2025 8:41 p.m.

Bryan Kohberger has agreed to plead guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students as part of a deal with prosecutors to avoid the death penalty, an attorney for one victim’s family said Monday.

Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the family of Kaylee Goncalves, confirmed that prosecutors informed the families of the deal by email and letter earlier in the day, and that his clients were upset about it.

“We are beyond furious at the State of Idaho,” Goncalves’ family wrote in a Facebook post. ”They have failed us. Please give us some time. This was very unexpected.”

A change of plea hearing was set for Wednesday, but the families have asked prosecutors to delay it to give them more time to travel to Boise, Gray said. Kohberger’s trial was set for August.

Kohberger, 30, is accused in the stabbing deaths of Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle and Madison Mogen at a rental home near campus in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022. Autopsies showed the four were all likely asleep when they were attacked, some had defensive wounds and each was stabbed multiple times.

FILE - Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students, is escorted into court for a hearing in Latah County District Court, Sept. 13, 2023, in Moscow, Idaho.

FILE - Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students, is escorted into court for a hearing in Latah County District Court, Sept. 13, 2023, in Moscow, Idaho. Ted S. Warren / AP

Kohberger, then a criminal justice graduate student at Washington State University, was arrested in Pennsylvania weeks after the killings. Investigators said they matched his DNA to genetic material recovered from a knife sheath found at the crime scene.

In a court filing, his lawyers said Kohberger was on a long drive by himself around the time the four were killed.

The killings shook the small farming community of about 25,000 people, which hadn’t had a homicide in about five years. The trial was moved from rural northern Idaho to Boise after the defense expressed concerns that Kohberger couldn’t get a fair trial in the county where the killings occurred.

In the letter to families, obtained by ABC News, prosecutors said Kohberger’s lawyers approached them seeking to reach a plea deal. The prosecutors said they met with available family members last week before deciding to make Kohberger an offer.

“This resolution is our sincere attempt to seek justice for your family,” the letter said. “This agreement ensures that the defendant will be convicted, will spend the rest of his life in prison, and will not be able to put you and the other families through the uncertainty of decades of post-conviction, appeals. Your viewpoints weighed heavily in our decision-making process, and we hope that you may come to appreciate why we believe this resolution is in the best interest of justice.”

In Idaho, judges may reject plea agreements, though such moves are rare. If a judge rejects a plea agreement, the defendant is allowed to withdraw the guilty plea.

Earlier Monday, a Pennsylvania judge had ordered that three people whose testimony was requested by defense attorneys would have to travel to Idaho to appear at Kohberger’s trial.

The defense subpoenas were granted regarding a boxing trainer who knew Kohberger as a teenager, a childhood acquaintance of Kohberger’s and a third man whose significance was not explained.

A gag order has largely kept attorneys, investigators and others from speaking publicly about the investigation or trial.

___

Associated Press reporter Mark Scolforo contributed from Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.

https://www.opb.org/article/2025/06...of-idaho-students-in-deal-to-avoid-execution/
 
If they want to get it over with, I suggest they shack him up with Jason Budrow in California's Pleasant Valley State Prison.
Jason Budrow is a self-avowed Satanist who is currently serving two life sentences after strangling 48 year old Margaret Dalton in 2010 and then strangling Roger Kibbe aka The I-5 Strangler in 2021 while the latter was his cellmate. He attacked Paul Flores (who killed Kristin Smart) in August 2023.
 
Could the state have opted to take him to trial to get the execution? If they have a slam dunk why wouldnt they? Just saving tax dollars on an expensive trial that will end with him off the street and not hurting people any more anyway?
They could, but, every trial has a possibility of acquittal.

So, the conundrum is "Take the sure thing which will result in this guy dying in prison of old age as he can't appeal and can't be paroled" or, "Go for execution too, with a 5% chance you boff it, lose, and he walks free"

It's a no-brainer.
 
I understand why emotions are high and people are angry on all sides of this. What a prosecution team can get a jury to convict for often falls far short of the justice victims of violence deserves. Trade-offs are unfortunately part of life but the ones regarding innocent victims of crime are the hardest to accept.

I saw this up close when a friend realized in his 20s that all the sexual shit his babysitter had done to him since he was little (I think it started at 8 years old) was actually abuse and not consensual. He worked with law enforcement to get her on a call where she admitted to everything. But the prosecutor talked him through every count they could charge her with versus what they could realistically convict her for. It was sickening. But fortunately they were able to convict her for those fewer counts. He wrote a book about it and, with Elizabeth Smart and other survivors, helps support victims through the prosecution process.
 
And the US government has already executed dozens of men later proven not guilty. But no, let's deny the defendant the full recourse of the legal system because the victim's sister is super sure he's the one who did it.
To make matters worse, there have been scandals in the State forensic labs (DC recently) where an examiner "met their metrics" by giving the result the prosecutor wanted to hear without actually doing the work
 
I'm going to read between the lines and assume that the other families quietly agreed to the deal, and the prosecution actively avoids dealing with Mr. Goncalves because he blabs everything to the media. I understand why he's angry, and some of his criticisms about how the case was handled are valid, but he proved numerous times that they couldn't trust him with any info. I also wonder if part of the reason the state is eager to accept a plea deal is because they were somewhat worried about the possibility of an appeals court tossing his conviction because of that massive evidence leak to Dateline NBC a couple of months ago.
 
I don't know who are worse cunts, both of these are antithetical to justice.
The trial was moved from rural northern Idaho to Boise after the defense expressed concerns that Kohberger couldn’t get a fair trial in the county where the killings occurred.
"Communities cannot enforce their own laws"
Your viewpoints weighed heavily in our decision-making process, and we hope that you may come to appreciate
"Your viewpoints weighed heavily, in the sense that we heard what you wanted and did the exact opposite"
 
This trial would cost millions of dollars to prosecute and it ties up the court for years. A plea with life no parole takes five minutes and costs maybe $10K with the extra security for media presence. With a trial you are talking dozens of witnesses, expert testimony, forensic records, character witnesses, crime scene evidence with videos and photos, and hundreds of hours in court arguing over it. When this guy is pathetically and shamefully obviously guilty.
I really hate this mentality.

"The system is broken so let's minimize it instead of fixing it"
 
I really hate this mentality.

"The system is broken so let's minimize it instead of fixing it"
Unfortunately nearly every aspect of the 'justice' system is broken. One dumb or corrupt juror can sink a case. One corrupt cop or judge can ruin a case. A misspelled word on a form can end a case. An activist judge or parole board can just release a maniac into society again. This at least guarantees that this piece of shit remains in a cell for life.
 
In all his photos he looks very...awake.
The story that he used to be a massively obese heroin addict, which I’m willing to believe is true, is surprising. I hope there are some sharp true crime investigators working on books about this case. I haven’t gone down a real rabbit hole on it myself but the fact that one of the girls came face to face with him in the house after the stabbings is a chilling detail.
 
Life in prison without parole is worse than death. He’s gonna be very, very miserable for a very, very long time.

He’s 30, so short of sudden health issues, he has decades ahead of him. Decades of sitting in a shitty cell with nothing interesting to do. Maybe some books from the library if he can even get that. A few channels on the TV that’s gonna be hogged by spooks and beaners. Most of the prisoners are fucked up in some way. Crackheads, nutjobs, gangbangers, psychopaths. What fun.

At least most of the other degens have a chance at parole even if it’s years away. It gives them something to live for. He won’t have that. He will never be free.
 
He’s 30, so short of sudden health issues, he has decades ahead of him. Decades of sitting in a shitty cell with nothing interesting to do. Maybe some books from the library if he can even get that. A few channels on the TV that’s gonna be hogged by spooks and beaners. Most of the prisoners are fucked up in some way. Crackheads, nutjobs, gangbangers, psychopaths. What fun.
Don't forget about eating prison slop every day forever and all your medical care for the rest of your life comes from med school flunkies who can't get work anywhere else.

And then maybe one day some mentally ill nigger gets the idea in their head that you're the anti-christ and clubs you to death with a pipe. If you're really unlucky you survive the attack and now have to live as a cripple in prison, and everyone steals from you because you're a fucking cripple the fuck you gonna do about it.
 
If you're going to do this as the prosecution, maybe just shut the fuck up and don't act like you're doing a favor for the families involved, especially when you know they disagree.
The only family that's publicly expressed unhappiness at this is the publicity-hungry Goncalves family and that's because now they won't be able to make bank as talking heads during the trial. During the initial investigation the father was going around giving interviews about his murdered daughter while wearing a hat sponsored by some crypto company.
 
The only family that's publicly expressed unhappiness at this is the publicity-hungry Goncalves family and that's because now they won't be able to make bank as talking heads during the trial. During the initial investigation the father was going around giving interviews about his murdered daughter while wearing a hat sponsored by some crypto company.
I thought the aunt came out and said she was upset, and so we're others? Maybe that was just shit early rumors1 from yesterday?

Either way, is it possible the judge rejects the plea? Judges have lost their jobs over perceived slights, specially after the Brock Turner sentencing, so could that have any play into the decision making process here or is it a stretch?
 
I understand why emotions are high and people are angry on all sides of this. What a prosecution team can get a jury to convict for often falls far short of the justice victims of violence deserves. Trade-offs are unfortunately part of life but the ones regarding innocent victims of crime are the hardest to accept.

I saw this up close when a friend realized in his 20s that all the sexual shit his babysitter had done to him since he was little (I think it started at 8 years old) was actually abuse and not consensual. He worked with law enforcement to get her on a call where she admitted to everything. But the prosecutor talked him through every count they could charge her with versus what they could realistically convict her for. It was sickening. But fortunately they were able to convict her for those fewer counts. He wrote a book about it and, with Elizabeth Smart and other survivors, helps support victims through the prosecution process.
How much time the cunt get?
 
Back