Crime Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to killing 4 University of Idaho students in deal to avoid execution - Trial was only 5 weeks away

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Bryan Kohberger to plead guilty to killing 4 University of Idaho students in deal to avoid execution
Oregon Public Braodcasting
By REBECCA BOONE (Associated Press)
June 30, 2025 8:41 p.m.

Bryan Kohberger has agreed to plead guilty to murdering four University of Idaho students as part of a deal with prosecutors to avoid the death penalty, an attorney for one victim’s family said Monday.

Shanon Gray, an attorney representing the family of Kaylee Goncalves, confirmed that prosecutors informed the families of the deal by email and letter earlier in the day, and that his clients were upset about it.

“We are beyond furious at the State of Idaho,” Goncalves’ family wrote in a Facebook post. ”They have failed us. Please give us some time. This was very unexpected.”

A change of plea hearing was set for Wednesday, but the families have asked prosecutors to delay it to give them more time to travel to Boise, Gray said. Kohberger’s trial was set for August.

Kohberger, 30, is accused in the stabbing deaths of Goncalves, Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle and Madison Mogen at a rental home near campus in Moscow, Idaho, in November 2022. Autopsies showed the four were all likely asleep when they were attacked, some had defensive wounds and each was stabbed multiple times.

FILE - Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students, is escorted into court for a hearing in Latah County District Court, Sept. 13, 2023, in Moscow, Idaho.

FILE - Bryan Kohberger, the man accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students, is escorted into court for a hearing in Latah County District Court, Sept. 13, 2023, in Moscow, Idaho. Ted S. Warren / AP

Kohberger, then a criminal justice graduate student at Washington State University, was arrested in Pennsylvania weeks after the killings. Investigators said they matched his DNA to genetic material recovered from a knife sheath found at the crime scene.

In a court filing, his lawyers said Kohberger was on a long drive by himself around the time the four were killed.

The killings shook the small farming community of about 25,000 people, which hadn’t had a homicide in about five years. The trial was moved from rural northern Idaho to Boise after the defense expressed concerns that Kohberger couldn’t get a fair trial in the county where the killings occurred.

In the letter to families, obtained by ABC News, prosecutors said Kohberger’s lawyers approached them seeking to reach a plea deal. The prosecutors said they met with available family members last week before deciding to make Kohberger an offer.

“This resolution is our sincere attempt to seek justice for your family,” the letter said. “This agreement ensures that the defendant will be convicted, will spend the rest of his life in prison, and will not be able to put you and the other families through the uncertainty of decades of post-conviction, appeals. Your viewpoints weighed heavily in our decision-making process, and we hope that you may come to appreciate why we believe this resolution is in the best interest of justice.”

In Idaho, judges may reject plea agreements, though such moves are rare. If a judge rejects a plea agreement, the defendant is allowed to withdraw the guilty plea.

Earlier Monday, a Pennsylvania judge had ordered that three people whose testimony was requested by defense attorneys would have to travel to Idaho to appear at Kohberger’s trial.

The defense subpoenas were granted regarding a boxing trainer who knew Kohberger as a teenager, a childhood acquaintance of Kohberger’s and a third man whose significance was not explained.

A gag order has largely kept attorneys, investigators and others from speaking publicly about the investigation or trial.

___

Associated Press reporter Mark Scolforo contributed from Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.

https://www.opb.org/article/2025/06...of-idaho-students-in-deal-to-avoid-execution/
 
The story that he used to be a massively obese heroin addict, which I’m willing to believe is true, is surprising.

If I remember correctly, he was fat either before or after the heroin addiction, and then he went super strict vegan and lost the weight and needed surgery to remove the excess skin.

He got fat again in prison and I genuinely believe part of his motivation for accepting a plea deal was not wanting the entire world to realize what a disgusting fat slob he’s become in prison.

This is his most recent mugshot, from March of this year.

IMG_4371.webp
 
what a disgusting fat slob he’s become in prison
Holy fuck he looks like Weird Al’s incel grandson. How did he get fat in prison?! My understanding is that the food sucks. (Admittedly my most recent source for that is reading the emails and listening to calls between Madeline Soto’s killer Stephan Sterns — incarcerated in Florida — and his parents.)
 
Blood for blood. If this guy had any chance to get acquitted he wouldn't take this plea. This is the states attorney not wanting to blow the time or money on the trial and the death penalty appeals. But at least if you're the family you would know he would either be set to fry or released out into the wild where you can deliver justice yourself.
getting a death sentence doesnt mean hes going to be killed by the state. between appeals, pardons, liberal prosecutors and their innocence projects cohorts to the drug companies refusing to sell their poison to the state, it may end up being a life sentence. look at mumia abu jamal.

There should be a separate category for lifers in prison marked as "if another prisoner chooses to murder this guy, lets all agree to look the other way and not pursue further charges on the prisoner".

Life without parole with a hint of "might receive some harsh justice".

the family can always pay the warden or a co to pay another death row inmate to kill him.
 
getting a death sentence doesnt mean hes going to be killed by the state. between appeals, pardons, liberal prosecutors and their innocence projects cohorts to the drug companies refusing to sell their poison to the state, it may end up being a life sentence. look at mumia abu jamal.
Yeah I mentioned the state doesn't want to deal with the appeals of a death penalty conviction. But the drug companies is a moot point because Idaho is becoming a firing squad state. And again the alternative is him getting to live and breath on tax payer dime for an undetermined number of years. The argument against using the death penalty is that the system is corrupt and inefficient. That is the American justice system in a nutshell.

Death is often times the appropriate punishment for a crime, and yet we have allowed the corruption in our justice system to make it seemingly a least desirable outcome for the state. Instead of sparing monsters from the chopping block, we should be dismantling the rot in our system that makes it an unviable option. Killing four young adults in cold blood and getting rewarded with three hots and a cot isn't justice.
 
Holy fuck he looks like Weird Al’s incel grandson. How did he get fat in prison?! My understanding is that the food sucks. (Admittedly my most recent source for that is reading the emails and listening to calls between Madeline Soto’s killer Stephan Sterns — incarcerated in Florida — and his parents.)
Why do people care so much about this case in particular?
 
Why do people care so much about this case in particular?
It's a fairly interesting case in that it had a few uncommon elements (College kids usually aren't murdered, people usually aren't murdered by people they don't know, it was a nation wide manhunt, the killer was white and highly educated).

But more to the point, you can go to any number of YouTube channels that are just airing court proceedings. And I'm not talking about high profile Kyle Rittenhouse/Karen Read stuff. I'm talking even petty small claims court shit. The law and our justice system is an inherently interesting topic for some people. And then you take into account that people are likely to put more investment learning about cases where there is a larger group of people to discuss with, and you end up with a snowball effect where the fact a certain amount of people are talking about a case makes it a more interesting case to learn about yourself so you can engage in the conversation as well.
 
Killing four young adults in cold blood and getting rewarded with three hots and a cot isn't justice.
as prisons stand today, it isnt justice. the same rot that makes the death penalty unviable also makes prisons meaningless. prisoners sneak cellphones in with ease, some manage to guns and drugs in and the COs dont have a lot of effective, legal tools to deter the behavior.
 
Holy fuck he looks like Weird Al’s incel grandson. How did he get fat in prison?! My understanding is that the food sucks. (Admittedly my most recent source for that is reading the emails and listening to calls between Madeline Soto’s killer Stephan Sterns — incarcerated in Florida — and his parents.)
He looks similar to the Son of Sam, if you ask me.
 
It's a fairly interesting case in that it had a few uncommon elements (College kids usually aren't murdered, people usually aren't murdered by people they don't know, it was a nation wide manhunt, the killer was white and highly educated).

But more to the point, you can go to any number of YouTube channels that are just airing court proceedings. And I'm not talking about high profile Kyle Rittenhouse/Karen Read stuff. I'm talking even petty small claims court shit. The law and our justice system is an inherently interesting topic for some people. And then you take into account that people are likely to put more investment learning about cases where there is a larger group of people to discuss with, and you end up with a snowball effect where the fact a certain amount of people are talking about a case makes it a more interesting case to learn about yourself so you can engage in the conversation as well.
Thanks for answering my question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just Want 2 Read
You know, I just had a thought. This dickwad idealized Dennis Rader and has now done exactly what Rader did at this stage of the trial. He took a plea deal to avoid the death penalty, and he thought that he'd get away with ever having to publicly admit anything or have his day in court. Edit: I just double checked my data and he didn't take a deal, technically, he changed his plea to guilty to avoid a trial.

But! The judge was like lol no, you're gonna stand there, shackled, looking like prison trash, and admit to every single thing you did if you want this plea deal. So while I would hate for this douche to get to keep emulating BTK, that parallel would be nice, maybe, for closure.

Just a thought I had while going down a rabbit hole this morning. I really wish we had a more robust discussion thread for this shit because Reddit is so exhausting to come through for any scrap of actual content.
 
I wonder if the whole "muh autism" thing came into play with accepting a plea. They didn't want to let Kohberger take the "can Autistic people get the death penalty" to the Supreme Court.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
I wonder if the whole "muh autism" thing came into play with accepting a plea. They didn't want to let Kohberger take the "can Autistic people get the death penalty" to the Supreme Court.
It came into play that his lawyers tried the autism defence to try and get death penalty off the table. However, the court wasn't having it - which is obvious why. Kohberger is clearly asperger light at best and clearly intelligent enough to understand that murdering four people might lead to the death penalty. We're not talking about a glue-eating tard here.
 
Death is often times the appropriate punishment for a crime, and yet we have allowed the corruption in our justice system to make it seemingly a least desirable outcome for the state. Instead of sparing monsters from the chopping block, we should be dismantling the rot in our system that makes it an unviable option. Killing four young adults in cold blood and getting rewarded with three hots and a cot isn't justice.
Fucking a. If innocent people are sent to death row, how many innocent people get convicted for lessor crimes?

Subs like that tell me the Internet was a genuine mistake.
 
Back