Derrick
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Missing a couple.
View attachment 5991120View attachment 5991126View attachment 5991127
View attachment 5991129View attachment 5991132View attachment 5991135View attachment 5991149View attachment 5991153View attachment 5991159View attachment 5991160View attachment 5991163View attachment 5991167
This one would be a real stretch for 793:
View attachment 5991187
It works because there is no number or letter between the 79 and 3.This one would be a real stretch for 793:
View attachment 5991187
Unfortunately this would not work as there is nothing separating the last 7 in 177 and the 2.
Unfortunately by their very episodic nature miniseries could never work. The show was broken up into two episodes both being fifty nine minutes, if the filmmakers intended for this to be seen as one continuous movie I do not think runtime, which combined would be less than two hours, was the issue, not that it would matter as we don't count episodic movies. It may seem a bit stringent or harsh to not accept 793. but the problem is that once we make an exception for one we'll have to make an exception for them all, which would take away from what this thread is for. However I feel confident, given what I've seen throughout this thread, that somebody autistic enough will be able to find a film which meets the criteria we're looking for for each number between one and a thousand.Since "The 7.39" has been posted several times and rejected as a miniseries, I'd like to take this opportunity to make a case that at least some miniseries could count as a movie. The reason being that a short TV miniseries (2-3 segments, 4-6 hours or so) has more in common with a made for TV movie than with an episodic TV series.
For one thing, watching such a miniseries in sequence feels like watching a long movie. Unlike most TV shows where each episode tends to have it's own story, in a miniseries, each installment picks up exactly where the previous left off. If you edited them all together, it would come across like a long movie.
These kinds of miniseries are likely written and filmed like a movie would be--a single plot, filmed all at once. I think they're only broken up because of the length. While most people wouldn't be interested in watching a 6 hour movie all at once, they would watch it in 2 hour segments over the course of 3 days.
It's getting tougher. 772 seems to barely qualify:
I don't understand the objection. The title is 1-7=72=0. The goal is 772 (not 177), so there is no need to separate the 7 from the 2.Unfortunately this would not work as there is nothing separating the last 7 in 177 and the 2.
My bad, I was in error in thinking we needed the 177 for some reason, you are right this has 772 completely separate and would work.I don't understand the objection. The title is 1-7=72=0. The goal is 772 (not 177), so there is no need to separate the 7 from the 2.
Perhaps it would be best for it to die out, given the large amount of gaps we now have it seems unlikely that they will ever be filled in and the last thing we'd want is people just randomly jumping 20-30 at a time without any intentions of filling in the missing, it would defeat the whole purpose of the thread. We've never had gaps this big before and, unlike before, it seems unlikely that somebody can find a short film for each of them.This thread is in danger of dying, so I'll get us up to 800, with unfortunately many more gaps:
Good news! I have found a proper 739. It passes the test of having an IMDB page.Since "The 7.39" has been posted several times and rejected as a miniseries, I'd like to take this opportunity to make a case that at least some miniseries could count as a movie. The reason being that a short TV miniseries (2-3 segments, 4-6 hours or so) has more in common with a made for TV movie than with an episodic TV series.