Canada is a failed state

For those being doom and gloomy about this country, I agree with you, but I think it presents several opportunities for those who don't care if it fails.

Start encouraging the angry (anonymously, if you can) to find out and show up at the addresses of Liberal politicians and the elite they serve. Protesting outside one's own residence is a GREAT way to make them scared.

When society breaks down and there is rioting in the streets, either make sure you're in a rural area far away from it, or take advantage of it. Encourage those who destroyed this country to fight each other. It shouldn't be hard to convince an angry communist to show up at Galen Weston's mansion.

Use the breakdown to aquire resources, (illegally if nessescary, and the cops are either non-existant or fighting other battles) and protect yourselves and your families.

The mentally ill leftists, trannies and commies will be the first to die, as they posess no survival skills. They have subverted our institutions, media and academia, and are partly the reason why we are in this mess. Don't help them.

Once cops and bodyguards are occupied or driven out of town, there will be no one one to protect the elite. You think some rich Liberal fuck knows how to fire a gun?

Canada is dead, and I see no reason to support it.

Best we can do is ride out the waves, and focus on the future. OUR future, my friends. Not Canada's.

Nothing cleans like fire.

Let Canada burn.
 
A long-held belief of mine is that the federal government (particularly left-wing parties) operate under the assumption that they can "guide" the markets through regulation and incentives.
Once you know the trick, you see it everywhere. I've started to notice it in other countries as well, such as NZ and AUS. I've seen suggestions online that it is pronounced in countries with a similar court & legislature as that's where it is easiest to subvert.
Best we can do is ride out the waves, and focus on the future. OUR future, my friends. Not Canada's.
Canada is a good country that is overrun by fags. After the fall it will re-emerge like the proverbial Phoenix. Whoever* coined that tree of liberty quote was more politically astute and historically literate than I am, and everyday it sounds more convincing.
What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure.
*it was Jefferson to William Stephen Smith (John Adams Son in Law)
 
Canada is a good country that is overrun by fags.
Canada is a good territorially-biased oligarchy, the very act of Confederation purpose-built it that way. There are maybe potentially good countries within it, but its existence as a ON/QC-dominated singularity is rotten by definition.
 
Canada is a good territorially-biased oligarchy, the very act of Confederation purpose-built it that way. There are maybe potentially good countries within it, but its existence as a ON/QC-dominated singularity is rotten by definition.
Personally, I am a great proponent of decentralization. The smaller the governed area, the greater the freedom of the populace within. Canada is too big, and the population too fragmented, to have homogenous laws throughout the country. If there has to be a federal government to rule over the entire country, the federal laws should only cover the bare minimum that every province can agree with.
IMO, it would be better to have smaller countries/city states that use treaties to govern how we interact with each other. However, I don't believe TPTB would allow Canada to become reality. So if we must be a contiguous state with an overriding federal body, the main principle in federal legislation should be one of minimalism.
As I hinted above, I'm not an expert in politics or history, so maybe there are good reasons why decentralization is not a reasonable solution in governance. If there is an obvious argument against it, I am at a loss as to what that might be.
 
As I hinted above, I'm not an expert in politics or history, so maybe there are good reasons why decentralization is not a reasonable solution in governance. If there is an obvious argument against it, I am at a loss as to what that might be.
Decentralization tends to minimize sociopaths' ability to pillage the state treasury and sell influence to compensate their absolute lack of market value.

As such, we can't actually have a system that's rationally designed and, if you were to develop one (like Jeffersonian Democracy), said sociopaths would chip at it to have crevices from which they can parasite off of wider society.
 
Around the time the documentary "inside job" was released in the U.S in 2010 a smaller Canadian documentary was produced called 'poor no more' around that time as well. Back in 2010 the "poors" featured in the documentary all owned their own homes. But had shitty working conditions and minimal benefits (one women who worked at LCBO got her chemo on her lunch hour). Most people had a car too. It talked about corporate greed etc. But none of it seemed quite extreme as it is today. The CEO of LCBO made "700k" a year in 2010 - big deal.

I'm not saying there wasn't problems back then, but it's shocking how much worse things have gotten in 13 years. Things sucked back then for low wage workers but they were still able to own homes, have cars, buy food. This is nothing like today. And back then the middle class was not particularly affected by these problems. The bad working conditions and lack of benefits issue mainly affected thr poor. If you were middle class in Canada in 2010 your quality of life was literally exceptional.

Still what the fuck happened?
 
Around the time the documentary "inside job" was released in the U.S in 2010 a smaller Canadian documentary was produced called 'poor no more' around that time as well. Back in 2010 the "poors" featured in the documentary all owned their own homes. But had shitty working conditions and minimal benefits (one women who worked at LCBO got her chemo on her lunch hour). Most people had a car too. It talked about corporate greed etc. But none of it seemed quite extreme as it is today. The CEO of LCBO made "700k" a year in 2010 - big deal.

I'm not saying there wasn't problems back then, but it's shocking how much worse things have gotten in 13 years. Things sucked back then for low wage workers but they were still able to own homes, have cars, buy food. This is nothing like today. And back then the middle class was not particularly affected by these problems. The bad working conditions and lack of benefits issue mainly affected thr poor. If you were middle class in Canada in 2010 your quality of life was literally exceptional.

Still what the fuck happened?


I suspect what was posted previously is true and anglo Canadians are actually the most low information and mass brainwashed population in the developed world.

That being said, nothing is broken or "going wrong" in Canada if it's working exactly as it's rulers intend it to.

A lawless, consequence free, post-national globalist playground for the wealthy and a soon to be Dubai level underclass of hoser retards that won't realize anything is amiss until 5 years past too late at the earliest. Not to worry the CBC will always be free and you can always console yourself by obsessing about America's surface level cultural disorder to the exclusion of real local factual information, relevant to you and your actual life in another actual other country.
 
Canada is a good territorially-biased oligarchy, the very act of Confederation purpose-built it that way. There are maybe potentially good countries within it, but its existence as a ON/QC-dominated singularity is rotten by definition.
Made worse by geography. Part of why the US was able to unify so much was its river network and intracoastal water way. Deserts and Mountains were no obstacle when you can just sail around them on a boat. In the 19th century it was faster to go from Saint Louis to Boston by boat down the Mississippi and then up the Atlantic coast then it was just cutting straight line across the continent. Try going from Calgary to Toronto in the same time frame.

In retrospect the Oregon Treaty between the US and the UK was a hideous mistake. Alot of Canada's headaches, both for their ruling elites in Ontario and for their subjects out west would have been solved if British North America ended at the tip of the Great Lakes. Alberta and British Columbia are essentially part of the US Pac Northwest/Cascadia in all but name, and a huge part of the development both in population and economy in that area (and Yukon) came from Americans coming over the border either to look for Gold or Cheap(er) land.
 
Made worse by geography. Part of why the US was able to unify so much was its river network and intracoastal water way. Deserts and Mountains were no obstacle when you can just sail around them on a boat. In the 19th century it was faster to go from Saint Louis to Boston by boat down the Mississippi and then up the Atlantic coast then it was just cutting straight line across the continent. Try going from Calgary to Toronto in the same time frame.

In retrospect the Oregon Treaty between the US and the UK was a hideous mistake. Alot of Canada's headaches, both for their ruling elites in Ontario and for their subjects out west would have been solved if British North America ended at the tip of the Great Lakes. Alberta and British Columbia are essentially part of the US Pac Northwest/Cascadia in all but name, and a huge part of the development both in population and economy in that area (and Yukon) came from Americans coming over the border either to look for Gold or Cheap(er) land.
You could include Saskatchewan and Manitoba as all of the Prairie Provinces are extensions of the Great Plains (though the rivers here empty into Hudson Bay and the Arctic Ocean). It was actually required to travel through the United States to get to them before the completion of the Canadian Pacific Railway in 1885.
 
Who do you think is worse Justin Trudeau or Joe Biden?
Did Biden give a standing ovation to an SS War Hero?

Going to have to say Biden is worse (but then again Biden was tough on crime in the 90s)

Still what the fuck happened?
Canada is now Khalistan (we imported infinite Pajeets)

At least the Arabs have the sense to be Anti-semitic. Pajeets worship at the alter of Kikes.
 
Around the time the documentary "inside job" was released in the U.S in 2010 a smaller Canadian documentary was produced called 'poor no more' around that time as well. Back in 2010 the "poors" featured in the documentary all owned their own homes. But had shitty working conditions and minimal benefits (one women who worked at LCBO got her chemo on her lunch hour). Most people had a car too. It talked about corporate greed etc. But none of it seemed quite extreme as it is today. The CEO of LCBO made "700k" a year in 2010 - big deal.

I'm not saying there wasn't problems back then, but it's shocking how much worse things have gotten in 13 years. Things sucked back then for low wage workers but they were still able to own homes, have cars, buy food. This is nothing like today. And back then the middle class was not particularly affected by these problems. The bad working conditions and lack of benefits issue mainly affected thr poor. If you were middle class in Canada in 2010 your quality of life was literally exceptional.

Still what the fuck happened?
Fuck miss the old days.
 
So I recently found out my very small, very rural town has reached the threshold of pajeets. Now we're celebrating pajeet holidays and setting off fire works.

10 years ago this town was fucking lily white. Now you see at least 40% indians. And that's only in this small, bumfuck nowhere town.
Drive them out with plumbing, Christian values, and decoderant. Pajeets are terrible and nothing like Apu and his family.
 
Drive them out with plumbing, Christian values, and decoderant. Pajeets are terrible and nothing like Apu and his family.
Can't. We're the perfect hotpot for pajeets:
A) Retirement town, so most of the land is for sale
B) Native(as in european not feather niggers) Canadians are poor as shit
So you have Rajesh coming over and buying family family farms and businesses and then using that to chain migrate his whole extended family.

And if you know indians once they start managing a place they'll employ nothing but indians. So we just get poorer and they keep pouring in.
 
Can't. We're the perfect hotpot for pajeets:
A) Retirement town, so most of the land is for sale
B) Native(as in european not feather niggers) Canadians are poor as shit
So you have Rajesh coming over and buying family family farms and businesses and then using that to chain migrate his whole extended family.

And if you know indians once they start managing a place they'll employ nothing but indians. So we just get poorer and they keep pouring in.


I got this creeping feeling that I need to brush up on my Francais... and this time not for the loose chouchou in Montreal, but just to have somewhere to live rural that can't be ransacked by the 3rd world over the course of a few years.

Don't think anywhere Anglo, no matter how remote is going to be safe and your standard issue Canadian corner-cuck will defend mass immigration until the day they die on a healthcare waiting list so 1000 non-Canadians can go ahead of them first.
 

FA2A03BA-1F82-4099-AF5A-4FE732EE3048.jpeg
Get ready!
 
I got this creeping feeling that I need to brush up on my Francais... and this time not for the loose chouchou in Montreal, but just to have somewhere to live rural that can't be ransacked by the 3rd world over the course of a few years.

Don't think anywhere Anglo, no matter how remote is going to be safe and your standard issue Canadian corner-cuck will defend mass immigration until the day they die on a healthcare waiting list so 1000 non-Canadians can go ahead of them first.
You're out of luck. Quebec imports Haitians.
 
Back