jje100010001
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2020
The problem is that Canada needs someone who can tamp down on centrifugal provincial movements (Legault, Kenny), make unpopular national realignments, and reaffirm belief and confidence in nation unity in this era of increasing instability- but Trudeau is not that type of person- he is essentially subservient to Quebec-Ottawa-bureaucractic interests (and the rest of his cabinet is captured by the Laurentian elites and laptop castes). And like Biden I would almost argue that he's a figurehead in all but name only, and more policy-making power resides in the PMO with Freeland and friends like Gerald Butts.For all the progressive rhetoric about "change", the Canadian government is extremely resistant to any kind of meaningful reform because it would threaten the Laurentian elite's chokehold on the system. Trudeau's promise of electoral reform was one such example. He bragged that the 2015 election would be the last to use "first past the post", but reneged on it. Why? The other parties and the committee on it wanted proportional representation while he personally wanted a ranked ballot because it would (in theory) give the Liberals successive supermajorities under the assumption that they were most Canadians' second choice. Geography is likely Canada's biggest weakness because the Canadian Shield separates southern Ontario from the west and the Laurentians possess a "one size fits all" mentality that doesn't work for a country that is as large and sparsely populated as ours. British Columbia is more physically and culturally tied to the Pacific Northwest while the Prairie Provinces are tied to the Great Plains states. It does not help that Quebec is always looking to extract concessions from Ottawa, which the latter more often than not caves in for the sake of "national unity" while ignoring or outright mocking discontent in the West.
It does not help that Trudeau is an imperious narcissist who listens to no one except those who share his worldview. He has done more to divide Canadians than any Prime Minister because he used vaccines as a wedge and is now doing the same with gun control and abortion by importing the American culture wars into the Canadian mainstream. I genuinely believes that he hates those who resist his attempts at domination like Jody Wilson-Reybould. She wrote in her memoir, Indian in the Cabinet, that he grew angry and aggressive when she resisted his attempts to pressure her before he ultimately threw her out of caucus. Then look at his conduct during question period where he lashes out like a child at the Conservatives simply because they oppose him, which is why they are her majesty's loyal opposition. Underneath the smiles and false affability is a man who is a spoiled and cruel child: he did not just want to see the Freedom Convoy broken up, but utterly destroyed. Hence why he invoked the Emergencies Act. Similarly, he wants Alberta under the yoke because the province had the audacity to defy his family. Hence, the canceled pipelines and attempting to push the so-called Just Transition, which ironically did more to help Putin by keeping Canadian crude landlocked. The only reason Jagmeet Singh escaped Justin's wrath is because Jughead prostrated before him and is no threat to him because the NDP have no leverage on the Liberals because of their dire finances.
I hesitate to call Canada a dictatorship, but Trudeau is a petty tyrant. Canadians by and large do not want to believe that we could horrid person to lead the country, and his supporter do act like deranged cults who will fiddle in Ottawa while the rest of the country. It might be more desirable for Canada to fragment given the hyper-polarization here and the Laurentians increasing unhinged behavior.
The fact that there is no additional capacity to bring Alberta crude to the Maritimes is a national security failure, same with the destruction of housing affordability in nearly every major city. Same with the systematic demolition of Canadian pride, and its literal replacement with Globohome Pride.
I agree with your note about the conservative nature of Canada's government; the fundamental issue is that Canada is fundamentally less dynamic and more inherently British-conservative in nature than the US (sometimes to its benefit), but the need to set itself apart from the US conservativism means that the cultural zeitgeist is profoundly liberal. Thus you get the worst of both worlds- essentially liberal in its outward appearances, but hostile to actual necessary change- the antithesis of the pragmatism that lasted up into the 80s.
Last edited: