Canada is a failed state

imretardedok said:
I wonder how popular Poilievre would be right now if he exclaimed "total jeet removal" on the debate stage.

Barely any of them are citizens so who care if they get mad. When I voted it was old white people and that's it, heard the same from everyone else that has voted.
Click to expand...
This is white Canadian boomers we are talking about. They would sooner sellout their kids future than allow deporto.
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Agree
Reactions: PhoBingas, InteracialBowelSyndrome, Steamy Hot Poo Poo and 5 others
zzzten said:
The canadian government hasn't sold its citizens off to corporations in the same way the united states has.
We still have universal healthcare, paid leave, and maternity leave that the law requires every job to have.
In comparison, the united states is basically a third world country with openly corrupt politicians and billionaires that use the country as their personal playground. Not to mentioned the school shooting problem that is unique to the states.

So yes, I'd rather the oligarchs under canada, than the ones that have destroyed america.
Click to expand...
What do you think the "Buy Canadian" movement is? We're all already debt slaves to the same 4 banks, the same 3 telecommunications companies, etc etc

"At least we still have socialist programs! The heckin us is such a backwards country with its school shootings! They go bankrupt for Healthcare!" OK boomer

Politicians are scum no matter what country they're from, but what varies is how flagrant they are about it, and the current liberal government's been pretty open with their corruption and violation of ethics. Because they know that nobody will fight back so long as they keep pointing the finger at Trump and other external factors.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: thashell, Weak Wi-Fi, InteracialBowelSyndrome and 14 others
Saddest thing is that just because we have fucking universal health care, that somehow means govt didn't sell us out.

No, bitch, the government owns us.

The study is very clear about the fact that Canada has one of the worst performing health care delivery system despite spending billions more and hiring thousands more every single year.
Screenshot_20250419_171848_Chrome.webp

Great thing about communism is that it front loads all the benefits at first and then over time it becomes stagnant and inefficient because of bloated health care beaucracy and stagnant health care innovation and changes.

We need two tier system like yesterday.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: StevieLasVegas, Coo Coo Bird, PhoBingas and 13 others
Brutality said:
What do you think the "Buy Canadian" movement is? We're all already debt slaves to the same 4 banks, the same 3 telecommunications companies, etc etc

"At least we still have socialist programs! The heckin us is such a backwards country with its school shootings! They go bankrupt for Healthcare!" OK boomer

Politicians are scum no matter what country they're from, but what varies is how flagrant they are about it, and the current liberal government's been pretty open with their corruption and violation of ethics. Because they know that nobody will fight back so long as they keep pointing the finger at Trump and other external factors.
Click to expand...
I can't make sense of what you just wrote.
During the 2008 financial crisis, canadian banks didn't go under like the american banks due to stricter regulations. Ive had to correct you so many times in this thread. I don't know why you're raging at me

you guys want to be miserable fags raging at imaginary enemies rather than looking at the real causes of what's happening. then I hope you continue to enjoy your ignorance.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: Hot Potato, Chuckwagon, roo farmer and 11 others
zzzten said:
I can't make sense of what you just wrote.
During the 2008 financial crisis, canadian banks didn't go under like the american banks due to stricter regulations. Ive had to correct you so many times in this thread. I don't know why you're raging at me
Click to expand...
They got bailed out all the same.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Posix, Chadikus Maximus, greatUncleShitHeel and 1 other person
zzzten said:
I can't make sense of what you just wrote.
During the 2008 financial crisis, canadian banks didn't go under like the american banks due to stricter regulations. Ive had to correct you so many times in this thread. I don't know why you're raging at me
Click to expand...
They were still bailed out. Because if they werent we wouldve had a Zimbabwe collapse.

Nobody's getting angry here, and if you can't make sense of what I'm saying then maybe that's a self report.
zzzten said:
you guys want to be miserable fags raging at imaginary enemies rather than looking at the real causes of what's happening. then I hope you continue to enjoy your ignorance.
Click to expand...
Well i take back what I said about nobody getting angry lmao
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kane Lives, CloverKitty and greatUncleShitHeel
Brutality said:
They were still bailed out. Because if they werent we wouldve had a Zimbabwe collapse.

Nobody's getting angry here, and if you can't make sense of what I'm saying then maybe that's a self report.

Well i take back what I said about nobody getting angry lmao
Click to expand...
more annoyed than angry. Unless you're an actual paid shill whos job it is to sew dissent, I don't understand how you're able to be consistently wrong, ignore the corrections made about your statement, and then claim yourself to be right. you know people can read this entire conversation and see that you've given absolutely 0 evidence to back up any of your claims.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Chuckwagon, roo farmer, Steamy Hot Poo Poo and 5 others
zzzten said:
more annoyed than angry. Unless you're an actual paid shill whos job it is to sew dissent, I don't understand how you're able to be consistently wrong, ignore the corrections made about your statement, and then claim yourself to be right. you know people can read this entire conversation and see that you've given absolutely 0 evidence to back up any of your claims.
Click to expand...
"SOURCE BRO. WHERE IS SOURCE BRO"


GROK: The narrative that Canadian banks were entirely unscathed doesn’t tell the whole story. A 2012 report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) argues that Canadian banks received significant government support—totaling $114 billion at its peak between October 2008 and July 2010. This support came from multiple sources: the Bank of Canada, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), and even the U.S. Federal Reserve. For context, $114 billion was about 7% of Canada’s GDP in 2009, or roughly $3,400 per Canadian. The CCPA report notes that at certain points, three major banks—CIBC, BMO, and Scotiabank—relied on government support that exceeded their market value, suggesting they were "completely underwater" without this aid. For example, CIBC received $21 billion, about 1.5 times its market value at the time. The CMHC also purchased $69 billion in mortgage-backed securities from banks to provide liquidity, a move that some argue shifted risk onto taxpayers.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: PhoBingas, Chuckwagon, Posix and 5 others
HOMO FOR LIFE RETURNS said:
"SOURCE BRO. WHERE IS SOURCE BRO"


GROK: The narrative that Canadian banks were entirely unscathed doesn’t tell the whole story. A 2012 report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) argues that Canadian banks received significant government support—totaling $114 billion at its peak between October 2008 and July 2010. This support came from multiple sources: the Bank of Canada, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), and even the U.S. Federal Reserve. For context, $114 billion was about 7% of Canada’s GDP in 2009, or roughly $3,400 per Canadian. The CCPA report notes that at certain points, three major banks—CIBC, BMO, and Scotiabank—relied on government support that exceeded their market value, suggesting they were "completely underwater" without this aid. For example, CIBC received $21 billion, about 1.5 times its market value at the time. The CMHC also purchased $69 billion in mortgage-backed securities from banks to provide liquidity, a move that some argue shifted risk onto taxpayers.
Click to expand...
your source is an ai trained by info given by the united states government. are you retarded? That's rhetorical btw.

It's sad enough that you aren't able to ask critical questions and have to resort to citing an AI. but to do it so brazenly without a hint of why you might be in the wrong. now I just pity you
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Chuckwagon, roo farmer, Posix and 8 others
zzzten said:
more annoyed than angry. Unless you're an actual paid shill whos job it is to sew dissent, I don't understand how you're able to be consistently wrong, ignore the corrections made about your statement, and then claim yourself to be right. you know people can read this entire conversation and see that you've given absolutely 0 evidence to back up any of your claims.
Click to expand...
Ah yes, because they would pay someone to go on fucking kiwi farms, yep.

You've conceded most of your points. Talking about how Canada wasn't ruled by oligarchs then you backpedaled to say that we do have them and that you prefer canada's.

Is using a search engine beyond your comprehension?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Steamy Hot Poo Poo, CloverKitty, Chadikus Maximus and 4 others
Brutality said:
Gypsies do originate from the subcontinent after all, so it makes sense why you'd see some here
Click to expand...
They're genetically 75%+ Indian so that's where their ancestors are from.

I voted today and it was a pretty short line.

Turns out BC is issuing retaliatory tarriffs on goods travelling to Alaska so that's going to go over well.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PhoBingas, Lobster Cult High Priest, WanderingWalker and 2 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back