I'd imagine the NRxers will piggyback off of paleolibs and probably become the "moral guardians" of the next culture war when that one starts. And the reason most of them seem to be going fash, white identarian, monarchist, christ nationalist, etc is because NRx principles, theories, descriptions, etc. seem to very similar to many of the principles, theories, descriptions, etc. of those ideologies. At the very least, the base concept of a non-malleable hierarchy and elite theory.
As for Carl huffing Evola, I'd probably link that squarely on the shoulders of AA; since AA was huffing that retardation before Carl seemed to have even heard about the guy.
Probably cause AA pushes Paul Gottfried and couple other paleolibs hard. I think Thomas Sowell can be considered paleolib, probably. Although NRX will never gain mainstream acceptance imo even if paleolib does. NRX is paleolib on crack, a lot of it is just right wing ideas using left wing tactics with the more extremist parts of NRX being as close you can get to National socialism without being National socialism. Keith Woods in fact made a video called reclaiming socialism from the left. I find Evola cringe to be honest, AAs sources, some are good but most arent. Ive not read Spengler or Carlyle so I dont know but Evola is just a stupid smug bastard and honestly very fitting for Carl. I have been getting into a lot of NRX content though, Ubersoy and Charlemagne, AA Ive been watching for a while so we will see.
I find it fascinating that the very pro-Lgbt Scrump just finally now decides to beef with Carl, as though he wasn't aware of what he's always been. His ideological enemy.
Hes not pro LGBT necessarily, hes just a tranny chaser to the point (SFO has confirmed this) he isnt attracted to actual women, so practically gay. He describes himself like AA does as an "anti regime" person so if the regime is pro gay he will be anti gay. Again its no commitment to principles, its just the Vaush truth is downstream from power position but in reverse, what can be charitably called fake reactionary. In fact he was a liberal centrist cuck like most skeptics, Evelyn is one of the two troons he was fucking who pushed him rightward once covid hit, I have a suspicion the other is rose of dawn since Evelyn retweets her a lot.
AA has been trying to keep this group with disparate views together with duct tape and tweets. Its a bunch of foxes pretending to be Lions who are jealous of the current foxes. I like farming book recommendations from their group but I don't put stock in them as a lasting movement. The ego fights over minor slights show the cracks this coalition has.
I dont know why they havent unionized with the wider alt right yet, the Millennialwoes Morgoth Ubersoy Groyper Richard Spencer alt right. If they have to survive they will do it, Im sure of that since Carl has already been talking about how he likes Fuentes.
I see it as both liberalism and communism are material ideologies, so people may see some similarities between the ideologies, particularly with regards to things seen as problems. However, beyond that, the two are essentially as different as chalk and cheese, based on the fundamental presuppositions and principles they hold.
This is true, the way I see it there are aggressive ideologies and non aggressive ideologies, the non aggressive ideologies may be stagnant but will be more stable but the aggressive ideologies will be more pure and more unstable. I wrote a substack piece on fascism which describes this, about fascism being a political tactical doctrine (strategy guide) which is used by aggressive ideologies for their end goals, not an ideology by itself (I dont want to shill it here cause thats faggotry). Communism, Marxism, White collectivism, Sharia, Christian supremacy are examples of aggressive ideologies which will eventually resort to fascism. Liberalism, Libertarianism and Conservatism are non aggressive ideologies with relatively cleaner simpler goals. Liberalism and Communism are not the same, one also does not lead to another and even if they are supposedly the same semantically (theyre not) one is aggressive and the other is not.
I just happened upon this watching through some of my NRX backlog.
View attachment 5613342
Source with timestamp:
Sargoon has maybe judged that enough time has passed that he can finally tap dance on Jim's deathbed without recourse and decides to do so a bit towards the end of a 4 hour live stream. Old hits such as "he could have led a political movement but he just live streamed and collected super chats". He must have forgotten to include the peter pan with his lost boys line and imply grooming again.
I finally saw this, hes clearly seething and he doesnt understand that Jim is technically correct with the self defeating establishment bit. All of his comments were clearly projection, like Jim has been doing this from 2007, those Spax3 videos were the same as Tumblrisms deviants hugbox chronicles everything upto his recent streams, its not fucking audience capture. If anything whatever Carl said happened to himself and hes going off the deep end, I wouldnt be surprised if he becomes a groyper in 24. And the ego is so clearly palpable, talking about a good friend like a desperate ebeggar cause he criticized you in the past is just awful, even Jim wished Carl the best in the Year of the Chud finale stream. I wouldnt know about it, I worship Jim on an altar. Dave is also clearly trying to avoid the convo, idk much about him but he doesnt want to talk about it. Carl mightve learnt how to be a bit more palatable to other people but hes still the same white nigger he always was and I wish something terrible happens to him cause he hates my e-daddy.
