Carl Benjamin / Sargon of Akkad / Akkad Daily / The Thinkery / @not_sargon / @WarPlanPurple - Leader of the "Liberalists" & Droning Pseudo-Intellectual Boomer anti-SJW Activist, Applebees Waiter, Mass Shooter Whiteknight

Would you rape Jess Phillips


  • Total voters
    2,413
Thats insane and also is a knock against free speech. I was under the impression this place, kiwifarms, was a place for people to pretty much say and do anything and was all about the individual.

Actually the Kiwi Farms is the internet's largest Social Justice and Feminism website ever. Over 70% of our users are trannies and 40% are the blacks.

“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” Tyrion Lannister, (George R.R. Martin, A Clash of Kings)


"Sunset found her squatting in the grass, groaning. Every stool was looser than the one before, and smelled fouler. By the time the moon came up she was shitting brown water. The more she drank, the more she shat, but the more she shat, the thirstier she grew, and her thirst sent her crawling to the stream to suck up more water." Daenerys Targaryen, (George R.R. Martin, Dance with Dragons
 
more just an opportunist. It's easy to criticize things, and this lets him always critique other people's ideas by selecting the kinds of issues they dont concern themselves with

If you ever watch any of his debates, particularly with Alt-Right types, it always devolves into a game of twenty questions. Carl just constantly fires questions, nitpicks their answer and then jumps to the next question. It's deliberate and designed to keep his opponents on the backfoot.
 
If you ever watch any of his debates, particularly with Alt-Right types, it always devolves into a game of twenty questions. Carl just constantly fires questions, nitpicks their answer and then jumps to the next question. It's deliberate and designed to keep his opponents on the backfoot.

He doesn't even do it well, if the alt-right is owning you in these shitty debates then you're a shitty debator and not that bright to begin with.
 
accelerationism is potentially a viable strategy in my book... the dem socialist types have begun to advocate batshit insane unpopular policies like abolishing ICE, things that are totally untenable and reveal them as the nutjobs they are.

ocasio-cortez will go on to be a lameduck official who can't get anything done because her agenda clashes with that of corporate neo-lib democrats, meanwhile the increased talk about "socialism" will rile trump's base and intensify the prospects of civil conflict. the US is already in a "soft" civil conflict, it will only get worse as shit like this happens more and more, and if you think about it, a full-on US civil war in 2018 would be the ultimate "cow crossover"

:popcorn:
it's fine as long as you arent at the wheel when it happens (lest you be blamed), but also arent powerless (as you will be after the collapse too)

He doesn't even do it well, if the alt-right is owning you in these shitty debates then you're a shitty debator and not that bright to begin with.

I can see why he thinks highly of himself. Watching his twitter account the lefties do an absolute shit job debating him, when they actually show up to debate him which isnt often. I would think I can just chide people and pepper them with loaded questions too in that position.

Compared this to when he first came back he quote tweeted some nationalist/altright-y accounts and ended up getting ratio'd and lambasted in the replies. And I've often said they arent good at debating, and they arent because they are obviously amateurs and fall for things amateurs do, but it's still enough.

Naturally he almost exclusively takes jabs at lefties now from what I have seen

If you ever watch any of his debates, particularly with Alt-Right types, it always devolves into a game of twenty questions. Carl just constantly fires questions, nitpicks their answer and then jumps to the next question. It's deliberate and designed to keep his opponents on the backfoot.

Exactly. He sets up the debate where he has the advantage of attacking and still looks like shit.


For whatever reason this just isnt playing for me
 
Last edited:
Carl, Master Debater:
DhgLI2_W0AEFbjL.jpg
DhgLJe_W0AEsHMu.jpg
DhgLKB3X4AAVPRQ.jpg
 
I'm spastic when it comes to these Twiiter "politicians", is dude (you?) fucking with him or not?

Things I assume were jokes in regards to this shit generally end up being sincere, so I usually don't know what's happening in real time.

pretty sure Sweden guy is fucking with him, on the basis of Carl calling himself a liberal while joining a right-wing party. or further-right (?):
classical liberal.jpg
 
Has #Liberalists™ accomplished anything yet?

Thats insane and also is a knock against free speech. I was under the impression this place, kiwifarms, was a place for people to pretty much say and do anything and was all about the individual. Look at all the people who get mocked and smeared on here, some deserved, and some certainly not. I dont see anyone speaking up for them, I wonder how those people feel being attacked on here, yet I post one thing on a thread and am threatened with the banhammer. Hmmmm...

“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.” Tyrion Lannister, (George R.R. Martin, A Clash of Kings)

People want these threads to be readable. Spam isn't conducive to making cow threads a good archive that can be easily read.

He's actually becoming Steve Shives . wow.

Kind of an aside, but how is the Steve Shives thread so miniscule? Is he that boring of a lolcow?

His videos are unwatchable boring, from the music to his boring subject matter. He's also kinda generic, being a just another cucked man getting pushed around by his wife.
 
to be fair these leftie twitter types understand politics even less than carl does. "classical liberal" is basically an analog for "conservative" in the context of the modern liberal state, so really they are using the same words and just talking past each other.

the trick here is that sargon is not actually a "classical liberal," he's a social liberal. in practice his ideal country would basically be sweden or norway economically, but without hate speech laws or mass immigration. these retards on twitter thing being against mass immigration and political correctness is, in and of itself, a "conservative" position.

like i was saying earlier, sargon panders to actual conservatives and right-wingers by appropriating their rhetoric and memes and paying lip service to a few of their pet issues. if you listen to the guy speak at length about what he actually believes, it becomes obvious that he is not one of them.

here he is talking to the dyed in the wool ultra-progressive retard we know as kevin logan. logan gets flustered because sargon has a slight point of disagreement with him, but in meaningful terms they really don't diverge much at all. he is more interested in changing ukip to appeal to people like logan than he is in actually adopting ukip's existing platform. he agrees with logan more than he agrees with ukip.
 
Class warfare is when two classes fight one another. By definition the classes can not fight amongst themselves. So by saying that the immigration crisis is a form of class warfare is he implying that there is a vast conspiracy amongst the European bourgeoise in order to drive down the wages of the proletariat? Because if he is then he will have to say that the destabilisation of africa and the middle east was orchestrated by Europes ruling class in order to drive the migration to Europe. This is deep deep deep conspiracy territory the likes of which I would expect from a 9/11 truther, but then again he has flirted with trutherism in the past.

I also once heard him in a livestream with Isaac Cohen (The one that sexually harassed a girl on twitter while his child was in the room) say that the immigration crisis was a way for the bourgeoise of Europe to drive up the failing birth rates of the continent in order to fulfil the first criteria needed to launch a modern war (population surplus). He said that most likely the target was russia.
 
Class warfare is when two classes fight one another. By definition the classes can not fight amongst themselves. So by saying that the immigration crisis is a form of class warfare is he implying that there is a vast conspiracy amongst the European bourgeoise in order to drive down the wages of the proletariat? Because if he is then he will have to say that the destabilisation of africa and the middle east was orchestrated by Europes ruling class in order to drive the migration to Europe. This is deep deep deep conspiracy territory the likes of which I would expect from a 9/11 truther, but then again he has flirted with trutherism in the past.

There were a lot of European corporations shilling for mass immigration during the refugee crisis, maybe their intention really was to oversaturate the job market with low-skill workers. They were probably deceived by the NGOs who didn’t tell them that these people aren’t even qualified enough to do our low-skill jobs because their education system is not comparable to our standards in the slightest and most of them didn’t finish school anyway.
 
Back