Cartoon Industry thread - Showcasing the Spergery of the Animation Industry

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I cannot imagine getting upset at technology that will legitimately save artists hours or even potential days of unnecessary work and help get products out at a faster rate without sacrificing too much quality all because you're upset that a computer...makes mistakes?

The cartoon industry might be suffering but certainly not in the way they think it is.
Having AI saving the western industry is something the western industry isn't aware of.
 
So a few days ago... Netflix of Japan made this little short film using experimental AI generated background designs due to a labor shortage
https://youtube.com/watch?v=J9DpusAZV_0
And of course, Everyone got pissed of because "AI Is Bad"
I'm very easily moved by anything regarding a boy and a dog, so I guess I was too distracted by that to care about the AI thing.
 
Looks like a Ben Garrison cartoon with all those labels.
url(1).jpg
 

Attachments

  • url(1).jpg
    url(1).jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 18
So a few days ago... Netflix of Japan made this little short film using experimental AI generated background designs due to a labor shortage
https://youtube.com/watch?v=J9DpusAZV_0
And of course, Everyone got pissed of because "AI Is Bad"

Ah yes, the inkcels of art community. I unironically support AI due to it making these fags seethe. Before I just supported it cause looked cool & worked quick.

Also, I know one of those guys, 1st pic, 2nd comment (one with the cat) is R34 artist.

I'd say someone who's into art, I also unironically support AI art. I just want the industry fags to keep coping for having AI to be done quickly.

They're angry at AI taking their jerbs, not seeming to care that the "+Human" means some human artist helped clean the background art up. Which means AI art is just another tool to aid artists by giving them a base to work off of to make additions to. It's literally no different from using pre-rendered bases in Photoshop and Blender and the like.

Perhaps I'm just being ignorant here but if these people are really this concerned, let them know that there are plenty of art-driven jobs such as industrial and graphic design with low entry requirements which have too many intricacies to be "replaced" by machines (except for maybe those globalized corporate illustrations, but that's beside the point). Sure, most people don't have the academics of an architect, nor the patience to work in a semi-restricted, team-based creative environment but at least you can still muck about in your own time rut-free weather that'd be animating/ drawing R34 degenerate crap or otherwise. I'm not trying to discourage people from working as full time artists/ animators to instead peruse a meaningful career (I don't know this thread's consensus on that) over some code but, in my opinion, it sounds delusional to claim that your skill has gone entirely to waste when there are plenty of other things that can benefit from it greatly.

I just watched the short. What did I fucking say?
View attachment 4422644
View attachment 4422648
View attachment 4422652
View attachment 4422636
It's a collab with a human and an AI. Kinda similar to the short about a human boy and his pet robot dog. It's like poetry, it rhymes, and Twitter artists are a bunch of fucking brats.

I cannot imagine getting upset at technology that will legitimately save artists hours or even potential days of unnecessary work and help get products out at a faster rate without sacrificing too much quality all because you're upset that a computer...makes mistakes?

The cartoon industry might be suffering but certainly not in the way they think it is.

Having AI saving the western industry is something the western industry isn't aware of.

I'm very easily moved by anything regarding a boy and a dog, so I guess I was too distracted by that to care about the AI thing.


Art was up till very recently regarded the most human of activities because of its intuitive bend.
What pisses some people against AI produced art is not the consequences for today but in 5 or 15 or 25 years time when AI will be doing all or almost all of the work including the creative part.

I kind of understand the art fags who hate this because I tend to dislike CGI animation, but it now has become practically the only animation in American feature films. And I could visualize a future where even scriptwriting could be left to a computer with only some final input by the studio head, if that.

Sure, that doggie cartoon was supervised by humans, and the backgrounds that the AI produced were corrected by hand, but to be honest and frank, those corrections could be considered superfluous: the untouched AI art could have made the final cut and no one would have noticed.

Now artists, the most expendable of professions, but at the same time the most «unique» are beginning to lose their uniqueness but have their expendability increased to 11.
 
So a few days ago... Netflix of Japan made this little short film using experimental AI generated background designs due to a labor shortage
https://youtube.com/watch?v=J9DpusAZV_0
And of course, Everyone got pissed of because "AI Is Bad"
AI made or not, it’s a tool that people need to accept it’s here or not. People are too resistant to Change. If I’m going to be forced to accept trannies and neo-pronouns, they need to accept AIs are here and now.
 
AI made or not, it’s a tool that people need to accept it’s here or not. People are too resistant to Change. If I’m going to be forced to accept trannies and neo-pronouns, they need to accept AIs are here and now.
Same retarded cope & seethe happened when Photoshop first kicked in. Now everyone has it on their PCs & even phones.

I'll give it a few years, until government itself starts bitching, people will accept it.
 
Nah, thing won't change at least not for a while, CN has operated out of WB before especially when it was in the early stages, they only got the Burbank building in 2000, remember CN is a brand as well so to retire it completely is ridiculous
Look, I am well aware that they're still operated from Warner and had purchasing Hanna-Barbera studio during the early-2000s, but that's not my point. To reiterate here, CN has been seen as in denial in their social media presence and even in their quality of programs.
 
I'm so over the AI art sperging. I know someone who spergs about it nonstop despite not even being an artist anymore.
 
I'm so over the AI art sperging. I know someone who spergs about it nonstop despite not even being an artist anymore.
"Don't feed your images into AI sites, they will HAVE YOUR LIKENESS!!" yeah, and so does Mark Zuckerberg even if you don't have a Facebook and are just posted alongside other people who do have a facebook. So does the US government from the moment you're born in a hospital with security cameras. Who fucking cares. At least the AI shows me what I look like as an anime girl.
 
I'm so over the AI art sperging. I know someone who spergs about it nonstop despite not even being an artist anymore.

"Don't feed your images into AI sites, they will HAVE YOUR LIKENESS!!" yeah, and so does Mark Zuckerberg even if you don't have a Facebook and are just posted alongside other people who do have a facebook. So does the US government from the moment you're born in a hospital with security cameras. Who fucking cares. At least the AI shows me what I look like as an anime girl.


It´s a bit like music. There are people who find auto-tuned, written-by-commitee (or AI) music horryfying and souless and such critics are fucking spot on. But 95% of humanity doesn´t give a fuck as long as they have some background noise , so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Back
Top Bottom