Center For Countering Digital Hate: "Kill Musk's Twitter" - British Fake Charity Scam Running as a Political NGO Aims to Take X Down

TLDR: dude named Imrad Ahmed, a UK citizen, is running a personal campaign to end X, and is doing this underneath a scam charity that is lobbying government. In the UK a charity is explicitly barred from political campaigning. He has been very busy with meetings in the USA, lobbying Democrats who will listen to him to craft regulation that will impede X from continuing as a going concern.

https://x.com/xDaily/status/1848827266257535193

https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/election-exclusive-british-advisors

Leaked documents from the Center for Countering Digital Hate reveal their primary goal is to "Kill Musk's Twitter" by targeting advertising and leveraging EU regulations. The British non-profit organization hosted a private meeting with liberal groups opposing Musk’s free speech platform, including representatives from the Biden White House, Rep. Adam Schiff’s office, the Biden-Harris State Department, and Media Matters for America.

CCDH held a private conference w/ a slew of liberal groups organizing against Musk including Biden White House, Congressman Adam Schiff's office, Biden/Harris State Department officials, Canadian MP Peter Julian & Media Matters for America

Center for Countering Digital Hate gets a lot of money from Hollywood. Staff say that one of the donors is singer Selena Gomez, a client of Aleen Keshishian

The response from Musk was predictable:

 

[Weebburner]

tl;dr is after 2-3 centuries of exploration and ability to go to America, and two world wars, the only bongs left alive and in Bongistan are the most buck-broken serfs. Mostly ditto for Euros.

I'm also pretty sure there is something about liking soccer that turns a nation 100% faggot.

theres something to be said about there being no hard Englishman left after 2 world war. Pretty much same for all of Europe really.

 

[Sneedenhagen Chew]

Is there just something about bongs and euros in general that makes them crave for a nanny state? Just go back to monarchies you inbred retards then you can have all the rules and regulations you like and save the trouble and paperwork of a bureaucratic state.

With modern medicine and amenities, monarchy (even absolutist) by established dynasties with roots in the nation and region would be preferable to globohomo commie bureaucracy without any hint of exaggeration.

 

[Catboy Ranch]

This fag again?
View attachment 6552863
View attachment 6552867
The guy is essentially a hatchet man for globohomo by way of the Labour Party and its financiers.

the scam charities that were involved in getting civil service workers out of their offices to hold up commercially-printed placards during the summer riots in the UK are also apart of this charity constellation.

It seems like Labour has found a loophole around the no-politics rule in their charity law so they can use government employees to essentially run political ratfucking campaigns and dress them up in soothing graphics and language to make the public believe they are humanitarian charities when they are anything but.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

Imran Ahmed

Sounds like a pakistani. This guy is almost certainly a childmolester

 

[Thumb Butler]

Null, please register the domain CenterforDigitalHate.com/net/whatever and link it to here.

 

[AnOminous]

They can keep trundling on for centuries, in which case it's the people who eventually collapse, exhausted, demoralised and atomised by the state, and then take the government with them as a new polity is built on their graves, figuratively or literally.

Even the most "successful" of the early Twentieth Century commie regimes are long buried. A couple generations seems to be about as long as they last. China was doing fairly well by allowing a level of economic freedom but they've hollowed out their economy by letting people create a successful business, then fucking their shit up and stealing it, much like the USSR did. That's not a sustainable model and unlike the USSR's collapse, the Chinese economy cratering will actually probably be a global disaster.

 

[popsoda]

Being honest, though, is what we do here "Hate"?
I, personally don't think so. I don't hate the people that are documented on this site, well maybe some of them, but is that really the main theme to take away?
Bossmanjack? I don't really care to be honest, Ralph? Ugh what a fat uggo, but whatever. Rekieta? I don't get it .
If there is someone I truly hate that is featured on this webzone, that's the animal abusers. I'd like to see these weirdos try to defend them.

 

[Curzon Dax-sama]

Counter proposal: kill the Bonglang gubberminth.

 

[Sneeter Rabbit]

Even the most "successful" of the early Twentieth Century commie regimes are long buried

I was thinking more of the Romans and then Byzantines. The state survived at the expense of the people, who basically withdrew from history and reemerged as something different after centuries of foreign rule.
Often an elite class will seek to preserve the institutions of their power even where it cannibalises the founding population of the state itself, this I see happening in the United Kingdom today.

 

[AnOminous]

I was thinking more of the Romans and then Byzantines. The state survived at the expense of the people, who basically withdrew from history and reemerged as something different after centuries of foreign rule.

I was talking about Communist authoritarian states. Monarchies and dynasties can be remarkably durable and actually have their positive aspects. So long as the royal line doesn't degenerate (although it always does eventually) and there is some continuity in social structure, there is often no particularly good reason to change them. Or at least in the past.

 

[Ashkenazi Porn Actress]

Von Mises actually opined (in the 30s I think) that he expected socialist countries to last around 60 years because thats how long it would take until the most durable capital goods were rotten through after mismanagement and no adequate replacement/expansion. He was off by a decade or two but mostly on target.

 

[The Taco Santo!]

View attachment 6552861

Okay, Bob Chipman's on board, not that he'll contribute money or anything else. Great start, though. You could always leave twitter, Bob, no one's forcing you to use Elon's platform.

 

[Curzon Dax-sama]

Von Mises actually opined (in the 30s I think) that he expected socialist countries to last around 60 years because thats how long it would take until the most durable capital goods were rotten through after mismanagement and no adequate replacement/expansion. He was off by a decade or two but mostly on target.

I think he was on point within 5 years: after the Russian civil war, a lot of the country's infrastructure needed rebuilding. A process that lasted through the 1920s and most of the 1930s. So, the 60 years is indeed very, very accurate.

 

[Fatsuit Shinji]

I'm convinced that World War II killed off so many of the based brits that the country was doomed afterwards. Same with Germany.

Close it was WWI that did it and WWII essentially killed nearly all of the remaining population. Trickle of a handful of the based brits had been noping TF out of England since the United State's independence. But most of those settled in elsewhere in the empire/Commonwealth and subsequently got kill off when it came time to die for Crown and country time and time again.

 

[JosephStalin]

Yo, Ahmed.

Eat shit. You don't even make a pimple on Elon Musk's ass.

Yo, Gomez.

Your IQ does not exceed your bust size, you useless twat.

Go pick corn out of cow shit and eat the corn.

 

[Kiwisee]

Musk is already doing a good job on killing Twitter without help from activists.

The only downside is, where will all the Twitter freaks go once it’s dead? Blue sky and Threads, maybe. It would greatly reduce their influence.

 

[Safir]

If the east Germans shot their own people and gorbachov sent in the tanks

Gorby was a br*tish spy. The USSR was done the moment the scabby fuck installed himself, but the rot had set in earlier, with Khrushchyov and his hohol whore. The USSR had one competent leader. It shows how strong the Communist economy was that it could win two world wars (1.5 and 2) and the space race and then stay afloat despite increasingly treacherous/senile leadership. The USSR is a good example of Communist values, but it is not a good example of "how to left" protips. If the true cost of running a Communist economy is a political system that outputs a hohol whore after one generation, it's not really sustainable.

Regimes

Fat and gay.

Regimes like that invariably collapse because they're shitty places to live and people can't make money.

Eat shit, solzhenitsyn.

People were able to make money in the USSR. People can't make money now (except by killing hohols). Businesses get raided, inflation destroys savings, food is garbage if it isn't poison, and of course, in the absence of an Iron Curtain, wealth is funneled overseas.

The best thing about the USSR was one couldn't steal land, or a factory. A Thot Leader could put diamonds up his boypussy and go on tour, but he couldn't put a diamond mine in there. But now they can.

 

[AnOminous]

solzhenitsyn.

Thanks for the compliment.

 

[Sneeter Rabbit]

I was talking about Communist authoritarian states

The Roman/Byzantine empires were authoritarian states and broadly non-dynastic. I only bring them up to warn people that a government allowed to rot doesn't necessarily fall apart. It can keep eating away at the social fabric for its own purposes, until the people are hollowed out completely.
When a governmental system crushes all alternatives and attacks anyone who seeks to seriously restructure it or move the centre of power, when it pervades every level and binds social life to itself, when it renders the peripheries dependent on the centre and suffocates their growth to feed itself it can create a stagnant order that only becomes more dysfunctional and more decrepit over time.
The 20th c. Communist states are patchy as examples, since Russia itself maintains the old paradigm of centralised rule from Moscow-St. Petersburg and unremitting authoritarianism, now with a large, impoverished and dying periphery. Russian federalism appears to be a mirage except where regional warlords like Kadyrov are concerned - these negotiate with the reigning City, they don't serve it.
The ideological trappings have changed while the structure remains in place, all political power emanates from 2nd Constantinople much as it did under Basil II, the result is an elite whose minds are in Moscow, where their power originates.

 

[Sister Miriam Godwinson]

I'm convinced that World War II killed off so many of the based brits that the country was doomed afterwards. Same with Germany.

You had eighty years to make more.