Charles Alexander Berry / Buck Daniel Riley / Toggle the Rat / @onebiggrumpyrat / ExitMouse / Smoochthispooch / huskeyindenial / clunkymunk - Doug Spink's little animal rapist friend

Toggle has argued countless times about how the furry fandom is inclusive to zoophiles and how zoophilia is a inherent part of the community. Judging by the reception Kero is getting, i'd say it is quite the contrary. There is no one outside his small circlejerk of animal rapists that support him and sees his mental sickness as normal and acceptable and, now that everyone knows his face, he's been experiencing the "acceptance and inclusiveness" of the fandom he talks so much about. Zoophilia activists are nothing but a small cancer in the community that deserve to be investigated for their crimes and have their identities shown.

Furries have a lot of deserved bad reputation, but it's good seeing that the majority of them have common sense and are against this kind of thing.
 
It's been awhile so apologies if I'm wrong, but I remember somewhere in the zoosadist thread Kero was talking on one of his social media accounts about his dog that passed away and I think the cause was something renal-related (kidney failure)?
Kero's dog died of a UTI, which is pretty eyebrow-raising in itself. I know it's not Chuck-related, just thought I'd clarify.
 
Right now im too lazy to figure out how to get an app to not open as an app while on mobile in an attempt to archive it, but i recall some small talk about the other members but not much in the first post on the thread. Unless it updated since last I checked.

It may or may not be useful to know who they are, in case they got some useful info (or if they themselves are zoos too, I guess.)
I think I got an archive at least for a page that records the fake names used for the other band members.


Also, with the help of spotify, looked at the band shamefinger.
On a fundraiser by party pat(?), he used the name farmer zanath, probably another fake name but who knows.

Hope this is useful to someone here.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210313-092221_Spotify.jpg
    Screenshot_20210313-092221_Spotify.jpg
    714.6 KB · Views: 139
  • Screenshot_20210313-092236_Spotify.jpg
    Screenshot_20210313-092236_Spotify.jpg
    522.9 KB · Views: 128
Toggle has argued countless times about how the furry fandom is inclusive to zoophiles and how zoophilia is a inherent part of the community. Judging by the reception Kero is getting, i'd say it is quite the contrary. There is no one outside his small circlejerk of animal rapists that support him and sees his mental sickness as normal and acceptable and, now that everyone knows his face, he's been experiencing the "acceptance and inclusiveness" of the fandom he talks so much about. Zoophilia activists are nothing but a small cancer in the community that deserve to be investigated for their crimes and have their identities shown.

Furries have a lot of deserved bad reputation, but it's good seeing that the majority of them have common sense and are against this kind of thing.
Most just dont talk about it, they brush it off as them somehow not being part of the community and do nothing about. If it wasnt because he was a Youtuber, Kero would still be roaming happily. Most furfags dont even recognize the other sickos, like Snake. They didnt care about a zoo on the fandom, they cared about "famous Youtuber drama".

So the reason why Toggle thinks like this is nothing more than the own inaction of the fandom as a whole to act like its a separate group and not the fandom itself with a rampant animal sex abuse problem.


It's been awhile so apologies if I'm wrong, but I remember somewhere in the zoosadist thread Kero was talking on one of his social media accounts about his dog that passed away and I think the cause was something renal-related (kidney failure)? Whatever it was, I remember not being surprised seeing how it was abused and the trauma from said abuse could have at least been an instigator to that poor dogs decline.
And the thing is, there was no mention (that I remember) of the dog being treated, not even a GoFundMe to help pay a vet bill.

Abnormalities almost always show up in blood (low RBC count, high glucose, lyme disease, etc.), so obtaining a blood sample is usually what a veterinarian does first after an external exam. And a lot of the time, it can be treated: there's medicine, food and certain types of therapy that can prolong a pet's life that's dealing with chronic health issues; pets with concerned owners don't just up and die from congestive heart failure or FIV anymore.
If the dog's that old, he should be seeing a veterinarian twice a year along with keeping up-to-date on vaccines. From simply skimming that PDF, there's a lot of things a veterinarian looks for in both the pet and the owner. If Charles was even half as responsible and cared half as much for his geriatric dog, he'd have already been caught.

The AVMA is right, I'm going to stop calling them zoophiles and start calling them animal sex abusers. No more flowery words that water down their actions and ignore the fact that animals are always a victim- they're sex abusers, plain and simple.
How long are these blood test viable? Like, lets talk in an hypothetical that he dicked his dog X time ago. How long could it be before the "traces" disappear?

Then again, it would be weird for the dog to not die from complications before the traces disappear, i imagine
 
How long are these blood test viable? Like, lets talk in an hypothetical that he dicked his dog X time ago. How long could it be before the "traces" disappear?

Then again, it would be weird for the dog to not die from complications before the traces disappear, i imagine
Well, I was speaking more about diseases in general, how it usually works behind-the-scenes. Gross shit like I think you're getting at couldn't get there unless there was an open cut or some other way for foreign bodies to get access to the bloodstream and even then it would normally be microorganisms like bacteria that shows up in tests (that's one way you can get sepsis). If anything, I would assume they would do something similar to what we do for humans who were raped: look for trauma like cuts, bruises, and scarring around the genital area, odd behavior when that area is touched, swabs for foreign...matter... I've only been working in the field for a few years and am currently getting properly educated myself, I just know a little more than the average normie; I am not a professional (yet). I could ask someone I know what they do procedure-wise when they suspect abuse, but how the hell can you bring that up out of the blue without sounding unhinged?

Anyway, I'm gonna stop so we can get back to railing on Charles Alexander Berry the Animal Sex Abuser.
 
Most just dont talk about it, they brush it off as them somehow not being part of the community and do nothing about. If it wasnt because he was a Youtuber, Kero would still be roaming happily. Most furfags dont even recognize the other sickos, like Snake. They didnt care about a zoo on the fandom, they cared about "famous Youtuber drama".

So the reason why Toggle thinks like this is nothing more than the own inaction of the fandom as a whole to act like its a separate group and not the fandom itself with a rampant animal sex abuse problem.
I've said it countless times off the forums so I'll iterate it here: 99.9% of the fandoms problems and its tattered corpse of a reputation are its fault and its fault alone. They won't police their conventions to stop sex weirdos from shitting them up (sometimes literally when you consider stuff like Rainfurrest) and won't be inclined to do so until enough venues refuse to house them. The first step to fixing a problem is to admit you have one and we've seen countless times that furries will never do that, and any who have enough sense to try to are shamed from speaking up or are ree'd at until they reconsider.


If anything, I would assume they would do something similar to what we do for humans who were raped: look for trauma like cuts, bruises, and scarring around the genital area, odd behavior when that area is touched, swabs for foreign...matter...
From what a vet tech friend of mine has said they'd probably only do so if the animal hadn't somehow gotten rid of the 'evidence' so to speak. Otherwise, they'd do as you said and look for physical and behavioral signs of abuse. Either way, I doubt Toggle would let his animal within three counties of a vet for fear of being caught and reported, not to mention being too lazy/poor to do so.
 
Right now im too lazy to figure out how to get an app to not open as an app while on mobile in an attempt to archive it, but i recall some small talk about the other members but not much in the first post on the thread. Unless it updated since last I checked.

It may or may not be useful to know who they are, in case they got some useful info (or if they themselves are zoos too, I guess.)
I think I got an archive at least for a page that records the fake names used for the other band members.


Also, with the help of spotify, looked at the band shamefinger.
On a fundraiser by party pat(?), he used the name farmer zanath, probably another fake name but who knows.

Hope this is useful to someone here.
Oh wow they look EXACTLY how you assume a dogfucking band looks like.... Or well who doesn't mind it if it's only Charles doing it.
 
Charles is spewing out pseudo-intellectual word diarrhea and wagging his smug fingers covered in the stench of animal fuckery that he'll never be able to wipe off:

(https://archive.ph/wip/KJr27)

1615750517428.png

1615750551481.png


tl;dr: Young furries are alt-right and should feel bad for not wanting animal fuckers in the furry fandom. Okay Chuck.
 
Last edited:
Charles is spewing out pseudo-intellectual word diarrhea and wagging his smug fingers covered in the stench of animal fuckery that he'll never be able to wipe off:

View attachment 1996981
View attachment 1996984

tl;dr: Young furries are alt-right and should feel bad for not wanting animal fuckers in the furry fandom. Okay Chuck.
So fucking stupid.
Furry was built around appreciation of cartoons, scifi and zine shit, not zooshit. Zoos are a completely different ballpark and not a furry exclusive thing. Zoosex communities, comics, sites were all a thing long before furry. While there's certainly a crossover with people who enjoy both things, the idea of zoos creating furry? Nah.

It's no mystery early furry was a mess, but it wasn't really zoo stuff. There was a lot of weird stuff like the burned furs, some small homophobic groups and all that. There's always been that kind of worry that the sexual side would destroy the community, but I think most folk have accepted now it's always going to have some sort of sexual aspect to it. That's just a people thing. You just need to vet who you're surrounded by.

'Desexualizing' the community is never going to really happen, but if the least you can do is openly denounce animal abusers, go for it. I'm happy to see people like Toggle and Kero told to fuck off. Fuck zoos who try to wriggle their way in and say they're just like any other furry. Him equating the bdsm and abdl shit is nonsense too. It's true a lot of lgbt folk prefer not to be seen as a 'kink party' when you go to pride and all the pup and leather folk and such come out, but I'm pretty sure a majority don't care what consenting adults do behind closed doors.

Funny how he's pointing at the younger folk being the issue, when they're the ones most likely to be manipulated into accepting his bullshit under the guise of being zoo-positive being a 'lgbt friendly' thing or some shit. There's so many young furries who genuinely are brainwashed into thinking they are real zoophiles and fly the zoo flag just because they like weird cartoon furry porn, leading to them becoming involved with real animal abusers.
 
Charles is spewing out pseudo-intellectual word diarrhea and wagging his smug fingers covered in the stench of animal fuckery that he'll never be able to wipe off:

(https://archive.ph/wip/KJr27)

View attachment 1996981
View attachment 1996984

tl;dr: Young furries are alt-right and should feel bad for not wanting animal fuckers in the furry fandom. Okay Chuck.
There's certainly different shades of "freak", Toggle, and some I think everyone could do without.

Obligatory NYPA, also, you dogfucking sicko
 
Charles is spewing out pseudo-intellectual word diarrhea and wagging his smug fingers covered in the stench of animal fuckery that he'll never be able to wipe off:

(https://archive.ph/wip/KJr27)

View attachment 1996981
View attachment 1996984

tl;dr: Young furries are alt-right and should feel bad for not wanting animal fuckers in the furry fandom. Okay Chuck.
Buck is getting salty after getting laughed and blocking furries that want dog fuckers gone.
He's slowly losing it
 
Funny how he's pointing at the younger folk being the issue, when they're the ones most likely to be manipulated into accepting his bullshit under the guise of being zoo-positive being a 'lgbt friendly' thing or some shit. There's so many young furries who genuinely are brainwashed into thinking they are real zoophiles and fly the zoo flag just because they like weird cartoon furry porn, leading to them becoming involved with real animal abusers.
I feel like there's a more than a few furries who are a part of the closed-mindedness belief that still like to think the furry community is an obscurely niche grassroots unknown fandom/community/whatever, and want to keep it that way while pretending to be all-inclusive, when all they want to do is is just try to goad the younger members of the community into thinking the way they do. They're the kind of people who think that the furry fandom is just fine being super freaky and out there. It's all kind of fear-tactical. "If you're a furry, you have to support all furries or else they'll get us", "you can't call yourself inclusive if you exclude these specific people", that sort of thing.

It's all bullshit, I think. Furry isn't mainstream, but it's common enough that it's not a niche thing anymore, especially when you've got companies like Disney that love to pander to the furry community and furries themselves who are in positions of production and development, or even normal people who know how the Internet works, like that person who designed the female Lombax in the new Ratchet and Clank game, or practically everyone who worked on Zootopia. Furries that think like Buck and Kero are fighting against the tide and are willing to drag as many people down with them as they can.
 
Last edited:
I feel like there's a more than a few furries who are a part of the closed-mindedness belief that still like to think the furry community is an obscurely niche grassroots unknown fandom/community/whatever, and want to keep it that way while pretending to be all-inclusive, when all they want to do is is just try to goad the younger members of the community into thinking the way they do. They're the kind of people who think that the furry fandom is just fine being super freaky and out there. It's all kind of fear-tactical. "If you're a furry, you have to support all furries or else they'll get us", "you can't call yourself inclusive if you exclude these specific people", that sort of thing.

It's all bullshit, I think. Furry isn't mainstream, but it's common enough that it's not a niche thing anymore, especially when you've got companies like Disney that love to pander to the furry community and furries themselves who are in positions of production and development, or even normal people who know how the Internet works, like that person who designed the female Lombax in the new Ratchet and Clank game, or practically everyone who worked on Zootopia. Furries that think like Buck and Kero are fighting against the tide and are willing to drag as many people down with them as they can.
Basically this comic.
 

Attachments

  • 1615138465892.png
    1615138465892.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 190
Charles is spewing out pseudo-intellectual word diarrhea and wagging his smug fingers covered in the stench of animal fuckery that he'll never be able to wipe off:

(https://archive.ph/wip/KJr27)

View attachment 1996981
View attachment 1996984

tl;dr: Young furries are alt-right and should feel bad for not wanting animal fuckers in the furry fandom. Okay Chuck.
SHUT THE FUCK UP

Well on a more serious note he isn't exactly wrong. Furries have always been weirdo sex pervert, however that doesn't mean it isn't horrendous Charles, It should not under any means be "accepted" because it's vile beyond belief. And all the younger furries that are against it are at least trying to do something (not gonna go on a furry fandom rant here but they're leagues ahead of what mr dogfucker is saying). And wtf is "anti-queer queers?" That's like saying an "antisemitic jew". It's the definition of an oxymoron retard.

Also lmao calling furries against dogfucking "alt right" :story: Keep on going Charles. I know you love the attention but it won't be healthy in the long run just sayin', But ah who am I kidding, if he had any sens of self-awareness the sociopath wouldn't even be where is now in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Since Charles is keeping quiet and this thread is at a bit of a standstill with not much for us to do, if the thread wants to help dig for evidence, there's been a new drop of zoosadism logs.


Look for a profile that matches our Chuck E. Cheese, ratboy extraordinaire.

- 24-28 years old (date of birth is 16th of May, 1989 if you need to check ages.)
- Lives in the South/Tennessee, Memphis.
- Husky is favorite type of dog.
- Would be living with Trevor at this time, look for mentions of Bear.
- Married on Oct. 17, 2015- he might have told the group.
- Inclined to talk about music, look for any mentions of being in a band.
- Might call their dog "Joey" or Toby.
- Strong interest in cub porn, focusing around chipmunk characters.

There's a lot to go through, but it's something that will definitely help if we can have a solid link to him and the zoosadists.
 
Back