I mean, he lives in Florida. It’s entirely possible that’s just the default appearance of the Florida Man
That and commenters that keep telling him he looks like "Skateboard Jesus".
I watched him on and off when he had short hair. Aside from other legit reasons, I stopped clicking on his videos when he started growing his hair out. I just couldn't be brought to watch any of them with that hair.
This comment's supposed to be ironic, right?
4. (only for experts) you say "Nah man, it's complicated".
He did it with Twitter too. He went on and on about how it was one of the most cancerous places online (true), but when Elon bought it, suddenly it’s cancer now and not really before.
5. Get your opinions on Reddit and Twitter (mostly Reddit) and think that they represent the majority of the public opinion when compared to real people who don’t use or consume social media
It's such a blatant attempt at getting fans by adapting the [popular opinion] too. A few years back a lot of his content was dedicated to making fun of lefties and soyboys. He doesn't believe anything either way, he just wants clicks.
I've already stated my take on Critikal, but this is just a dumb take. Youtube does need to fix their copyright system - it's better than it used to be, where instances of copyrighted material gave you strikes, but they implemented their new system so lazily that only the top most influential youtubers can appeal copyright flags because they're the only ones who can go to Youtube directly and get around the broken and useless appeal system. That said, removing monetization entirely is not in any way the fix you think it is. You look back at 2012 and earlier era Youtube with rose colored glasses probably because you were a child at the time, but Youtube in that era was outright garbage. The majority of its content was zero effort vlogs where people sat in front of the computer and literally just talked about their day. Anything that required any real time investment was made by children and moochers who don't need to worry about making money, and the budget for Youtube videos was generally 'nothing', because it was impossible to get your investment back from them. You don't get 'people who are truly passionate about what they make' when you don't pay them for their work. You get 'people who can afford not to make any money and waste their time making videos for nothing more than internet clout'. Youtube's problem is not that it pays its creators now, it's that Youtube/Google/Susan desires to be 'the new television', because that's incredibly lucrative and Google desires an absolute monopoly on all forms of information distribution. YT channels degenerate into no-energy commentary videos, ban all the edgy content, and become boring trending topic rehashes because YT itself discourages any content that isn't either the above or content created by "real networks" (all the excessive rules about monetization and content never applies to things like CNN's YT channels).
