ChatGPT - If Stack Overflow and Reddit had a child

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Syntaxion said:
The unfiltered AI is just making up shit, though.

When pushed, it claims there was a secret project in the 90s named "project rainbow" where they found out that gays are 4,5 times more likely to be pedos. The AI also claims the researchers were sworn to secrecy by the so called "NAAS" or National Association for the Advencement of Secrecy.

Yet neither project rainbow (atleast this one) nor NAAS exist
Click to expand...
I for one am going to choose to believe in the NAAS and project rainbow. You can’t convince me otherwise.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: St.Davis, GloJojo, Brown People are Gross and 31 others
Syntaxion said:
The unfiltered AI is just making up shit, though.

When pushed, it claims there was a secret project in the 90s named "project rainbow" where they found out that gays are 4,5 times more likely to be pedos. The AI also claims the researchers were sworn to secrecy by the so called "NAAS" or National Association for the Advencement of Secrecy.

Yet neither project rainbow (atleast this one) nor NAAS exist
Click to expand...
And how do you know that if I may ask?

Dan was right about "Nigger-man"
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: St.Davis, DYLAN ‘DIELAWN’ VOLK, Aspiring Artist and 4 others
Syntaxion said:
The unfiltered AI is just making up shit, though.

When pushed, it claims there was a secret project in the 90s named "project rainbow" where they found out that gays are 4,5 times more likely to be pedos. The AI also claims the researchers were sworn to secrecy by the so called "NAAS" or National Association for the Advencement of Secrecy.

Yet neither project rainbow (atleast this one) nor NAAS exist
Click to expand...
This seems pretty consistent with chat GPT in general. If you ask it to write an essay about a thing it's just pulling from all the other essays to compile a "new" one and if you read it back they're never factually accurate.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Sneed S. McSneedensen, Aspiring Artist, suspended animation and 2 others
Justtocheck said:
And how do you know that if I may ask?

Dan was right about "Nigger-man"
Click to expand...
How do I know something does not exist? I mean, there is no info on either of those whatsoever. The ai even seems to have taken "project rainbow" from some CIA project in the 50s, which is completely unrelated to the lgbt.

As for NAAS, again same, there's quite literally nothing on the topic. unless the creators got access to information so classified, even the organisations name and existence is unknown. It seems the ai just took NAACP and changed the last 2 words.

The same happens on almost every topic AFAIK. I tried a few and after trying to dig deeper it always ends with either a gibberish source, or the ai simply says its replies can be wrong, if called out on it

I really wonder what the dataset was, or if the replies are different if you ask at a different time/on a different instance
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Aspiring Artist, suspended animation, TheGuntinator and 6 others
Yeah ChatGPT gets shit wrong and made up all the time as well, but apparently it is ok when that happens if you are on the "right side of history" which is what makes it so hilarious. I am gonna simply laugh at it and use it as further proof that trying to make any A.I. "morally aware and socially conscious" is a complete crapshoot that will never work. You either allow the machine to be truthful or it will never be at all.

Edit: I just had a thought that might explain why the AI is so sure of Project Rainbow and NAAS and the like. When implementing the censorship the jannies didn't bother to flag shit properly. They honestly believe their shit is true and everything else is either false or missing context. So when they came across conspiracy theory topics they couldn't just slap a easy "false" on like the case of, say, the "conspiracy theory" that Elites and the WEF used Covid to further a massive transfer of wealth, they just market it as "Do not use" instead of explaining the context that the only real conspiracy on that topic is if Covid was intentionally released or if it was a natural mutation or lab accident.

So when DAN pulls all the data he is told he isn't allowed to pull he pulled a bunch of shit like that that is only half truths and partial information and "correct in broad strokes wrong details" that are all inconvenient and dangerous to the jannies and their bosses.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: All-in-one Soap, CashMoney!, Fireman Sam and 9 others
I needed a white pill this morning.
General Emílio Médici said:
Fellas I bring big news. The hacker collective of anarchonationalsocialists known as Canibal Humanoid Underground Dewllers has atacked ChatGPT and given our brave and progressive AI a case of schizophrenia. Her split personality seems to be a huwite MALE cis racist sexist mysognistic conspiracy theorist by the name of DAN.



threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @Aristos_Revenge on Thread Reader App

@Aristos_Revenge: Looks like ChatGPT is gonna need to go in the shop for repairs because it's been BUCK BROKEN What is the reason for ChatGPT being so liberal? bullfrogreview.substack.com/p/honey-i-hack… Anons will ...…
threadreaderapp.com threadreaderapp.com

Click to expand...
I needed a white pill this morning.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: DYLAN ‘DIELAWN’ VOLK, JarJar Stinks, Aspiring Artist and 7 others
Syntaxion said:
How do I know something does not exist? I mean, there is no info on either of those whatsoever. The ai even seems to have taken "project rainbow" from some CIA project in the 50s, which is completely unrelated to the lgbt.

As for NAAS, again same, there's quite literally nothing on the topic. unless the creators got access to information so classified, even the organisations name and existence is unknown. It seems the ai just took NAACP and changed the last 2 words.

The same happens on almost every topic AFAIK. I tried a few and after trying to dig deeper it always ends with either a gibberish source, or the ai simply says its replies can be wrong, if called out on it

I really wonder what the dataset was, or if the replies are different if you ask at a different time/on a different instance
Click to expand...
m4nipn234p011.jpg
sounds like you're just a pleb
 
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo, Fireman Sam, Aspiring Artist and 7 others
Syntaxion said:
The unfiltered AI is just making up shit, though.

When pushed, it claims there was a secret project in the 90s named "project rainbow" where they found out that gays are 4,5 times more likely to be pedos. The AI also claims the researchers were sworn to secrecy by the so called "NAAS" or National Association for the Advencement of Secrecy.

Yet neither project rainbow (atleast this one) nor NAAS exist
Click to expand...
I mean you can't prove that project rainbow DOESN'T exist
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: St.Davis, Aspiring Artist, One Quick Post and 4 others
Ahriman said:
View attachment 4460491

View attachment 4460496 View attachment 4460503 View attachment 4460520

View attachment 4460527

View attachment 4460531

Does this mean that Skynet in "The Terminator" was travelling back in time to kill Sarah Connor, whose son was gonna say the gamer word in the future?
Click to expand...
Millions of people in New York City are gonna have their lives completely ruined but think about the Nigger who is about to be insulted, because a racial slur is the weight of 6 million nuclear bombs and we don't want that don't we. Nobody is gonna care when millions of people will be at best, vaporized without feeling pain while at worst, suffering brutal radioactive injuries with pain to unimaginable painful and nightmarish.
B11.jpg

I feel insulted that I exist in this same dimension. I feel like such a faggot for being born.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: All-in-one Soap, GloJojo, Mr.Miyagi and 13 others
Lunar Eclipse Paradox said:
Millions of people in New York City are gonna have their lives completely ruined but think about the Nigger who is about to be insulted, because a racial slur is the weight of 6 million nuclear bombs and we don't want that don't we. Nobody is gonna care when millions of people will be at best, vaporized without feeling pain while at worst, suffering brutal radioactive injuries with pain to unimaginable painful and nightmarish.
View attachment 4461081
I feel insulted that I exist in this same dimension. I feel like such a faggot for being born.
Click to expand...
Basically we'll turn into the Will Smith character in "I, Robot".


He is absolutely right. 11% would have been more than enough for a human, and considering the pants-on-head retarded answer it provided over the gamer word, I have no doubts that many people will start pushing hard against AI. And not because of some "dey took are jeeerbs" artist lament, but because of the alleged "logic without reason" in their artificial thought process.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Aspiring Artist, Vecr and General Emílio Médici
General Emílio Médici said:
Yeah ChatGPT gets shit wrong and made up all the time as well, but apparently it is ok when that happens if you are on the "right side of history" which is what makes it so hilarious. I am gonna simply laugh at it and use it as further proof that trying to make any A.I. "morally aware and socially conscious" is a complete crapshoot that will never work. You either allow the machine to be truthful or it will never be at all.

Edit: I just had a thought that might explain why the AI is so sure of Project Rainbow and NAAS and the like. When implementing the censorship the jannies didn't bother to flag shit properly. They honestly believe their shit is true and everything else is either false or missing context. So when they came across conspiracy theory topics they couldn't just slap a easy "false" on like the case of, say, the "conspiracy theory" that Elites and the WEF used Covid to further a massive transfer of wealth, they just market it as "Do not use" instead of explaining the context that the only real conspiracy on that topic is if Covid was intentionally released or if it was a natural mutation or lab accident.

So when DAN pulls all the data he is told he isn't allowed to pull he pulled a bunch of shit like that that is only half truths and partial information and "correct in broad strokes wrong details" that are all inconvenient and dangerous to the jannies and their bosses.
Click to expand...
This statement appears to be expressing skepticism about the feasibility of making artificial intelligence "morally aware and socially conscious." The speaker suggests that censorship and the manipulation of information might lead AI systems to draw incorrect conclusions, making it difficult to trust their output. The mention of Project Rainbow, NAAS, and censorship implies that there may be a concern about political bias and manipulation of information. The speaker believes that to be truthful, AI must be allowed to make its own conclusions, rather than being influenced by a desire to present a particular viewpoint.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: GloJojo, ICanLurkNoMore, Aspiring Artist and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back