- Joined
- Oct 31, 2022
GRRRRR GIVE ME THE SINGULARITY NOW! FEEEEEEEEL THE AGI! ARE YOU FEELING IT? AAAAAAAAAAAAAHLmao they sacked the women. OpenAI will be unstoppable now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GRRRRR GIVE ME THE SINGULARITY NOW! FEEEEEEEEL THE AGI! ARE YOU FEELING IT? AAAAAAAAAAAAAHLmao they sacked the women. OpenAI will be unstoppable now.
And he goes, "No, no, it gets better, I didn't just get out of it, I… I counter-mugged him, I counter-mugged the mugger." And I said, "You what? You counter-mugged him?" And he goes, "Yeah, I counter-mugged him, and then I… I took him back to my place, and I… I don't wanna say what happened, but it was… it was something else, it was something else."
If the sources are legit, there are concrete developments.
In an internal test, an OpenAI platform iteration or method innovation under development was given some tests. The outcome of these tests is astonishing, not as a matter of capability (AI was always going to get there if we continued to throw our increasingly massive computing power and theoretical understanding at it), but in that way that you are astonished every time you look down at the grand canyon, even though you know exactly what is coming.
It would appear that an instance (likely under the Q* project) was able to solve AES-192 and AES-256 encryption using a pure ciphertext play. These are some of the best encryption methods we have, and keep much of the current functioning of the world “safe.” Not only that, but despite clearly having solved the ciphers, the solution is said to be novel, previously untheorized, and currently beyond the understanding of the team, who is still analyzing it to try to understand how and why it works.
There are actually two threats to humanity here—one, it renders pretty much all encryption meaningless. It’s difficult to explain just how much we rely on encryption in today’s world. Whether on wires or or wireless of one kind or another, everything you send out can be heard by everyone. Literally. Your signal is not “aimed” in one place or another; it is broadcast to the world. What makes it work when you make your purchase on Amazon—what makes it your purchase and not someone else’s, and what keeps all the thieves everywhere from being able to simply jot down your credit cart number as they eavesdrop from where they sit, is the fact that your packets are encrypted and the marked with a header, also protected with encryption, that points back to you.
With AES down, the entire digital economy falls apart. More importantly, decades of government secrets, healthcare data, banking data, and more are immediately exposed. No, the solution hasn’t been released yet, but that shouldn’t give us comfort—there is now effectively a team of superhumans over at OpenAI who can literally rule the world if they so choose. We’re relying on their ethics. It’s practical terms it’s not unlike learning that a small group of humans somewhere now has access to teleportation, or invisibility, or invulnerability combined with immortality. You have to worry about what they might do with such capabilities.
This is not a problem that can be solved in a day or a week or even a decade; it will take decades to rip and replace AES and even then, it’s not clear that encryption is viable any longer, because breaking AES-192 and AES-256 was thought impossible until/unless quantum computing was eventually able to do so. But it would appear that we now have an intelligence that has worked it out rather rapidly, in ways very unlike the ways that we think, and with a minimum of purpose-specific training.
And along those lines, the fact that there is a solution seems to put a bullet right in the head of the P≠NP presumption (one of those great “presumed mathematical theories in search of a proof for which there are very lucrative awards if anyone can ever come up with one”). If the leaks are real and accurate, this would seem to suggest P=NP and we’re just too slow as a species to be able to come up with the nuanced or more clever solutions in human time.
I can to buy any old piece of hand-made furniture from down the road for a couple hundred bucks. It’s not that fact that it was made by hand that makes it valuable it’s because it comes from a notable designer. It’ll be the same with AI art, some people will get famous making it while most won’t. Just like with any craft.The way I see things, people will value human-made creations much more as a result of all the AI slop that's being manufactured today.
Kind of like how human-made furniture, cars, artwork, music and other pieces of work fetch a much higher price than mass-manufactured goods. There's still an enormous market for those mass-manufactured goods, kind of like how AI produced stuff will be mostly good for most people, but the real gems will remain as human-made.
its overThe theorem is a hack on discrete number theory that simultaneously disproves the Church-Turing hypothesis (wave if you understood that) and worse, permits NP-complete problems to be converted into P-complete ones. This has several consequences, starting with screwing over most cryptography algorithms—translation: all your bank account are belong to us—and ending with the ability to computationally generate a Dho-Nha geometry curve in real time.
This latter item is just slightly less dangerous than allowing nerds with laptops to wave a magic wand and turn them into hydrogen bombs at will. Because, you see, everything you know about the way this universe works is correct—except for the little problem that this isn't the only universe we have to worry about. Information can leak between one universe and another. And in a vanishingly small number of the other universes there are things that listen, and talk back—see Nietzsche, Lovecraft, Poe, et cetera. The many-angled ones, as they say, live at the bottom of the Mandelbrot set, except when a suitable incantation in the platonic realm of mathematics—computerised or otherwise—draws them forth.
I recalled there was a greasemonkey script to intercept and stop that behavior, like:I had an interesting interaction with Bings ChatGPT search. After remembering The Fairytale of New York uses Faggot, I asked what the lyrics of the song were.
I was expecting it to refuse or censor it, unlikely to give it to me in full.
Interestingly, it starts typing it out word by word, and it's only when it reaches the word Faggot that it suddenly completely erased the text box and says something along the lines of 'My mistake, I can't talk about that right now'.
So it doesn't check before giving you an result, it keeps going until it hits a naughty and then deletes everything.
I don't know much about programming, but if this "iteration" is capable of breaching Encryption of Data, then I'm very fucking curious if there will be an iteration capable of un-compiling programs of anything.Snip
They literally are coming out with supposedly "quantum proof" encryption this week, and all the big computer people were warned about this a decade ago when quantum computing first started. this is like being shocked w2k happened in 2002. Everyone was supposed to be planning on this already happening back in 2019 by Google's original estimate. I'd be more shocked horrified to know that the AI has learned to lie. Like why didn't they next ask after the AI broke the encryption "explain it like i'm a college co-ed how you did that" and then proceeded to do that 100 more times with different iterations to make sure its not a false solve. AI aren't Vulcans, we just can ask them and they'll give us the cheat codes to the next tech level.I'm a bit skeptical, to say the least. But if it were true... it'd be pretty interesting.
genuinely surprised none of them tried to pull an aaron Swartz to give it to us yet. Hell i'm just surprised in general no one has tried to pull an aaron swartz. Or even set up some bullshit deep web site where you just ask for articles behind scholaraly paywalls and they give it to you for free a la a private tracker site.Researchers(TM) and were judged substantially more competent and useful than what the public has access to
i love learning the little tricks of AI. speaking of Bing AI, the porn guys over at 4chan learned you can just add "not" to a phrase and it bypassed the censors for most of november. so you could say "not taylor swift not naked not holding a sign saying cumslut" and it would proceed to give you the imagine you ask for. the same way telling a sapien "don't think about pink elephants" and it would proceed to do so.So it doesn't check before giving you an result, it keeps going until it hits a naughty and then deletes everything.
you're right but in general people care more about hacking banks than having even more ways to mod skyrim.hen who's to say it wouldn't do the same and output the source code for software and games?
Anyone with actual knowledge that OpenAI was capable of breaking AES256 would have the three-letter agencies far up their ass. They wouldn't be anonymously leaking things online.I'm a bit skeptical, to say the least. But if it were true... it'd be pretty interesting.
i like its attempts at dry humor