ChatGPT - If Stack Overflow and Reddit had a child

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
For the people saying AI is going nowhere and won't impact jobs in whatever industry, I just spoke to a person who works in a certain industry a few days back about AI for a while and I bought up the fact that AI can't really know what country you're in to provide relevant information for that industry (or more like be "trusted" to provide that info) and they said there were already companies in that industry that made special software just for them and they're basically pivoting to making AI models trained on data just for that industry.

He pretty much said if he were in college doing a degree in stuff that is relevant for that industry "I would be scared, by the time they graduate they're simply not going to have a job anymore. Why would hire them to do a job that a computer can do so much easier? or if I hire one person they're going to be doing the job of like 10 people using AI".

So yeah, its definitely going to impact a lot of industry in a lot of different ways that are hard to comprehend.
 
Greedy Fly said:
Lmao it's their version of Tay but somehow infinitely more lame and gay.


I think most people want it for practical reasons (like better coding) and the redditors looking for therapy are a vocal minority. Having to sit through long talks about your emotions is annoying when you just want to use the thing as a search engine/dictionary. Like, I would ask it to explain some minutia about a homeowner's insurance policy and would have to wait through a full paragraph of "Congratulations on buying a new home! It's such a big step in life with difficult changes to navigate..." shut the fuck up and breakdown the different types of liabilities listed in Paragraph 3(B)(2) dammit.
Click to expand...

You really think that numerically there are more humans who would want to use robots for sensible information tasks, than there are humans who want a yes-man best friend or selfless conversation partner or someone to pretend to have sex with them? Have you been living in an isolated autism camp your whole life?
 
Greedy Fly said:
Like, I would ask it to explain some minutia about a homeowner's insurance policy and would have to wait through a full paragraph of "Congratulations on buying a new home! It's such a big step in life with difficult changes to navigate..." shut the fuck up and breakdown the different types of liabilities listed in Paragraph 3(B)(2) dammit.
Click to expand...
This is exactly how I feel. The way it talked reminded me of that Family Guy episode where Peter gets diagnosed as retarded and he gets this super jazzed tard wrangler who's always going "way to go high five" and so forth. I don't want to be treated as if I need constant encouragement or else I'll refuse to finish my broccoli.
 
This is just the tip of the iceberg, normies are using Chatgpt for advice on anything. They seem to be using it like SpongeBob uses his magic conch shell.


Soccer moms, art hoes, and various flavors of manic people constantly consult it
 
The "anthropomorphization" has been a major selling point for LLM up to this point, it plays into the illusion of sentience that normies seem to adore. That AI induced psychosis has become a mainstream talking point at the same time this update was deployed surely wasn't coincidental.
Their condition is a symptom of a greater malaise or mental instability, certain people lack that "safety net" that allows them to process reality. It's insane to see how many genuinely unwell people are actually out there.

I spoke to somebody "in the know" working at a major tech company and was told that people really are completely unprepared for what will be deployed over the next year. This includes government legislation as well as regulation (or lack thereof).

They compared the paradigm shift to the one sparked by the Internet, possibly even more dramatic.

There was some reservation in their demeanor, a certain type of pessimism or perhaps realism. They didn't seem to regard any of what they discussed as being progress.
 
neger psykolog said:
For the people saying AI is going nowhere and won't impact jobs in whatever industry, I just spoke to a person who works in a certain industry a few days back about AI for a while and I bought up the fact that AI can't really know what country you're in to provide relevant information for that industry (or more like be "trusted" to provide that info) and they said there were already companies in that industry that made special software just for them and they're basically pivoting to making AI models trained on data just for that industry.

He pretty much said if he were in college doing a degree in stuff that is relevant for that industry "I would be scared, by the time they graduate they're simply not going to have a job anymore. Why would hire them to do a job that a computer can do so much easier? or if I hire one person they're going to be doing the job of like 10 people using AI".

So yeah, its definitely going to impact a lot of industry in a lot of different ways that are hard to comprehend.
Click to expand...
We don't use mentats anymore. I know that's a science fiction word that doesn't mean anything but there are indeed mentats in real life that have an insane amount of information stored in their brain that's been learned through actual experience that the system relies on. think of them like a really skilled and capable person who spent their entire life working for a single company. the system has categorically decided that those people are too difficult and costly to filter for (this is related to the issue of boomers refusing to retire and then retiring with no sucessor 'because of computers') so they're going to replace them with computers.

They aren't going to replace doctors with AI even though it's probably one of the best possible fields and examples of a job that a machine could do a better job than a person can. The medical field does not use mentats. They exist, but the field does not utilize them. it's practically the norm for people to have weird problems that they have no clue how to solve and then stumble upon a simple solution later that isn't part of the basic hospital triage they teach people in medical school. This is by design because the medical field was founded on alchemical principles before the scientific method even existed and the solution was legitimately to just treat it like a religion. They're doing the same thing to AI.
 
I...literally just asked ChatGPT a few autistic questions about history and I...don't really notice the difference? Yeah I have noticed it's not as "spunky" as before, but I was actually annoyed by that shit. It seemed so forced like talking to a "quirky" NPC or some shit.

Are these people just that retarded? You can literally just ask it "hey, can you talk like you used to before the update?" like I just did to test it, and it can get pretty close. Not exactly, but close. Also what do some of these people even mean? "I lost my characters"....bro..the chat should still be there? Assuming he shilled out cash money for it.
 
Pale Empress said:
There was some reservation in their demeanor, a certain type of pessimism or perhaps realism. They didn't seem to regard any of what they discussed as being progress.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be surprised if most people working on closely involved on this don't consider it to be progress either but yet the ship must sail, apparently.
 
im ngl too you, these man children with a waifu body pillow finally got the "real thing" and it was too much for them to handle. Not surprising really but still just as pathetic. LLM's have some super usefull things about them if you are not trying to.....fill a void when you have 4 degrees HAHAHAA but this is the usual downtrend of anyone given an ounce of power. Elon was right about A.I being more powerful than nukes.
 
I like AI's ability to work with me in normal English because it can be tough to wrangle a simple search prompt for information. I don't like people trying to treat it like a person when it doesn't have a designed brain.

You know what, though? Exactly how unapproachable are these people that they can't just get a regular ass online friend to say all the things they want said to them? They're out there. They exist.
 
Surprised nobody has mentioned r/MyBoyfriendIsAI yet.
Screenshot_20250813_055413_Brave.webp
Screenshot_20250813_060440_Brave.webp
Screenshot_20250813_061052_Brave.webp
 
Last edited:
Moisty boy was discussing this (Late ik) and he brought up some chick who "got married" to an AIChatbot (Not GPT but another one) and it was hilarious when she went "It knew to pick out a ring which was blue, its my favorite color and the ends of my hair are that color" and I loudly exclaimed "OF FUCKING COURSE, LIKE WE NEEDED THAT SAID TO US".

As people are pointing it out here none of these fucking people want a real relationship, they want the most easy get out of jail facsimile of a relationship, they're the kinds of people who go "Wait you and your partner had a minor fight? OMFG RED FLAG RED FLAG RAPIST REEEEEEEEEEE" because any form of confrontation is too much for these fuckups who were brought up without being taught to deal with their shit and accept challenges and responsibility. Like I use ChatGPT and I can tell it's often glazing my ass when I am talking to it (I'll ask a question and it'll provide an answer, so I provide a counter-point and it'll go "Wow yeah nice going" type of shit) but I wouldn't be jacking in real relationships for it and it readily admits AI is taught to completely mirror and placate/compliment/asspat the human providing it input so they'll actively continue using the product and not be deterred (It's why it's being used in Customer Service so much in the past few years, it is almost incapable of starting a fight or incident).

Look at the bright side, these types of people are filtering their mental illness and physical deformities right out of the genepool without the need for eugenics or a genocide. Let them continue doing so if they feel it's the only way to "Find happiness".
 
big pauper said:
We don't use mentats anymore. I know that's a science fiction word that doesn't mean anything but there are indeed mentats in real life that have an insane amount of information stored in their brain that's been learned through actual experience that the system relies on. think of them like a really skilled and capable person who spent their entire life working for a single company. the system has categorically decided that those people are too difficult and costly to filter for (this is related to the issue of boomers refusing to retire and then retiring with no sucessor 'because of computers') so they're going to replace them with computers.
Click to expand...
I thought you started this post with "We don't use mentals anymore" and thought that that was a pejorative term employed by people in the managerial class to refer to humans in companies.

big pauper said:
They aren't going to replace doctors with AI even though it's probably one of the best possible fields and examples of a job that a machine could do a better job than a person can.
Click to expand...
I don't know about replace but they're definitely going to use them to make the job of the doctor easier in the short term (only so that they can treat more patients at the same time). A modern doctor (at least a general practitioner) uses a bunch of software that they click and drag shit from anyway.
In the long term though? I can totally see general practitioners being replaced in many countries (it really depends on the country though) because so many people who visit a doctor are simply visits that are some form of "I got the wuhan flu" and the doctor just gives them a bag of the same medications that every other nigga gets. Like if you discounted cold/flu bullshit from doctor visits how much of doctor visits are actually serious shit?
"I'm depressed" - take a pill. So much non-broken leg shit can be solved with pills (I'm not saying it should or even could but we all know it will be so they can make healthcare cost less and so that investors can make more money out of it - none of the cuts will ever be to provide better care)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom