Chris-Chan: A Comprehensive History

Just watching the video, when they got to the photo of him and Megan, I couldn't help but notice a sticker in the background for "The End Game Center", not sure if Chris knew of that place yet at the time, but it's just interesting noticing it was around at the time he was at The Game Place.
 
That was pretty good. The second documentary was a little weak with how much it focused on Animal Crossing, but the first one was great. Way better than the last one that threw around words like "trolls" and "sagas" that nobody outside of the scene would understand.

It's reasonable to say Chris is completely washed up. He's definitely not interesting anymore, really people like myself just cling on for the sake of closure, not to see what he'll do next, but, just to find out what will happen after Barb dies. I think most people who are interested in Chris feel the same. That's why I find it interesting that people are taking less time to try and "troll" Chris and actually properly document and condense his life into consumable media, such as documentaries, for the masses. Regardless of who Chris is, he's definitely an interesting statement about the modern era and how the internet is affecting the lives of people, both mentally deficient and those who enjoy praying on the mentally deficient. There's been plenty of weird people before, all fairly documented, but Chris is unique in he's the first instance of the internet being used to document someone, and showing just how much information the internet can amass on one individual. In this stage of Chris' existence, I think that's the most interesting part about him.

Just got around to watching it myself. I don't think the second part was "weak" per se, but I do agree that he focused a little too much on his Animal Crossing stuff. Overall though I really liked it. I like that instead of just jumping into things and using terms like "trolls" and "sagas" as you said, he's taking time to explain how and why Chris became what he became so that the viewer can better understand the motives behind everything that happens later on. The one thing i didn't like was how the second part opened with Sonichu right off the bat and didn't explain how Chris came up with him. Maybe he'll come back to that in Part 3. We'll just wait and see.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Fool and Trilby
I'm only one minute in actually watching this documentary and one thing is clear. @Marvin will disagree all he wants, but Chris will always be there. Troll or not. Chris will always be there to Tweet, to say something, to beg for Cole's help, to beg his fanbase for money, etc.
 
Just got around to watching it myself. I don't think the second part was "weak" per se, but I do agree that he focused a little too much on his Animal Crossing stuff. Overall though I really liked it. I like that instead of just jumping into things and using terms like "trolls" and "sagas" as you said, he's taking time to explain how and why Chris became what he became so that the viewer can better understand the motives behind everything that happens later on. The one thing i didn't like was how the second part opened with Sonichu right off the bat and didn't explain how Chris came up with him. Maybe he'll come back to that in Part 3. We'll just wait and see.

To be fair, he covered the origin of Sonichu in part 1, I guess he's assuming if you're watching part 2 you've watched part 1, which is understandable, but a short recap would have been a good idea too.
 
I'm only one minute in actually watching this documentary and one thing is clear. @Marvin will disagree all he wants, but Chris will always be there. Troll or not. Chris will always be there to Tweet, to say something, to beg for Cole's help, to beg his fanbase for money, etc.
I say give it some time, and we'll see some good content.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: The Un-Clit
I've never heard such speculation that Chris literally came in his pants during the 18th birthday party.

That's gross and stupid.

Edit: Why is Part two focusing so much on the stupid Animal Crossing documentary?

Did Chris ever get Zelda and Mario on Animal Crossing? No.
 
Last edited:
I've never heard such speculation that Chris literally came in his pants during the 18th birthday party.

That's gross and stupid.
Well, that's part of the problem when the entirety of every documentarian's source material comes from only one source -- the CWCki. As well-researched as the CWCki may be, it can still only provide conclusive proof of the events for which it has evidence, which means much of Christory is undiscovered and, thus, rampant for speculation.

Even worse, since there are very few first person accounts of most Christorical events (and since Chris himself is a very unreliable narrator), it's hard to discern the truth from wishful thinking (either Chris's or those of discussion boards, such as the Farms) for events that happened several years ago.

Case in point: While it's hilarious to think that Chris was so excited at his gal-pals coming to visit him on the 18th Christian Love Day that he came in his pants, the truth (that the stain was probably paint or Crayola Model Magic or bleach or just a rip in the fabric) is far more boring. If you look closely, you'll see various other grease and dirt stains on his jeans, too. So Chris is a slob? Big deal, we all know that; it's just far more outrageous to claim he jizzed in his jeans.

0466-CWC18th1.jpg


Similarly, the documentary made many other references to events whose causes were unknown or pure speculation. For example: I would love to know what exactly happened at Nathanael Greene Elementary School; I've always wondered what first possessed Chris to make a Sonichu medallion and decide to wear it everywhere; and I would trample small children for a chance to find out what happened in MLW's office and if Chris really did curse-ye-ha-me-ha her. Sadly, we will probably never find out the truth behind these, along with many other events.
 
Well, that's part of the problem when the entirety of every documentarian's source material comes from only one source -- the CWCki. As well-researched as the CWCki may be, it can still only provide conclusive proof of the events for which it has evidence, which means much of Christory is undiscovered and, thus, rampant for speculation.

Even worse, since there are very few first person accounts of most Christorical events (and since Chris himself is a very unreliable narrator), it's hard to discern the truth from wishful thinking (either Chris's or those of discussion boards, such as the Farms) for events that happened several years ago.

Case in point: While it's hilarious to think that Chris was so excited at his gal-pals coming to visit him on the 18th Christian Love Day that he came in his pants, the truth (that the stain was probably paint or Crayola Model Magic or bleach or just a rip in the fabric) is far more boring. If you look closely, you'll see various other grease and dirt stains on his jeans, too. So Chris is a slob? Big deal, we all know that; it's just far more outrageous to claim he jizzed in his jeans.

0466-CWC18th1.jpg


Similarly, the documentary made many other references to events whose causes were unknown or pure speculation. For example: I would love to know what exactly happened at Nathanael Greene Elementary School; I've always wondered what first possessed Chris to make a Sonichu medallion and decide to wear it everywhere; and I would trample small children for a chance to find out what happened in MLW's office and if Chris really did curse-ye-ha-me-ha her. Sadly, we will probably never find out the truth behind these, along with many other events.
That is something to keep in mind in all this, we really don't know what happened in these scenarios.
 
I've never heard such speculation that Chris literally came in his pants during the 18th birthday party.

That's gross and stupid.

I'm positive that was just poking fun at Chris. That doesn't look anywhere close to a cum stain, how sheltered can someone be to have never seen a cum stain? Like, I think staining your pants with cum is just a part of growing up.
 
I'm positive that was just poking fun at Chris. That doesn't look anywhere close to a cum stain, how sheltered can someone be to have never seen a cum stain?
I agree that the CWCki could very well have been making a joke at Chris's expense; after all, even Marvin admits that the contents of the CWCki should not be taken at face value. However, the documentarian was quite serious when he repeated the claim, implying that he believed in it (or, at the very least, thought it plausible).

The problem arises when people who aren't familiar with Chris and/or the CWCki watch the documentary. Those folks will take the claim seriously, and then Chris will suddenly be known as the creep who jizzed his jeans when girls came over to visit.
 
I'm positive that was just poking fun at Chris. That doesn't look anywhere close to a cum stain, how sheltered can someone be to have never seen a cum stain? Like, I think staining your pants with cum is just a part of growing up.
I would've thought that was like cake frosting or whatever Chris had ate before the pic was taken (remembering that other pic where his lips were red, suggesting he had Kool-aid or such).
 
there were a few interesting tidbits, like for instance I didn't know that Bob's radio show was available online. I just think there's nowhere left to go with the documentary approach at the amateur level.

I'm less interested in Chris because there's only so much to learn. What'd be more interesting would be the people around him. Barb, his former galpals, maybe even some trolls. I wonder if he has a reputation in Ruckersville?
 
It displays a remarkable lack of self awareness though. Would you socialize if your pants looked like that?
I wouldn't but, then, I also wouldn't go to church wearing pony ears and a unicorn horn. Chris, on the other hand...

I just think there's nowhere left to go with the documentary approach at the amateur level.

I'm less interested in Chris because there's only so much to learn. What'd be more interesting would be the people around him. Barb, his former galpals, maybe even some trolls. I wonder if he has a reputation in Ruckersville?
Unfortunately, it would be bordering on ween behavior but I agree that the best way to make an interesting documentary would be to interview non-trolls who have been exposed to Chris first-hand. Even though it would be difficult as hell to explain to these people our fascination with Chris, it would be beyond illuminating to speak to speak to folks like Megan, the Wallflower, MLW, Michael Snyder, and the gal-pals to hear their version of events and to learn about their thoughts and impressions of Chris.

As an aside, I think the interview with Lucas and Mimms on the CWCki is a great example of how a good documentary should approach the people around Chris. The two guys told good stories, refuted some urban legends (such as Chris being a pedofork), and provided a more neutral and believable viewpoint that described Chris's banning from the Game Place.

One of the things in @spylobster's/Sachumo's documentary that I really liked was when he got a special education teacher to try to put some of Chris's actions in context. I thought it made the documentary far less speculative to have an actual professional giving his opinion of Chris's antics. Similarly, I think an interview and an "armchair diagnosis" with an actual practicing psychologist/psychiatrist would put to rest a lot of questions as to why Chris does the things he does.
 
Back