Chris-Chan: A Comprehensive History

"This is extremely unfortunate. To me, it sounds like a coordinated attack from white knights or just one white knight creating sockpuppet accounts to report your videos." -Fredrik Knudsen

Personally, I find this theory the most realistic. I'd wager to guess it's that whale (I think her name was "Little Amy Chen" or something?) who's been white knighting for a while now.

https://twitter.com/LittleAmychan this is the individual I was referring to previously. I just found her twitter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: AnonAutismo, Al1 Gaye, Chester Rigby and 2 others
Okkervils said:
He kinda looks like a gay serial killer in my opinion...
Click to expand...
Or maybe a young Truman Capote.

81c82222aa75579c4fd1006953a08e1c - Edited.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Chuckaway, Hummingbird, AnonAutismo and 3 others
averagejane said:
i don't understand what about those videos would warrant a strike? he censors just about everything.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter, mate. This must be the result of a coordinated attack from various white knights and edgy teens, that were flagging the channel since part 1 was uploaded. They aren't interested in an objective portrait of Christian, they are just REEEEEEEEEEing at the fact of an -alleged- trans person being "harassed".

I guess I need a Rage rating now...
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: AnonAutismo, Muscle Bra, The Fool and 3 others
These videos were getting plenty of attention, some were even in the trending page. I wouldn't be surprised if some normies who don't know who Chris-Chan is stumbled into one of these and was shocked by the stuff that happened to Chris - so much so they reported the video because they didn't like what was in it, and eventually YouTube acted.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AnonAutismo, Muscle Bra, Snuckening and 6 others
HTL5N said:
@Null maybe you could talk to this guy and move the documentary to kf, idk just came to mind. KF or the CWCki, probably the latter.
Click to expand...
I think these "documentaries" are basically rereadings of the cwcki. The cwcki is for humor purposes, not documentary purposes where objectivity is valued.

Documentaries based on Chris' life are almost always going to be sourced 99% from the cwcki. That's not really a documentary.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: gettar, Pony Horn, Chester Rigby and 5 others
I legit never do anything on YT, I've used HookTube to get around the ads, but I did watch GenoSamuel's documentaries on YT. What is wrong with the people of YouTube? Bullying? By reporting and explaining what happened? Could you imagine if they did that in politics? OH wait.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: AnonAutismo, Chester Rigby and The Fool
I wasn't aware his shit got taken down till i looked at the shoutbox here talk about it. Shame, i really liked the way he did these.
 
I watched these with my group of friends and we all loved it. A bonding experience. I'm so upset it's gone. Didn't even get to part 13 .

Even though most veterans here disliked it, I thought it was okay, being a (mostly) newfag to Chris-Chan, and having a bunch of drunk buddies watching, it was an experience.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: AgentYoshida4444, The Fool and Fin Saipher
Silver Octopus said:
These videos were getting plenty of attention, some were even in the trending page. I wouldn't be surprised if some normies who don't know who Chris-Chan is stumbled into one of these and was shocked by the stuff that happened to Chris - so much so they reported the video because they didn't like what was in it, and eventually YouTube acted.
Click to expand...
It sucks that it got taken down. I was pretty upset when I heard the news, but this is typical for YouTube and normies to ruin everything.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Army Burger, The Fool, You Can't Sit With Us and 1 other person
Marvin said:
I think these "documentaries" are basically rereadings of the cwcki. The cwcki is for humor purposes, not documentary purposes where objectivity is valued.

Documentaries based on Chris' life are almost always going to be sourced 99% from the cwcki. That's not really a documentary.
Click to expand...
I was a bit harsh here.

I hear it was well produced, entertaining and informative. However source-wise, it does not present an unbiased view of Chris.

You're always going to have a little bias in any documentary, of course, because you're always going to have one sped who'll shriek about some inconsistency. But the bias in this documentary was substantial. Not intentionally or anything, but just because there's no good source of information on Chris.

The cwcki documents cwc: the Lifetime dramatization.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Orkeosaurus, Mechalcanos, Vocaloid Ruby and 3 others
Marvin said:
However source-wise, it does not present an unbiased view of Chris.
Click to expand...
It really is a well-done, professional, and entertaining documentary. However, if Geno had to list out all of his sources, research paper style, the CWCki would end up being 99% of his citations.

I've previously mentioned that Geno seems to treat the CWCki as the word of godbear and it never fails to make me laugh when he reports on some of the more outrageous and comedic claims in the CWCki using the same serious, matter-of-fact voice as when he talks about Chris's birthdate or his high school graduation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chronicler Takua, Orkeosaurus, Mechalcanos and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back