StraightShooter2
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2020
So now that I think of it, given that he mentioned at least 10 sexual encounters with Barb, does this means he could face up to 10 separate charges?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are welcome but this is Chris we are still talking about and has been in hot water with the cops before and the story he produced about him attacking them shows he is anti cop just saying food for thoughtAha, I wasn't aware there was an antifa thread. Thanks for letting me know!
ACAB is correct since it stands for "All Cops Are Bastards" but antifa is short of anti-fascist so I suppose AntiFa might make sense.
No worries, I have also seen other people go allcaps with it but it's technically incorrect.
Chris was molesting Barbara.I can't answer this, but I will speculate that this makes sense given:
Chris is her carer, would you send her back by herself?
And that's true but Barbara really can't take full care of herself anymore. People like to say she fakes everything but there's also truth to her current disabilities and, well, she's fucking 80.Chris was molesting Barbara.
Having no carer is better than having one who abuses you.
I don't think they will put her back in her home. A hoarder 2 story rat's nest is a dangerous place for an old lady. They're going to have to file to get a trustee for her money, stop the bank payments, and let the bank take it.And that's true but Barbara really can't take full care of herself anymore. People like to say she fakes everything but there's also truth to her current disabilities and, well, she's fucking 80.
If she returns home, they won't let her stay there by herself and, if they're not highly irresponsible, they simply won't let Chris go back with her either anymore. Yes, after release, Chris is definitely going to return home (if anything, for the toys and games) even when ordered otherwise and police hijinks might ensue again.
But someone else will have to care for Barb in her home or somewhere else.
i know, i said that in my comment, i added to that by saying, i bet there are chris chan supporters who would actually do that lolIt was a joke!
No shit sherlock.Chris was molesting Barbara.
Having no carer is better than having one who abuses you.
he is in jail ... while most of us are very curious about his behavior in jail, its next to impossible to get any info since hes in custodyDear lurkers: Have you heard about the latest wacky thing Chris Chan did today? Google "Lavon Affair" for more information!
In a semi related thought. Even with a rape kit it's going to be a hard case to prove. Simply because I'm sure every surface of that house and any and all inhabitants of it, animal or vegetable are almost certainly covered in Chris's juices. The CSI techs will probably file a lawsuit for undue emotional distress.Have you never watched a single episode of Forensic Files in your entire life? Even in the 1980s when Chris was still a child, forensic technology was up to snuff to allow investigators to determine whether or not they drowned naturally or if they were forced under the water.
Bob and Barb couldn't even be fucked to make Chris wear adult diapers. How the fuck could they have been expected to beat forensic technology?
He really isn't competant to aid in his own defense. He's an easily manipulated retard. Let's hope the DA and Heilberg can come to an equitable agreement where Chris gets an indefinate admission to a locked psyche facility that can proviide him with some care and treatment.Let's hope Chris get's a just trial with all evidence being weighed in.
Irregardless for his safety he should not live by himself again.
ABSOLUTELY.He really isn't competant to aid in his own defense. He's an easily manipulated retard. Let's hope the DA and Heilberg can come to an equitable agreement where Chris gets an indefinate admission to a locked psyche facility that can proviide him with some care and treatment.
From what I've gathered from e-lawyers on here, they might not even need or want to use the rape kit since it just opens up a bunch of angles of attack on the DNA. Biggest factor will probably be whatever he told the cops, assuming he repeated what he said in that phone call. Plus if Barbara's vagina looks all tore up and bruised from Chris pounding the shit out of it then they aren't really gonna need the DNA.In a semi related thought. Even with a rape kit it's going to be a hard case to prove. Simply because I'm sure every surface of that house and any and all inhabitants of it, animal or vegetable are almost certainly covered in Chris's juices. The CSI techs will probably file a lawsuit for undue emotional distress.
Arguing insanity is an extremely desperate defense, it essentially frees the prosecution from having burden of proof which is extremely disadvantageous. Chris has already freely acknowledged Barb resisted in some fashion, and when friends asked him whether the allegations were true he was extremely evasive in his replies before eventually admitting admitting yes. Both prove consciousness of guilt in themselves.He really isn't competant to aid in his own defense. He's an easily manipulated retard. Let's hope the DA and Heilberg can come to an equitable agreement where Chris gets an indefinate admission to a locked psyche facility that can proviide him with some care and treatment.
Meanwhile, Don Lemon just started his own political party ..."Lavon Affair"
Yes, look up a man named Billie Gene Seabolt (what's up with Virginia and incest?), add in rape if they go with Barb being too mushbrained to know what she was doing along with elderly abuse. This trial will be a real interesting one to watch.So now that I think of it, given that he mentioned at least 10 sexual encounters with Barb, does this means he could face up to 10 separate charges?
They have Chris admitting to everything, all they have to do is get a copy of text messages, and have a doctor give Barbs dustbin a good look over to see if there's any damage because according to Chris, she was in pain during it.In a semi related thought. Even with a rape kit it's going to be a hard case to prove. Simply because I'm sure every surface of that house and any and all inhabitants of it, animal or vegetable are almost certainly covered in Chris's juices. The CSI techs will probably file a lawsuit for undue emotional distress.
The main reason for DNA attacks is that there's a 1% difference in DNA between people, with Barb basically being a shut-in and there's a 99% chance that Chris is really the only person she ever really has close contact to, it'll be hard to deny that the DNA test could be wrong (if they do find any, DNA testing isn't 100% accurate), but yes, if there's damage to her vagina there's enough probable cause to not need to use DNA.From what I've gathered from e-lawyers on here, they might not even need or want to use the rape kit since it just opens up a bunch of angles of attack on the DNA. Biggest factor will probably be whatever he told the cops, assuming he repeated what he said in that phone call. Plus if Barbara's vagina looks all tore up and bruised from Chris pounding the shit out of it then they aren't really gonna need the DNA.
This whole situation started on lies about who he was having sex with, along with his previous knowledge of being it wrong and illegal, it wouldn't be easy to argue Chris wasn't aware of what he was doing at the time, all signs about this (from his own mouth and admission) says he knew it was wrong because he fought with the idea for awhile before deciding it felt right. In the end, nobody held a gun to Chris and made him do it. He acted in his own manner and had no reason to do so based on threats or blackmail.Arguing insanity is an extremely desperate defense, it essentially frees the prosecution from having burden of proof which is extremely disadvantageous. Chris has already freely acknowledged Barb resisted in some fashion, and when friends asked him whether the allegations were true he was extremely evasive in his replies before eventually admitting admitting yes. Both prove consciousness of guilt in themselves.
I'm betting that the scenario hypothesized in the legal perspective OP is what plays out. He gets severe probation conditions as part of a plea deal which he immediately breaches because he has no self-discipline.
For the animals and the CP. Like others have said, she didn't break any laws since she's not obligated to report anything. Like a retard, she flew too close to the sun.ABSOLUTELY.
Bella should also be investigated.
america is known for our large prison population so him going to jail is a big possibility but our court system is fucking retarded so the chances of him getting off due to a technicality or mismanagement of the case is a big possibility tooif chris was in europe, he would get away with it, but i'm really hoping he won't be as lucky in america.
The leaks prove she did.For the animals and the CP. Like others have said, she didn't break any laws since she's not obligated to report anything. Like a retard, she flew too close to the sun.
I'm talking about in relation to Chris and Barb, not what she was doing while she was a student. They could care less, she's not legally a reporter of elder abuse.The leaks prove she did.
The college looked the other way. I believe the leaks because there were two people interviewed that collaborate her behavior.
Sorry off topic but does anyone know why the Isabella Loretta Janke thread is inaccessible with a 502 error? I would ask in chat but that is down too. Did Isabella Loretta Janke put out a statement or something? Is there a reason that specific thread is down?