Chris court appearance

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aha, I wasn't aware there was an antifa thread. Thanks for letting me know!

ACAB is correct since it stands for "All Cops Are Bastards" but antifa is short of anti-fascist so I suppose AntiFa might make sense.

No worries, I have also seen other people go allcaps with it but it's technically incorrect.
You are welcome but this is Chris we are still talking about and has been in hot water with the cops before and the story he produced about him attacking them shows he is anti cop just saying food for thought
 
  • Like
Reactions: Black Lives Matter
Chris was molesting Barbara.
Having no carer is better than having one who abuses you.
And that's true but Barbara really can't take full care of herself anymore. People like to say she fakes everything but there's also truth to her current disabilities and, well, she's fucking 80.
If she returns home, they won't let her stay there by herself and, if they're not highly irresponsible, they simply won't let Chris go back with her either anymore. Yes, after release, Chris is definitely going to return home (if anything, for the toys and games) even when ordered otherwise and police hijinks might ensue again.

But someone else will have to care for Barb in her home or somewhere else.
 
And that's true but Barbara really can't take full care of herself anymore. People like to say she fakes everything but there's also truth to her current disabilities and, well, she's fucking 80.
If she returns home, they won't let her stay there by herself and, if they're not highly irresponsible, they simply won't let Chris go back with her either anymore. Yes, after release, Chris is definitely going to return home (if anything, for the toys and games) even when ordered otherwise and police hijinks might ensue again.

But someone else will have to care for Barb in her home or somewhere else.
I don't think they will put her back in her home. A hoarder 2 story rat's nest is a dangerous place for an old lady. They're going to have to file to get a trustee for her money, stop the bank payments, and let the bank take it.
 
Chris was molesting Barbara.
Having no carer is better than having one who abuses you.
No shit sherlock.
However, more likely she gets put in a home because sending someone who can't look after themselves and probably doesn't even know what day it is back to live by themselves in that hovel is akin to leaving a dog tied to a fence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed
Have you never watched a single episode of Forensic Files in your entire life? Even in the 1980s when Chris was still a child, forensic technology was up to snuff to allow investigators to determine whether or not they drowned naturally or if they were forced under the water.

Bob and Barb couldn't even be fucked to make Chris wear adult diapers. How the fuck could they have been expected to beat forensic technology?
In a semi related thought. Even with a rape kit it's going to be a hard case to prove. Simply because I'm sure every surface of that house and any and all inhabitants of it, animal or vegetable are almost certainly covered in Chris's juices. The CSI techs will probably file a lawsuit for undue emotional distress.

Let's hope Chris get's a just trial with all evidence being weighed in.
Irregardless for his safety he should not live by himself again.
He really isn't competant to aid in his own defense. He's an easily manipulated retard. Let's hope the DA and Heilberg can come to an equitable agreement where Chris gets an indefinate admission to a locked psyche facility that can proviide him with some care and treatment.
 
He really isn't competant to aid in his own defense. He's an easily manipulated retard. Let's hope the DA and Heilberg can come to an equitable agreement where Chris gets an indefinate admission to a locked psyche facility that can proviide him with some care and treatment.
ABSOLUTELY.
Bella should also be investigated.
 
In a semi related thought. Even with a rape kit it's going to be a hard case to prove. Simply because I'm sure every surface of that house and any and all inhabitants of it, animal or vegetable are almost certainly covered in Chris's juices. The CSI techs will probably file a lawsuit for undue emotional distress.
From what I've gathered from e-lawyers on here, they might not even need or want to use the rape kit since it just opens up a bunch of angles of attack on the DNA. Biggest factor will probably be whatever he told the cops, assuming he repeated what he said in that phone call. Plus if Barbara's vagina looks all tore up and bruised from Chris pounding the shit out of it then they aren't really gonna need the DNA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed
He really isn't competant to aid in his own defense. He's an easily manipulated retard. Let's hope the DA and Heilberg can come to an equitable agreement where Chris gets an indefinate admission to a locked psyche facility that can proviide him with some care and treatment.
Arguing insanity is an extremely desperate defense, it essentially frees the prosecution from having burden of proof which is extremely disadvantageous. Chris has already freely acknowledged Barb resisted in some fashion, and when friends asked him whether the allegations were true he was extremely evasive in his replies before eventually admitting admitting yes. Both prove consciousness of guilt in themselves.

I'm betting that the scenario hypothesized in the legal perspective OP is what plays out. He gets severe probation conditions as part of a plea deal which he immediately breaches because he has no self-discipline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed
eurofag law student here, but one of the cases that we've studied is an incest case, and the main argument was that because the victim was mentally ill, and the attacker had learning difficulties, they couldn't prove that the last person that had sex with the victim was the attacker. they claimed that it was just as easy for the victim to have gone out and had sex, then informed the attacker of that and thus the attacker worded it in such a retarded way to police that he essentially made it sound like he was the one that had sex with her.

the bella/chris call could be explained away as fucked up roleplay, barb's rape kit (if even done) could be said to be another person (similar dna to chris explained as a false positive due to dna tests not being made for incestuous sexual relations). also, if the defence is smart, they'll cite the utter destruction chris has done to his body with the hormones, and cast doubt on his ability to rape at all. the all star video shows that chris struggles to obtain an erection, let alone sustain it and perform on a regular basis.

if chris was in europe, he would get away with it, but i'm really hoping he won't be as lucky in america.
 
So now that I think of it, given that he mentioned at least 10 sexual encounters with Barb, does this means he could face up to 10 separate charges?
Yes, look up a man named Billie Gene Seabolt (what's up with Virginia and incest?), add in rape if they go with Barb being too mushbrained to know what she was doing along with elderly abuse. This trial will be a real interesting one to watch.
In a semi related thought. Even with a rape kit it's going to be a hard case to prove. Simply because I'm sure every surface of that house and any and all inhabitants of it, animal or vegetable are almost certainly covered in Chris's juices. The CSI techs will probably file a lawsuit for undue emotional distress.
They have Chris admitting to everything, all they have to do is get a copy of text messages, and have a doctor give Barbs dustbin a good look over to see if there's any damage because according to Chris, she was in pain during it.
From what I've gathered from e-lawyers on here, they might not even need or want to use the rape kit since it just opens up a bunch of angles of attack on the DNA. Biggest factor will probably be whatever he told the cops, assuming he repeated what he said in that phone call. Plus if Barbara's vagina looks all tore up and bruised from Chris pounding the shit out of it then they aren't really gonna need the DNA.
The main reason for DNA attacks is that there's a 1% difference in DNA between people, with Barb basically being a shut-in and there's a 99% chance that Chris is really the only person she ever really has close contact to, it'll be hard to deny that the DNA test could be wrong (if they do find any, DNA testing isn't 100% accurate), but yes, if there's damage to her vagina there's enough probable cause to not need to use DNA.
Arguing insanity is an extremely desperate defense, it essentially frees the prosecution from having burden of proof which is extremely disadvantageous. Chris has already freely acknowledged Barb resisted in some fashion, and when friends asked him whether the allegations were true he was extremely evasive in his replies before eventually admitting admitting yes. Both prove consciousness of guilt in themselves.

I'm betting that the scenario hypothesized in the legal perspective OP is what plays out. He gets severe probation conditions as part of a plea deal which he immediately breaches because he has no self-discipline.
This whole situation started on lies about who he was having sex with, along with his previous knowledge of being it wrong and illegal, it wouldn't be easy to argue Chris wasn't aware of what he was doing at the time, all signs about this (from his own mouth and admission) says he knew it was wrong because he fought with the idea for awhile before deciding it felt right. In the end, nobody held a gun to Chris and made him do it. He acted in his own manner and had no reason to do so based on threats or blackmail.
 
if chris was in europe, he would get away with it, but i'm really hoping he won't be as lucky in america.
america is known for our large prison population so him going to jail is a big possibility but our court system is fucking retarded so the chances of him getting off due to a technicality or mismanagement of the case is a big possibility too
we have innocent people in jail and the guilty walking around so we just have to wait and see
 
For the animals and the CP. Like others have said, she didn't break any laws since she's not obligated to report anything. Like a retard, she flew too close to the sun.
The leaks prove she did.
The college looked the other way. I believe the leaks because there were two people interviewed that collaborate her behavior.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Barley
The leaks prove she did.
The college looked the other way. I believe the leaks because there were two people interviewed that collaborate her behavior.
I'm talking about in relation to Chris and Barb, not what she was doing while she was a student. They could care less, she's not legally a reporter of elder abuse.
 
Sorry off topic but does anyone know why the Isabella Loretta Janke thread is inaccessible with a 502 error? I would ask in chat but that is down too. Did Isabella Loretta Janke put out a statement or something? Is there a reason that specific thread is down?

IDK, but can I offer you a nice ED thread in this trying time?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back