Chris is on the move

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Atlas 95 said:
That's been a fairly common thing for Chris, post something publicly and just assume your intended audience (and only your intended audience) will find it
Click to expand...
I don't think it is so much that Chris thinks everyone will read it, it's just that he hasn't really developed well-formed thoughts on the matter. He assumes everyone he wants to (and noone else) will read it because it makes his life easier. If that is the case, he can say what he wants to say and be done with it.

If you asked him "Focus Chris, do you really think all of the nearby retail workers read that?", he would probably say "I guess not".

But then he wouldn't do anything about it and go back to the convenient assumption as soon as possible.
 
Last edited:
Some poor inmate is going to wake up to find Chris spooning with him.

Damocles_Sword said:
He's going to mace the person at the counter of the Ruckersville McDonalds the first time the shake machine is down, isn't he?
Click to expand...

captkrisma said:
I can imagine Chris' next victim: It'll be a male employee of a big box store asking if he needs any assistance.
Click to expand...

I fear it'll be the cops in the first parked patrol car he sees. Or Barb. We should make a poll.

Edit: Come to think of it, this is exactly the kind of thing he'd do if the PD told him to stay put and be quiet.
 
Last edited:
Chris has hung around malls and big shops for years. Often he just paces, or does circuits of the place. It's a habit of his.
Sometimes he'll combine this with something else, like the love quest or his anti-Snyder flyers, or his blue arms protest.
He's been getting hassle from the authorities for years, too. His autism means it's hard for him to understand or predict their intervention.
I think he sees the pepper spray as something of an equaliser in these jerkop/manajerk encounters.
I also think this will lead to trouble for him.
 
I miss the good ol days when he was actually funny in a sadistic sort of way getting on camera and making a video complaining that some random person had ticked him off literally towards the point of breaking stuff in his pigsty of a room. I wonder if he'll revert back to that one day. We all have a particular metamorphosis we all go through that seperates our childhood from adulthood, he's straight up not handling it well and now its actually not back in the day funny but a why type of humor. I am surprised there's any lawyer with any sort of self respect even willing to take this case.
 
an unpopular opinion, but i think he meant "I Will Defend myself, and only retaliate when absolutely necessary. I Would even spray [you,] myself." i think it makes more sense than the alternative of him blinding himself out of a need of self-restrain.
 
[QUOTE="Napalmxxx2, post: 476942, member: 5212" I am surprised there's any lawyer with any sort of self respect even willing to take this case.[/QUOTE]

Legal representation is a right. The public defender assigned to him doesn't have a choice in the matter.
 
Hellblazer said:
Legal representation is a right. The public defender assigned to him doesn't have a choice in the matter.
Click to expand...
Poor bastard. Still, I look forward to Chris expanding on the concept and deciding that "what the world Really Needs is Public Sweethearts who are Assigned to Lonely Male Lesbians; they Do Not Have a choice in the matter."
 
DangerousGas said:
Really? I'm not up on how US law works, but I was under the impression that even a court-appointed defense lawyer could back out of defending an unreasonable client.
Click to expand...

They can, but 'unreasonable' is extremely hard to prove and more effort than just putting up with an annoying client for a bit.
 
DangerousGas said:
Really? I'm not up on how US law works, but I was under the impression that even a court-appointed defense lawyer could back out of defending an unreasonable client.
Click to expand...

I was thinking that too for the longest time. Chris defending himself in court with no experience in the legal field makes me wish I could see this for myself, however him with a public defender could be just as worthwhile to see. Now the question at hand is "Will he plead guilty or will he plead not guilty?" I am fairly certain a plea bargain can be reached for this however that insinuates that he is willing to cooperate with said public defender.
 
Homely Wilson said:
I don't think we need to psychoanalyze Chris here, I think his own explanation is good enough. He gets extremely stressed out by confrontational situations (due to autism) and he thinks the pepper spray is an acceptable way to get people to back off so he can escape the situation.
Click to expand...

Yes, but Chris puts himself in these confrontational situations and then, instead of doing the sensible thing (which would be leaving quietly in the case of the stores he's been banned from) he escalates the confrontation via his actions.
 
DangerousGas said:
Really? I'm not up on how US law works, but I was under the impression that even a court-appointed defense lawyer could back out of defending an unreasonable client.
Click to expand...
If the lawyer is able to do that, wouldn't Chris get assigned another one? I didn't think the US court system is allowed to say "Sorry, you're an asshole, no legal counsel for you. I guess you will have to go directly to jail."
 
serdog said:
That would not go to codependency to stand trial, rather once, (I hate to even this) or if, the lawyer talks Chris into pleading guilty Autism and da stress become relevent to the sentence to court will give Chris.

also looking that the offense of release of a gas if Chris sprayed himself in Wal-mart he could be get another charge
Click to expand...
Sorry, I just need to be infantile for a moment if I may. Chris, release of gas... lol. But seriously I think he'll use the Autism card plus his mothers care as excuses for a non-custodial sentence. He'll end up with community service I'd guess.
 
Stud2Stud said:
Well, don't get me wrong, if Chris was attacked for no reason I'd feel sorry for Chris and think the other guy is an asshole.

But if it's the outcome of Chris trespassing/vandalising, throwing a hissyfit when confronted and trying to escape via the JERK-repelling tard-spray, I'd say it serves him right to taste some of his own medicine.
Click to expand...

And what about t he next poor schmuck at McDonald's texting on his phone? What if Chris gets it into his head that the guy is a troll? (We've seen this before with the incident at Burger King where Chris thought some random guy was in communication with his "troll kind".)
 
Thetan said:
And what about t he next poor schmuck at McDonald's texting on his phone? What if Chris gets it into his head that the guy is a troll? (We've seen this before with the incident at Burger King where Chris thought some random guy was in communication with his "troll kind".)
Click to expand...


you mean @PCA ?
 
I think you guys are forgetting that, just last year, Chris came here to try and instigate a personal-army attack on a Walmart Asset Protection Manager.

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/september-2-fb-update-new-troll-to-welcome.1805/

He has a reckless disregard for other people and it's become such that he feels he is entitled to physically assault people who bother him, even when he's committing a crime.

So, yes, despite my system of constantly giving him the benefit of a doubt, I would say that Chris is now a danger to himself and others.
 
Hellblazer said:
They can, but 'unreasonable' is extremely hard to prove and more effort than just putting up with an annoying client for a bit.
Click to expand...
By dint of his documented actions, he's doing everything he/she/whatever can to prove unreasonableness (excuse the godawful neologism there) as a defining character trait.

Napalmxxx2 said:
Chris defending himself in court with no experience in the legal field makes me wish I could see this for myself, however him with a public defender could be just as worthwhile to see.
Click to expand...
I get the distinct impression that it's one of those things that'd become funnier once the legend has grown around it, you know? A direct transcript would, at this point, probably just prove to be a sad and somewhat pathetic rant about shit no-one but Chris cares about, whereas the mythos would become something immense in subsequent re-tellings.

I dunno - this is proving to be an uncomfortable saga to be a spectator of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom