- Joined
- Sep 16, 2013
I wrote a post about this recently.
I don't think Chris keeps multiple realities in his head a lot more than other people. There are things he doesn't know for sure; like the truth about the sweethearts, the size of the fandase, and perhaps the intention of a few of the gal-pals. These things, in Chris mind may or may not be true.
One could easily argue that he should know the answers to these questions, but leaving that aside, having questions about our past is common to all of us. "Why did my ex leave me?" etc.
Our opinions about these questions fluctuate. Sometimes rationally, because of new information. Sometimes irrationally, because of mood. Chris is different because his opinions fluctuate a lot, and because he is not great at nuance so he expresses his opinions as if they were facts.
He also brings up contradictory statements to prove different issues. I don't think he fully believes that both statements are guaranteed to be true. His thought process is, "I am trying to say I am capable of meaningful relationships. If Ivy were real it would help prove this point. I think Ivy might have been real, so I will use this to argue my point." A few days later, he thinks "I am trying to argue my life has been miserable. If Ivy were a troll, it would help prove this point. I think Ivy might have been a troll, so I will use this to argue my point."
My guess would be is, if you could get Chris in a moment of calm, collected, candor about any of the things he flip-flops on, he would tell you he didn't know the true answer about whether Ivy was real, or any of the other issues.
I don't think Chris keeps multiple realities in his head a lot more than other people. There are things he doesn't know for sure; like the truth about the sweethearts, the size of the fandase, and perhaps the intention of a few of the gal-pals. These things, in Chris mind may or may not be true.
One could easily argue that he should know the answers to these questions, but leaving that aside, having questions about our past is common to all of us. "Why did my ex leave me?" etc.
Our opinions about these questions fluctuate. Sometimes rationally, because of new information. Sometimes irrationally, because of mood. Chris is different because his opinions fluctuate a lot, and because he is not great at nuance so he expresses his opinions as if they were facts.
He also brings up contradictory statements to prove different issues. I don't think he fully believes that both statements are guaranteed to be true. His thought process is, "I am trying to say I am capable of meaningful relationships. If Ivy were real it would help prove this point. I think Ivy might have been real, so I will use this to argue my point." A few days later, he thinks "I am trying to argue my life has been miserable. If Ivy were a troll, it would help prove this point. I think Ivy might have been a troll, so I will use this to argue my point."
My guess would be is, if you could get Chris in a moment of calm, collected, candor about any of the things he flip-flops on, he would tell you he didn't know the true answer about whether Ivy was real, or any of the other issues.