War Cicada pizza, tacos and sushi are being gobbled up. Why Americans are finally eating bugs. - Remember: The last person to eat the bugs got strangled to death with unbreakable toilet paper via Gentleman Tarzan.


Newsflash, America: Almost everybody eats bugs but us.

Differences in food cultures have often been used to reinforce cultural identity and stereotype the people and cultures in warmer climates.

It may have surprised you to read about how the large Brood X cicadas, emerging after 17 yearsunderground, make for a delicious meal. But in fact, insects are a staple of diets around the world, and we’re just catching up.


Cicadas for dinner? It’s about time!
Other cultures have known how enjoyable insects are for millennia. Today, 2,000 species are eaten by more than 2 billion people. In every corner of the world, people are dining on bugs like sakondry, mopane, grasshoppers and, of course, cicadas. Many cultures even consider them a delicacy — because they are.
We’re just now starting to truly understand the positive impact that deliciousness can have on the planet, because many insects are both more nutritious (rich in digestible proteins, key amino-acids and micronutrients) and far better for the environment than livestock, which can require a lot of land, water and feed.

And most of the edible bugs you’ll encounter actually taste really good. I promise. Cicadas have a nutty, pork-like flavor — if you prepare them a certain way, they can even resemble a giant meaty sunflower seed. Sakondry are known as “the bacon bug” because they actually do taste like bacon. Chapulines (grasshoppers) have the flavor of a sweet, smoky tender jerky with a crispy chicken skin exterior. Green ants have a zesty quality.
There’s also none of that squishy stuff you might associate with eating an insect. Their texture is like other meats when cooked, and their legs and wings crisp up in the heat like chicken skin. It’s just meat; an often-overlooked meat that’s one of the keys to creating a sustainable food system. So, if they’re good for the environment, good for you, and taste great, why haven’t they caught on in America until now?
1623251750298_n_hallie_brk_cicada_scampi_210609_1920x1080.jpg

Unfortunately, until now, for many people in this country eating bugs was gross. While shows like “Fear Factor,” and even the classic playground dare, sensationalized America’s aversion to eating bugs, our alienation of insects as food — and fear and disgust toward insects in general — has far deeper roots.
While eating insects is common along the earth’s equator, it has likely always been rare in northern latitudes. The cold climates of Northern Europe don’t support the same ample, biodiverse, year-round insect populations that are common farther south, and many insects found within our warm(er) homes have been seen as pests or signs of rot in foods we stored throughout the winter.
These differences in food cultures have often been used to reinforce cultural identity and stereotype the people and cultures in warmer climates. Even though 80 percent of all animal species on earthare insects, we try not to think about them at all, and when we do, we generally reduce their incredible diversity to “bugs,” even when those insects aren’t bugs (such as butterflies), or even insects (say, spiders). These biases and blindspots have not only limited our own experience of insects as food but have also undervalued insects as an agricultural resource to combat food insecurity and biodiversity loss.


I’ll admit it, I was once hesitant to eat insects, too. But after I was served a plate of sakondry halfway across the planet a decade ago, I’m now toasting, frying and whipping up insect sushi and fondue like anyone else on the global block. I’ve met very few people who don’t eat cicadas again after trying them. It’s usually nothing more than the mental hurdles that prevent us from reaping the benefits (unless, of course, you have a shellfish allergy).

Those hurdles are coming down right now, in large part due to Covid-19 vaccines beginning to slow the pandemic within the U.S. We are, like these cicadas, shedding our skins — i.e. masks — and beginning to venture out into the world. After more than a year full of loss and a lack of choices, we are now seizing them. People are trying new things — and one of them just happens to be chowing down on cicada tacos.
But it’s bigger than Brood X just being trendy or people feeling like they’ve crossed a bold new frontier; people actually want to learn about why we should eat insects, and all of the benefits that come with doing so. In every interview I’ve donefor my cicada dishes, which have traveled around the country, I’ve been asked almost immediately about the sustainability benefits, and how insect eating can be a step towards solving some of the issues our planet is facing.

That is a seismic shift, and leaves me with little doubt that, at least on this front, we are turning the corner. It won’t be long before you’re seeing frozen insects in your local supermarket and munching on a bowl of bugs at your local bar. Or, if you’re like me, packing a bag of cicadas in your kids’ lunchboxes.


Our recognition of the interconnectedness between our health and that of the planet is increasing. And where we once might have used novel foods to distance ourselves from “others,” our food culture is now defined by the very diversity that makes this country great. So we are turning to bugs to improve our diets in ways that help us and the planet — bugs that reinforce our wonder in the world and our eagerness to get outside to share a fun meal with friends and family. We all need a change for our collective good right now, and this one comes pan-fried.

Cortni Borgerson
Cortni Borgerson is a professor of anthropology at Montclair State University and a National Geographic Explorer. When she isn’t making cicada tacos with her kids in New Jersey, she’s ameliorating food insecurity and reducing the unsustainable hunting of endangered species in Madagascar through the farming of traditional insects.
 
It's crazy just how much of the entire landmass in the US is farmland. We're using so much of our flatter land for farms that the deserts are being turned into farms. And yet we wonder why we have water problems now, and way less of pretty much every animal in the country.
Because Californians are stupid and didn't invest in their own water infrastructure in the 60s so now they have to drain the water from the surrounding states to grow almonds and have the greenest lawns. In non-retard states, we have less problems because we're not stupid hippies with no ability to plan for the future.
 
It's crazy just how much of the entire landmass in the US is farmland. We're using so much of our flatter land for farms that the deserts are being turned into farms. And yet we wonder why we have water problems now, and way less of pretty much every animal in the country.
Who cares about stupid flyover country. It's overrun with evil right wing bible thumpers who hate black people and probably rape children with their pastor or something.
 
Yeah but they still only come out once a year then each batch has to spend 17 years underground developing. If you start hunting them during this vital mating season their numbers will inevitably decrease, especially since you can hunt down males by their call. We'll end up killing them off like we've killed off bird species before.
I keep telling people the real threat to the environment is not eating steak or driving cars. It's overpopulation. And I just know people are going to find a way to fuck this up as well.
 
I keep telling people the real threat to the environment is not eating steak or driving cars. It's overpopulation. And I just know people are going to find a way to fuck this up as well.
Pretty much every environmental problem we have today is because of an explosively booming population, mostly originating from South America and Africa, though India and China are also to blame on this (though they tend to keep more to themselves population wise). Cow farts, carbon dioxide, urban expansion, resource exploitation, none of these would be current issues if the world population was 1-3 billion or less. We'd also have many more people actually able to keep steady jobs instead of being dumped out into the streets or shoved under skyscrapers. But the elites are free to ignore this pressing issue because they have infinite resources apparently and can just float above the plebs, not like the collapse of the environment would involve them as well or anything.
 
Pretty much every environmental problem we have today is because of an explosively booming population, mostly originating from South America and Africa, though India and China are also to blame on this (though they tend to keep more to themselves population wise). Cow farts, carbon dioxide, urban expansion, resource exploitation, none of these would be current issues if the world population was 1-3 billion or less. We'd also have many more people actually able to keep steady jobs instead of being dumped out into the streets or shoved under skyscrapers. But the elites are free to ignore this pressing issue because they have infinite resources apparently and can just float above the plebs, not like the collapse of the environment would involve them as well or anything.
I'll sum it up:

1) The West exports its pollution. The most polluting thing we do is not nuclear waste, since that can actually be re-used as fuel and there's a ton of research repurposing it, but e-waste. Old batteries, computer parts and cell phones are not easily recycled. They require hazardous, environmentally devastating treatments to remove the valuable parts from it. Separating the plastic, metals and other such components is costly and ineffective if you need to be environmentally sound. So we export this process. To Mongolia, which has the world's largest lake of toxic sludge, viewable from space. This is not talked about.

2) Planned obsolescence has only increased our consumption and wastefulness. What is planned obsolescence? Well, you know how appliances and cars and stuff from the 60s and 70s are basically fucking indestructible and last for like 40 years? Yeah, well, corporations decided this was not economically sound. So shit that is mass produced now is made to not last. Its basically made to fuck up after a certain period of time. This exponentially increases our wastefulness. But again, everyone wants that shiny new iphone every year, or a different model of car. Appliances that lasted 20+ years now barely last 5. This only increases the amount of pollution. Small incremental upgrades constantly being released increases consumption. This is not the corporate position, so you don't hear about it.

3) The developing world, much like the West, uses really shitty, inexpensive fossil fuels to pump its industry up. The main problems of this are India and China. They both still use coal because they want to move out of being a developing world, so they consume really bad fossil fuels. They also have really, really bad environmental regs so they can rush through. And of course, we export our slave labor here to compensate for the number 1 and number 2. Why isn't anything made in America? Well, we have labor laws and production laws. And you can keep a very visible eye on factories here. Even though the world has grown smaller, its still hard to keep an eye on something thousands upon thousands of miles away, with other cultures and other languages.

4) While population is a difficulty, as nations begin to industrialize, population decreases. This is universal and seen with China, which shifted from agrarian to industrial. This will happen in India and Africa as well, as it is a reaction to economic conditions. Not to mention we have VERY efficient ways of farming land now. So population and food production isn't a problem. Nor is population density. Vast swathes of America are uninhabited or have low populations. Same with Africa. We just concentrate in cities where the jobs are.

The problem isn't really population so much as concentration of wealth in the hands of the elite. Workers lost 3.7 trillion dollars in earnings during the pandemic. What did we trade for this? 500 new billionaires and the world's wealthiest became $5 trillion dollars richer. The gap between the rich and the poor is widening, and with the shrinking of the world, these people can escape anywhere. Which is why I prefer a self-sufficient society where corporations are beaten with lead pipes when they get out of line, banks are operated by the state, the fed can get assfucked, usury is illegal and highly regulated, we're generally isolationist and promote the health of the worker. You know, the majority of the population.

This isn't really a left or right issue. The problem is the wealth itself. Overwhelming concentration of wealth in the hands of the few is the problem. Note how none of the major causes of pollution are addressed but one of the only ways that the poor and middle-class can enjoy themselves. The elite don't care about the other stuff because it would directly involve their profits, but want to reduce access and make it incredibly expensive to eat meat. That way the 'environment' will be cleaner for them without impacting their profit margins. And they get to lord over you, thinking that they're your betters. The wealthy are disgusting, vile creatures. And a majority of the time, they're fucking retarded. They aren't smart. They just have more money than god and are sociopaths, who think they know how things work.
 
The minor broods make this eat the bugs shit even worse. Journoscum will confidently ignore the cycling sizes of broods, popscience types will say it's ok to mass hunt cicadas because science says so, and articles will shill killing them instead of simply letting them have sex and die so they finally shut up.

It's like that old Midwest locust swarm that happened every decade or so until it suddenly stopped because some forest or plains they lived in got turned into a farm.
Reminds me how pandas get all the protection in the world, but uglier and arguably more useful creatures get scorned at and ignored even when they’re at risk.

Pretty privilege is dangerous in the conservation world.
 
Not gonna lie, when I’m in Oaxaca I dig some Escamole Tacos which are basically just Ant Larvae. That being said, I wouldn’t want to eat them every day and I’m sure as shit not eating a Cicada or a Grasshopper.
 
Back