- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
The Jews already fought for their right to own land there and won almost every single time. There would be no Palestine if things were settled normally.
Clashes between Jews and Palestinians in Jerusalem. Israel now invading Gaza according to (Questionable) Reports - If your thoughts are "I don't like either" you don't need to fucking post because it's been said 100 times you fucking dullard
- Thread starter KingCoelacanth
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2020
I have no sympathy for Palestine to be Frank they probably should have been wiped out after the 1st war launched with the explicit goal of genocide
- Joined
- May 19, 2020
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
Mothra1988
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 27, 2021
The idea that "the Jews stole the land from the Palestinians" is laughable. Whatever side you prefer, it's a fact they were there first before Muslims. For as much as /pol/acks pretend to love Emperor Hadrian, they sure seem ignorant of what he did.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Not only that, but there was never a time when there weren't any Jews living in Israel. At the time of the Balfour Declaration, World War I, and the later San Remo conference, which made the foundation of Israel a fact of international law, there were already Jewish communities in the region that had been there for generations and lived alongside the existing Arab communities.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2020
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
How does land change ownership legitimately in your mind? Purchased or conquered, almost everyone has an argument that their country is illegitimate.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
What does land ownership have to do with recognizing a state? Most countries own only a small amount of land under their jurisdictions.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Some countries have purchased at least some of their current land from other nations. Case in point, the Louisiana Purchase.
Protistology
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2020
What the Goyim allow and don't allow doesn't matter.
HaShem has ordered exile for the Jewish people until it pleases Him to end it..
Neturei Karta - Orthodox Jews United Against Zionism
Neturei Karta is an international organization of Orthodox Jews dedicated to the propagation and clarification of Torah Judaism.
www.nkusa.org
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
You can't have a state without borders, and you can't have borders without land. A state that doesn't have any land is no state at all. What are your standards for a state to be legitimate?
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
You absolutely can have a border without owning the land its on. Otherwise Texas wouldn’t have a border.
Imagine being this fucking retarded.
A Jewish state can’t be legitimate unless it has a temple and a king.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Your definition of ownership is not the definition anyone else is using. We're talking about sovereignty, no property ownership. The United States "owns" Texas as a part of its sovereign territory.
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2014
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Appealing to authority only works if your appealing to a specific authority. You've cited no legal authority in your argument, and cannot, because your argument is born out a fundamental misunderstanding of confusing the legal concept of personal ownership with the concept of national sovereignty.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
I wasn’t the one who confused that concept.
National sovereignty has nothing to do with land ownership. A state can own land. A state might have an interest in protecting land under its jurisdiction. Asking me how land title is legitimately transferred has nothing to do with the legitimacy of a state!
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Except we were clearly not talking about personal land ownership, if you were actually following the conversation, but national sovereignty. You are the only one who has misunderstood the conversation, and everybody else has been trying to explain that to you.