Cogent's CEO is directly involved in trying to censor the Kiwi Farms

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I think he should change the name to "LizDongsConsentAccidentFarms.com" for at least a couple months. Long enough for the journos and wikipedia to have to update their articles with that in it.
Keep in mind Donger controls the Wikipedia page and journos primarily reach out to him for contact too. It'd be pretty easy for him to chalk it up to defamation so at best we'd maybe get an acknowledgement that the word consent accident exists. Really don't think he'll ever acknowledge his Tweet.
Maybe Liz Dong would even hesitate to make that round of phone calls and have to explain the new name to all the ISP people.
This guy is pathetically deranged and obsessed, I don't think anything will make him hesitate calling for girltalks.

I'm not Null so I can't say what's best for the site but after all the DNS problems this year I'm happy we're on kiwifarms.net again and think changing DNS is probably much more trouble than what it's worth. (I'm thinking about search engine troubles and the reduction in userbase when we didn't have .net)
 
Learn about what you're talking about before making suggestions.

Where's my error?

Josh is banned from twitter and the updates on telegram are locked behind an account registration. Also, new users will have a really hard time coming in, eventually killing the site from the userbase dying off.

Josh should make a new twitter and see if he stays banned. They're letting it rip there lately.

All trannies need to do is send a single email clarifying that extremelyinnocentsitethatdoesntdoanyfunnythings.website is the latest domain KF is operating under

Yea maybe that works for some. Maybe it doesn't for others.

Journos wouldn't update if the site went under that name, since Kiwi Farms was once named CWCki Forums and the Wiki article just says the site was previously named after a "webcomic artist's" initials. Also, Elliot would not hesitate to saw his own arms off if it meant a single month of KF downtime.

I agree regarding Elliot. I dont know for sure that its not possible to make the new name newsworthy. Send a Press Release to the wire services too, try to get it picked up.

It'd be pretty easy for him to chalk it up to defamation so at best we'd maybe get an acknowledgement that the word consent accident exists. Really don't think he'll ever acknowledge his Tweet.

If succesful, part of the point is to show his motivation is personal vendetta and coverup.

I'm not Null so I can't say what's best for the site but after all the DNS problems this year I'm happy we're on kiwifarms.net again and think changing DNS is probably much more trouble than what it's worth. (I'm thinking about search engine troubles and the reduction in userbase when we didn't have .net)

As long as he has the .net domain, it could kiwiflare then redirect.

As long as the site can stay up like it is, it should. If it the final host is eliminated or final ISP pulls some shit, whats the next move? In my mind its "rebrand" with some hilarious bullshit and go through the lineup of hosting providers again. I know you think it'd be trivially easy to repeat the ban for cloudflare and every host and isp, but i'm not so convinced they will all just snap to attention when Jones emails them and instantly obey. It buys however much time it takes to run down the list, and expends however much of Eliots resources. What other plays do you have at that point anyway?

I said from the beginning these were last resort plans and Im MATI right now for all the hate im getting for my big brain ideas instead of dooming
 
Where's my error?
Josh doesn't even use a CDN in the first place, and the rest of your message is... uh, hard to understand. Using different domains will cause problems that have been discussed previously.
Josh should make a new twitter and see if he stays banned. They're letting it rip there lately.
He did, and got banned quickly.
Yea maybe that works for some. Maybe it doesn't for others.
It will take the same amount of effort on the troons' end, and more for Josh.
I agree regarding Elliot. I dont know for sure that its not possible to make the new name newsworthy. Send a Press Release to the wire services too, try to get it picked up.
Journos won't just post the new name, and even if we do something newsworthy, they will weasel out of saying the name, like how the Wiki article doesn't mention even CWC's initials.
If succesful, part of the point is to show his motivation is personal vendetta and coverup.
He can easily spin this as defamation with the help of journos.
As long as he has the .net domain, it could kiwiflare then redirect.

As long as the site can stay up like it is, it should. If it the final host is eliminated or final ISP pulls some shit, whats the next move? In my mind its "rebrand" with some hilarious bullshit and go through the lineup of hosting providers again. I know you think it'd be trivially easy to repeat the ban for cloudflare and every host and isp, but i'm not so convinced they will all just snap to attention when Jones emails them and instantly obey. It buys however much time it takes to run down the list, and expends however much of Eliots resources. What other plays do you have at that point anyway?
The .net domain has to be up to redirect, which means Null has a single point of failure regardless of how many sites it can redirect to. It has a very small chance of helping against bogus abuse complaints, but "it automatically redirects to CP" is not that much less bad-sounding than "it hosts CP". This isn't a valid way for the site to keep itself up if it gets worse, because it assumes some things that won't end up true.
I said from the beginning these were last resort plans and Im MATI right now for all the hate im getting for my big brain ideas instead of dooming
These plans aren't valid because they require tons of effort for extremely dubious reward. Also, I'm not hating you, just pointing out how retarded your ideas are. It's okay to concede and/or leave if you get MATI at people doing that. I'm also not dooming at all, because you know who's making all the big brain plans and executing them? Null. He's going to figure this shit out (he already basically solved it by changing those A records) and he's going to fucking make it. Thank you for your discussion anyway, and remember: LET'S FUCKING GOOOOOOOO!
 
1698843870747.png

Holy crap, folks, stand by for incoming...
 
A few questions:

Firstly, how is this stuff "Leaks in the Public interest"? What is the societal importance of hosting shoeonhead's nude leaks? or the public significance of hosting the nudes that aediot uploaded in order to attempt to blackmail his ex-gf?

Secondly, isn't it illegal to host nonconsensual pornography, whether that be stolen nudes or revenge porn?

You even described it as revenge porn or extortion in the case of adezero. So what's the issue with deleting this stuff from the site?
 
Last edited:
Firstly, how is this stuff "Leaks in the Public interest"? What is the societal importance of hosting shoeonhead's nude leaks? or the public significance of hosting the nudes that aediot uploaded in order to attempt to blackmail his ex-gf?
They feature a public figure, as opposed to a website allowing you to name-and-shame ex-girlfriends, which would not be public interest.

Secondly, isn't it illegal to host nonconsensual pornography, whether that be stolen nudes or revenge porn?
No, and as an uneducated website administrator I have no definition of what "nonconsensual pornography" is, considering that whores who literally sell nudes use noncon as an excuse to get shit removed from search engines that is just a protection of their market. It is impossible for me to discern what images were published consensually and which were not. Therefore, you should get a court order.

You even described it as revenge porn or extortion in the case of adezero. So what's the issue with deleting this stuff from the site?
Because it's their gross messy breakup they decided to have in public. She had the opportunity to ask for a court order and never did - or tried, and failed. In which case, not my problem.


Regardless of your position on this, you should agree that random telecommunications companies should not be the arbiter of truth in these matters, and if you disagree with that, you should kill yourself because you're a faggot.
 
Back