Come point and laugh at user @lautaro for being a disgusting pedophile

[lautaro]

It's funny how when a man does it he's (rightfully) called a pedo and sexual predator, meanwhile the article here the other day about a woman doing the same was much more generous to her.

This man will get likely a decade or more this, meanwhile women often don't serve any time at all.

For boys, having sex with a woman at 14-15 is probably the best experience of their lives. It will not result in them saying "oh, no, I was abused". It's also very lucky, and for most of men it will never happen, hence it gives men envy and they usually say "why didn't it happen to me". For men in that age, getting sex is something difficult.
Back in the day, an uncle would take their 13-16 (or older, if they still were virgins) to prostitutes and those who needed but couldn't avoided becoming incels.
It's quite funny how the US sexual culture leads to much higher competitions which leads to incels, but also leads to unhappy 30s teachers who fuck younger boys, so it creates incels but also give the chance of sex to others.

Girls are different. They have a "sexual activation" later, they tend to be quite innocent regards it up to 15, and some even later. Women usually need trust and love to have sex with someone. A relationship with an older man could easily end up bad, even if they consent, they may claim years later that they were abused. It also has no merit at all, for women to get sex is as easy as just wanting it. It's not something lucky or rewarding in that respect like it is for that 1% of boys who get lucky.

For boys it isn't traumatic, rather the opposite, those lucky ones are the envy of every other male. Why should it be punished if it's consensual and both parties are happy after it?

very surprised it was not a woman.

Haha, I was going to comment, "why didn't this happen to m,,," and then I read it was a man.

 

[Otterly]

For boys it isn't traumatic, rather the opposite, those lucky ones are the envy of every other male. Why should it be punished if it's consensual and both parties are happy after it?

Because they’re children and minors cannot consent. Pedophilia is not lessened by the victim being a boy.
Predators go where the prey is. Perhaps we need enhanced background checking for all people working with children, whatever they’re doing now isn’t working

 

[lautaro]

Because they’re children and minors cannot consent. Pedophilia is not lessened by the victim being a boy.
Predators go where the prey is. Perhaps we need enhanced background checking for all people working with children, whatever they’re doing now isn’t working

We're talking about 14-15 years old boys, not children. They understand their actions and know what sex is (unless they're severely retarded).
Also, minors can consent. Not that I care what the law says, I was talking about what's right or wrong, not legal or illegal. But legally they can consent at 16 in most states. "Real consent", of course they also can. The ability to consent doesn't happen magically at some age the state decided. For some it may be in childhood, for some at 15, and some people are just too stupid to consent, at whatever age.

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to people with pre-pubescent bodies. It doesn't apply for those older than 11 and it also doesn't mean fucking children either. It can't be illegal.

 

[Otterly]

We're talking about 14-15 years old boys, not children.

They’re children. They cannot consent. Dude is a pedo and gets the wood chipper

Also, minors can consent.

They cannot. That is the legal and moral definition of a minor. It’s why we have an age of majority, because children cannot consent and there are many predatory adults around who will take advantage of them, all of whom are rightly loathed by society and should go on the woodchipper

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to people with pre-pubescent bodies. It doesn't apply for those older than 11

I thought is was 14-15? Getting younger isn’t it? Can I interest you in a woodchipper?

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

For boys, having sex with a woman at 14-15 is probably the best experience of their lives. It will not result in them saying "oh, no, I was abused". It's also very lucky, and for most of men it will never happen, hence it gives men envy and they usually say "why didn't it happen to me". For men in that age, getting sex is something difficult.
Back in the day, an uncle would take their 13-16 (or older, if they still were virgins) to prostitutes and those who needed but couldn't avoided becoming incels.
It's quite funny how the US sexual culture leads to much higher competitions which leads to incels, but also leads to unhappy 30s teachers who fuck younger boys, so it creates incels but also give the chance of sex to others.

Girls are different. They have a "sexual activation" later, they tend to be quite innocent regards it up to 15, and some even later. Women usually need trust and love to have sex with someone. A relationship with an older man could easily end up bad, even if they consent, they may claim years later that they were abused. It also has no merit at all, for women to get sex is as easy as just wanting it. It's not something lucky or rewarding in that respect like it is for that 1% of boys who get lucky.

For boys it isn't traumatic, rather the opposite, those lucky ones are the envy of every other male. Why should it be punished if it's consensual and both parties are happy after it?

That sounds suspiciously like Feminist propaganda. "Female pedos aren't just harmless, they actually help men" that's bullshit.

 

[Montalbane]

For boys, having sex with a woman at 14-15 is probably the best experience of their lives. It will not result in them saying "oh, no, I was abused". It's also very lucky, and for most of men it will never happen, hence it gives men envy and they usually say "why didn't it happen to me". For men in that age, getting sex is something difficult.
Back in the day, an uncle would take their 13-16 (or older, if they still were virgins) to prostitutes and those who needed but couldn't avoided becoming incels.
It's quite funny how the US sexual culture leads to much higher competitions which leads to incels, but also leads to unhappy 30s teachers who fuck younger boys, so it creates incels but also give the chance of sex to others.

Girls are different. They have a "sexual activation" later, they tend to be quite innocent regards it up to 15, and some even later. Women usually need trust and love to have sex with someone. A relationship with an older man could easily end up bad, even if they consent, they may claim years later that they were abused. It also has no merit at all, for women to get sex is as easy as just wanting it. It's not something lucky or rewarding in that respect like it is for that 1% of boys who get lucky.

For boys it isn't traumatic, rather the opposite, those lucky ones are the envy of every other male. Why should it be punished if it's consensual and both parties are happy after it?

It actually is
But pornsick boomers just gush over it.

 

[lautaro]

They’re children. They cannot consent. Dude is a pedo and gets the wood chipper

Legally? Yes. In the reality no, childhood ends with puberty, and puberty fiishes at 16 for girls and 17 for boys, roughly. A 14-15 years old isn't a child, they're past the middle of puberty.

They cannot. That is the legal and moral definition of a minor. It’s why we have an age of majority, because children cannot consent and there are many predatory adults around who will take advantage of them, all of whom are rightly loathed by society and should go on the woodchipper

You have a very common trouble of people which is that they mingle Ethics (or morality, or what's right or wrong) based in reality, with law (which is very usually arbitrary and changes across state lines).

It's wrong in both cases anyway. Minors can consent in the "real" sense (understand their actions and agree on to proceed with something), and they can legally consent to sex if they're above 16 (in most states) as well. They can consent to medical treatments, opening some bank accounts, get in a job contract, etc. as well. They can't consent to open an LLC and some others actions.

"Minor" isn't a moral term. It's just a legal concept. The age of majority is something arbitrary, what happens at 18? Nothing special. More rights are already given at 16, so it could be 16 for what matters.


If the law was based on morality (objective morality; Ethics), then rights should be given or restricted basing them off that particular person capability, to each their own. This is usually done only to restrict, not to concede rights.

What they do is decide an arbitrary age and if you're below that age, the state just tells you "well, fuck you, wait until 18", regardless of your real mental capability. You may earn some of these rights by emancipating (but who the hell does that). If doesn't matter how intelligent or mentally mature a 15.5 years old is, he cannot touch a tit if he wants to. The state thinks they have the right to allow or not allow other people to do what they desire, going against Ethics.

I thought is was 14-15? Getting younger isn’t it? Can I interest you in a woodchipper?

No, pedophilia was always the sexual attraction to pre-pubescent bodies. Above 13 falls into what could be called "hebephilia", and it's a matter of debate if it's paraphilic or not, because those people have adult features that it would be expectable someone feels sexual attraction. Older than 15 it's already considered normal, it isn't a paraphilia. I'm not sure if we should apply hebephilia to boys either, since it refers to attraction to pubescent girls.

Still, women fucking boys is probably not pedophilia. It's not definetely in the case of those past puberty. Most of these cases are just women wanting dick, from young men. Cases where they're much younger seem to be rarer, but it's probably the same.
Women aren't attracted to undeveloped bodies like it happens in male pedophilia. Even a very young child has as functional penis, so it serves to satisfy them, but there's not a particular attraction to children.
The thrill of doing something forbidden may be some other reason, and the previous relationship deranging in sexual may be another motive, a lot of these cases involve mothers, aunts or babysitters. Actual pedophilia in women is very rare, almost unexistant.

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

They’re children. They cannot consent. Dude is a pedo and gets the wood chipper

They cannot. That is the legal and moral definition of a minor. It’s why we have an age of majority, because children cannot consent and there are many predatory adults around who will take advantage of them, all of whom are rightly loathed by society and should go on the woodchipper

I thought is was 14-15? Getting younger isn’t it? Can I interest you in a woodchipper?

I wouldn't waste any more time arguing with this fucked up pedo nigger, he has exactly one topic he posts to the Farms about and here it is:

Pedophiles range from 3-30% depending on the study. What percentage of people actually fuck children? The great majority of them don't abuse children.
The majority aren't even exclusively pedophilic, but they also like the 'normal' range (post-pubescent), so it's not really a problem because they can still go for adults. Of those who are exclusive, the majority have enough self-control, only the most stupid and/or sociopathic actually do it.

Was it actually given to children, though? The average age reported was around 15 I think, which is very late if the idea was delaying puberty. Women are almost adults by then and men have already developed most of their penis and a big part of height.

How can a heterosexual man be traumatized by fucking at 13? It's the biggest win a man can have in life. If it lead to pregnancy or other trouble, well, I understand. But other than that? You won. You defeated 99% of males.
If anyone ever bullies you can just say "shhh. I fucked at 13, you didn't. Virgin." Indeed, this is the reason so many teachers are caught, men brag about it.
I'd be very happy if something like that happened to me, but of course, it didn't and it never will. God has favourites and gives bread to those without teeth.

Bring back the old custom of uncles taking their 13 years old nephews to whorehouses. There, solved.


Any boy aged 15 that hasn't got sex yet can solicite a free half-hour with a prostitute, but only once. He will be provided with a kit of condoms and STD prevention leaflets, of course.

 

[ZazietheBeast]

Mandatory.

Predators go where the prey is. Perhaps we need enhanced background checking for all people working with children, whatever they’re doing now isn’t working

That's the mystery, innit? How would you even detect a pedophile? Considering those types will do anything just so they get access to kids to diddle.

 

[JimiHendrix]

We're talking about 14-15 years old boys, not children. They understand their actions and know what sex is (unless they're severely retarded).

so could someone fuck the local 15 year old gay boy? just curious. this is something I've never understood about this retarded mentality, if a 15 year old boy gets raped by a pedophile woman, every idiot comes out going "oh, that's fine. i wish that was me actually. i love pedophiles"

so, if a 15 year old boy is gay, can someone fuck his tight ass? i mean that should be fine with you right? or is it only ok when the person sexually abusing the kid is a woman, because you get off to it?

also if you think 14-15 year old girls don't want to get fucked, you've never spoken to a woman before in your life (obvious from your posts). just because a child wants sex (at the peak of hormones in their life) doesn't change the fact they're a literal child.

 

[lautaro]

I wouldn't waste any more time arguing with this fucked up pedo nigger, he has exactly one topic he posts to the Farms about and here it is:

Not true. I commented on several topics. You just picked the ones which were more interesting to you, wonder why.

Funny how you think that I want to fuck children when, first, those aren't even children but young men, and secondly, it was more easy to assume that I'd just to be those fellow men and fuck women? No, you went through all the mental labyrinth of me wanting to the woman who's fucking them, but me being a man instead and... ??? Nice projection.

And the comment about puberty blockers, what does it have to do? Yes, a 15 years old have an almost sized penis, which is something that you should know if you ever saw anything about human puberty. Or just happened to have a penis and have been 15. Interesting how just mentioning a feature of anatomy makes you think that I'm interested in 15 years old penises.


The topic it's so emotionally touching and personal for you that you took the job to block me from replying to your pedo accusation. Wonder why.

 

[Well Intentioned]

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to people with pre-pubescent bodies.

Wow, I thought you ephebophile retards died out in the mid 2010s.

Anyway, do you prefer head or feet first into the chipper? Since you're such a stickler for preferences, I feel it's only proper.

 

[AnotherPleb]

Wow, I thought you ephebophile retards died out in the mid 2010s.

Anyway, do you prefer head or feet first into the chipper? Since you're such a stickler for preferences, I feel it's only proper.

Dick first is the only right way.

 

[Merried Senior Comic]

We're talking about 14-15 years old boys, not children. They understand their actions and know what sex is (unless they're severely retarded).
Also, minors can consent. Not that I care what the law says, I was talking about what's right or wrong, not legal or illegal. But legally they can consent at 16 in most states. "Real consent", of course they also can. The ability to consent doesn't happen magically at some age the state decided. For some it may be in childhood, for some at 15, and some people are just too stupid to consent, at whatever age.

Pedophilia is the sexual attraction to people with pre-pubescent bodies. It doesn't apply for those older than 11 and it also doesn't mean fucking children either. It can't be illegal.

You are a retarded fucking nigger-ape and I sincerely wish from the bottom of my heart that you get raped to death by a pack of AIDS-ridden turbofaggots.

 

[lautaro]

so could someone fuck the local 15 year old gay boy? just curious. this is something I've never understood about this retarded mentality, if a 15 year old boy gets raped by a pedophile woman, every idiot comes out going "oh, that's fine. i wish that was me actually. i love pedophiles"

Right.

Men want sex at 15.
Men don't get it, get it later or not at all.
Men grow up.
Men, being older, see other men, 15, who got <good thing they wanted> but couldn't get.
Men feel envious and say "I wish that was me getting <good thing they wanted>".

This is what you don't understand? Men wanting sex with women or the basic social mechanism of envy?

Also, no one ever mentioned "15 years old boy gets raped by a pedophile woman". These are cases where it's consensual, no one is being raped. And those women aren't perophile, supposing that pedophile women exist to begin with, which I already discussed.
You call a consensual relationship "rape" because someone put in your mind the idea that a 15 years old can't consent, like they were machines without a conscious experience, lmao.
Rape means forcing someone. Consensual sex isn't rape. No one wants to be raped. They'd want to have had consensual sex at that age.

so, if a 15 year old boy is gay, can someone fuck his tight ass? i mean that should be fine with you right? or is it only ok when the person sexually abusing the kid is a woman, because you get off to it?

What is "could"? That they "should", that it's right? Yes, if both of them understand what they're doing, yes, why not? If you undertstand what getting fucked in the ass is and you want to get fucked so hard, go ahead.

You also mention "fucking a boy", like he was a sort of object being passively done something and he didn't have moral agency. A total lack of consideration toward that human, like he was mentally retarded or a sort of soulless robot. This is TWO people, choosing to fuck. Both of them are doing something, together.


You also mentioned gay, which seems to imply that he's aware of his sexuality and, maybe, already had sexual experiences with other men. You cannot claim that he's "innocent", and it's being manipulated or "pushed" by the older one.
This is actually taken in account in some countries. In Argentina, for example, it's legal to have sex with those 13-15, but a lot of "if" are considered, among which is the previous sexual experiences of that person. In practice, the general age of consent is 16.

also if you think 14-15 year old girls don't want to get fucked, you've never spoken to a woman before in your life (obvious from your posts).

I didn't say that they didn't want to get fucked. But they can just get it from almost any man. Men can't. For them it's almost a miracle to get sex before 16, or even later, provided they don't get external help (the uncle). And I already clarified why it's different for women. Women are very likely to get emotionally involved and result damaged, even if they apparently consented, and regret it later. Men are unlikely to say that they were abused. They'd just go "yes, I fucked at 15 and it was awesome". Unless they're gay, or it was seriously traumatic. It's a positive, building experience of the pass to adulthood.

just because a child wants sex (at the peak of hormones in their life) doesn't change the fact they're a literal child.

No, they aren't. You just contradicted yourself. Why are they at the peak of hormones? Because they're not children, they're going through puberty, and well into it. A "literal child" is somoene who hasn't started puberty, which slowly starts at 9-10, and accelerates past 11. A literal child is someone younger than 11, as last.

The argument of the hormones, like that acting under the influence of hormones voids consenst is quite stupid. If I get horny at 20 and I decide to have sex, and after the hormones relax I regret, was I raped? You always decide to have sex under hormones, otherwise you wouldn't be horny to begin with. I have the same level of sexual desire that I had at 15, I'm as horny as I was back then, when I am. Does this voids my ability to decide? Not more than it's normal.

The peak of hormones is also 14 for boys, when they grow the most. Women, by 15, are almost adults and the peak has already happened.

 

[Dog-O-Tron 5000v5.0]

FB locked/long ago abandoned:

https://www.facebook.com/dallas.shuler

View attachment 5992839

If only Nan knew how bad things really were.

"Who's that?"
"Oh haha that's just Nan. She's a friend. I'm not attracted to her because she's not a 10 year old boy!"

 

[AnotherPleb]

Tldr pedophile apologia

That's a lot of words for someone that deserves to go in the goddamned woodchipper.

 

[JimiHendrix]

These are cases where it's consensual, no one is being raped.

minors can not consent. you appear to be a pedophile and I hope you suck start a shotgun someday. bye.

 

[lautaro]

85 IQ unfunny unoriginal joke about woodchippers copied from another retard

minors can not consent. you appear to be a pedophile and I hope you suck start a shotgun someday. bye.

Why? Because the state says so, because they hadn't gone an arbitrary number of laps around the Sun?

Also, you're wrong. Minors CAN legally consent, the age of consent is 16. What part of "the AGE OF CONSENT" you don't understand? It's not the age of adulthood (1, it's the age of CONSENT (to sex). Are you stupid?

You seem to be immature, uncapable of handling a discussion without getting emotionally triggered and resorting to wishing death upon others and those childish behaviors, and yet the law considers you able to consent just because you reached 18, see how it's arbitrary? There are 10 years old more mature than you, and they can't consent to anything.

 

[VargReallyDidNothingWrong]

The topic it's so emotionally touching and personal for you that you took the job to block me from replying to your pedo accusation. Wonder why.

You can't prevent someone from replying to your post you literal retard. Then again I wouldn't expect a newfag who does nothing but pedoshields for female pedophile rapists because of his obvious "adult woman fucking teenage boys" fetish to know about the most well known software bug inherent in this forum's software. Too busy jacking your cock to thoughts of women fucking boys afterall.

P.S. kill yourself