Sex Cannon Lupa
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2021
Witten's a queen, you incel!There's always Witten!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Witten's a queen, you incel!There's always Witten!
I was serious. I like Witten!Witten's a queen, you incel!
I would say it's more about completely mindless sycophancy, Frog will embrace a completely retarded sycophant much more eagerly than an intelligent person who is superior to him in most ways and could guide him correctly.It feels to me @FROG has this one character flaw: he is desperate to get friends and be liked. His entire history with Gail Simone is proof to that and he is repeating it with WC and the various people in his livestreams. Or on this board.
He likes a person, invests in them, then they make him look bad and he lashes at them like a scorned child. I am starting to think that this is how he feels about the entire comicbook industry, he felt the SJW creators were his firends and he is mad at them for rejecting him.
Can I just add, it might be more accurate to say she poops his head out of her ass. And the shots posted by @Captain Manning appear to depict a tiny astronaut, Frog, being not only devoured but also pooped out of the giantess (Gina Carano).She literally pops his head out of her ass like a ben-wa ball. It's not subtle. Insertion is a macrophile trope.
I've learned to much about this degenerate kink in the last day - I'm done after this
Post went to bat for him hard when he was getting complaints about fluting and thin paper. Plus he has his head deep up Frog's ass at all times, which is the main requirement, along with a tolerance for being fucked with, and a strict policy of only ever laughing with, not at Frog.Does anyone honestly think he was bringing Post on for his entertainment value?
Who cares if people refund the book because they realized it's weird fetish fiction they aren't comfortable with?I think it has to. In all seriousness he should be careful how he handles it now so all those backers he sent don't refund. THAT would be a dick move. There's a dozen ways he can have fun with it though.
I suppose to be completely fair I should note that, in the track list as ordered on Youtube, the track with the ass cheek artwork actually plays before the tracks that are accompanied the uhhh... "consumption."Can I just add, it might be more accurate to say she poops his head out of her ass. And the shots posted by @Captain Manning appear to depict a tiny astronaut, Frog, being not only devoured but also pooped out of the giantess (Gina Carano).
Get out! There's too much degeneracy in this thread as it is.I was serious. I like Witten!
Kinda makes you wonder if these guys know or not.Who cares if people refund the book because they realized it's weird fetish fiction they aren't comfortable with?
They should get a refund if that's the case.
No one owes him funding.


I go back and forth with this. On the one hand, yes you should get a refund if you want one, especially since it is still funding. On the other, if you are so fucking stupid as to just blindly back a project because "Creator draw Frog art and Frog man say book good", then no you shouldn't get your money back because you won't learn anything.Who cares if people refund the book because they realized it's weird fetish fiction they aren't comfortable with?
They should get a refund if that's the case.
No one owes him funding.
Witten is probably less of a cow than a lot of CGers and not for lack of trying.There's always Witten!
I would mostly call it insecurity and a need to be the big man calling the shots. The fact that his friends are Cecil, Malin and YBZ, people who may be willing to call out his shit and the fact he is here talking to us like we are human beings is the interesting part.I would say it's more about completely mindless sycophancy, Frog will embrace a completely retarded sycophant much more eagerly than an intelligent person who is superior to him in most ways and could guide him correctly.
This is because Frog is not a hero, he's a villain. He's the bad guy, the bad guy is the one who always wants mindless loyalty. Look at all the people he compares himself to, Darth Vader and Tony Soprano and people like that. Scumbag villains basically.
He is a villain! Or at least a wannabe villain. And the reason he wants to be the villain is so that he can misbehave.
Witten is probably less of a cow than a lot of CGers and not for lack of trying.
But also, Witten and Ethan don't mix at all. Cecil and Malin can work with either of them, but Witten is the one person to ignore and trigger Ethan. Every time EVS joins a Jack show with Witten in, he fucks of within minutes.
Not happening,
That campaign is very clear about what it is. They even have most of it as a downloadable PDF on the page so you know exactly what you're buying, presumably to avoid exactly what you describe.Who cares if people refund the book because they realized it's weird fetish fiction they aren't comfortable with?
They should get a refund if that's the case.
No one owes him funding.
It would have been interesting what the other "parent" in the "divorce" (Worm) would have done with Wenger. Typical Worm style would have been to cynically use him for entertainment on the show until his entertainment value was used up and then simply not talk to him anymore. Say what you like about FROG, but the Worm is very ruthless about using people for his show. Worm's strength is being slicker in the "disposal" of those who have run their course on his show.Similarly, Wenger was like a kid in the 'divorce' between Frog and Worm, Frog battled hard for him, but then when Wenger started raping his show and threatening to destroy him, Frog decided Wenger was a little too feisty, and had to be cut loose.
I don't think it was funded before he sent them to it. I checked and it is a "fixed goal" campaign so if it dipped back under the goal and failed to reach it again, the backers would automatically be refunded their money when the campaign was over.Was that campaign even funded when Frog sent his backer army to buy it sight-unseen? What happens if enough refund that the total raised drops back below the target goal? Does it still have to fulfill the handful of books still left on order? IMO that would go down as one of the shittiest things ever done to an innocent bystander by Comicsgate
It would have been interesting what the other "parent" in the "divorce" (Worm) would have done with Wenger. Typical Worm style would have been to cynically use him for entertainment on the show until his entertainment value was used up and then simply not talk to him anymore. Say what you like about FROG, but the Worm is very ruthless about using people for his show. Worm's strength is being slicker in the "disposal" of those who have run their course on his show.
Not innocent - he drew Cyberfrog, that's what brought the Frog sniffing around.Was that campaign even funded when Frog sent his backer army to buy it sight-unseen? What happens if enough refund that the total raised drops back below the target goal? Does it still have to fulfill the handful of books still left on order? IMO that would go down as one of the shittiest things ever done to an innocent bystander by Comicsgate.
One sad thing about the old Wormhole getting nuked is that we lost some interesting videos from his CG era, like an early appearance of beardless mutton-chop Liam with pre-Worm Doug. I don't disagree with what you're saying here, but it's worth noting that Doug himself got viciously turned on by CG toddlers Sketch, Liam, and Nasser, after he apparently 'let them into his life', even giving them his address and personal phone number. He can't be that slick, giving out his digits to that bunch!It would have been interesting what the other "parent" in the "divorce" (Worm) would have done with Wenger. Typical Worm style would have been to cynically use him for entertainment on the show until his entertainment value was used up and then simply not talk to him anymore. Say what you like about FROG, but the Worm is very ruthless about using people for his show. Worm's strength is being slicker in the "disposal" of those who have run their course on his show.
I would say it's more about completely mindless sycophancy, Frog will embrace a completely retarded sycophant much more eagerly than an intelligent person who is superior to him in most ways and could guide him correctly.
This is because Frog is not a hero, he's a villain. He's the bad guy, the bad guy is the one who always wants mindless loyalty. Look at all the people he compares himself to, Darth Vader and Tony Soprano and people like that. Scumbag villains basically.
He is a villain! Or at least a wannabe villain. And the reason he wants to be the villain is so that he can misbehave.
Look at him introducing DAMEGANG to his bovine sycophants here, and tell me it's not clearly the work of a deeply Machiavellian and evil troll:
You might care a little to much.On the other, if you are so fucking stupid as to just blindly back a project because "Creator draw Frog art and Frog man say book good", then no you shouldn't get your money back because you won't learn anything.
I did a search. The campaign doesn't mention macrophilia or GTS fetish at all.That campaign is very clear about what it is.
Thanks. I never saw that. If they read the PDF and decide it's something they weren't interested in after all then they should get a refund. IGG is set up for this.They even have most of it as a downloadable PDF on the page so you know exactly what you're buying, presumably to avoid exactly what you describe.
If you go to a hotdog stand looking for aWas that campaign even funded when Frog sent his backer army to buy it sight-unseen? What happens if enough refund that the total raised drops back below the target goal? Does it still have to fulfill the handful of books still left on order?
Not if it was never meant to be funded in the first place.IMO that would go down as one of the shittiest things ever done to an innocent bystander by Comicsgate.
There was a $1000 fixed goal.I don't think it was funded before he sent them to it. I checked and it is a "fixed goal" campaign so if it dipped back under the goal and failed to reach it again, the backers would automatically be refunded their money when the campaign was over.
Then he moves into a mash up of Modern and Figurative artwork. The sexual elements lend it a disconcerting edge that evokes unease, something HR Geiger used to great effect.
You forgot diminutive men emerging out of their asses.His current artstyle takes elements of the modern and figurative style and moves toward a looser cartoon style that breathes without coming completely undone, from what he's shown us.



I suspect it's already done (and creative production funded by other means) or nearly so.Speaking of. Assuming he draws the entire book and the cards and the covers, how likely will he be to deliver quality and on time?
It wasn't. You can tell just from watching Ethan's stream.I don't think it was funded before he sent them to it.
I don't think that'll happen, but it would be funny as hell if it did.I checked and it is a "fixed goal" campaign so if it dipped back under the goal and failed to reach it again, the backers would automatically be refunded their money when the campaign was over.
I mean it's a valid question, it's just that it needs to be asked along with a bunch of other questions which aren't being asked. Awareness is good. Monomania isn't.But hey, at least one person asked the single most important question in CG.
Say what you want about him being a narcissist or a hypocrite, but myself and others have been openly critical toward him and he's taken it very well in comparison to most people who get mentioned here.So, to court mr Van Scriver you must make him feel important, don't let him play you around and don't make him look bad. I can see why his peers yeeted him off.
On the subject of Mr H, does anybody happen to know anything more about his crowdfunded movie? He mentioned that he lost money on it and won't be trying it again. Disappointing to hear, but it would be interesting to hear him go over it all, like a post-mortem. But not on Frog's show. It's not the right venue for it. You don't want to have Frog there, wanking himself off insufferably, like the grotesque retarded tranny cheerleader that he is.Witten is probably less of a cow than a lot of CGers and not for lack of trying.
But also, Witten and Ethan don't mix at all. Cecil and Malin can work with either of them, but Witten is the one person to ignore and trigger Ethan. Every time EVS joins a Jack show with Witten in, he fucks of within minutes.
Not happening,
I would mostly call it insecurity and a need to be the big man calling the shots. The fact that his friends are Cecil, Malin and YBZ, people who may be willing to call out his shit and the fact he is here talking to us like we are human beings is the interesting part.
Then he was super respectful to YoungRippa and Mister H when they called out G&G and it was interesting seeing him talking to Jessie, where he was obviously pissed at her for the Mary Mayhem stream but also avoided any confrontation
The way he responded to the Fandom Rejects cucking said it all.
So, to court mr Van Scriver you must make him feel important, don't let him play you around and don't make him look bad. I can see why his peers yeeted him off.
What part of "don't let him play you around" you did not get.I mean it's a valid question, it's just that it needs to be asked along with a bunch of other questions which aren't being asked. Awareness is good. Monomania isn't.
Say what you want about him being a narcissist or a hypocrite, but myself and others have been openly critical toward him and he's taken it very well in comparison to most people who get mentioned here.
Courting him and making him feel important might get you in the door, but he'll quickly get tired of the constant positive reinforcement and will eventually start looking for things to dislike about you.