#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ronnal said:
Has Zack talked about Ethan post drunk stream? Just curious if Zack would actually disavow him or if he's just going to pretend like it didn't happen.
Click to expand...
Hey. have you seen that Critical Drinker put up a video of Venom? He didn't even see the movie ™️ what a clown princess. Lol!
Also, I just bought a betty rocker vintage mini oven, yeah it cost 450$ but guys it's worth it trust me. Comics are on the way.
 

CRITICAL FAKERS- The Birthday Party Clowns Have RUINED Film Criticism For An Entire Generation​

Zack is back on the attack with yet another one of his monomaniacal rants.

In the interest of not boring you, I'll try and summarize:

Zack is super pissy in this one again, this time in regards to reactions to Venom 3, which Zack liked.

Zack HATES the BPCs (Drinker specifically) for "ruining movie criticism for an entire generation."

Zack says that mainstream media criticism is now more reliable than BPC movie criticism.

Zack is once again enraged by the fact that Drinker claims he doesn't have time to see movies right away. Zack watches a movie and immediately reviews it, so why can't Drinker?

Drinker pretends to be too busy to watch a movie right away, but he really needs to get a consensus from the "bog dwellers and hillbillies" before he dares to give his opinion.

Zack calls the BPCs "review-captured, corrupt activists" and says they have no charisma.

You can tell how jealous Zack is of Drinker because he seethes about Drinker being on Piers Morgan and getting to interview Russell Crowe.

Zack cries about how Drinker and the others are snide, sarcastic assholes in their reviews.
(Kind of how you used to review comic books, Zack?)

Zack cries about how Drinker and others were making fun of Venom 3. Why do they have to make fun of the musical number? (You're gay, Zack)

Why do Drinker and others have to review movies if they think they're so terrible?
(Zack, why did you review so many comic books if you thought they were so terrible?)

The review scores for Venom 3 are "shockingly low," but Zack liked it, because he doesn't have "hoity-toity" tastes like Drinker does. (Remember, this is the guy who calls the BPCs hillbillies and now he's complaining about their hoity-toity tastes.)

Zack saw another trailer for the new, upcoming Captain America movie, and he predicts it will do very well.
(LOL - let's remember that prediction. I've heard quite the opposite will be the case.)

Once again, Zack's video devolves into babbling chaos at the end.

The funniest bit does come at the end when Zack tells us that he doesn't like watching movies if he doesn't like the weapons in them. This is why Zack doesn't like pirate or cowboy movies. He only likes movies with weapons from WWII or more recently. (You are a fucking retard, Zack.)
----------------------------------------------------------------​
A couple of reflections:

Why does Zack keep yammering about the Drinker and BPC reviews? Is it because Zack sees something and likes it (because he has no taste), and then Drinker slams it, and that hurts Zacks feelings, because he can't understand how anybody can dislike the trash he likes?

Sarcasm, wit, and mockery have been the hallmarks of good criticism for centuries. (Millennia, if you go back to the Greeks and Romans.) Siskel and Ebert were pretty sarcastic in many of their reviews. Newspapers and magazines have always contained biting movie reviews. Everybody has made fun of bad movies for as long as movies have existed. But Mr. Bachelor's Degree in History seems to be completely unaware of this. Did all of these past critics also "ruin movie criticism for a generation"?

Zack doesn't want to be a movie critic, he wants to work for a movie PR firm.
 
Last edited:
Stupor Mario said:
Zack doesn't want to be a movie critic, he wants to work for a movie PR firm.
Click to expand...
In some community post, he said, "I don't want Siskel and Ebert loading freight, and I don't want hillbillies reviewing movies." However, Siskel and Ebert had hoity-toity taste, and even sometimes had strong disagreements about movies. There is absolutely no way Zack would have liked them reviewing modern movies.
Stupor Mario said:
The funniest bit does come at the end when Zack tells us that he doesn't like watching movies if he doesn't like the weapons in them. This is why Zack doesn't like pirate or cowboy movies. He only likes movies with weapons from WWII or more recently. (You are a fucking retard, Zack.)
Click to expand...
Ah, clearly what one would expect from a history major. There are a lot of things that go into making a cow but having a take so bad that you wouldn't be able to imagine it until the cow makes it is a good start. Why would anyone ever listen to Richard about a movie or TV review ever again with a take like this?
Stupor Mario said:
You can tell how jealous Zack is of Drinker because he seethes about Drinker being on Piers Morgan and getting to interview Russell Crowe.
Click to expand...
I'm glad this upsets Zack. I hope he cries about it every night.
Stupor Mario said:
Sarcasm, wit, and mockery have been the hallmarks of good criticism for centuries. (Millennia, if you go back to the Greeks and Romans.) Siskel and Ebert were pretty sarcastic in many of their reviews. Newspapers and magazines have always contained biting movie reviews. Everybody has made fun of bad movies for as long as movies have existed. But Mr. Bachelor's Degree in History seems to be completely unaware of this. Did all of these past critics also "ruin movie criticism for a generation"?
Click to expand...
Did Richard get his bachelor's degree at the same school where he was slamming his fist on another student's desk because the teacher had lost control of the class? I'm guessing it wasn't exactly Ivy League.
 
Stupor Mario said:
Zack calls the BPCs "review-captured, corrupt activists" and says they have no charisma.
Click to expand...
Zack of all people saying they have no charisma is wild. I don't like EVS but he does have charisma when he's not black out drunk pissing on himself. Cecil has charisma in a pretender comedian sort of way. Feel free to disagree, but I can see them carry a show - the rest of CG... Not so much.

Stupor Mario said:
The review scores for Venom 3 are "shockingly low," but Zack liked it, because he doesn't have "hoity-toity" tastes like Drinker does. (Remember, this is the guy who calls the BPCs hillbillies and now he's complaining about their hoity-toity tastes.)
Click to expand...
Yes well even though the bad reviews for Venom came out before Drinker really put out a video, and the box office was low before Drinker's video, I know that Drinker had a hand in it's downfall. He's the most over reaching 'nobody' I've ever seen.

Stupor Mario said:
This is why Zack doesn't like pirate or cowboy movies.
Click to expand...
Does this nigger like ANYTHING? (See Zack, you're allowed to dislike things, it's okay sweetheart)

Stupor Mario said:
and then Drinker slams it, and that hurts Zacks feelings, because he can't understand how anybody can dislike the trash he likes?
Click to expand...
He takes it so personally because Drinker is his love interest, and he worries every day that Drinker and him don't have much in common and thus the relationship might not work out. The biggest roadbump in this is that Drinker presumably likes to fuck drunk women.
 
Mr Processor said:
Ah, clearly what one would expect from a history major. There are a lot of things that go into making a cow but having a take so bad that you wouldn't be able to imagine it until the cow makes it is a good start. Why would anyone ever listen to Richard about a movie or TV review ever again with a take like this?
Click to expand...
I think it would be funny for people here to compile a list of all of Zack's eccentricities. Him liking to go to a McDonald's, because old guys set up chairs in the parking lot and him disliking movies that have olde tymie weapons is so amusing.

Mr Processor said:
Did Richard get his bachelor's degree at the same school where he was slamming his fist on another student's desk because the teacher had lost control of the class? I'm guessing it wasn't exactly Ivy League.
Click to expand...
Zack feels the need to tell us that he has a bachelor's in history, and this guy displays little to no awareness of cultural history. Apparently, Zack never heard of MAD magazine, Cracked, or National Lampoon, all of which contained satirical movie reviews that must have also ruined movie criticism for a generation.

You know who really ruined criticism for generations? Sarcastic assholes like Mark Twain, Juvenal, Jonathan Swift, and H.L. Mencken, that's who.
 
Stupor Mario said:

CRITICAL FAKERS- The Birthday Party Clowns Have RUINED Film Criticism For An Entire Generation​

Zack is back on the attack with yet another one of his monomaniacal rants.

In the interest of not boring you, I'll try and summarize:

Zack is super pissy in this one again, this time in regards to reactions to Venom 3, which Zack liked.

Zack HATES the BPCs (Drinker specifically) for "ruining movie criticism for an entire generation."

Zack says that mainstream media criticism is now more reliable than BPC movie criticism.

Zack is once again enraged by the fact that Drinker claims he doesn't have time to see movies right away. Zack watches a movie and immediately reviews it, so why can't Drinker?

Drinker pretends to be too busy to watch a movie right away, but he really needs to get a consensus from the "bog dwellers and hillbillies" before he dares to give his opinion.

Zack calls the BPCs "review-captured, corrupt activists" and says they have no charisma.

You can tell how jealous Zack is of Drinker because he seethes about Drinker being on Piers Morgan and getting to interview Russell Crowe.

Zack cries about how Drinker and the others are snide, sarcastic assholes in their reviews.
(Kind of how you used to review comic books, Zack?)

Zack cries about how Drinker and others were making fun of Venom 3. Why do they have to make fun of the musical number? (You're gay, Zack)

Why do Drinker and others have to review movies if they think they're so terrible?
(Zack, why did you review so many comic books if you thought they were so terrible?)

The review scores for Venom 3 are "shockingly low," but Zack liked it, because he doesn't have "hoity-toity" tastes like Drinker does. (Remember, this is the guy who calls the BPCs hillbillies and now he's complaining about their hoity-toity tastes.)

Zack saw another trailer for the new, upcoming Captain America movie, and he predicts it will do very well.
(LOL - let's remember that prediction. I've heard quite the opposite will be the case.)

Once again, Zack's video devolves into babbling chaos at the end.

The funniest bit does come at the end when Zack tells us that he doesn't like watching movies if he doesn't like the weapons in them. This is why Zack doesn't like pirate or cowboy movies. He only likes movies with weapons from WWII or more recently. (You are a fucking retard, Zack.)
----------------------------------------------------------------​
A couple of reflections:

Why does Zack keep yammering about the Drinker and BPC reviews? Is it because Zack sees something and likes it (because he has no taste), and then Drinker slams it, and that hurts Zacks feelings, because he can't understand how anybody can dislike the trash he likes?

Sarcasm, wit, and mockery have been the hallmarks of good criticism for centuries. (Millennia, if you go back to the Greeks and Romans.) Siskel and Ebert were pretty sarcastic in many of their reviews. Newspapers and magazines have always contained biting movie reviews. Everybody has made fun of bad movies for as long as movies have existed. But Mr. Bachelor's Degree in History seems to be completely unaware of this. Did all of these past critics also "ruin movie criticism for a generation"?

Zack doesn't want to be a movie critic, he wants to work for a movie PR firm.
Click to expand...
This thread just got hilarious.
I never thought in all my time of watching this faggot is that he would give such a bad take, weapons, really?
 
For the record, The Critical Drinker found Venom 3 a fun movie. Incoherent and stupid, but well paced and exploring the relationship between Brock and the symbiote with better care than the other ones, so probably the best film in a trilogy of mediocre, forgettable crap.

But this is still not good enough for Richard, who apparently finds Venom 3 worthy of competing at Venice, Sundance or Cannes...

I remember that around 2019 Zack once proposed that Flash Thompson from the original Lee/Ditko Spiderman comics was just bullying Peter Parker to try become friends with him because that's how male friendships work (in hinsight, an early clue of Zack's insane view on human relationships and real life). Could Zack be trying to be the Drinker's pal?
 
Mr Processor said:
In some community post, he said, "I don't want Siskel and Ebert loading freight, and I don't want hillbillies reviewing movies." However, Siskel and Ebert had hoity-toity taste, and even sometimes had strong disagreements about movies. There is absolutely no way Zack would have liked them reviewing modern movies.
Click to expand...
I think Siskel was more snobby than Ebert. Ebert always seemed like a guy who just really loved movies and wanted to like them but still had his own sensibilities and thought this or that was crap, sometimes for weird reasons. But you could tell he was passionate about them.

I haven't found a movie review guy I like as much since him. The closest is probably the Red Letter Media guys. They hate things and want to be funny hating things, sure, but you kind of feel like at their core they have a lot of love for movies.

And I guess Outlaw Vern was a favorite for a while but I kind of soured on him a few years ago when he kept slipping woke political opinions into his reviews.
 
FluffyJackal said:
For the record, The Critical Drinker found Venom 3 a fun movie. Incoherent and stupid, but well paced and exploring the relationship between Brock and the symbiote with better care than the other ones, so probably the best film in a trilogy of mediocre, forgettable crap.

But this is still not good enough for Richard, who apparently finds Venom 3 worthy of competing at Venice, Sundance or Cannes...
Click to expand...
I just listened to it. I thought it was a solid review. Whether or not you agree with him, it's a comprehensive look at the film, it's aspects, and it's larger context.

But you know who's reviews are not thorough and comprehensive? Zack's. Zack is not good at reviewing movies. His reviews are confusing and haphazard and he's too invested in talking about himself all the time. If you listen Zack commenting on a movie, he makes sweeping generalizations and he fixates on weird things that trigger him or that make him trail off into one of his batty anecdotes.

I think that's why Zack hates the Drinker's reviews. Zack fancies himself an expert commentator on most things, so Drinker having this massively popular movie review channel while Zack's review channel withers on the vine seems to be a blow to Zack's ego.

FluffyJackal said:
I remember that around 2019 Zack once proposed that Flash Thompson from the original Lee/Ditko Spiderman comics was just bullying Peter Parker to try become friends with him because that's how male friendships work (in hinsight, an early clue of Zack's insane view on human relationships and real life). Could Zack be trying to be the Drinker's pal?
Click to expand...
Any explanation is as good as another, I guess. Sure, why not? Zack is going for the hard neg. I can envision a Single, White, Female Zack scenario. He is pretty nuts.
 
Olórin of Hype said:
Honestly, what else was he supposed to do?
"I was fully aware of every choice I made, and I fully stand behind everything you saw on camera." isn't going to help his marriage, we know Andrea watches his stuff, so it's not like he got away with anything at all.

This was probably a lot worse than it could've been though. Rather than being serious, he tries to tell the story like he's a 20 year old frat boy that almost got caught drinking underage.

Rather than being an adult and saying: "Yeah that was a bad choice. You won't see it again from me. That was a young man's mistake, and I am not a young man. I know better. I have a wife and child at home that need me to provide for them; and not wasting away in jail because I recorded in a bathroom. There are better ways to destress, let's all sing along to the hate Rippa song."

I should just start a Public Relations consultancy for livestreamers...
Click to expand...
nah you should learn to stop sniffing your own farts and trade the vix, because even us that adore you are sick of your holier than thou bullshit.

bounding into shut the fuck up your not that smart.
 
Stupor Mario said:
You know who really ruined criticism for generations? Sarcastic assholes like Mark Twain, Juvenal, Jonathan Swift, and H.L. Mencken, that's who.
Click to expand...

We even had gay slapfights between artists and critics thousands of years ago...

Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo,
Aureli pathice et cinaede Furi,
qui me ex versiculis meis putastis,
quod sunt molliculi, parum pudicum.
Nam castum esse decet pium poetam
ipsum, versiculos nihil necesse est;
qui tum denique habent salem ac leporem,
si sunt molliculi ac parum pudici,
et quod pruriat incitare possunt,
non dico pueris, sed his pilosis
qui duros nequeunt movere lumbos.
Vos, quod milia multa basiorum
legistis, male me marem putatis?
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo.
I’ll push your shit in and fuck your face--
Aurelius, you cocksucker; Furius, you little bitch--
since you think that my little poems
have gone soft and I must not be too upright!
It’s true; the devoted poet should stand erect
in his values, but not necessarily in his little
poems, which are truly witty and charming
when they're a little soft, and not too stiff,
but can still cause a little tingling--
I don't just mean for youth, but for hairy men
who can't make their own loins stand upright!
You! You read about my "many kisses"
and doubt I'm fully a man?
I’ll push your shit in and fuck your face.
 
WhimsicalTrolli said:
Losing subscribers with Zack: venom edition


Unless It's women in comics. You can be a miserable cunt who hates everything.


Click to expand...
Screenshot_20241028-151836_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20241028-151935_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20241028-152012_DuckDuckGo.jpg

The dunning/Kruger never ends
 
Mr Processor said:
In some community post, he said, "I don't want Siskel and Ebert loading freight, and I don't want hillbillies reviewing movies." However, Siskel and Ebert had hoity-toity taste, and even sometimes had strong disagreements about movies. There is absolutely no way Zack would have liked them reviewing modern movies.
Click to expand...
Ebert mellowed later on and got roasted for being the only critic on the planet who liked Tomb Raider: Cradle of Life, but he was a smug bitch at times. Those 'tards put the 1990 TMNT movie (the best comic book adaptation ever) on their worst of the year list.


They barely even talk about it until three minutes later when Gene calls it a disco fight that drones on. What Bauman-style cockgobblers.

deskgum said:
I haven't found a movie review guy I like as much since him. The closest is probably the Red Letter Media guys. They hate things and want to be funny hating things, sure, but you kind of feel like at their core they have a lot of love for movies.
Click to expand...
At his core Jay Bauman has a love for cock.
 
Maybe Zack thinks he will get a job from all this. Like the addict that gets hired as a rehab counselor. Or the hacker that gets hired by cyber security. Perhaps he thinks hollywood is going to call him up to be a youtuber shitheel consultant expert.
 
Quarterback Rex Grossman said:
Ebert mellowed later on and got roasted for being the only critic on the planet who liked Tomb Raider: Cradle of Life, but he was a smug bitch at times. Those 'tards put the 1990 TMNT movie (the best comic book adaptation ever) on their worst of the year list.

They barely even talk about it until three minutes later when Gene calls it a disco fight that drones on. What Bauman-style cockgobblers.
Click to expand...
Oh yeah, critics could be snobby tards with bad takes even back in the day. Didn't Siskel and Ebert criticize Return of the Jedi and say that parents should take their kids to Tender Mercies instead or am I misremembering that? (Pure lunacy.)

But even if their takes were dumb, none of their negative, critical sarcastic commentary "ruined generations of critics" like Zack is claiming it does.
 
Mr Processor said:
In some community post, he said, "I don't want Siskel and Ebert loading freight, and I don't want hillbillies reviewing movies." However, Siskel and Ebert had hoity-toity taste, and even sometimes had strong disagreements about movies. There is absolutely no way Zack would have liked them reviewing modern movies.
Click to expand...
i think one of the most insufferable things about Richard is how condescending he is towards people he disagrees with. he clearly thinks he's better then everybody and has a contempt for anyone who isn't from a major city which is exactly how leftists think. which is funny since lets be honest, he joined the military because he's a low I.Q retard whose only worth was being used as cannon fodder. he probably realizes this deep down and him calling people yokels and hillbillies is almost certainly more projection from retard Richard here.

Really when you get right down to it Richard is just the mundane matt of CG, he's a leftist weirdo who was lucky enough to have an SJW attack him and get him a lot of fans in right wing circles but ultimately he hates them just as much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom