Commonwealth of Virginia v. Austin Curtis Peterson - JA010478-02-00 Assault and Battery on Family Member & GC24002688-00 DRUGS: POSSESS SCH I OR II

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So we're not even going to get a Valentine's Day stream. On the bright side, by that time, our boy might find true love within the walls, and love conquers all. :feels:

Can anyone make the 14th? Bring tons of digital recording equipment for our entertainment please!
If you get caught and share a bunk with our boy until his 2nd DV offense (or beyond), you'll be an absolute legend!
 
BMJFailedDrugs.png
The left is why he is staying inside, but I can't read the writing on the right.
 
I am posting documents from the case GC24002688-01 as I've received them. The only edit I did is to make everything into a singular PDF.
Awesome as always totally not Hardin...

This document is the actual warrant the first bond violation of the drug posession charge where he was sent to rehab.

The official reason for the charge is "Failed to appointments with OAR/Be tested for drugs." So its not even failing the test itself he flat out wasnt going to the tests.

The notes on the left side are the notes from either the sherrif executing the warrant, or notes from the judge. Its the worst hand writing I've ever seen.
 
but I can't read the writing on the right.
Neither can I. If I didn't know this was in English, I'd have guessed Turkish.
The notes on the left side are the notes from either the sherrif executing the warrant, or notes from the judge. Its the worst hand writing I've ever seen.
Come now! I can read whole one word. Surely that means the writing is merely too masterful.
 
View attachment 6623944
The left is why he is staying inside, but I can't read the writing on the right.
My attempt to transcribe the writing on the right:
10:00 pm
Elliot 2pm
On ag scan
Petiton + go down
To resched.


Thats all i can get. This looks like a boomer with dementia writing this.
 
My attempt to transcribe the writing on the right:
10:00 pm
Elliot 2pm
On ag scan
Petiton + go down
To resched.


Thats all i can get. This looks like a boomer with dementia writing this.
It's all part of the conspiracy to get our boy. The State is trying to hide their motivations behind incomprehensible moon runes. It's fucking rigged bros.
 
I'd love to be but I can't get off work today as it would be an all day affair to drive there and back home. Shame. Looks like it would be a nice day and the drive through central Virginia is so pretty. Here's hoping our boy can get a full house clutch on the last card draw!
 
Austin had his court appearance this morning in General District Court. Even though all 5 charges were on the docket for this morning the primary reason for the hearing was to review his bond violation/bail violations, as these were dates set from back in September when he was sent to rehabe and subsequently kicked out.

Austin's attorney, Bryan Jones, Was in attendance, with myself entering the court house just behind him. While waiting for the judge to enter Jones had a brief conversation with the Prosecutor which was very brief.

Jones:"So about Austin?"
Prosecutor: "No Chance"

It is obvious he was asking about if she'd support bond or not. THere was additional talk about getting Pre Trial Services onboard, but that was a negatieve as well. Pre Trial Services is who Austin likely was calling his "PO" as you have to report to them for drug screens etc.

Attorney Jones then left the court room just before the inmates were brought in. Austin was first through the door and he seemed a lot more alert, standing upright, and not as depserated. His goatee has grown in a little but still appears crackheadish. He gavea quick glance around the room not seeing his attorney or anyone else and promptly sat down. His face was neutral during this, as if he was resigned to no one being thereyet again but not really bothered.

A few minutes later Austin's Father Scott and his mother Diane walked into the courtroom and sat down in the second row. Inmates are in a seperate seating area with a chest high divider so they cannot readily see the general public area of the court room and thus Austin did not see them walk in. As Diane started speaking to Scott, Austin instantly stood up with a huge grin across his face and waived to his mom and dad and started to say something like "hey". This was instantly shut down by both the bailiff in the front of the court room by Austin, and the one by the general public area.

The bailiff by the general public area warned Scott and Diane that Austin is to have no contact, and if they tried they would have to leave. I am not sure if this is general practice, or the officers were aware of a protective order since Austin is still in jail for 2 domestic violences as well. A couple other inmates waived to people and did not get the same immediate treatment.

Attorney Jones had a chat with the parents about the days plan, and again with Austin. These might be attorney/client privelaged but it equated to wanting to get clarification on the evaluation from rehab and being kicked out to try to plead for bond.

When Austin was called up he actually greeted the judge more appropriately with a "good morning your honor" and we are on to the main event.

I dont know if it was out of instinct but Scott tried to also go to the stand to be besides Austin and was immediately physically blocked by the Bailiff and told to return to his seat. I had never seen such a thing, and Scott was allowed to stand with Austin last time so I am thinking it is a protective order of no-contact in place.

The judge got down to business only addressing the Bond/Bail violations. The judge started out by saying "We sent him to treatment and he was kicked out. Obviously Austin has a drug problem, he was kicked out, so what do you suggest?"

Attorney Jones tried to make a case that the letter/report was unclear that Austin was kicked out for positive drug screens and that he wanted to get with the rehab to confirm if it was because any of the screens had failed. The judge said "but he didnt finish treatment". Jones then tried to rebut saying Austin was also suffering from mental health issues but was "on medications and stable now".

The judge then restated "He might but he also has a drug problem" Jones then tried to counter with "he's only in for a posession charge.." trying to downplay the drug problem. The judge then asked the prosecutor for the Commonwealths stance. The prosecutor then outlined how Austin was non compliant with pre trial services (did not state failed or missed tests) for the bond, then was kicked out of the court ordered rehab revoking the second bond, and while out had picked up another three charges to include eluding and domestic violence".

It was at this point the judge had heard enough and in a very pissed off tone concluded "What precedent does it set if I send someone to treatment, and they get kicked out, and I let them go home to their parents?" and denied bond. The judge then set the preliminary hearing for the drug posession charge itself for the next available date of the court officer (who was not in court for this hearing) November 21. No other discussion of the eluding and resisting charges at this point. They might be their own trials with that officer.

Austin is still being held without bond.
 
This is definitely best for Austin. Going home would only inevitably lead to more drug use. Best to be locked up until sentencing, to give him a chance to show "good behavior" aka not being able to do drugs.

Thank you LCS for attending once again :feels:
 
Back