ddlloo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2018
I don't know much about he guy but I've seen other clips where he is deadpan while being sarcastic. I assume he's just doing that.
Community Driven Happening Feed (Version 1)
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2021
The thing with leftists is you can't be ironic with them, if you say anything sarcastic they will think it's sincere. Leftists can only understand sarcasm if there's a laugh track or clear indicator that it's a sarcasm. Vaush severely underestimated how retarded leftists really are.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2021
Man anytime Tranny's get blasted somewhere I always see Fantano swooping in to defend. Does the man just search trans tag for threads to voice his opinions on all day?View attachment 2797309
J.K. Rowling on Twitter: "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance…
archived 12 Dec 2021 20:36:42 UTCarchive.ph
J.K. Rowling drops a based tweet, trannies and checkmarks are seething. Seems like the bomb threats didn't quite work.
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2021
- Joined
- May 10, 2019
Pretty sure it's sarcasm. Idk why he thought it was a good idea to make the joke, though
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2020
Don't make me buy Harry Potter books JK RowlingView attachment 2797309
J.K. Rowling on Twitter: "War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance…
archived 12 Dec 2021 20:36:42 UTC
J.K. Rowling drops a based tweet, trannies and checkmarks are seething. Seems like the bomb threats didn't quite work.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
The Queen of Terven plays kick the troons right in the "girl"dick again just by stating the truth...and I love it.
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2019
>be Stalinist
>rat out lib leftists to gain good boy points from auth right feds that hate you
Surely this will further the worker’s revolution.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Not trying to rain on anyone's parade but I'd like the original video and a timestamp, the clip is extremely short and was posted by some dude who it looks like just wants some attention and to boost his follower count. It doesn't sound to me like he's being sarcastic, that doesn't match his tone but if he starts laughing afterwards, says "just kidding" or something of the like then I'd just say it was a stupid joke to make and move on.
Of course he would never grant the same charity to anyone else ever but I'm not trying to dishonestly score political points like he is.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2021
Are we not gonna throw confetti? Jussie Smollette plead guilty for staging a hate crime 
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
He was convicted; he didn't plead guilty. At any rate, let's see if he gets a meaningful sentence.Are we not gonna throw confetti? Jussie Smollette plead guilty for staging a hate crime
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
Zakhaev
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
The Department of Justice has announced they will be changing the Foreign Agents Registration Act(FARA) soon.
To explain what FARA is, it is essentially a law from Word War 2 that was used to combat propaganda from the Nazis and Soviets by requiring them to publicly disclose everything about themselves to the U.S government by hence registering as a foreign agent. The more modern use of the law today is in the area of foreign lobbying. There's been amendments and court cases that narrowed the definition of what it means to be acting in the interest of a foreign power as well as removing the mention of "propaganda" from the law entirely but I will attempt to give my best example of a scenario that would violate the law today.
Say you are sitting on your couch and think to yourself that the Chinese are getting a bad rap and the United States should have a day dedicated to celebrating Chinese culture, so you begin attempting to lobby congress to establish a national Chinese recognition day. This scenario while some would call retarded, is perfectly legal and protected speech. However, if Xi Jinping calls you up and tells you to do this, you are now acting in the interest of a foreign power and you must register with the government under FARA. If you are interested in the specifics, here is a law firm that practices in FARA specifically.
This announcement is some what notable as the law was dead in the water, other than being tacked on to charges against spies and prosecuting the mentally ill, from 1966 until 2016 when the Russians decided to start poking around in voting machines. The proceeding investigations saw an unprecedented use of the law, but this post isn't concerning politicians. The interesting event that occurred was the indictment against the Internet Research Agency on February 16th 2018. The Internet Research Agency, despite having no presence in the United States, was charged with violating FARA for their disinformation campaigns on social media. The following article goes into depths on the subject I'm certainly unable to provide and I recommend reading it, however the conclusion is that the government, under the current law, has no way to enforce it against entities not in the United States and the governments theory is based on the courts interpretation of where and when a law is violated in the context of the internet that is normally applied to hacking laws.
So where does this lead us to? My theory on the upcoming changes is that the Department of Justice is going to craft a social media disinformation law out of FARA. We have seen news media organizations such as RT America and Xinhua News compelled into registration and their Youtube videos prominently display a notice on their source of funds. Although this change was Google's choice rather than a requirement by the law, After pressure by the government occurring the same month as the Internet Research Agency Indictment. This war on disinformation from foreign governments by the United States was likely furthered more than ever after the National Intelligence Council report on Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections which declared most if not all activity was disinformation campaigns in comparison to intrusion attempts from the 2016 election.
Regardless of the opinion on the basics of the law itself and foreign influence, It's highly disturbing to see a law from 1938 be potentially used for what information the government finds to be disinformation on the internet. It's also odd as the point of registration was for the purposes of transparency and to not censor information, yet it seems the government will compel and the companies will in turn, censor. Is it doomsday? no but it may be the beginning of something horrible.
Then again maybe I'm just insane.
This is the first time I've done a kind of write up, I'd appreciate feed back on how schizo I am for future posts.
To explain what FARA is, it is essentially a law from Word War 2 that was used to combat propaganda from the Nazis and Soviets by requiring them to publicly disclose everything about themselves to the U.S government by hence registering as a foreign agent. The more modern use of the law today is in the area of foreign lobbying. There's been amendments and court cases that narrowed the definition of what it means to be acting in the interest of a foreign power as well as removing the mention of "propaganda" from the law entirely but I will attempt to give my best example of a scenario that would violate the law today.
Say you are sitting on your couch and think to yourself that the Chinese are getting a bad rap and the United States should have a day dedicated to celebrating Chinese culture, so you begin attempting to lobby congress to establish a national Chinese recognition day. This scenario while some would call retarded, is perfectly legal and protected speech. However, if Xi Jinping calls you up and tells you to do this, you are now acting in the interest of a foreign power and you must register with the government under FARA. If you are interested in the specifics, here is a law firm that practices in FARA specifically.
This announcement is some what notable as the law was dead in the water, other than being tacked on to charges against spies and prosecuting the mentally ill, from 1966 until 2016 when the Russians decided to start poking around in voting machines. The proceeding investigations saw an unprecedented use of the law, but this post isn't concerning politicians. The interesting event that occurred was the indictment against the Internet Research Agency on February 16th 2018. The Internet Research Agency, despite having no presence in the United States, was charged with violating FARA for their disinformation campaigns on social media. The following article goes into depths on the subject I'm certainly unable to provide and I recommend reading it, however the conclusion is that the government, under the current law, has no way to enforce it against entities not in the United States and the governments theory is based on the courts interpretation of where and when a law is violated in the context of the internet that is normally applied to hacking laws.
So where does this lead us to? My theory on the upcoming changes is that the Department of Justice is going to craft a social media disinformation law out of FARA. We have seen news media organizations such as RT America and Xinhua News compelled into registration and their Youtube videos prominently display a notice on their source of funds. Although this change was Google's choice rather than a requirement by the law, After pressure by the government occurring the same month as the Internet Research Agency Indictment. This war on disinformation from foreign governments by the United States was likely furthered more than ever after the National Intelligence Council report on Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections which declared most if not all activity was disinformation campaigns in comparison to intrusion attempts from the 2016 election.
Regardless of the opinion on the basics of the law itself and foreign influence, It's highly disturbing to see a law from 1938 be potentially used for what information the government finds to be disinformation on the internet. It's also odd as the point of registration was for the purposes of transparency and to not censor information, yet it seems the government will compel and the companies will in turn, censor. Is it doomsday? no but it may be the beginning of something horrible.
Then again maybe I'm just insane.
This is the first time I've done a kind of write up, I'd appreciate feed back on how schizo I am for future posts.
- Joined
- May 30, 2021
Horse cock enthusiast and pedophile streamer Vaush has followed Hasan into the abyss.
Starts Here
Vaush was apparently reacting to Hasan's ban for saying the word cracker. Stating: "Cracker is a slur, and I will use it." His ban is permanent.
With Vaush and Hasan's ban, nothing of value was lost.
Good riddance!
Good riddance!
Bongocat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2020
You don't need context to know its a joke because the feds have no interest in antifa beyond funding them
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Twitch: Cracker is a Slur
Cracker Charlotte of One Piece: *SWEATS*
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
That would make it even funnier and in character if they turn snitch unprompted and unwanted. Alas a man can dream of peak clown world.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
How have trannies never had a nuclear meltdown and tried getting it removed from streaming services after it's portrayal of some of those okamas?
I know in the show, they're more like drag queens/crossdressers but internet trannies fly off the handle at even the slightest of provocation so the fact I've never seen any kind of backlash against it is honestly pretty amazing.
Honka Honka Burning Love
In Clown World, the only god is the one who Honks.
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Not that I ever heard of, but The Okama are all pretty well liked in the fandom so it may be the first time Trannies know better than to try.
- Status