- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
Poor dog's going to be eaten.
Corissa Enneking / fatgirlflow and Juliana "J" Aprileo / comfyfattravels - Delusional fat-acceptance lesbian couple, junk-food addicts with expensive taste, denied a mortgage due to excessive Doordash ordering
- Thread starter Hamplanet Fitness
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2020
WTF, look at her chin(s), wrists and the fat pad on the back of her right hand. Absolute body horror.
Juliana's at that chest-pillow fat level I've only seen on My 600 Lb Life before. Her big fat head sinks into her chest fat when she lies prone. It's like she's propped up on a thick pillow. If she tried to get her cheek flat on the bed, she'd have to hunch her back over as far as she can.
The white nail polish makes her knuckles look even darker. Her face skin tone is shocking. This bitch is literally dying while Corissa brags about the huge bags of candy they eat.
MuffinSangria
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2025
Having to sit with your legs two feet apart because your gunt prevents you from sitting with your knees together is hilarious.
Someone put that dog out of its misery. Everything in that house looks like it’s at death’s door.
Someone put that dog out of its misery. Everything in that house looks like it’s at death’s door.
Oh… my god. How can you see yourself with that gunt and not dissolve into a heap of hysterical weeping about how thoroughly you have destroyed your life
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2016
NGL, I love old white-faced, toothless Chis with their tongues flopping out. But god damn, that poor dog is so obese. I know the troon ex-husband fattened him up in the first place, but the poor little guy had no chance of being allowed to get to a proper weight while living with Corissa and Juliana because caring for a pet's health and keeping them at an ideal body comp is fatphobic.
Seriously, the deathfats I despise the most are the ones who fuck up their children (Kelly Lenza) or their pets with their FatLib insanity. They're helpless dependents who rely on their parents or owners to see to their best interests and make sure they get proper care, not proving grounds for one's shitty, self-serving ideas about fatness.
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2020
Holy shit, can someone come get their drunk, randy grandma? She's looking older than barely 40 here, THIS is feelin' herself?!
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
Alright. Yes, I understand that there's a difference between deathfat bike shorts and cyclist bike shorts, aka: my shorts have a chamois sewn in for comfort while spending hours on a bike saddle whereas deathfat bike shorts do not. However, there's a bit of similarity:
Both are stupidly thin, incorporate the same material (lycra is a brand name for spandex, after all) and both cling to you like a second skin.
There's reasons for that with cyclist bike shorts - the less motion there is between the fabric you're wearing and your flesh while you pedal for hours on end, the less likely it is you're going to develop saddle soars and friction rashes. Which fucking HURT. Because having the flesh rubbed raw at the junctions of your legs sucks. Also, it provides a layer of protection between your thighs and the saddle horn as your legs pump up and down, making friction rash less likely to form on your inner thighs. This 'I want no friction because soars and rashes fucking ache' is also why cyclists don't wear anything under their shorts. Yup, we ride in the buff. The chamois is suppose to be right against your fleshy bits. And why they fit tight as bejeezus for the dudes - they don't want their dangly bits flopping all about, so the chamois and tight fit of the shorts ensures everything stays up front and slightly to the cyclist's preferred side. (Ride with enough dudes, and you learn this shit.)
The same reason can apply with deathfat bike shorts - you want them firmly in place and unmoving while working out, or when using them underneath something when you prefer to have a little more modesty. Just a nice, snug fit so that they don't shift or ride as the legs are set into motion and the torso rotated.
What both aren't, typically, is see-through when they're the proper size. At least not when they're in good condition.
Granted, this isn't universal. I have seen the worst cycling shorts ever - spoken white. Those highlight every lump under the fabric, so it leaves /nothing/ to the imagination. It's hard to watch cycling when you are watching guys pedaling away in white shorts. And if they're sweat-soaked, it's even worse. (This is why I almost universally own black shorts and swear by them - I have one set of dark gray and one set of blue, and very, very rarely wear those even though they're bib shorts and stupidly cozy.)
When bike shorts actually get see-through is when they're worn out. I recently chucked a pair in the trash because of this - those shorts were three years old, and I've logged in excess of 6,000 miles of riding in them. (That's not an exaggeration. In fact, it's a low-ball estimate, because over the last three years there's been far over 18,000 miles ridden. This is dividing the miles ridden by the number of shorts regularly rotated through, minus a few miles based on other kits worming their way in from time to time.)
That said, I doubt that Corissa's putting in the equivalent of 6,000 miles of riding into a pair of bike shorts. I'd equate that to wearing them for working out over the course of ~300-400 hours.
Both are stupidly thin, incorporate the same material (lycra is a brand name for spandex, after all) and both cling to you like a second skin.
There's reasons for that with cyclist bike shorts - the less motion there is between the fabric you're wearing and your flesh while you pedal for hours on end, the less likely it is you're going to develop saddle soars and friction rashes. Which fucking HURT. Because having the flesh rubbed raw at the junctions of your legs sucks. Also, it provides a layer of protection between your thighs and the saddle horn as your legs pump up and down, making friction rash less likely to form on your inner thighs. This 'I want no friction because soars and rashes fucking ache' is also why cyclists don't wear anything under their shorts. Yup, we ride in the buff. The chamois is suppose to be right against your fleshy bits. And why they fit tight as bejeezus for the dudes - they don't want their dangly bits flopping all about, so the chamois and tight fit of the shorts ensures everything stays up front and slightly to the cyclist's preferred side. (Ride with enough dudes, and you learn this shit.)
The same reason can apply with deathfat bike shorts - you want them firmly in place and unmoving while working out, or when using them underneath something when you prefer to have a little more modesty. Just a nice, snug fit so that they don't shift or ride as the legs are set into motion and the torso rotated.
What both aren't, typically, is see-through when they're the proper size. At least not when they're in good condition.
Granted, this isn't universal. I have seen the worst cycling shorts ever - spoken white. Those highlight every lump under the fabric, so it leaves /nothing/ to the imagination. It's hard to watch cycling when you are watching guys pedaling away in white shorts. And if they're sweat-soaked, it's even worse. (This is why I almost universally own black shorts and swear by them - I have one set of dark gray and one set of blue, and very, very rarely wear those even though they're bib shorts and stupidly cozy.)
When bike shorts actually get see-through is when they're worn out. I recently chucked a pair in the trash because of this - those shorts were three years old, and I've logged in excess of 6,000 miles of riding in them. (That's not an exaggeration. In fact, it's a low-ball estimate, because over the last three years there's been far over 18,000 miles ridden. This is dividing the miles ridden by the number of shorts regularly rotated through, minus a few miles based on other kits worming their way in from time to time.)
That said, I doubt that Corissa's putting in the equivalent of 6,000 miles of riding into a pair of bike shorts. I'd equate that to wearing them for working out over the course of ~300-400 hours.
Didn't bother reading that bullshit: Bike shorts shouldn't be see-through until they've been work to absolute pieces. All this tells me is that Corissa's buying shorts that are far too small for her beachball gunt and flappy little frog-ass, and she's stressing the spandex to failure.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2024
Good god that absolute GUNT!
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2016
Hmm all of the 3x shorts don't fit her... I guess Tess Hooliday is right, and every plus size brand is running small! It can't possibly be that Corissa has graduated to a 4x.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2023
Why are all the fatties into Hokas? Jude Valentine mentioned them too. Was there a memo sent out or something?
Ik they're trendy (definitely commuter-core) but I think they're ugly AF. Unless you're running a marathon there are many other better choices.
Ik they're trendy (definitely commuter-core) but I think they're ugly AF. Unless you're running a marathon there are many other better choices.
I just took a look at their website and I'm actually kind of obsessed with the boat shoe/loafer they did. Very of the moment "sneakerina" franken-shoe. Could see the Balenciaga-focused downtown fashion set getting in on this one like the puma ballet flat etc. Not for me but I can at least appreciate the avant-garde-ness of it. Very of the moment.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Because they have an extra wide fit, so their fat feet actually fit over the sole rather than spill out over the side.
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
Even if you're running a marathon, there are many other better choices. They're just known for their springiness. Not their comfort, their lightness, their stability, nothing. Just springiness.
Which is likely why deathfats love 'em - because they mush under their gargantuan wide feet but still provide some cushion rather than simply being obliterated.
But hey, this is Cori and she's making bellowings about fitness things, so I suspect we'll see plenty more posts about Hokas and see-through bike shorts in the near future. (Personally, I'm wondering with the warmer weather coming if we'll ever get fatty on her kayak again, because seeing her toddler-sitting on a partially submerged plastic vessel was fucking hilarious)
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2021
im late on this but
The one home phone number beaten into you from a small child. You had to write your address and number 100 times to show you knew it. The number you call if you get in trouble at school. The number you give to police/authorities if you get lost. The number you call to talk to your parents when college gets stressful. The number you'll never call again because your last living parent dropped the phone service for the house.
...i just made myself sad
man talking on the phone used to be so physical. Comfortable to hold between your ear and shoulder for hours at a time, restricted to one location in the house, the feel of the buttons so ingrained you could call 15 people without looking at the dialpad.
i can understand it.
The one home phone number beaten into you from a small child. You had to write your address and number 100 times to show you knew it. The number you call if you get in trouble at school. The number you give to police/authorities if you get lost. The number you call to talk to your parents when college gets stressful. The number you'll never call again because your last living parent dropped the phone service for the house.
...i just made myself sad
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2017
im late on this but
man talking on the phone used to be so physical. Comfortable to hold between your ear and shoulder for hours at a time, restricted to one location in the house, the feel of the buttons so ingrained you could call 15 people without looking at the dialpad.
i can understand it.
The one home phone number beaten into you from a small child. You had to write your address and number 100 times to show you knew it. The number you call if you get in trouble at school. The number you give to police/authorities if you get lost. The number you call to talk to your parents when college gets stressful. The number you'll never call again because your last living parent dropped the phone service for the house.
...i just made myself sad
Wouldn't get a tattoo of it, but I get it, too. I haven't lived in the place that whose name and address I learned by heart in Kindergarten for decades, yet I can still remember them off the top of my head. Plus the first phone that my parents had to my memory was either similar or the exact same model that Coco tattooed to her skin. We kept that phone as a spare when my parents bought their first Caller ID (damn, remember how exciting Caller ID was? My siblings and I used to race to the phone when it rang, hovering over it to see who called before shouting it to Mom. We felt like the Jetsons knowing who was calling. I just realized that kids these days will never have that experience. I feel sad now.)
Edit: did not notice that GenociderSyo posted the photos earlier
Last edited:
I have tried Hokas (I run) and hated them but I have to say I LOVE the trend of deathfats wearing these overhyped, ultra-“athletic” shoes, as though they might jump up and do something non-sedentary at any moment. It’s almost as funny as Juliana shilling for those “workout clothes.”
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2020
All old things were once new. And some of the things we love and don't appreciate enough now will be gone someday. Too much nostalgia ages you and turns you into Coco and J.i can understand it.
The one home phone number beaten into you from a small child. You had to write your address and number 100 times to show you knew it. The number you call if you get in trouble at school. The number you give to police/authorities if you get lost. The number you call to talk to your parents when college gets stressful. The number you'll never call again because your last living parent dropped the phone service for the house.
...i just made myself sad
When Coco looks back, I wonder if she'll think how she could have been married to a guy, had a couple kids, and lived a normal life. I think she's going to miss a lot more things to come, including a lot she never did.
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2020
That's how I felt when they first started making "yoga pants" in 3x-6x sizes, and suddenly enormous fat activists were posing in them online. "LMAO", thought I, "This will be a short-lived, but hilarious fad. I'm glad I saw it before it inevitably dies for being too absurd!" I was so wrong. They'll never stop wearing skin-tight clothes now.
She's too selfish to ever regret self-centered, short-sighted decision making. The spending, eating, image obsession and lack of future planning is as much a part of her as her gunt.
If she lives long enough, she'll regret her financial irresponsibility. But I doubt she'll ever admit fault when she's broke and her house is in foreclosure.
Someday she'll wish she could say she was a mother, but that's just for the clout or the ability to online bully other women over their parenting. She'll overcome that hurdle by claiming she was voluntarily infertile through no fault of her own, just like Polissa and some of the other deathfats.
Juliana won't live long enough to come close to these regrets. I'll be shocked if she lives to 40.
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2020
When you're 70 and alone in some assisted living on Independence Day, it's pretty easy to be jealous of the people you went to high school with who are living independently, going over to their son's or daughter's place for a barbeque.
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2023
I know someone who swears by Hokas but that's because they suffered a gnarly foot injury about 15 years ago that required them to get a metal pole in their foot. They tried a lot of shoes over the years, but Hokas have been the only ones to give them some kind of major relief/support in the last couple years. I'm not gonna knock them given the circumstances in that case.