Counter Strike

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A friend pestered me to play this for the free steam wallet from the weekly drop and honestly how do people take this game seriously at all?

Deathmatch? 75% of "players" are cheating bots
Comp? Constant cheaters.
Premier? Less cheaters, but still quite a lot. (Couldn't surrender while facing 2 blatant cheaters btw)

I am baffled by all the people who no-life this game and use their in-game rank as a measurement of self-worth. Just how can anyone take it seriously at all knowing that most of the matches they play are not legitimate? But at least the lucky drop got me a DLC for another game, so there's that.

Trust factor matters, I haven't come across a single cheater in weeks and I hover around 26k Premier rating. That being said if you are playing Valve's official game modes you are doing it wrong. Just go to community servers / FACEIT as God intended (you'll have to google them because Valve is indeed full of retards incapable of making a working server browser).
 
as it turns out, Zool is a massive fucking fag that did use CSGO SDK leaked code as well as hacked and outdated .exe's and .dll's, even after he said he didnt do any of it. And apparently, Valve DID tell them to knock it off years ago and Zool STILL went off in a smear campaign DESPITE all valve would have to do is say "This guy is just, lying" and they would be victors.
Did I miss something? I think the hard proof of this should be put in the thread so that this isn't just hearsay.
 
So the devs are lying dick heads and Valve was right? Valve really should communicate more.
Yeah, this really seems like the absolute easiest W turned into a somewhat big controversy by not just putting out a legal notice saying "Cease and desist because you fucking stole source code", rather than just "cease and desist, OK bye"
 
So the devs are lying dick heads and Valve was right? Valve really should communicate more.
Yeah, this really seems like the absolute easiest W turned into a somewhat big controversy by not just putting out a legal notice saying "Cease and desist because you fucking stole source code", rather than just "cease and desist, OK bye"
Didn't this happen before with another mod for a different Valve game too? TF2 if I remember but I could be wrong.
 
Did I miss something? I think the hard proof of this should be put in the thread so that this isn't just hearsay.
classicoffensivelauncher.webp
Link

Didn't this happen before with another mod for a different Valve game too? TF2 if I remember but I could be wrong.
You might be thinking of TF: Source 2, which was DMCA'd by Valve because it was made via s&box, an entirely separate game created by Garry Newman (creator of Garry's Mod / Rust).

Otherwise, TF2C and Open Fortress were asked to be taken down temporarily in 2021 by Valve in the interest of Steam releases, only to reopen in 2022 after getting no response (and now after the TF2 Source SDK release in February, are both finally coming to Steam).
 
Last edited:
So the devs are lying dick heads and Valve was right? Valve really should communicate more.
Maybe Valve knows that the truth always comes out eventually, and communicating is like talking after being given Miranda warning. It can always come back to bite you in the ass, so the best thing to do is not talk at all. It has done wonders for them so far (with a few hiccoughs).
 
Last edited:
How is it doing dll injection into the normal csgo executable proof of it being a full redistribution? Isn't that proof of the exact opposite, that it is a mod that simply overwrites and modifies some parts of the base game
 
Counter-Strike has changed a lot. The players are better on average, even in premier 3000. Everyone knows every smoke lineup, has good aim, often come with a 4-stack, no blatant retards play the game anymore. It's quite demoralizing, makes me wanna bully my teammates for crouch-peeking mid.
 
Valve when it comes to CS, are greedy as hell. I can imagine them being salty about something risking their CS2 money cow.
Maybe, but I sense it's all part of a slow growing industry wide cynicism. That said, Valve in particular has always seemed embarrassed and increasingly tired about it's own reputation and those of its fans, and they make no secret of the fact they prefer engaging with their customers as little as possible. They seem pretty sick of games now, and do the bare minimum - because it works. As far as greed's concerned, I've seen CS:GO 2 players and streamers urge Valve to protect the value of their skin economy even as the updates dry up. Gabe Newell is a believer in product obsolesce and I'm sure he's not pleased with how long CS:GO's popularity has lasted.

So an indie dev team spends nearly a decade making a mod for a 13 year old game that ports over a 25 year old game, takes advantage of Valve's relatively lenient position on mods, lies about it, violating policy and possibly making a defective if not shady product. It's all very silly, and over a game that I'm sure Valve would wish could finally die.

So rather than get into hot water by essentially accusing some of their customers of lying over something as unsympathetic as copyrighted assets and source code, they took the safer approach that has worked for them for years - say 'no', and explain nothing else. Perhaps they knew they didn't have to.

Screenshot 2025-05-31 230040.webp

I don't know what the developers were expecting. They sound like Yandere Dev types who think they're the only ones in the world who know how to computer.
 
How is it doing dll injection into the normal csgo executable proof of it being a full redistribution? Isn't that proof of the exact opposite, that it is a mod that simply overwrites and modifies some parts of the base game
I'm retarded. I tested CO and it does not require CS:GO in order to run, it is indeed a full redistribution of the game. I completely misunderstood it.

Take my Semper Fi as compensation.
 
Last edited:
so, valve should've explained what exactly did they do, so zool would get shit on his head instead...
well atleast we finally have mod, and people who are hosting and playing it
i did try it out too, fun experience
 
View attachment 7434293
Link


You might be thinking of TF: Source 2, which was DMCA'd by Valve because it was made via s&box, an entirely separate game created by Garry Newman (creator of Garry's Mod / Rust).

Otherwise, TF2C and Open Fortress were asked to be taken down temporarily in 2021 by Valve in the interest of Steam releases, only to reopen in 2022 after getting no response (and now after the TF2 Source SDK release in February, are both finally coming to Steam).
How hard is it to be transparent and NOT use leaked stuff and then lie about it??

RIP this dudes credibility.
 
Yeah, a team used the leaked TF2 source code to essentially open-source TF2.

Which of course was all in vain the second Valve did it themselves :story:
Every tf2 mod team in existence started off using leaked/stolen code. Most used the 2008 codebase that was leaked in 2012. They all tended to avoid using the 2016 codebase that was leaked in 2020, though I am willing to bet some teams did in fact peruse the 2016 code and used bits of it for bug fixes.

For some reason, a lot of people seemed to think it was kosher to use the 2008 codebase but were deathly afraid of touching the 2016 codebase for fear Valve would smite them. What's even funnier is some idiot went and made their own repo of the leaked code and called it "tf_port" and then claims started flying around that tf_port was totally legal to use which was not the case whatsoever.

Of course, with the proper legal tf2 codebase release from Valve, there's no point in using the leaked code anymore.
 
Every tf2 mod team in existence started off using leaked/stolen code.
Honestly, considering how utter shite the modding APIs are for source games, I don't blame them in the slightest. The only thing that's halfway decent is hammer, but even that is painfully outdated compared to just Godot, let alone the commercial softwares out there.
 
Honestly, considering how utter shite the modding APIs are for source games, I don't blame them in the slightest. The only thing that's halfway decent is hammer, but even that is painfully outdated compared to just Godot, let alone the commercial softwares out there.
Use Hammer++ then, it's way better than normal Hammer. Has ingame lighting preview mode for the 3D viewport which means no more changing lights, recompiling map, testing it ingame, going back to change lights again, recompiling the map again, testing again, rinse and repeat.
 
I shall be filling C&Ds to every source mod from now on.
Based and C&Ds pilled, anything to get these NEET retards out there an touch grass. Moders today are just leeches. Untalented morons who want to LARP game dev not actually do game dev, using an already existing game because it already has a userbase that they want to milk. It's the kikes of the gaming world.
 
>caring about intellectual property
faggot
The thing that'd make Zool a fag is him supposedly lying about it for years, lying to Valve about it for the same amount of time, and then lying to the entire Valve community about it and trying to start a smear campaign under clear false pretenses after he explicitly broke the existing agreement they had for an extended period of time. This is not an argument about/for the sanctity of intellectual property or copyright law.
 
Back
Top Bottom