There's worse. Actual full-blown furfag stuff has been made, and to rub salt into the wound they turn best girl Panam into a furry.
Possible, but given Mr. Blue Eyes was involved its more likely she had access to people with much better equipment and know-how. That, and since the neural damage she suffered was caused by AI it was probably easier for an AI to fix it.
You can sneak up on all the cyberpsychos but a few do have forced aggression. Just break line of sight but don't leave the arena and you can get a stealth takedown. The hardest is always Lilith because she teleports and aggros every time you get too far from the cooler. Pure stealth is the most fun but you'll be dumping cool regardless so a nonlethal pistol backup will work. Stealth netrunner requires you to always stack sonic shock first if you don't want to be instantly hostile. Overclock is needed to even think about doing damage so you'll need 15 INT, too. Outside those two, you can dump whatever but probably reflexes for dashing. Corpo seems to make the most sense for stealth. Streetkid feels like the default for the game.
It really doesn't matter, since your lifepath doesn't really factor in after the first mission or so.
You need to pick up Gibson's Count Zero. That picks up a few years after Neuromancer with three different, but weirdly entangled stories.
Because it was a huge disappointment when it came out.
I haven’t played Phantom Liberty yet but last time I played about a few months or so ago before its release I had an amazing experience. The only glitch I had was the Delamain car not showing up for one of the quests where you had to track them down. The fix for it was as easy as doing a different mission and then coming back. That was it. The only glitch I saw and I played that game a TON. Got all the endings.
Believe me, I LOVE to bring up that New Vegas was a buggy piece of shit at launch whenever people compare it favorably to the newest buggy piece of shit at launch. To the point that people have a hatred of me around here for it.
I 100%ed the game in the first month; 2.0 really isn't something that makes the game good if you hated it at launch. All the glitches I had at launch were related to asset streaming.
Well, when 2.0 dropped, people like myself argued it was time to change the title again, but spergs continually shit themselves and screamed about bugs and issues that aren't really that anymore.
All you're saying is New Vegas, which is heralded as one of the greatest RPGs of all time (Which it isn't really) didn't have enough development time, which is the exact same criticism about Cyberpunk.
Cyberpunk was in development for the better part if a decade. Saying it didn't have enough development time is pure cope.
Cyberpunk had, and this is being generous to the idea they didn't have enough development time, five years.
Right, and three years later its in a much better state. Clearly it needed more dev time. I don't see how this is cope, its simply history as it unfolded.
Hindsight being what it is, it should have been delayed further. Is there anyone here arguing that it wouldn't have benefited from more time to fix bugs and refine systems?
I'm really confused where the line of "All games that have 5 years of development time is enough" as though there's some magical development cook book that if you follow it perfectly, in 5 years you will have a magical perfect release.
Just because the game is better after three years worth of post launch patches to fix bugs and issues doesn't mean the game wasn't given enough development time. It means the devs were incompetent.
All you've established is that this has been a(nother) shitty year for games and that you have unbelievably low standards.
