- Joined
- Apr 21, 2024
Reading OP, I get that Lana and Dalton know each other, but is the pegging accusation just her being insane? Listening to it, this woman doesn't seem to be the most reliable source.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, probably, but it's really funny. Besides, her claiming she pegged him is just words, so there's no harm in mentioning it constantly.Reading this, I get that Lana and Dalton knew each other, but is the pegging accusation just her being insane? Listening to it, this woman doesn't seem to be the most reliable source.
> it's immoral to fight someone calling you a bitch nigger who lets his wife fuck other dudes>eventually you will find someone who will fight you for words
>touch grass
You could just say you have no good argument and are a woke faggot in less words.
You haven't made valid points. That's why I was passive aggressive in telling you obvious facts that you and I both know you already are aware of. What you said was obviously false, and was so obviously false that it made me suspicious of your motives, as lying is an inherently malicious action. I fundamentally do not believe that you are unaware of Whites being openly despised by browns, nor do I buy that you don't know blacks still blame Whites for things that happened centuries ago.You can go through my post history here. I have not really disparaged anybody for having a different opinion than me. I disagree with people. But I’ve not (to my knowledge) personally attacked somebody, lol.
But I can understand why you’re suspicious.
and you don’t have to buy it.
But I think I’m making valid points.
It’s not about optics.
Personally, I think it’s about a grifter being enshrined as something he’s not and making things worse when there are more productive ways to deal with race tensions.
You believe different.
Thanks for answering I guess. Even if you’re being a little passive aggressive.
Accusing people of crimes and actually prosecuting them in a legal setting are entirely different things. I can't believe I even have to point that out. I hope you are just being intellectually dishonest because otherwise you might be clinically retarded. My argument is that you should be allowed to exercise your freedom of speech without getting assualted by people. Physical altercation for words that do not cause physical harm is a disproportional response and is not an appropriate response.Isn't your entire argument that niggers can't control themselves over words and will fight you over them? Also, you know accusing people of serious crimes counts as "words", right?
Watch out, the nigger defense squad is going to be running laps defending the Sikh in that thread like they are here.The British Police apparently. The stabbing victim bled to death in handcuffs because the murderer of color cried Raycizm.
Thread 'Sikh man stabbed 18-year-old university student to death with an eight-inch ceremonial knife after claiming he'd been racially abused' https://kiwifarms.st/threads/sikh-m...ter-claiming-hed-been-racially-abused.245518/
Yeah keep making shit up. White trash are less likely to commit crime than the richest nigglets, btw.I like how so many so called white supremacists blatanlty ignore the existance of poor white trash like Chud and act like their entire race are shining examples of modern citizens.
You haven't made valid points. That's why I was passive aggressive in telling you obvious facts that you and I both know you already are aware of. What you said was obviously false, and was so obviously false that it made me suspicious of your motives, as lying is an inherently malicious action. I fundamentally do not believe that you are unaware of Whites being openly despised by browns, nor do I buy that you don't know blacks still blame Whites for things that happened centuries ago.
So what are your "more productive ways to deal with race tensions"? I answered you, so maybe you will answer me back.
I view this as an entirely different situation from what happened with Shiloh Hendrix.This reminds me of the Shiloh Hendrix deal, where people told me I should take the side of a black kid stealing from a White baby, and a child rapist black, just because the White woman said "nigger" and looked "trashy".
Ok, you didn't lie, you are just profoundly willfully ignorant about every single aspect of White and black racial relations in the United States of America.You’re declining to state what was false?
I’ve not lied about anything.
I never said blacks don’t blame whites.
I never said browns don’t hate whites.
You’re saying im lying - but im not.
You’re just hearing things I never said.
Nah, dude, it's all just words.Accusing people of crimes and actually prosecuting them in a legal setting are entirely different things.
What part of "freedom of speech" involves following people around and harassing them? I forget.My argument is that you should be allowed to exercise your freedom of speech without getting assualted by people.
And I agree, but when those words come from someone clearly looking to instigate a reaction after expressing his desire to shoot niggers and start another race riot? By the way, your white savior is hoping niggers burn down your local Wendy's through his actions.Physical altercation for words that do not cause physical harm is a disproportional response and is not an appropriate response.
The N-word is dehumanizing towards black people. Going around calling random black people that is the same as calling them something less than human. It's not free speech when you do what Chud did and aggressively approach people calling them names. Not saying its okay to attack Chud but what he was doing was pretty rude and uncalled for.Bro is not even racist he practices what he preaches which is to exercise free speech but there are people here ITT who still think its okay to commit physical harm to people for words.
LaNativePatriot-2055703035779989821-01.mp4
He isn't trying to start a physical altercation he goes up to multiple black people and has civil discourse and explains that he believes he has the right to freedom of speech and he never instigates, you can see him even in the OP walking away in all those clips, even in the case he is said to be walking away until he was assualted and had every right to defend himself.Nah, dude, it's all just words.
What part of "freedom of speech" involves following people around and harassing them? I forget.
And I agree, but when those words come from someone clearly looking to instigate a reaction after expressing his desire to shoot niggers and start another race riot? By the way, your white savior is hoping niggers burn down your local Wendy's through his actions.
Ok, you didn't lie, you are just profoundly willfully ignorant about every single aspect of White and black racial relations in the United States of America.
Will you answer the question now? "So what are your "more productive ways to deal with race tensions"? I answered you, so maybe you will answer me back."
This slimy response is exactly why I assumed the worst about you, btw.
Now that you point it out, the Sikh who ran after a drunk guy and pulled him off a fence just to stab him has a lot in common with Chud chasing niggers around town so he can try to get the opportunity to "legally" kill one. Interesting!Watch out, the nigger defense squad is going to be running laps defending the Sikh in that thread like they are here.
You know this isn't true. How can you be so disingenuous? If one of the first three words out of his mouth is nigger, a word intended to provoke the person, then he clearly is instigating. You can find countless examples of him yelling the word and being as belligerent as possible. In the OP you can watch him brandish the bearspray as he follows the nigger as he walks away. He even hit some of the people dining outside with it, is that ok? Some of the people eating dinner were White.He isn't trying to start a physical altercation he goes up to multiple black people and has civil discourse and explains that he believes he has the right to freedom of speech and he never instigates, you can see him even in the OP walking away in all those clips, even in the case he is said to be walking away until he was assualted and had every right to defend himself.
He isn't trying to start a physical altercation he goes up to multiple black people and has civil discourse and explains that he believes he has the right to freedom of speech and he never instigates, you can see him even in the OP walking away in all those clips, even in the case he is said to be walking away until he was assualted and had every right to defend himself.
In the clips posted to this thread he calls them the n-word then walks away. He is the one instigating. Its like walking up to some lesbians and calling them faggots and expecting them to ignore you while you walk away. His intentions are to provoke a reaction out of black people.He isn't trying to start a physical altercation he goes up to multiple black people and has civil discourse and explains that he believes he has the right to freedom of speech and he never instigates, you can see him even in the OP walking away in all those clips, even in the case he is said to be walking away until he was assualted and had every right to defend himself.
It really is like a modern day minstrel show for white people, I like how so many so called white supremacists blatanlty ignore the existance of poor white trash like Chud and act like their entire race are shining examples of modern citizens. Of course you're gonna have bad examples in any population but imagine how blacks feel about niggers, chud is just like that.